Re: [gentoo-user] install under centos606

On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 6:49 AM, wrote: > Any likely problems if i install the stage3 tarball etc. under centos6.6? > tried the live dvd but it has problems with my current graphics card > (framebuffer driver). Sir, I would be extremely careful with that

Re: [gentoo-user] install under centos606

On Mon, Aug 21, 2017 at 7:08 AM, Ralph Seichter wrote: > On 21.08.2017 13:49, mad.scientist.at.la...@tutanota.com wrote: > >> I'm excited about using gentoo, though the online instructions could >> really use more structuring, i.e. it's hard to avoid reading the parts

Re: [gentoo-user] mount: Permission Denied in CHROOT

Hello Everyone, I did try that as well however when I do a grub install I am getting: grub-install /dev/sda Installing for i386-pc platform. grub-install: warning: disk does not exist, so falling back to partition device /dev/sda2. grub-install: warning: disk does not exist, so falling back to

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: downgrading glibc

On 08/22/2017 07:18 AM, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 6:34 AM, Nils Freydank > wrote: >> >> BTW, mythtv has no maintainer, might you be interested in a proxied >> maintainership? >> > > I'd encourage somebody to step up and do this - I no longer use it

Re: [gentoo-user] Is this working correctly??

Mick wrote: > On Tuesday, 22 August 2017 16:41:54 BST Dale wrote: >> Alan McKinnon wrote: >>> On 22/08/2017 15:01, Dale wrote: Howdy, I have this > You have not defined what "this" is. The word "this" is being used here as a > determinant (I think), but it is not preceded by a

Re: [gentoo-user] Is this working correctly??

On Tuesday, 22 August 2017 16:41:54 BST Dale wrote: > Alan McKinnon wrote: > > On 22/08/2017 15:01, Dale wrote: > >> Howdy, > >> > >> I have this You have not defined what "this" is. The word "this" is being used here as a determinant (I think), but it is not preceded by a sentence defining

Re: [gentoo-user] Is this working correctly??

Alan McKinnon wrote: > On 22/08/2017 15:01, Dale wrote: >> Howdy, >> >> I have this set to send text only for gentoo.org and kde.org. Someone >> replied making me think it is not doing as instructed, even tho settings >> says it is. Can someone tell me for sure and certain that this is >>

Re: [gentoo-user] Is this working correctly??

Dale wrote: > Howdy, > > I have this set to send text only for gentoo.org and kde.org. Someone > replied making me think it is not doing as instructed, even tho settings > says it is. Can someone tell me for sure and certain that this is > sending as it should? Text only I hope. > > Thanks. >

Re: [gentoo-user] Is this working correctly??

On 22/08/2017 15:01, Dale wrote: > Howdy, > > I have this set to send text only for gentoo.org and kde.org. Someone > replied making me think it is not doing as instructed, even tho settings > says it is. Can someone tell me for sure and certain that this is > sending as it should? Text only I

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: downgrading glibc

On 22 August 2017 14:09:39 EEST, Dale wrote: >It may have been you but I was thinking either Walter or Duncan but not >sure. It could be, I read it on -dev too. I'm just not sure who it >was >just know it is gentoo related, since Gentoo is all I'm subscribed to. > >One

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: downgrading glibc

On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 6:34 AM, Nils Freydank wrote: > Am Dienstag, 22. August 2017, 09:01:07 CEST schrieb Raffaele Belardi: >> […] >> > [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=604430 >> > [2] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=575232 >> >> Just as follow up,

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: downgrading glibc

On Tue, 2017-08-22 at 15:34 +0200, Nils Freydank wrote: > Am Dienstag, 22. August 2017, 09:01:07 CEST schrieb Raffaele Belardi: > > […] > > > [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=604430 > > > [2] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=575232 > > > > Just as follow up, inspired by [2] I

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: downgrading glibc

Am Dienstag, 22. August 2017, 09:01:07 CEST schrieb Raffaele Belardi: > […] > > [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=604430 > > [2] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=575232 > > Just as follow up, inspired by [2] I fixed the mythtv build issue by > adding #include to videosource.cpp

Re: [gentoo-user] Is this working correctly??

On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 4:01 PM, Dale wrote: > > I have this set to send text only for gentoo.org and kde.org. Someone > replied making me think it is not doing as instructed, even tho settings > says it is. Can someone tell me for sure and certain that this is > sending as

Re: [gentoo-user] Is this working correctly??

I only see content-type text/plain. So it seems to be working from my POV. Todd On 8/22/2017 9:01 AM, Dale wrote: Howdy, I have this set to send text only for gentoo.org and kde.org. Someone replied making me think it is not doing as instructed, even tho settings says it is. Can someone

[gentoo-user] Is this working correctly??

Howdy, I have this set to send text only for gentoo.org and kde.org. Someone replied making me think it is not doing as instructed, even tho settings says it is. Can someone tell me for sure and certain that this is sending as it should? Text only I hope. Thanks. Dale :-) :-)

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: ruby 22

John Covici wrote: > On Tue, 22 Aug 2017 05:16:55 -0400, > Neil Bothwick wrote: >> [1 ] >> [2 ] >> RUBY_TARGET Is an expanded use flag so ypu need to run emerge - - update - - >> newuse @world to apply the change. The depclean should work, >> Just check for stray ruby settings in /etc/portage.

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: ruby 22

On Tue, Aug 22, 2017 at 07:57:39AM -0400, John Covici wrote: > > > > I deleted RUBYTARGETS from make.conf, ran eselect to make ruby22 the > > default, but when I ran emerge --depclean I still have packages > > pulling ruby21 as follows: > > > > Calculating dependencies .. . done! > >

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: ruby 22

On Tue, 22 Aug 2017 05:16:55 -0400, Neil Bothwick wrote: > > [1 ] > [2 ] > RUBY_TARGET Is an expanded use flag so ypu need to run emerge - - update - - > newuse @world to apply the change. The depclean should work, > Just check for stray ruby settings in /etc/portage. > > On 22 August 2017

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: downgrading glibc

It may have been you but I was thinking either Walter or Duncan but not sure. It could be, I read it on -dev too. I'm just not sure who it was just know it is gentoo related, since Gentoo is all I'm subscribed to. One would think there would be some method to downgrade that is known to work

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: downgrading glibc

I did it once, some years ago. AFAIR I commented out the version che k in, i think, the glibc-toolchain eclass then emerged the older version. Just make sire you have a binary package of the current version that you can unpack in / if things go wrong. On 22 August 2017 13:53:35 EEST, Dale

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: downgrading glibc

Raffaele Belardi wrote: > On Fri, 2017-08-18 at 09:00 +0200, Raffaele Belardi wrote: >> I hava a build problem upgrading Mythtv to 0.28.1-r1 [1] on an ~amd64 >> system. The problem is related to a glibc API change [2] introduced >> in >> glibc-2.24 and still present in glibc-2.25. So I'm thinking

Re: [gentoo-user] Question on install

Thomas Mueller wrote: >> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; >> boundary="5A3B7F546928893D6B2B7B3A" >> X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.2 cv=HvEGIwbS c=1 sm=1 tr=0 >> a=ZNQZ+YIiQ1SmzuxDAKl+CA==:117 a=ZNQZ+YIiQ1SmzuxDAKl+CA==:17 >> a=x7bEGLp0ZPQA:10 a=ISoD08LcTzsA:10

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: ruby 22

RUBY_TARGET Is an expanded use flag so ypu need to run emerge - - update - - newuse @world to apply the change. The depclean should work, Just check for stray ruby settings in /etc/portage. On 22 August 2017 05:21:23 EEST, John Covici wrote: >On Mon, 21 Aug 2017

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: ruby 22

On Tue, 22 Aug 2017 02:58:31 -0400, Raffaele Belardi wrote: > > On Mon, 2017-08-21 at 22:21 -0400, John Covici wrote: > > On Mon, 21 Aug 2017 21:20:04 -0400, > > Alec Ten Harmsel wrote: > > > > > I deleted RUBYTARGETS from make.conf, ran eselect to make ruby22 the > > default, but when I ran

Re: [gentoo-user] Question on install

> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; > boundary="5A3B7F546928893D6B2B7B3A" > X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.2 cv=HvEGIwbS c=1 sm=1 tr=0 > a=ZNQZ+YIiQ1SmzuxDAKl+CA==:117 a=ZNQZ+YIiQ1SmzuxDAKl+CA==:17 > a=x7bEGLp0ZPQA:10 a=ISoD08LcTzsA:10 a=xqWC_Br6kY4A:10 a=KeKAF7QvOSUA:10 >

[gentoo-user] Re: downgrading glibc

On Fri, 2017-08-18 at 09:00 +0200, Raffaele Belardi wrote: > I hava a build problem upgrading Mythtv to 0.28.1-r1 [1] on an ~amd64 > system. The problem is related to a glibc API change [2] introduced > in > glibc-2.24 and still present in glibc-2.25. So I'm thinking to try > the > build with an

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: ruby 22

On Mon, 2017-08-21 at 22:21 -0400, John Covici wrote: > On Mon, 21 Aug 2017 21:20:04 -0400, > Alec Ten Harmsel wrote: > > > I deleted RUBYTARGETS from make.conf, ran eselect to make ruby22 the > default, but when I ran emerge --depclean I still have packages > pulling ruby21 as follows: > >