Re: [gentoo-user] Holy Quran in all languages Available

On Tue, 2016-07-26 at 14:23 -0500, R0b0t1 wrote: > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=talqltbOsNU > > Won't be praying for you, so don't be praying for me. > Silence http://www.truthrevolt.org/commentary/sounds-silence-simon-garfunkel -islam-video

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Holy Quran in all languages Available

Ian Bloss wrote: > Meh, OP's the one posting this in a distro discussion mailing list And this was a bad idea. But IMO it was also a bad idea to respond. I think that we don't need any religious discussions here. Apart from that, top posting sucks. ;-) -- Regards wabe >

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Holy Quran in all languages Available

Meh, OP's the one posting this in a distro discussion mailing list On Tue, Jul 26, 2016, 19:18 Deven Lahoti wrote: > make America great again amirite? is this the level of shitpost we're > falling to? > > On Jul 26, 2016 22:13, "James" wrote: > >>

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Holy Quran in all languages Available

make America great again amirite? is this the level of shitpost we're falling to? On Jul 26, 2016 22:13, "James" wrote: > uniq-star.com> writes: > > > Quran in 55 languages > > > http://www.truemuslims.net > > > tl;dr > > Here is a quick reference:: > >

[gentoo-user] Re: Holy Quran in all languages Available

uniq-star.com> writes: > Quran in 55 languages > http://www.truemuslims.net tl;dr Here is a quick reference:: http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/pages/quran/violence.aspx James

Re: [gentoo-user] Holy Quran in all languages Available

You can't convert us from the church of Gentoo On Tue, Jul 26, 2016, 16:48 R0b0t1 wrote: > On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Landis Blackwell > wrote: > > y u no snackbar? > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_River_War > > dw, had a snickers and

Re: [gentoo-user] Holy Quran in all languages Available

On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Landis Blackwell wrote: > y u no snackbar? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_River_War dw, had a snickers and chewed it over with a twix.

Re: [gentoo-user] Holy Quran in all languages Available

y u no snackbar? On 7/26/2016 2:23 PM, R0b0t1 wrote: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=talqltbOsNU Won't be praying for you, so don't be praying for me.

Re: [gentoo-user] Machine running before modem turned on - Network weirdness

On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Andrew Lowe wrote: > Anyone got any idea as to what has changed? What should I be looking > for to fiddle to get my preferred behaviour, modem/machine startup in any > order and I'll get an IP address. Is there a dchp "polling time" or >

Re: [gentoo-user] Machine running before modem turned on - Network weirdness

On 26/07/2016 18:53, Andrew Lowe wrote: On 27/07/16 00:10, Alan McKinnon wrote: On 26/07/2016 18:01, Andrew Lowe wrote: Hi all, I can remember in the distant past that I had to have my modem turned on before the computer otherwise, I wouldn't get an IP address. Then something changed. One

Re: [gentoo-user] Holy Quran in all languages Available

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=talqltbOsNU Won't be praying for you, so don't be praying for me.

[gentoo-user] Re: MBR & GPT dual compliant format

Tom H gmail.com> writes: > > > I you're using GTP but want to stick to MBR, then you create 1MB > > > partition to hold the boot loader, then /boot and the rest. Hello, The idea is to be able to set up a batch of 2T+ disks now and in the future, all pretty much the same (generic) layout for

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: GPT newbee needs some help

An alternate workaround that I found (I had the same issue) is to run partprobe. It'll find them and add them to /dec whether you have kernel support for GPT or not.

Re: [gentoo-user] Machine running before modem turned on - Network weirdness

On 27/07/16 00:10, Alan McKinnon wrote: On 26/07/2016 18:01, Andrew Lowe wrote: Hi all, I can remember in the distant past that I had to have my modem turned on before the computer otherwise, I wouldn't get an IP address. Then something changed. One day I forgot to turn on the modem first.

Re: [gentoo-user] Machine running before modem turned on - Network weirdness

W dniu 2016-07-26 18:01, Andrew Lowe pisze: Hi all, I can remember in the distant past that I had to have my modem turned on before the computer otherwise, I wouldn't get an IP address. Then something changed. One day I forgot to turn on the modem first. I turned the machine on then

Re: [gentoo-user] Machine running before modem turned on - Network weirdness

W dniu 2016-07-26 18:01, Andrew Lowe pisze: Hi all, I can remember in the distant past that I had to have my modem turned on before the computer otherwise, I wouldn't get an IP address. Then something changed. One day I forgot to turn on the modem first. I turned the machine on then

Re: [gentoo-user] Machine running before modem turned on - Network weirdness

On 26/07/2016 18:01, Andrew Lowe wrote: > Hi all, > I can remember in the distant past that I had to have my modem > turned on before the computer otherwise, I wouldn't get an IP address. > Then something changed. One day I forgot to turn on the modem first. I > turned the machine on then

[gentoo-user] Machine running before modem turned on - Network weirdness

Hi all, I can remember in the distant past that I had to have my modem turned on before the computer otherwise, I wouldn't get an IP address. Then something changed. One day I forgot to turn on the modem first. I turned the machine on then realised the modem wasn't on, I turned it, the

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: MBR & GPT dual compliant format

On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 8:10 AM, Artur Zych wrote: > 26 lip 2016 10:29 "Tom H" napisał(a): >> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 2:56 AM, Artur Zych wrote: >>> >>> If you're using GPT disk and want to use uefi then you can just create >>> one

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: MBR & GPT dual compliant format

On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 9:54 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On 26 July 2016 10:29:08 CEST, Tom H wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 2:56 AM, Artur Zych wrote: >>> >>> If you're using GPT disk and want to use uefi then you can just create

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: MBR & GPT dual compliant format

On 26 July 2016 10:29:08 CEST, Tom H wrote: > On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 2:56 AM, Artur Zych > wrote: > > > > If you're using GPT disk and want to use uefi then you can just > create > > one efi partition (should be around 200-500mb (depends if you're > >

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: MBR & GPT dual compliant format

26 lip 2016 10:29 "Tom H" napisał(a): > > On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 2:56 AM, Artur Zych wrote: > > > > If you're using GPT disk and want to use uefi then you can just create > > one efi partition (should be around 200-500mb (depends if you're > > planning

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: MBR & GPT dual compliant format

On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 2:56 AM, Artur Zych wrote: > > If you're using GPT disk and want to use uefi then you can just create > one efi partition (should be around 200-500mb (depends if you're > planning on using multiple systems on the same disk) - this will hold > .efi

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: MBR & GPT dual compliant format

Hi, If you're using GPT disk and want to use uefi then you can just create one efi partition (should be around 200-500mb (depends if you're planning on using multiple systems on the same disk) - this will hold .efi files for all your systems as well as the bootloader. I you're using GTP but want