On 07/27/2014 06:50:49 PM, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi Mick,
thanks for your reply on the topic.
I executed the mkswap/dd combo a several times today. Since I have
no logs I repeated again. Here are the results:
solfire:/home/usermkswap -L swap -f -c /dev/sda2
1 bad page
mkswap: /dev/sda2:
On Sunday, July 27, 2014 08:44:02 PM Kerin Millar wrote:
On 27/07/2014 17:55, J. Roeleveld wrote:
On 27 July 2014 18:25:24 CEST, Stefan G. Weichinger li...@xunil.at
wrote:
Am 26.07.2014 04:47, schrieb walt:
So, why did the broken machine work normally for more than a year
without rpcbind
Hi all,
I don't run telnet at all. I don't even have it installed on my machine
yet tonight I had a look in /var/lib to try and find a reason as to why
something else is failing and lo and behold there is a telnet dir.
Having a look inside shows:
**
bluey telnet # pwd
On 28/07/2014 16:45, Andrew Lowe wrote:
Hi all,
I don't run telnet at all. I don't even have it installed on my machine
yet tonight I had a look in /var/lib to try and find a reason as to why
something else is failing and lo and behold there is a telnet dir.
Having a look inside shows:
Hello every body.
I was wondering that is it possible to make portage to sync a only a subset
of portage tree. For example I have not installed Gnome and I dont want to
sysc command download ebuilds related to this branch.
thanks
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 6:28 PM, J. Roeleveld jo...@antarean.org
2014-07-28 1:00 GMT+03:00 Kerin Millar kerfra...@fastmail.co.uk:
On 27/07/2014 21:38, Grand Duet wrote:
2014-07-27 22:13 GMT+03:00 Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk:
On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 13:33:47 +0300, Grand Duet wrote:
That's what replaces it when eth0 comes up.
It looks like eth0 is not
On Mon, 28 Jul 2014 19:59:16 +0430, behrouz khosravi wrote:
I was wondering that is it possible to make portage to sync a only a
subset of portage tree. For example I have not installed Gnome and I
dont want to sysc command download ebuilds related to this branch.
Please do not top-post
On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 5:05 AM, Alexander Kapshuk
alexander.kaps...@gmail.com wrote:
Which NTPd package would the list recommend using, ntp, openntpd, or
some other package?
openntpd seems to be easier to set up according to wiki.gentoo.org.
The list's advice would be much appreciated.
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Douglas J Hunley
doug.hun...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 5:05 AM, Alexander Kapshuk
alexander.kaps...@gmail.com wrote:
Which NTPd package would the list recommend using, ntp, openntpd, or
some other package?
openntpd seems to be easier to set
Am 28.07.2014 18:47, schrieb Rich Freeman:
Anybody have a decent comparison of timedated vs ntpd or anything else
for that matter?
Running ntpd isn't hard at all, so I'm not really sure why I'd want to
switch. At the very least I'd want to ensure that the replacement
covers the basics.
Am 28.07.2014 23:20, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
I am running networkd and I'm very happy with it. Setting it up for
dhcp-only is brain-dead simple, and I have it serving up a bridge for
containers/kvm with fairly little trouble as well.
shameless pointer to an older blog entry:
Am 28.07.2014 23:20, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
As far as I understand this:
if other ntp-software is installed, systemd-timedated.service uses the
ntp-unit with higher priority (in my current case chronyd.service) for
ntp-syncing.
So you may use the systemd-timedated.service to do
Hi all,
Fired up the 'puter last night and instead of a backdrop showing the
dog doing something stupid, a task bar, the start button thingy, and a
few other bits and pieces, I had the default KDE backdrop. The task bar
was on the second screen, the backdrop was the default, there was no
13 matches
Mail list logo
