Re: [gentoo-user] Holy Quran in all languages Available

[Gary Hodder]

On Tue, 2016-07-26 at 14:23 -0500, R0b0t1 wrote:
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=talqltbOsNU
> 
> Won't be praying for you, so don't be praying for me.
> 
Silence

http://www.truthrevolt.org/commentary/sounds-silence-simon-garfunkel 
-islam-video

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Holy Quran in all languages Available

[wabe]

Ian Bloss  wrote:

> Meh, OP's the one posting this in a distro discussion mailing list

And this was a bad idea. But IMO it was also a bad idea to respond.
I think that we don't need any religious discussions here.

Apart from that, top posting sucks. ;-)

--
Regards
wabe
 
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016, 19:18 Deven Lahoti  wrote:
> 
> > make America great again amirite? is this the level of shitpost
> > we're falling to?
> >
> > On Jul 26, 2016 22:13, "James"  wrote:
> >  
> >>   uniq-star.com> writes:
> >>  
> >> > Quran in 55 languages  
> >>  
> >> > http://www.truemuslims.net  
> >>
> >>
> >> tl;dr
> >>
> >> Here is a quick reference::
> >>
> >> http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/pages/quran/violence.aspx
> >>
> >>
> >> James
> >>
> >>
> >>  

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Holy Quran in all languages Available

[Ian Bloss]

Meh, OP's the one posting this in a distro discussion mailing list

On Tue, Jul 26, 2016, 19:18 Deven Lahoti  wrote:

> make America great again amirite? is this the level of shitpost we're
> falling to?
>
> On Jul 26, 2016 22:13, "James"  wrote:
>
>>   uniq-star.com> writes:
>>
>> > Quran in 55 languages
>>
>> > http://www.truemuslims.net
>>
>>
>> tl;dr
>>
>> Here is a quick reference::
>>
>> http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/pages/quran/violence.aspx
>>
>>
>> James
>>
>>
>>

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Holy Quran in all languages Available

[Deven Lahoti]

make America great again amirite? is this the level of shitpost we're
falling to?

On Jul 26, 2016 22:13, "James"  wrote:

>   uniq-star.com> writes:
>
> > Quran in 55 languages
>
> > http://www.truemuslims.net
>
>
> tl;dr
>
> Here is a quick reference::
>
> http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/pages/quran/violence.aspx
>
>
> James
>
>
>

[gentoo-user] Re: Holy Quran in all languages Available

[James]

  uniq-star.com> writes:

> Quran in 55 languages  

> http://www.truemuslims.net


tl;dr

Here is a quick reference::

http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/pages/quran/violence.aspx


James

Re: [gentoo-user] Holy Quran in all languages Available

[Ian Bloss]

You can't convert us from the church of Gentoo

On Tue, Jul 26, 2016, 16:48 R0b0t1  wrote:

> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Landis Blackwell
>  wrote:
> > y u no snackbar?
>
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_River_War
>
> dw, had a snickers and chewed it over with a twix.
>
>

Re: [gentoo-user] Holy Quran in all languages Available

[R0b0t1]

On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 2:52 PM, Landis Blackwell
 wrote:
> y u no snackbar?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_River_War

dw, had a snickers and chewed it over with a twix.

Re: [gentoo-user] Holy Quran in all languages Available

[Landis Blackwell]

y u no snackbar?


On 7/26/2016 2:23 PM, R0b0t1 wrote:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=talqltbOsNU

Won't be praying for you, so don't be praying for me.

Re: [gentoo-user] Machine running before modem turned on - Network weirdness

[R0b0t1]

On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 11:01 AM, Andrew Lowe  wrote:
> Anyone got any idea as to what has changed? What should I be looking
> for to fiddle to get my preferred behaviour, modem/machine startup in any
> order and I'll get an IP address. Is there a dchp "polling time" or
> something similar that I need to set to get this running nicely again?

Newer dhcpcds can be configured to request an address when an
interface goes up. Did a change in settings slip through a
dispatch-conf? (Aside: This is the main cause of network issues when
dhcpcd is installed and a dhcpd is not running.)

Re: [gentoo-user] Machine running before modem turned on - Network weirdness

[Alan McKinnon]

On 26/07/2016 18:53, Andrew Lowe wrote:

On 27/07/16 00:10, Alan McKinnon wrote:

On 26/07/2016 18:01, Andrew Lowe wrote:

Hi all,
I can remember in the distant past that I had to have my modem
turned on before the computer otherwise, I wouldn't get an IP address.
Then something changed. One day I forgot to turn on the modem first. I
turned the machine on then realised the modem wasn't on, I turned it,
the modem, on and prepared to reboot the machine only to see an IP
address appear.

It appeared that dhcp was now periodically attempting to get an
address whereas in the past, if on boot it didn't find one, that was it,
it just gave up. It appears that my machine has now, for some reason
reverted to "the olden days" of IP address allocation. No modem at boot,
no IP address. Reboot the machine, with the modem continuing to run, and
I get an IP address. When I have no IP address, I can run "dhcpcd
restart" and I'll get one.

Anyone got any idea as to what has changed? What should I be looking
for to fiddle to get my preferred behaviour, modem/machine startup in
any order and I'll get an IP address. Is there a dchp "polling time" or
something similar that I need to set to get this running nicely again?

Thoughts greatly appreciated,
Andrew



There's no single global default, that is set is whatever dhcp client
you are using. Which one is it?



dhcpcd




Thanks. What's in your /etc/dhcpcd.conf and related network 
configs/settings?

Re: [gentoo-user] Holy Quran in all languages Available

[R0b0t1]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=talqltbOsNU

Won't be praying for you, so don't be praying for me.

[gentoo-user] Re: MBR & GPT dual compliant format

[James]

Tom H  gmail.com> writes:



> > > I you're using GTP but want to stick to MBR, then you create 1MB
> > > partition to hold the boot loader, then /boot and the rest.

Hello,

The idea is to be able to set up a batch of 2T+ disks now and in the future,
all pretty much the same (generic) layout for both bios based systems and
efi systems, so the drives do not have to have the partition tables changed.
A standard partition scheme will put the extra disk space (according to
size) all into the /usr/local partition. A wide variety of File systems will
be imposed on the /usr/local and maybe the other 
(3) partitions:: /; /boot/: /usr File systems can change, especially what 
is on /usr/local. Distributed file systems will be routinely tested too.
All drive will keep the default boot-drive partitions, maybe for multiple
different systems/kernels (all linux though) so if a drive is to be used
as a non-boot drive, the some of the partitions may not be mounted for a
particular experiment (cluster/codes) configuration. I hope this clearly
states the ultimate goal so the myriad of bios systems I have can be used,
but also the same scheme with many new embedded and efi based systems with
many different processors (and Soc) on the mobo. Much of the testing will
be only changing codes on gentoo systems. But there will be time when a
*buntu cluster is tested, keeping all the hardware identically the same
as a gentoo reference run.


Testing a wide (wild?) variety of clusters will constantly mix and match
disks to various motherboards and embedded systems (with sata) interfaces.

So what I'm looking for is for someone to edit the partition table I
post below, so that it looks like what I need. I have tons of verbiage of
what to do, but not a single, example  partition table of what it would
actually look like (perhaps as viewed by several different (CLI)
partitioning tools (gdisk, fdisk, parted) to highlight the minutia
of the partition table.. A companion fstab (ext2/3/4) that works, would be
keenly appreciated. I only ask because I have failed at this effort in the
past and currently.

> > > About the 100MB EFI-partition: it's a Microsoft recommendation:
> > > https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/EFI_System_Partition, read the
> > > "create the partition" section.

I intend to only use grub-legacy for this effort. But, some explanation
as to when I would absolutely need grub-2, if that case even exists, would
be keen knowledge to have. Some other common distros, when I cannot get
something to work with gentoo, would be alpine and arch, when a gentoo
solution evades me. I might even spin up a complete (DC/OS) like mesosphere
or CoreOS for benchmarking. The idea is to take a small cluster and spin it
up with several different (cluster centric) solutions to problems and
measure the performance in a variety of test surveys. The suspected outcome
is that gentoo  that is minimized and optimize (including kernel and
compiler and framework tweaks), is always the performance king of the
clusters. At this point my evidence is anecdotal and not 'publishable
grade'.  I want to be fair to the bloated vendor communities and have a
consistent hardware platform, for these test-surveys.

Additionally, searching out details of kernel tweaks that optimize 
a particular problem-set of cluster-code-solutions is also of keen interest
to me.

> > Please bottom-post.

Agreed.


> > The OP wants a partition scheme for both "standard" and efi firmware,
> > so he wants an EF02 (gdisk name) of 1MB and an EF00 (also gdisk name).

Guys, the drives are 2T and larger, so the ridiculously largest partition
size needed in the worst case scenario, that works as specd-above is the
best answer.


> > The OP wanted the EF02 to be mounted as "/boot" so it has to be larger
> > than 100MB in order to accommodate multiple kernels (and possibly
> > initramfs "thingies" as they're sometimes called here).

I have never had a linux system with less than 6 kernels, often many more,
just for that one system. I use to hack kernels for breakfast (2.2-early
3.x) so yes tons of space for kernel hackery is warranted. All kernels will
also be archived to a separate backup machine/system. Kernel tweaks (as
found in kernel sources, as well as many codes in the wild, pretty much
means that endless kernel tests are warranted and that does require gigs of
disk space and organized back end storage and notations.


> Then the OP is lucky as the handbook describes this exact scheme the OP 
> wants. Only one adjustment should be considered - I would recommend 
> around 500 MB for /boot if the OP wants to use multiple systems and if 
> disk space is of no special concern.

I was think 2G for /boot. Here is a common partition table and subsequent
fstab that folks are encourage to edit as to what they would use for this
universal partitioning scheme.


#parted -l /dev/sda
Model: ATA WDC WD20EARX-00P (scsi)
Disk /dev/sda: 2000GB
Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/4096B
Partition 

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: GPT newbee needs some help

[John Runyon]

An alternate workaround that I found (I had the same issue) is to run partprobe. It'll find them and add them to /dec whether you have kernel support for GPT or not.

Re: [gentoo-user] Machine running before modem turned on - Network weirdness

[Andrew Lowe]

On 27/07/16 00:10, Alan McKinnon wrote:

On 26/07/2016 18:01, Andrew Lowe wrote:

Hi all,
I can remember in the distant past that I had to have my modem
turned on before the computer otherwise, I wouldn't get an IP address.
Then something changed. One day I forgot to turn on the modem first. I
turned the machine on then realised the modem wasn't on, I turned it,
the modem, on and prepared to reboot the machine only to see an IP
address appear.

It appeared that dhcp was now periodically attempting to get an
address whereas in the past, if on boot it didn't find one, that was it,
it just gave up. It appears that my machine has now, for some reason
reverted to "the olden days" of IP address allocation. No modem at boot,
no IP address. Reboot the machine, with the modem continuing to run, and
I get an IP address. When I have no IP address, I can run "dhcpcd
restart" and I'll get one.

Anyone got any idea as to what has changed? What should I be looking
for to fiddle to get my preferred behaviour, modem/machine startup in
any order and I'll get an IP address. Is there a dchp "polling time" or
something similar that I need to set to get this running nicely again?

Thoughts greatly appreciated,
Andrew



There's no single global default, that is set is whatever dhcp client
you are using. Which one is it?



dhcpcd

Re: [gentoo-user] Machine running before modem turned on - Network weirdness

[Artur Zych]

W dniu 2016-07-26 18:01, Andrew Lowe pisze:

Hi all,
I can remember in the distant past that I had to have my modem 
turned on before the computer otherwise, I wouldn't get an IP address. 
Then something changed. One day I forgot to turn on the modem first. I 
turned the machine on then realised the modem wasn't on, I turned it, 
the modem, on and prepared to reboot the machine only to see an IP 
address appear.


It appeared that dhcp was now periodically attempting to get an 
address whereas in the past, if on boot it didn't find one, that was 
it, it just gave up. It appears that my machine has now, for some 
reason reverted to "the olden days" of IP address allocation. No modem 
at boot, no IP address. Reboot the machine, with the modem continuing 
to run, and I get an IP address. When I have no IP address, I can run 
"dhcpcd restart" and I'll get one.


Anyone got any idea as to what has changed? What should I be 
looking for to fiddle to get my preferred behaviour, modem/machine 
startup in any order and I'll get an IP address. Is there a dchp 
"polling time" or something similar that I need to set to get this 
running nicely again?


Thoughts greatly appreciated,
Andrew



Hi Andrew,

You can set-up a deamon to "monitor" your desired interface and try to 
acquire connection whenever possible.
The handbook introduces ifplugd and also mentions netplug - 
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Handbook:X86/Networking/Dynamic.


--
Artur

Re: [gentoo-user] Machine running before modem turned on - Network weirdness

[Artur Zych]

W dniu 2016-07-26 18:01, Andrew Lowe pisze:

Hi all,
I can remember in the distant past that I had to have my modem 
turned on before the computer otherwise, I wouldn't get an IP address. 
Then something changed. One day I forgot to turn on the modem first. I 
turned the machine on then realised the modem wasn't on, I turned it, 
the modem, on and prepared to reboot the machine only to see an IP 
address appear.


It appeared that dhcp was now periodically attempting to get an 
address whereas in the past, if on boot it didn't find one, that was 
it, it just gave up. It appears that my machine has now, for some 
reason reverted to "the olden days" of IP address allocation. No modem 
at boot, no IP address. Reboot the machine, with the modem continuing 
to run, and I get an IP address. When I have no IP address, I can run 
"dhcpcd restart" and I'll get one.


Anyone got any idea as to what has changed? What should I be 
looking for to fiddle to get my preferred behaviour, modem/machine 
startup in any order and I'll get an IP address. Is there a dchp 
"polling time" or something similar that I need to set to get this 
running nicely again?


Thoughts greatly appreciated,
Andrew



Hi Andrew,

You can set-up a deamon to "monitor" your desired interface and try to 
acquire connection whenever possible.
The handbook introduces ifplugd and also mentions netplug - 
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Handbook:X86/Networking/Dynamic.


--
Artur

Re: [gentoo-user] Machine running before modem turned on - Network weirdness

[Alan McKinnon]

On 26/07/2016 18:01, Andrew Lowe wrote:
> Hi all,
> I can remember in the distant past that I had to have my modem
> turned on before the computer otherwise, I wouldn't get an IP address.
> Then something changed. One day I forgot to turn on the modem first. I
> turned the machine on then realised the modem wasn't on, I turned it,
> the modem, on and prepared to reboot the machine only to see an IP
> address appear.
> 
> It appeared that dhcp was now periodically attempting to get an
> address whereas in the past, if on boot it didn't find one, that was it,
> it just gave up. It appears that my machine has now, for some reason
> reverted to "the olden days" of IP address allocation. No modem at boot,
> no IP address. Reboot the machine, with the modem continuing to run, and
> I get an IP address. When I have no IP address, I can run "dhcpcd
> restart" and I'll get one.
> 
> Anyone got any idea as to what has changed? What should I be looking
> for to fiddle to get my preferred behaviour, modem/machine startup in
> any order and I'll get an IP address. Is there a dchp "polling time" or
> something similar that I need to set to get this running nicely again?
> 
> Thoughts greatly appreciated,
> Andrew
> 

There's no single global default, that is set is whatever dhcp client
you are using. Which one is it?


-- 
Alan McKinnon
alan.mckin...@gmail.com

[gentoo-user] Machine running before modem turned on - Network weirdness

[Andrew Lowe]

Hi all,
	I can remember in the distant past that I had to have my modem turned 
on before the computer otherwise, I wouldn't get an IP address. Then 
something changed. One day I forgot to turn on the modem first. I turned 
the machine on then realised the modem wasn't on, I turned it, the 
modem, on and prepared to reboot the machine only to see an IP address 
appear.


	It appeared that dhcp was now periodically attempting to get an address 
whereas in the past, if on boot it didn't find one, that was it, it just 
gave up. It appears that my machine has now, for some reason reverted to 
"the olden days" of IP address allocation. No modem at boot, no IP 
address. Reboot the machine, with the modem continuing to run, and I get 
an IP address. When I have no IP address, I can run "dhcpcd restart" and 
I'll get one.


	Anyone got any idea as to what has changed? What should I be looking 
for to fiddle to get my preferred behaviour, modem/machine startup in 
any order and I'll get an IP address. Is there a dchp "polling time" or 
something similar that I need to set to get this running nicely again?


Thoughts greatly appreciated,
Andrew

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: MBR & GPT dual compliant format

[Tom H]

On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 8:10 AM, Artur Zych  wrote:
> 26 lip 2016 10:29 "Tom H"  napisał(a):
>> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 2:56 AM, Artur Zych  wrote:
>>>
>>> If you're using GPT disk and want to use uefi then you can just create
>>> one efi partition (should be around 200-500mb (depends if you're
>>> planning on using multiple systems on the same disk) - this will hold
>>> .efi files for all your systems as well as the bootloader.
>>>
>>> I you're using GTP but want to stick to MBR, then you create 1MB
>>> partition to hold the boot loader, then /boot and the rest.
>>>
>>> About the 100MB EFI-partition: it's a Microsoft recommendation:
>>> https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/EFI_System_Partition, read the
>>> "create the partition" section.
>>
>> Please bottom-post.
>>
>> The OP wants a partition scheme for both "standard" and efi firmware,
>> so he wants an EF02 (gdisk name) of 1MB and an EF00 (also gdisk name).
>>
>> The OP wanted the EF02 to be mounted as "/boot" so it has to be larger
>> than 100MB in order to accomodate multiple kernels (and possibly
>> initramfs "thingies" as they're sometimes called here).
>
> Then the OP is lucky as the handbook describes this exact scheme the OP
> wants. Only one adjusment should be considered - I would recommend around
> 500 MB for /boot if the OP wants to use multiple systems and if
> disk space is of no special concern.

I haven't looked at the handbook for a long time but I hope that it
doesn't recommend creating both of these partitions by default. It
doesn't make sense for a default setup.

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: MBR & GPT dual compliant format

[Tom H]

On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 9:54 AM, Neil Bothwick  wrote:
> On 26 July 2016 10:29:08 CEST, Tom H  wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 2:56 AM, Artur Zych  wrote:
>>>
>>> If you're using GPT disk and want to use uefi then you can just create
>>> one efi partition (should be around 200-500mb (depends if you're
>>> planning on using multiple systems on the same disk) - this will hold
>>> .efi files for all your systems as well as the bootloader.
>>>
>>> I you're using GTP but want to stick to MBR, then you create 1MB
>>> partition to hold the boot loader, then /boot and the rest.
>>>
>>> About the 100MB EFI-partition: it's a Microsoft recommendation:
>>> https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/EFI_System_Partition, read the
>>> "create the partition" section.
>>
>> Please bottom-post.
>>
>> The OP wants a partition scheme for both "standard" and efi firmware,
>> so he wants an EF02 (gdisk name) of 1MB and an EF00 (also gdisk name).
>>
>> The OP wanted the EF02 to be mounted as "/boot" so it has to be
>> larger than 100MB in order to accomodate multiple kernels (and
>> possibly initramfs "thingies" as they're sometimes called here).
>
> It's the ESP (EF00) that can be used as /boot, EF02 is a special
> partition that should exist but not be used.

Good catch.

I no longer have my initial email but it looks like I also screwed up
my first para and emailed it unfinished; somehow.

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: MBR & GPT dual compliant format

[Neil Bothwick]

On 26 July 2016 10:29:08 CEST, Tom H  wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 2:56 AM, Artur Zych 
> wrote:
> >
> > If you're using GPT disk and want to use uefi then you can just
> create
> > one efi partition (should be around 200-500mb (depends if you're
> > planning on using multiple systems on the same disk) - this will
> hold
> > .efi files for all your systems as well as the bootloader.
> >
> > I you're using GTP but want to stick to MBR, then you create 1MB
> > partition to hold the boot loader, then /boot and the rest.
> >
> > About the 100MB EFI-partition: it's a Microsoft recommendation:
> > https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/EFI_System_Partition, read the
> > "create the partition" section.
> 
> Please bottom-post.
> 
> The OP wants a partition scheme for both "standard" and efi firmware,
> so he wants an EF02 (gdisk name) of 1MB and an EF00 (also gdisk name).
> 
> The OP wanted the EF02 to be mounted as "/boot" so it has to be larger
> than 100MB in order to accomodate multiple kernels (and possibly
> initramfs "thingies" as they're sometimes called here).

It's the ESP (EF00)  that can be used as /boot, EF02 is a special partition 
that should exist but not be used. 
-- 
Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: MBR & GPT dual compliant format

[Artur Zych]

26 lip 2016 10:29 "Tom H"  napisał(a):
>
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 2:56 AM, Artur Zych  wrote:
> >
> > If you're using GPT disk and want to use uefi then you can just create
> > one efi partition (should be around 200-500mb (depends if you're
> > planning on using multiple systems on the same disk) - this will hold
> > .efi files for all your systems as well as the bootloader.
> >
> > I you're using GTP but want to stick to MBR, then you create 1MB
> > partition to hold the boot loader, then /boot and the rest.
> >
> > About the 100MB EFI-partition: it's a Microsoft recommendation:
> > https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/EFI_System_Partition, read the
> > "create the partition" section.
>
> Please bottom-post.
>
> The OP wants a partition scheme for both "standard" and efi firmware,
> so he wants an EF02 (gdisk name) of 1MB and an EF00 (also gdisk name).
>
> The OP wanted the EF02 to be mounted as "/boot" so it has to be larger
> than 100MB in order to accomodate multiple kernels (and possibly
> initramfs "thingies" as they're sometimes called here).
>
Then the OP is lucky as the handbook describes this exact scheme the OP
wants. Only one adjusment should be considered - I would recommend around
500 MB for /boot if the OP wants to use multiple systems and if
disk space is of no special concern.

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: MBR & GPT dual compliant format

[Tom H]

On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 2:56 AM, Artur Zych  wrote:
>
> If you're using GPT disk and want to use uefi then you can just create
> one efi partition (should be around 200-500mb (depends if you're
> planning on using multiple systems on the same disk) - this will hold
> .efi files for all your systems as well as the bootloader.
>
> I you're using GTP but want to stick to MBR, then you create 1MB
> partition to hold the boot loader, then /boot and the rest.
>
> About the 100MB EFI-partition: it's a Microsoft recommendation:
> https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/EFI_System_Partition, read the
> "create the partition" section.

Please bottom-post.

The OP wants a partition scheme for both "standard" and efi firmware,
so he wants an EF02 (gdisk name) of 1MB and an EF00 (also gdisk name).

The OP wanted the EF02 to be mounted as "/boot" so it has to be larger
than 100MB in order to accomodate multiple kernels (and possibly
initramfs "thingies" as they're sometimes called here).

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: MBR & GPT dual compliant format

[Artur Zych]

Hi,

If you're using GPT disk and want to use uefi then you can just create one
efi partition (should be around 200-500mb (depends if you're planning on
using multiple systems on the same disk) - this will hold .efi files for
all your systems as well as the bootloader.
I you're using GTP but want to stick to MBR, then you create 1MB partition
to hold the boot loader, then /boot and the rest.

About the 100MB EFI-partition: it's a Microsoft recommendation:
https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/EFI_System_Partition, read the "create
the partition" section.

Regards,
-az

2016-07-26 7:55 GMT+02:00 Neil Bothwick :

> On 25 July 2016 13:36:24 GMT-04:00, David Haller 
> wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Sun, 24 Jul 2016, Neil Bothwick wrote:
>>
>>> Step 1: Use gdisk to create a 1M partition at the start of the disk.
>>> Step 2: Set its type to EF02
>>>
>>
>> I think the EFI-partition should be 100MiB.
>>
>> -dnh
>>
>>
> The ESP (EF00) can be whatever size you need, mine is 1GB. Bit the
> compatibility EF02 partition needs be inly 1MB.
> --
> Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
>