Re: [gentoo-user] tc filter add ... fails

On Wednesday 09 December 2015 11:56:39 Andrew Savchenko wrote: > ... Also it is much better to write iptables / iproute / > tc rules manually then using high level generators like shorewall — > this will give you a good understanding on what is going on and how > to optimize or tighten your

[gentoo-user] grub-0.97-r16 missing manifest

Is this a matter of rinse and repeat later in the day, or shall I be filing a bug report? = These are the packages that would be merged, in order: Calculating dependencies... done! [ebuild U ]

Re: [gentoo-user] tc filter add ... fails

Hi, On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 13:52:20 +0100 lee wrote: > it seems I might be missing some kernel modules: > > > , > | heimdali ~ # tc filter add dev ppp0 parent : protocol all prio 10 basic > police mpu 64 rate 16000kbit burst 10kb action drop > | RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument > | We

[gentoo-user] System only recognizes 1 of 2 partitions

I recently received and installed a 3TB drive. Before formatting it, I zeroed the first GiB (dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sdb bs=1M count=1024). Then formatted with gdisk. Both gdisk and parted report the partition table correctly as containing a ~1MB (empty) sdb1 and ~2.7TB sdb2 (with a protective

Re: [gentoo-user] System only recognizes 1 of 2 partitions

On Wednesday, December 09, 2015 03:19:45 AM John Runyon wrote: > I recently received and installed a 3TB drive. Before formatting it, I > zeroed the first GiB (dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sdb bs=1M count=1024). > Then formatted with gdisk. > > Both gdisk and parted report the partition table

Re: [gentoo-user] grub-0.97-r16 missing manifest

On 09/12/2015 11:12, Mick wrote: Is this a matter of rinse and repeat later in the day, or shall I be filing a bug report? = These are the packages that would be merged, in order: Calculating dependencies... done! [ebuild

Re: [gentoo-user] System only recognizes 1 of 2 partitions

Its not a boot disk. / and /boot are on 500GB, MBR-only sda. BIOS is ~2011 i'd guess. Its a Dell. "J. Roeleveld" wrote: >On Wednesday, December 09, 2015 03:19:45 AM John Runyon wrote: >> I recently received and installed a 3TB drive. Before formatting it, I >> zeroed the

Re: [gentoo-user] grub-0.97-r16 missing manifest

On Wednesday 09 Dec 2015 11:03:21 Alan McKinnon wrote: > On 09/12/2015 11:12, Mick wrote: > > Is this a matter of rinse and repeat later in the day, or shall I be > > filing a bug report? > > > > = > > These are the packages

Re: [gentoo-user] grub-0.97-r16 missing manifest

On Wednesday 09 Dec 2015 12:03:02 Mick wrote: > On Wednesday 09 Dec 2015 11:03:21 Alan McKinnon wrote: > > On 09/12/2015 11:12, Mick wrote: > > > Is this a matter of rinse and repeat later in the day, or shall I be > > > filing a bug report? > > > > > >

Re: [gentoo-user] OT: i7-6700, anyone already?

On 09/12/2015 23:24, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: > Am 2015-12-09 um 21:42 schrieb Alan McKinnon: > >> Did you get an SSD as well? > > sure. I even look for the PCIe variant (just contacted my dealer for > this option ... forgot in the first place). > > I am on SSDs for years now on desktop and

Re: [gentoo-user] OT: i7-6700, anyone already?

On Wednesday 09 Dec 2015 20:39:30 Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: > Ordered today. Looking forward .. > It will be triple-boot: gentoo, fedora, win10 (as I paid for it) If you bought it in EU you can ask for the cost of Win10 back. There was an case brought in France (against Dell I think) and it

Re: [gentoo-user] OT: i7-6700, anyone already?

Am 2015-12-09 um 21:42 schrieb Alan McKinnon: > Did you get an SSD as well? sure. I even look for the PCIe variant (just contacted my dealer for this option ... forgot in the first place). I am on SSDs for years now on desktop and laptops. > It's one of the biggest performance improvements you

Re: [gentoo-user] OT: i7-6700, anyone already?

Am 2015-12-09 um 22:49 schrieb Alan McKinnon: > Sounds like you're all set to use that i7 to it's fullest :-) most of my work is terminal stuff ... and email the i7-2600 does that as well, if we are honest! I will give the i7-2xxx to someone with a way older CPU ... so it all works out in a

Re: [gentoo-user] OT: i7-6700, anyone already?

Am 2015-12-02 um 23:13 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger: > > I consider buying a new machine for my office in december. > > The intel core-i7-6xxx look interesting to me, although the plain CPU > performance isn't that much better than my plain old i7-2600 when I look > at cpunbenchmark.net > > I

Re: [gentoo-user] OT: i7-6700, anyone already?

On 09/12/2015 22:39, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: > Am 2015-12-02 um 23:13 schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger: >> >> I consider buying a new machine for my office in december. >> >> The intel core-i7-6xxx look interesting to me, although the plain CPU >> performance isn't that much better than my plain

[gentoo-user] Re: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org

On Tue, 8 Dec 2015 19:00:20 +0200 Alan McKinnon wrote: > Allow me to translate the Google-speak: > > "less secure mail app" really means "a really shitty auth method that > isn't our (Google's) auth method". So click the (rather well-hidden) > button in Gmail's

Re: [gentoo-user] OT: i7-6700, anyone already?

Am 10.12.2015 um 05:50 schrieb waltd...@waltdnes.org: > CFLAGS="-O2 -march=native -fomit-frame-pointer -pipe -fno-unwind-tables > -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables" > > That's what I use, except for cross-compiling. For an explanation of > the "unwind" flags, see thread... >

Re: [gentoo-user] OT: i7-6700, anyone already?

On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 11:03:23PM +0100, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote > Am 2015-12-09 um 22:49 schrieb Alan McKinnon: > > > Sounds like you're all set to use that i7 to it's fullest :-) > > most of my work is terminal stuff ... and email > > the i7-2600 does that as well, if we are honest! > >

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org

On 10/12/2015 02:08, walt wrote: > On Tue, 8 Dec 2015 19:00:20 +0200 > Alan McKinnon wrote: > >> Allow me to translate the Google-speak: >> >> "less secure mail app" really means "a really shitty auth method that >> isn't our (Google's) auth method". So click the (rather

[gentoo-user] terminal colors

I have a hard time reading text in terminal when editing *.tex files. My background is black but the dark blue/violet text it is very hard to see on a black background. Recently Gentoo changed those colors, how to restore them the colors so I can read the text on a black background. -- Thelma

Re: [gentoo-user] OT: i7-6700, anyone already?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Am 09.12.2015 um 23:44 schrieb Mick: > On Wednesday 09 Dec 2015 20:39:30 Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: >> Ordered today. Looking forward .. It will be triple-boot: gentoo, >> fedora, win10 (as I paid for it) > > If you bought it in EU you can ask for

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org

On Thursday 10 Dec 2015 06:51:45 Alan McKinnon wrote: > On 10/12/2015 02:08, walt wrote: > > On Tue, 8 Dec 2015 19:00:20 +0200 > > > > Alan McKinnon wrote: > >> Allow me to translate the Google-speak: > >> > >> "less secure mail app" really means "a really shitty auth