Re: [gentoo-user] vm still grinding away at compiling webkitgtk-2.14.2

On November 20, 2016 6:21:40 AM GMT+01:00, Alan McKinnon wrote: >On 20/11/2016 02:59, Harry Putnam wrote: >> An emerge of webkitgtk-2.14.2 has been running for over 2hrs. I >> wonder if I am starving my vbox vm of gentoo with 3GB or ram. >> >> Top's cpu usage is

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: `sets' & sets.conf

On 20/11/2016 02:43, Harry Putnam wrote: > > [...] > > Neil Bothwick writes: > >> You can create a set containing a list of packages. I do this for >> dependencies of packages that are not from portage, so they don't get >> depcleaned and don't end up in @world. Something

Re: [gentoo-user] vm still grinding away at compiling webkitgtk-2.14.2

On 20/11/2016 02:59, Harry Putnam wrote: > An emerge of webkitgtk-2.14.2 has been running for over 2hrs. I > wonder if I am starving my vbox vm of gentoo with 3GB or ram. > > Top's cpu usage is fluxuating between 45% and 99% during this compile > > Portage pulling 99% by itself at times. > > I

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: elog default lifespan

On 20/11/2016 02:21, Harry Putnam wrote: > Mick writes: > >> On Saturday 19 Nov 2016 08:54:53 Harry Putnam wrote: >>> After looking thru the portage man pages, the make.conf.example in >>> /usr/share/portage/config, and the `Portage log wiki' it still is not >>> clear

Re: [gentoo-user] libgcrypt-1.7.3 build fail

On 11/10/2016 11:42 AM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > Hi, > Please open a bug. > You probably updated gcc and should run revdep-rebuild or similar, see > [1][2] for reference. > Alon > [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=561938 > [2] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=578302 > > On 10

Re: [gentoo-user] libgcrypt-1.7.3 build fail

On 11/10/2016 11:42 AM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > Hi, > Please open a bug. > You probably updated gcc and should run revdep-rebuild or similar, see > [1][2] for reference. > Alon > [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=561938 > [2] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=578302 > > On 10

[gentoo-user] vm still grinding away at compiling webkitgtk-2.14.2

An emerge of webkitgtk-2.14.2 has been running for over 2hrs. I wonder if I am starving my vbox vm of gentoo with 3GB or ram. Top's cpu usage is fluxuating between 45% and 99% during this compile Portage pulling 99% by itself at times. I thought 3GB was a bit high for a vm compared to what

[gentoo-user] Re: `sets' & sets.conf

[...] Neil Bothwick writes: > You can create a set containing a list of packages. I do this for > dependencies of packages that are not from portage, so they don't get > depcleaned and don't end up in @world. Something like [...] Thanks for the nifty examples... ...

[gentoo-user] Re: elog default lifespan

Mick writes: > On Saturday 19 Nov 2016 08:54:53 Harry Putnam wrote: >> After looking thru the portage man pages, the make.conf.example in >> /usr/share/portage/config, and the `Portage log wiki' it still is not >> clear to me how long elogs are kept if you use the

Re: [gentoo-user] sans-dbus was: gnome intrusion?

On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 4:59 PM, Tom H wrote: > On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 7:47 AM, Miroslav Rovis > wrote: >> >> Ah, I almost forgot. Gentoo is as default (OpenRC) without dbus! Have a >> look: >> >>

Re: [gentoo-user] sans-dbus was: gnome intrusion?

On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 7:47 AM, Miroslav Rovis wrote: > > Ah, I almost forgot. Gentoo is as default (OpenRC) without dbus! Have a > look: > > https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Comparison_of_init_systems > > There is no D-Bus under "Main dependencies" for OpenRC (I really

Re: [gentoo-user] disabling IPv6 autoconfig for all interfaces

On Sat Nov 19 22:33:33 2016, J. Roeleveld wrote: > doesn't work, I still get these: > inet6 fe80::2e0:81ff:fecc:6ec6 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x20 > > The problem with these (the mac-based ones) is that with multiple VLANs, they > all insist on using the same IP as they are all on the same

Re: [gentoo-user] disabling IPv6 autoconfig for all interfaces

On Saturday, November 19, 2016 09:13:14 PM Alarig Le Lay wrote: > On Sat Nov 19 20:09:24 2016, J. Roeleveld wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > A related question: How do I prevent IPv6 addresses other than the ones I > > DO configure? > > > > Many thanks, > > > > Joost > > Hi, > > You can do this

Re: [gentoo-user] `sets' & sets.conf

On 19/11/2016 18:04, Harry Putnam wrote: > Can anyone post, in laymans, terms how to use sets.conf. Or thru > FEATURES if thats how its done, I've read the posrtage manpage that > covers it and this URL: > > https://dev.gentoo.org/~zmedico/portage/doc/ch02s02.html#config-set-syntax-single > >

Re: [gentoo-user] disabling IPv6 autoconfig for all interfaces

On Sat Nov 19 20:09:24 2016, J. Roeleveld wrote: > Hi all, > > A related question: How do I prevent IPv6 addresses other than the ones I DO > configure? > > Many thanks, > > Joost Hi, You can do this with sysctl by setting the option net.ipv6.conf.$if.accept_ra to 0. -- alarig

[gentoo-user] disabling IPv6 autoconfig for all interfaces

Hi all, For my VM server, I have several network interfaces and bridges configured. I don't want every single interface and bridge to have an IPv6 address. Only the one required for accessing the host will be sufficient. What is the correct way to disable any form of autoconfiguration? Setting

Re: [gentoo-user] Doubt about R support in gentoo

Yeah, thank you. ICU is a great pain in the ring! Regards On 11/19/2016 12:26 PM, c0a80...@gmail.com wrote: On 11/19/16 12:50, Alec Ten Harmsel wrote: El 19/11/2016 a las 07:47 a. m., Zhu Sha Zang escribió: Hello everybody... A single doubt here: After an upgrade in package

Re: [gentoo-user] `sets' & sets.conf

On Sat, 19 Nov 2016 11:04:44 -0500, Harry Putnam wrote: > Can anyone post, in laymans, terms how to use sets.conf. Or thru > FEATURES if thats how its done, I've read the posrtage manpage that > covers it and this URL: > >

Re: [gentoo-user] elog default lifespan

On Saturday 19 Nov 2016 08:54:53 Harry Putnam wrote: > After looking thru the portage man pages, the make.conf.example in > /usr/share/portage/config, and the `Portage log wiki' it still is not > clear to me how long elogs are kept if you use the `save' flag in > make.conf or not. > > I did see

Re: [gentoo-user] plain copy of root disk won't work

On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 10:20:13PM +0300, Константин wrote: > On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 04:30:28PM +0100, Raffaele BELARDI wrote: > > I want to move the main disk contents (hda, PATA) to another, larger > > disk (sda, SATA). > > > > hda contains 4 ext3 partitions (root, home, data, swap). > > I

[gentoo-user] `sets' & sets.conf

Can anyone post, in laymans, terms how to use sets.conf. Or thru FEATURES if thats how its done, I've read the posrtage manpage that covers it and this URL: https://dev.gentoo.org/~zmedico/portage/doc/ch02s02.html#config-set-syntax-single Finally reinstalled portage with USE="doc" to get the

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Doubt about R support in gentoo

No, no overlay here. In fact I avoid overlay at any cost. Thank you for a while!! On 11/19/2016 12:36 PM, Michael Palimaka wrote: On 20/11/16 01:47, Zhu Sha Zang wrote: Hello everybody... A single doubt here: After an upgrade in package dev-libs/icu (from 57.1 to 58.1-r1) i tried a

[gentoo-user] Re: Doubt about R support in gentoo

On 20/11/16 01:47, Zhu Sha Zang wrote: > Hello everybody... > > > A single doubt here: > > > After an upgrade in package dev-libs/icu (from 57.1 to 58.1-r1) i tried > a package upgrade inside R and got that: > > > /> update.packages(checkBuilt=TRUE, ask=FALSE, >

Re: [gentoo-user] Doubt about R support in gentoo

On 11/19/16 12:50, Alec Ten Harmsel wrote: El 19/11/2016 a las 07:47 a. m., Zhu Sha Zang escribió: Hello everybody... A single doubt here: After an upgrade in package dev-libs/icu (from 57.1 to 58.1-r1) i tried a package upgrade inside R and got that: />

Re: [gentoo-user] Doubt about R support in gentoo

El 19/11/2016 a las 07:47 a. m., Zhu Sha Zang escribió: Hello everybody... A single doubt here: After an upgrade in package dev-libs/icu (from 57.1 to 58.1-r1) i tried a package upgrade inside R and got that: /> update.packages(checkBuilt=TRUE, ask=FALSE,

[gentoo-user] Doubt about R support in gentoo

Hello everybody... A single doubt here: After an upgrade in package dev-libs/icu (from 57.1 to 58.1-r1) i tried a package upgrade inside R and got that: /> update.packages(checkBuilt=TRUE, ask=FALSE, repos='http://cran.us.r-project.org') trying URL

[gentoo-user] elog default lifespan

After looking thru the portage man pages, the make.conf.example in /usr/share/portage/config, and the `Portage log wiki' it still is not clear to me how long elogs are kept if you use the `save' flag in make.conf or not. I did see something about '7 days' but it was not clear if that is the

Re: [gentoo-user] Firefox 49.0 & Youtube....Video: Yes - Audio: No...

On 161119-10:22+0100, Miroslav Rovis wrote: > On 161119-00:33-0800, Daniel Campbell wrote: ... > > > And there is a question/query/my-asking-for-advice further below. ... > > >>> If jackd is to do with alsa, then it could be the following. > > >>> > > >>> Mozilla went pulse all the way: > > >>>

Re: [gentoo-user] split-elog setting

On Sat, Nov 19, 2016 at 01:48:14AM -0500, Harry Putnam wrote: > On gentoo `Portage log wiki' pages one is told: > > "In order to create per-category elog files, enable the split-elog > Portage feature." > > (If you want to create `category-based' subdir.) > > It never gets around to

Re: [gentoo-user] Firefox 49.0 & Youtube....Video: Yes - Audio: No...

On 161119-00:33-0800, Daniel Campbell wrote: > On 11/18/2016 10:11 PM, Miroslav Rovis wrote: > > Hi Meino! > > > > I regret not having told you more... See below... > > > > And there is a question/query/my-asking-for-advice further below. > > > > On 161016-08:48+0200, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:

Re: [gentoo-user] Firefox 49.0 & Youtube....Video: Yes - Audio: No...

On 11/18/2016 10:11 PM, Miroslav Rovis wrote: > Hi Meino! > > I regret not having told you more... See below... > > And there is a question/query/my-asking-for-advice further below. > > On 161016-08:48+0200, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote: >> Miroslav Rovis [16-10-16