Re: [gentoo-user] Plasmashell consuming huge amounts of memory.

Dale wrote: > P Levine wrote: >> On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 2:49 PM, Dale > >wrote: >> >> After another round of google searches, startpage >> actually, I found where someone posted that having a slideshow causes >> this.  I switched

Re: [gentoo-user] Alternatives to knutclient

Daniel Frey wrote: > > Well, that's odd. I just built it and see nothing of the sort. I built > it with all USE flags. > > I am not using nut now, but I was trying it about a year ago. I did > have a client (it wasn't knutclient), maybe it was removed from the > tree. That's disappointing. > > How

Re: [gentoo-user] Plasmashell consuming huge amounts of memory.

P Levine wrote: > On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 2:49 PM, Dale >wrote: > > After another round of google searches, startpage > actually, I found where someone posted that having a slideshow causes > this.  I switched from slideshow to

Re: [gentoo-user] Python 3.5

On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 8:17 PM, Philip Webb wrote: > Python 3.5 has become stable : what are the pro/cons of updating to it ? > I have in make.conf : > > USE_PYTHON="2.7 3.4" > PYTHON_TARGETS="python2_7 python3_4" > PYTHON_SINGLE_TARGET="python3_4" > > Is it

[gentoo-user] Python 3.5

Python 3.5 has become stable : what are the pro/cons of updating to it ? I have in make.conf : USE_PYTHON="2.7 3.4" PYTHON_TARGETS="python2_7 python3_4" PYTHON_SINGLE_TARGET="python3_4" Is it advisable to replace '3_4' '3.4' with '3_5' '3.5' ? --

Re: [gentoo-user] A portage nuisance

On 10/28/2017 08:10 PM, Wols Lists wrote: > > In other words, I'm asking emerge to automate what I do - look at the > output, find a subset of packages that I think will work, and then ask > it to try again with just those packages. I would be very surprised if > it iterated repeatedly down to

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: systemd fails to mount nfs4 mounts

> I'm still having this issue, anyone have any ideas? I can see that > NetworkManager-Wait-Online finishes, and that the mounting starts > immediately after, but I don't think the network is quite up yet, resulting > an all nfs mounts to timeout. > > The computer is using a static IP, so it

Re: [gentoo-user] A portage nuisance

On 28/10/17 23:45, Andrew Savchenko wrote: >> emerge -u world >> > A will be emerged with options ... >> > B will be emerged with options ... >> > C will be emerged with options ... >> > D is blocked by E >> > F will be emerged with options ... >> > G is blocked by H >> > Giving up, too many

Re: [gentoo-user] Plasmashell consuming huge amounts of memory.

On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 2:49 PM, Dale wrote: > After another round of google searches, startpage > actually, I found where someone posted that having a slideshow causes > this. I switched from slideshow to something else and sure enough, it > hasn't hogged up memory, yet

[gentoo-user] Re: systemd fails to mount nfs4 mounts

On 10/13/2017 03:13 PM, Daniel Frey wrote: I discovered that after my update the other day (systemd is up to date as of Wednesday) that my remote nfs mounts are failing on startup. (Note: as per my other thread, I haven't tried to disable ipv6 yet. I want to figure this out first.) I use an

Re: [gentoo-user] Alternatives to knutclient

On 10/28/2017 09:48 AM, Mick wrote: On Saturday, 28 October 2017 15:18:26 BST Daniel Frey wrote: On 10/28/2017 01:58 AM, Mick wrote: Hi All, I've been using the net-misc/knutclient GUI application to provide information to desktop users of the state of the UPS. Portage is telling me this

Re: [gentoo-user] Plasmashell consuming huge amounts of memory.

R0b0t1 wrote: > On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 5:35 PM, Dale wrote: >> P Levine wrote: >> >> >> >> On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 2:49 PM, Dale wrote: >>> Now let us pray that there is a fix soon enough. I miss my slideshow. :( >> >> You could track it here:

Re: [gentoo-user] A portage nuisance

On Sat, 28 Oct 2017 22:59:26 +0100 Anthony Youngman wrote: [...] > All I'm asking is that as it progresses, it makes a list of those > packages it can resolve the dependencies for. If it then gives up with > the current list it's processing, eg "world", it then goes back to the > list it thinks

Re: [gentoo-user] Plasmashell consuming huge amounts of memory.

On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 5:35 PM, Dale wrote: > P Levine wrote: > > > > On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 2:49 PM, Dale wrote: >> >> Now let us pray that there is a fix soon enough. I miss my slideshow. :( > > > You could track it here:

Re: [gentoo-user] Plasmashell consuming huge amounts of memory.

P Levine wrote: > > > On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 2:49 PM, Dale > wrote: > > Now let us pray that there is a fix soon enough.  I miss my > slideshow.  :( > > > You could track it here: ​https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=344879​ >

Re: [gentoo-user] Plasmashell consuming huge amounts of memory.

On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 2:49 PM, Dale wrote: > > Now let us pray that there is a fix soon enough. I miss my slideshow. :( > You could track it here: ​https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=344879​

Re: [gentoo-user] A portage nuisance

On 28/10/17 21:50, Alan McKinnon wrote: On 28/10/2017 22:39, Anthony Youngman wrote: On 28/10/17 20:54, Alan McKinnon wrote: Portage cannot do that, it is backed by silicon and has no concept of meaning. So it has only one real choice - it can do it all or it does not try. I'm not surprised

Re: [gentoo-user] A portage nuisance

On 28/10/2017 22:39, Anthony Youngman wrote: > On 28/10/17 20:54, Alan McKinnon wrote: >> Portage cannot do that, it is backed by silicon and has no concept of >> meaning. So it has only one real choice - it can do it all or it does >> not try. >> >> I'm not surprised Zac never tried implementing

Re: [gentoo-user] A portage nuisance

On 28/10/17 20:54, Alan McKinnon wrote: Portage cannot do that, it is backed by silicon and has no concept of meaning. So it has only one real choice - it can do it all or it does not try. I'm not surprised Zac never tried implementing partial graph resolution for the very simple reason that if

Re: [gentoo-user] bounces

I'm sorry, but I'm going to be rude here. I have no goddamn idea what the below paragraph means. It reads like my kids on a sugar high when they were 10. On 28/10/2017 21:54, mad.scientist.at.la...@tutanota.com wrote: > sorry, didn't realize that message posted, with getting a bounce >

Re: [gentoo-user] A portage nuisance

On 28/10/2017 19:58, Wols Lists wrote: > On 28/10/17 15:52, Andrew Savchenko wrote: >> On Fri, 27 Oct 2017 14:58:13 +0100 Peter Humphrey wrote: On Fri, 27 Oct 2017 12:52:54 - Helmut Jarausch wrote: >> I have a problem with emerge for a long time. >>

Re: [gentoo-user] bounces

sorry, didn't realize that message posted, with getting a bounce message.  resubscribing solved the problem, please disregard the post.  as far as headers, difficult to get with my current free provider and i can't see any reason headers would tell me why, suddenly, emails to list are bouncing

Re: [gentoo-user] bounces

On 28/10/2017 21:08, mad.scientist.at.la...@tutanota.com wrote: > why is my email to the list bouncing back at me??  I just tried twice. > > mad.scientist.at.large (a good madscientist) Any special reason why you did not post the bounce message complete with all headers? Because if

[gentoo-user] Re: systemd: "local system does not support BPF/cgroup based firewalling"

Alright, thanks. Looks like I'll have to live with that message for a while. Which isn't a big deal. On 28/10/17 21:58, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 1:44 PM, Nikos Chantziaras > wrote: > > There is no such kernel option.

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: systemd: "local system does not support BPF/cgroup based firewalling"

you should probably update your' kernel anyway, a lot of recent security fixes in the newer kernels. mad.scientist.at.large (a good madscientist) -- "The U.S. intelligence community concluded in a report made public in January that the Kremlin sought to disrupt the 2016 election and sway the

[gentoo-user] bounces

why is my email to the list bouncing back at me??  I just tried twice. mad.scientist.at.large (a good madscientist) -- "The U.S. intelligence community concluded in a report made public in January that the Kremlin sought to disrupt the 2016 election and sway the race in Trump's favor." 

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: systemd: "local system does not support BPF/cgroup based firewalling"

you should update the kernel anyway.  some serious security holes have recently been found and corrected in the newest kernel. mad.scientist.at.large (a good madscientist) -- "The U.S. intelligence community concluded in a report made public in January that the Kremlin sought to disrupt the

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: systemd: "local system does not support BPF/cgroup based firewalling"

updating the kernel is a really good idea, recent kernels have corrected a number of serious security issues that are definitely  real and exploitable. mad.scientist.at.large (a good madscientist) -- "The U.S. intelligence community concluded in a report made public in January that the Kremlin

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: systemd: "local system does not support BPF/cgroup based firewalling"

On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 1:44 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > > There is no such kernel option. Yes, there is[1]. However, there is no such option for kernel version 4.9[2], although there is for 4.10[3]. I think that's the problem, for using the firewall BPF options of systemd,

Re: [gentoo-user] Plasmashell consuming huge amounts of memory.

Dale wrote: > Just a little update, a recent update seems to have corrected this > issue.  The update to 5.11.2 doesn't seem to have the same memory hog > issue.  If anyone else is having this issue, upgrade to that version and > hopefully it will work like it should. > > Thanks to all for their

[gentoo-user] Re: systemd: "local system does not support BPF/cgroup based firewalling"

There is no such kernel option. On 28/10/17 21:21, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: Do you have CONFIG_CGROUP_BPF enabled? Regards. On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 1:03 PM, Nikos Chantziaras > wrote: I'm getting these at startup: systemd[1]: File

Re: [gentoo-user] Does Gentoo support more than 8 bits per color channel?

Helmut Jarausch wrote: > Hi, > I'm considering buying a new monitor (and graphics card) which > supports 10 bits per color channel. > Will Gimp on a Linux machine (X11) support this now or in the near > future. Or is it just waste of money to buy a monitor with more than > 8

Re: [gentoo-user] systemd: "local system does not support BPF/cgroup based firewalling"

Do you have CONFIG_CGROUP_BPF enabled? Regards. On Sat, Oct 28, 2017 at 1:03 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > I'm getting these at startup: > > systemd[1]: File /lib/systemd/system/systemd-journald.service:33 > configures an IP firewall (IPAddressDeny=any), but the local system

[gentoo-user] systemd: "local system does not support BPF/cgroup based firewalling"

I'm getting these at startup: systemd[1]: File /lib/systemd/system/systemd-journald.service:33 configures an IP firewall (IPAddressDeny=any), but the local system does not support BPF/cgroup based firewalling. systemd[1]: Proceeding WITHOUT firewalling in effect! systemd[1]: File

Re: [gentoo-user] A portage nuisance

On 28/10/17 15:52, Andrew Savchenko wrote: > On Fri, 27 Oct 2017 14:58:13 +0100 Peter Humphrey wrote: >> > On Fri, 27 Oct 2017 12:52:54 - >> > Helmut Jarausch wrote: >> > >>> > > I have a problem with emerge for a long time. >>> > > Sometimes I need to (re-)emerge many

Re: [gentoo-user] Alternatives to knutclient

On Saturday, 28 October 2017 15:18:26 BST Daniel Frey wrote: > On 10/28/2017 01:58 AM, Mick wrote: > > Hi All, > > > > I've been using the net-misc/knutclient GUI application to provide > > information to desktop users of the state of the UPS. Portage is telling > > me this package depends on

Re: [gentoo-user] Does Gentoo support more than 8 bits per color channel?

On Fri, 20 Oct 2017 16:17:37 - Helmut Jarausch wrote: > Hi, > I'm considering buying a new monitor (and graphics card) which supports > 10 bits per color channel. > Will Gimp on a Linux machine (X11) support this now or in the near future. > Or is it just waste of money to buy a monitor with

Re: [gentoo-user] A portage nuisance

On Fri, 27 Oct 2017 14:58:13 +0100 Peter Humphrey wrote: > On Fri, 27 Oct 2017 12:52:54 - > Helmut Jarausch wrote: > > > I have a problem with emerge for a long time. > > Sometimes I need to (re-)emerge many packages like in an > > emerge --emptytree @world > > > >

Re: [gentoo-user] Alternatives to knutclient

On 10/28/2017 01:58 AM, Mick wrote: Hi All, I've been using the net-misc/knutclient GUI application to provide information to desktop users of the state of the UPS. Portage is telling me this package depends on Qt4, it has received no development upstream and is due to be ditched: !!! The

[gentoo-user] Alternatives to knutclient

Hi All, I've been using the net-misc/knutclient GUI application to provide information to desktop users of the state of the UPS. Portage is telling me this package depends on Qt4, it has received no development upstream and is due to be ditched: !!! The following installed packages are