Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} Allow work from home?

"J. Roeleveld" writes: > On Tuesday, January 19, 2016 11:22:02 PM lee wrote: >> "J. Roeleveld" writes: >> > [...] >> > If disk-space is considered too expensive, you could even have every VM >> > use >> > the same base image. And have them store only the

Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} Allow work from home?

"J. Roeleveld" writes: > On Wednesday, January 20, 2016 01:46:29 AM lee wrote: >> "J. Roeleveld" writes: >> > On Tuesday, January 19, 2016 01:46:45 AM lee wrote: >> >> "J. Roeleveld" writes: >> >> > On Monday, January 18, 2016

Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} Allow work from home?

Rich Freeman writes: > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 5:08 PM, lee wrote: >> >> BTW, is it as easy to give a graphics card to a container as it is to >> give it a network card? > > I've never tried it, but I'd think that the container could talk to a > graphics

Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} Allow work from home?

Rich Freeman writes: > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 5:22 PM, lee wrote: >> "J. Roeleveld" writes: >> >> How does that work? IIUC, when you created a snapshot, any changes you >> make to the snapshotted (or how that is called) file system are

Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} Allow work from home?

Alec Ten Harmsel writes: > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 10:56:21PM +0100, lee wrote: >> Alec Ten Harmsel writes: >> > >> > Depends on how the load is. Right now I have a 500GB HDD at work. I use >> > VirtualBox and vagrant for testing various

Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} Allow work from home?

On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 4:35 PM, lee wrote: > And I thought vnc sends a copy of what is displayed on the screen, so if > you were running a program that renders something on the screen and > uses/requires a graphics card for that, you should be able to see what > it renders. If

Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} Allow work from home?

On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 5:00 PM, lee wrote: > Hm, I must be misunderstanding snapshots entirely. > Well, in the case of zfs/btrfs you are. Different implementations have different snapshotting features. > What happens when you remove a snapshot after you modified the >

Re: [gentoo-user] What is forcing the qt4 USE flag?

On Friday 22 Jan 2016 21:04:48 Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > I have a weird problem. I have an ebuild where either qt4 or qt5 can be > enabled. They are both disabled by default and I have to choose which > one I want. The ebuild does that with: > >IUSE="qt4 qt5" >REQUIRED_USE="^^ ( qt4 qt5

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: {OT} Allow work from home?

>> The answer to this may be an obvious "yes" but I've never done it so I'm >> not sure. Can I route requests from machine C through machine A only >> for my domain name, and not involve A for C's other internet requests? >> If so, where is that configured? > > While ZT can be used to route

[gentoo-user] What is forcing the qt4 USE flag?

I have a weird problem. I have an ebuild where either qt4 or qt5 can be enabled. They are both disabled by default and I have to choose which one I want. The ebuild does that with: IUSE="qt4 qt5" REQUIRED_USE="^^ ( qt4 qt5 )" I'm on the plasma profile which enabled qt5 automatically.

[gentoo-user] Re: {OT} Allow work from home?

Am Wed, 20 Jan 2016 01:46:29 +0100 schrieb lee : > The time before, it wasn't > a VM but a very slow machine, and that also took a week. You can have > the fastest machine on the world and Windoze always manages to bring > it down to a slowness we wouldn't have accepted even 20

Re: [gentoo-user] What is forcing the qt4 USE flag?

On Fri, 22 Jan 2016 19:45:29 +, Mick wrote: > > Can someone enlighten me? > > euse -I qt4 > > should provide some pointers. It may be your desktop profile? If so, it should show up in "emerge --info | grep qt4". I am using default/linux/amd64/13.0/desktop/plasma/systemd and both qt4 and

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: {OT} Allow work from home?

On Fri, 22 Jan 2016 11:51:45 -0800, Grant wrote: > > To talk to this computer from another of my machines over ZT I would > > use the 10.252... address. If you tried that address, you'd get > > nowhere as you are not connected to my network. > So if 10.252.252.6 were configured as a router,

[gentoo-user] Re: {OT} Allow work from home?

Am Fri, 22 Jan 2016 00:52:30 +0100 schrieb lee : > Is WSUS of any use without domains? If it is, I should take a look at > it. You can use it with and without domains. What domains give you through GPO is just automatic deployment of the needed registry settings in the client.

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: {OT} Allow work from home?

On Thu, 21 Jan 2016 17:18:27 -0800, Grant wrote: > > There is ZeroTier as a replacement for OpenVPN, and Syncthing for > > syncing. Both are P2P solutions and you can run your own discovery > > servers if you don't want any traffic going through a 3rd party > > (although they don't send data

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: {OT} Allow work from home?

On Fri, 22 Jan 2016 07:52:12 -0500, Rich Freeman wrote: > My understanding is that ZT does not support routing of any kind. > Traffic destined to a ZT peer goes directly to that peer, and that's > it. You can't route over ZT and onto a subnet on a remote peer's > network, or from one peer to

[gentoo-user] Re: {OT} Allow work from home?

> > > Zerotier looks especially interesting. Can I have machine A listen for > > Zerotier connections, have machine B connect to machine A via Zerotier, > > have machine C connect to machine A via Zerotier, and rsync push from B > > to C? > > You set up a network and the machines all connect to

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: {OT} Allow work from home?

On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 7:29 AM, Grant wrote: > > The answer to this may be an obvious "yes" but I've never done it so I'm not > sure. Can I route requests from machine C through machine A only for my > domain name, and not involve A for C's other internet requests? If so,

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: {OT} Allow work from home?

On Fri, 22 Jan 2016 04:29:00 -0800, Grant wrote: > The answer to this may be an obvious "yes" but I've never done it so I'm > not sure. Can I route requests from machine C through machine A only > for my domain name, and not involve A for C's other internet requests? > If so, where is that

Re: [gentoo-user] Shutdown through systemctl as a normal user

On Sat, Jan 16, 2016 at 1:34 PM, lukash wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm reading on the internet that systemctl poweroff should work for > normal user if he is the only one logged in, he is logged in locally > and his session is active. I seem to be meeting these conditions: > > #

[gentoo-user] Re: What is forcing the qt4 USE flag?

On 23/01/16 09:21, Michael Palimaka wrote: On 01/23/2016 06:04 AM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: I have a weird problem. I have an ebuild where either qt4 or qt5 can be enabled. They are both disabled by default and I have to choose which one I want. The ebuild does that with: IUSE="qt4 qt5"

[gentoo-user] Re: What is forcing the qt4 USE flag?

On 22/01/16 21:45, Mick wrote: On Friday 22 Jan 2016 21:04:48 Nikos Chantziaras wrote: I have a weird problem. I have an ebuild where either qt4 or qt5 can be enabled. They are both disabled by default and I have to choose which one I want. The ebuild does that with: IUSE="qt4 qt5"

[gentoo-user] Re: What is forcing the qt4 USE flag?

On 01/23/2016 06:04 AM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > I have a weird problem. I have an ebuild where either qt4 or qt5 can be > enabled. They are both disabled by default and I have to choose which > one I want. The ebuild does that with: > > IUSE="qt4 qt5" > REQUIRED_USE="^^ ( qt4 qt5 )" > >

[gentoo-user] spike-community-overlay

Well this one is new to me. Googling reveals the spike linux distro is a version of Sabayon, which is based on gentoo. So 'eix -R cassandra' :: dev-db/cassandra [5] Available versions: 0.6.1 ~0.7.0-r2 ~2.0.7 ~2.0.10 ~2.1.3 ~2.12 {doc ELIBC="FreeBSD"} Homepage:

[gentoo-user] Re: {OT} Allow work from home?

Neil Bothwick digimed.co.uk> writes: > > The answer to this may be an obvious "yes" but I've never done it so I'm > > not sure. Can I route requests from machine C through machine A only > > for my domain name, and not involve A for C's other internet requests? > > If so, where is that

Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} Allow work from home?

lee wrote: > Rich Freeman writes: > > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 5:22 PM, lee wrote: > >> "J. Roeleveld" writes: > >> > >> How does that work? IIUC, when you created a snapshot, any changes you > >> make to the