Re: [gentoo-user] Re: emerge --sync

On 161024-22:27+0200, Alarig Le Lay wrote: > On Mon Oct 24 15:49:09 2016, Rich Freeman wrote: > > Why not just share everything via bind mounts in this case? I'd think > > that would have less overhead than rsync/http and then you're not > > storing files twice. > > Because I have several host

Re: [gentoo-user] Dirty COW, 4.4.8-hardened-r1 how to fix?

On 161021-11:04-0400, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 10:49 AM, Mick wrote: > > https://github.com/dirtycow/dirtycow.github.io/wiki/VulnerabilityDetails > > Not yet: > https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=597624 > We are talking grsecurity-patched

Re: [gentoo-user] I finally ditched acroread

Hey dude, i have acroread installed but use okular since long time ago. In fact my i was in doubt if acroread still installed. I'll uninstall acroread, but how to recompile packages without 32-bit ABI? Is there a smart way or I need to change e recompile each one? Best regards. On

Re: [gentoo-user] Networkmanager Auto Connect

On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 12:25:14AM +0200, Frank Steinmetzger wrote: > On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 06:18:13PM +0200, Silvio Siefke wrote: > > On Sat, 15 Oct 2016 12:51:36 +0200 > > Alexander Openkowski wrote: > > > > > I have the same problem. Unfortunately, I do not know of

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge --sync

Jorge Almeida wrote: > I want to do emerge --sync on computer A and then update computer B by > copying /usr/portage. Is this safe? The point is: does emerge --sync > just updates the contents of /usr/portage or does it also change > something else ? > > TIA > > Jorge Almeida > > This may be a

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge --sync

Den 24. okt. 2016 17:21, skrev Jorge Almeida: > I want to do emerge --sync on computer A and then update computer B by > copying /usr/portage. Is this safe? The point is: does emerge --sync > just updates the contents of /usr/portage or does it also change > something else ? I have one box that I

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: emerge --sync

On Mon Oct 24 15:49:09 2016, Rich Freeman wrote: > Why not just share everything via bind mounts in this case? I'd think > that would have less overhead than rsync/http and then you're not > storing files twice. Because I have several host boxes and I build the packages on only one. -- alarig

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: emerge --sync

On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 2:02 PM, Alarig Le Lay wrote: > > I use a similar setup for LXC containers running over a gentoo box, > except that my box is setted up to publish the binary packets on a > specified directory that is accessible via HTTP. My LXCs take the binary >

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: emerge --sync

On Mon Oct 24 10:44:24 2016, Jorge Almeida wrote: > My use case is basic: 2 home computers, I do emerge et. al. on the > faster one and produce binary packages to be used on the other one, > which doesn't even need distfiles, just portage tree plus binary > packages. I copy stuff between boxes

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: emerge --sync

On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 9:56 AM, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 12:45 PM, Jorge Almeida wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Fernando Rodriguez >> wrote: >>> >>> But a more elegant solution is to emerge

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: emerge --sync

On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 12:45 PM, Jorge Almeida wrote: > On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Fernando Rodriguez > wrote: >> >> But a more elegant solution is to emerge app-admin/gentoo-rsync-mirror and >> setup your own rsync mirror. >> > > Sure, but it

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: emerge --sync

On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Fernando Rodriguez wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > On 10/24/2016 11:35 AM, Jorge Almeida wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 8:29 AM, Martin Vaeth wrote: >>> Jorge Almeida

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: emerge --sync

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 10/24/2016 11:35 AM, Jorge Almeida wrote: > On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 8:29 AM, Martin Vaeth wrote: >> Jorge Almeida wrote: >>> I want to do emerge --sync on computer A and then update computer B by >>>

[gentoo-user] Re: I finally ditched acroread

On 2016-10-23, Mick wrote: > On Sunday 23 Oct 2016 21:53:56 Grant Edwards wrote: >> On 2016-10-23, Mick wrote: >> > On Sunday 23 Oct 2016 00:32:02 Grant Edwards wrote: >> >> >> >> For the past several years, I've had to keep acroread

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: emerge --sync

On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 8:29 AM, Martin Vaeth wrote: > Jorge Almeida wrote: >> I want to do emerge --sync on computer A and then update computer B by >> copying /usr/portage. Is this safe? > > Yes, although ... > >> does emerge --sync just updates the

[gentoo-user] Re: emerge --sync

Jorge Almeida wrote: > I want to do emerge --sync on computer A and then update computer B by > copying /usr/portage. Is this safe? Yes, although ... > does emerge --sync just updates the contents of /usr/portage portage also changes the content of /var/cache/edb, and in

[gentoo-user] emerge --sync

I want to do emerge --sync on computer A and then update computer B by copying /usr/portage. Is this safe? The point is: does emerge --sync just updates the contents of /usr/portage or does it also change something else ? TIA Jorge Almeida

Re: [gentoo-user] perl-cleaner output

On Fri, 7 Oct 2016 09:30:01 -0700 Daniel Frey wrote: > So, I was upgrading several machines, and as a habit I always run > perl-cleaner. Every machine gave me an output like so with somewhat > different package lists: > > > * > * It seems like perl-cleaner had to rebuild some packages. > * > *

Re: [gentoo-user] screen tearing with mpv but not mplayer

On Saturday, October 22, 2016 05:28:22 AM David Haller wrote: > Hello, > > On Fri, 21 Oct 2016, Behrouz Khosravi wrote: > >> $ mplayer foo.mp4 | grep '^VO: ' > >> VO: [gl] ... > >> $ mpv foo.mp4 | grep '^VO: ' > >> VO: [opengl] > >> > >> See 'mplayer -vo help' and 'mpv -vo help'. > > > >Thanks.