On Thursday, March 19, 2015 12:20:26 AM Walter Dnes wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 10:27:05PM -0400, Fernando Rodriguez wrote
> > On Wednesday, March 18, 2015 9:56:12 PM Walter Dnes wrote:
> > > My situation...
> > >
> > > * I've dug up my ancient netbook, and got Gentoo re-installed on it
> >
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 10:27:05PM -0400, Fernando Rodriguez wrote
> On Wednesday, March 18, 2015 9:56:12 PM Walter Dnes wrote:
> > My situation...
> >
> > * I've dug up my ancient netbook, and got Gentoo re-installed on it
> > * The cpu is a dual-core Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU Z520
> > * It's 32-bi
Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Wednesday 18 March 2015 13:12:47 Dale wrote:
>
>> I switched way back in 2003 when it was rare that a init thingy was needed
>> in Gentoo. It seems someone screwed that up.
> I still don't have one, nor do I foresee a need.
I didn't have one until I recently rebooted an
On Wednesday, March 18, 2015 9:56:12 PM Walter Dnes wrote:
> My situation...
>
> * I've dug up my ancient netbook, and got Gentoo re-installed on it
> * The cpu is a dual-core Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU Z520
> * It's 32-bit only; YES!
> * Compiling just the Seamonkey binary (ignoring its dependancies
My situation...
* I've dug up my ancient netbook, and got Gentoo re-installed on it
* The cpu is a dual-core Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU Z520
* It's 32-bit only; YES!
* Compiling just the Seamonkey binary (ignoring its dependancies) took
14 hours
I obviously want to offload compiling to another m
On Wednesday, March 18, 2015 4:41:25 PM walt wrote:
> On 03/17/2015 04:49 PM, walt wrote:
> > I get a certificate verification error when visiting https://www.att.com
> > using firefox-36.0, but not when using chrome-41.0.2272.76.
>
> Thanks to all who replied. I'm surprised by the variety of dif
On 03/18/2015 04:41 PM, walt wrote:
> On 03/17/2015 04:49 PM, walt wrote:
>> I get a certificate verification error when visiting https://www.att.com
>> using firefox-36.0, but not when using chrome-41.0.2272.76.
>
> Thanks to all who replied. I'm surprised by the variety of different results
> y
On 03/17/2015 04:49 PM, walt wrote:
> I get a certificate verification error when visiting https://www.att.com
> using firefox-36.0, but not when using chrome-41.0.2272.76.
Thanks to all who replied. I'm surprised by the variety of different results
you reported.
(BTW, I'm running firefox-bin-36
On Wednesday 18 March 2015 13:12:47 Dale wrote:
> I switched way back in 2003 when it was rare that a init thingy was needed
> in Gentoo. It seems someone screwed that up.
I still don't have one, nor do I foresee a need.
> I try to keep a few fall back plans around. Spare kernels etc.
One ol
Amazing and with real potential!
I have partially updated the image but can't update python and some
other packages because they want /dev/shm. The Android kernel uses
/dev/ashmem with a different API to /dev/shm - other than a custom
kernel, is there another workaround?
BillK
On 17 March 2015 2
On Wed, Mar 18, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Dale wrote:
>
> I thought there was a tool that just lists the contents. Things is, I'm
> not sure what I would be looking at.
An initramfs is just a root filesystem. init is /sbin/init unless the
kernel is told otherwise.
If you took your entire root filesyste
On Tue, 17 Mar 2015 17:47:04 -0700
Daniel Frey wrote:
> On 03/17/2015 04:49 PM, walt wrote:
> > I get a certificate verification error when visiting
> > https://www.att.com using firefox-36.0, but not when using
> > chrome-41.0.2272.76.
> >
> > Anyone else see the same with firefox-36?
FWIW, I
Poncho wrote:
> On 18.03.2015 17:37, Rich Freeman wrote:
>
>> [...]
>> You can look inside an initramfs by doing the following:
>> mkdir /tmp/ext
>> cd /tmp/ext
>> zcat /boot/initramfs-3.18.9-gentoo.img | cpio -i
>> find usr
>> find lib64
>> ...
>> [...]
> dracut comes with the /usr/bin/lsinitrd to
On 18.03.2015 17:37, Rich Freeman wrote:
> [...]
> You can look inside an initramfs by doing the following:
> mkdir /tmp/ext
> cd /tmp/ext
> zcat /boot/initramfs-3.18.9-gentoo.img | cpio -i
> find usr
> find lib64
> ...
> [...]
dracut comes with the /usr/bin/lsinitrd tool. pretty convenient.
With
gmx.de> writes:
> Then I installed dev-lisp/gcl there (which compiles fine).
You might want to cross-compile the codes and dependent codes
on a x86 machine and move them over, as another test
I'd first try by only setting the minimum you need to get
the codes to compile. Then test and se
On Wednesday 18 March 2015 11:14:43 Dale wrote:
> Well, since I set this rig up, I have had to grow /usr twice. The only
> reason I have not had to grow it recently is because I moved all the
> portage stuff to /var. In the past, I had to move everything to another
> drive, rework the partitions
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 5:07 PM, Dale wrote:
> Alan McKinnon wrote:
>> You are reading it wrong. That means:
>> util-linux needs to be built with USE="static-libs"
>> because
>> lvm2 is already built with USE="static"
>>
>> None of which explains why you originally built lvm2 that way.
>
> It was
Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Wednesday 18 March 2015 04:33:18 Dale wrote:
>
>> Well, /boot doesn't change to much, plus it is fairly small anyway. The
>> root partition doesn't change a whole lot either. /usr tho, it tends to
>> grow. If nothing else, it grows as KDE grows but it grows with the
>>
On Wednesday 18 March 2015 04:33:18 Dale wrote:
> Well, /boot doesn't change to much, plus it is fairly small anyway. The
> root partition doesn't change a whole lot either. /usr tho, it tends to
> grow. If nothing else, it grows as KDE grows but it grows with the
> number of kernels I have too
Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Tuesday 17 March 2015 16:07:29 Dale wrote:
>
>> I don't have / on lvm. /boot and / are on regular partitions.
>> Everything else, /usr, /var and /home, are on lvm. Keep in mind, I
>> was trying to avoid that init thingy.
> I remember something of that discussion, but no
On Wed, 18 Mar 2015 08:54:40 +, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > I don't have / on lvm. /boot and / are on regular partitions.
> > Everything else, /usr, /var and /home, are on lvm. Keep in mind, I
> > was trying to avoid that init thingy.
>
> I remember something of that discussion, but not why
On Tuesday 17 March 2015 16:07:29 Dale wrote:
> I don't have / on lvm. /boot and / are on regular partitions.
> Everything else, /usr, /var and /home, are on lvm. Keep in mind, I
> was trying to avoid that init thingy.
I remember something of that discussion, but not why you wanted to keep /usr
On Wed, 18 Mar 2015 05:11:25 +0100, Tamer Higazi wrote:
> Hi people!
> I have problems getting these blocks at a system update solved...
>
> I executed:
> emerge --backtrack=30 -fuDN @system @world
> ...
> ...
> [blocks B ] (" virtual/perl-ExtUtils-Install-1.670.0)
> [blocks B ] media-
23 matches
Mail list logo
