Re: [gentoo-user] preparing for profile switch -- major problem

On Sat, 09 Dec 2017 18:20:40 -0500, Daniel Frey wrote: > > On 12/09/17 08:18, John Covici wrote: > > On Sat, 09 Dec 2017 10:28:25 -0500, > > Daniel Frey wrote: > >> > >> I had a lot of problems with the perl updates as well, and could > >> not get it to resolve. I wasted over an hour trying to

[gentoo-user] Make failed to compile: symbol __alloca not found...

Hi, sys-devel/make-4.2.1-r1 failed to compile with this: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -DLOCALEDIR=\"/usr/share/locale\" -DLIBDIR=\"/usr/lib64\" -DINCLUDEDIR=\"/usr/include\" -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I./glob-march=native -O2 -pipe -c -o vpath.o vpath.c x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Is gnome becoming obligatory?

On Sat, Dec 9, 2017 at 5:36 PM, Peter Humphrey wrote: > On Saturday, 9 December 2017 12:00:12 GMT Jorge Almeida wrote: >> On Sat, Dec 9, 2017 at 10:45 AM, Mick wrote: >> > Thank you all for detailed and clear replies. You'd forgive me for >> >

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Is gnome becoming obligatory?

On Saturday, 9 December 2017 12:00:12 GMT Jorge Almeida wrote: > On Sat, Dec 9, 2017 at 10:45 AM, Mick wrote: > > Thank you all for detailed and clear replies. You'd forgive me for > > being (a little) paranoid about Poettering's fingers getting anywhere > > near my

Re: [gentoo-user] OT: btrfs raid 5/6

On Sat, Dec 9, 2017 at 1:28 PM, Wols Lists wrote: > On 09/12/17 16:58, J. Roeleveld wrote: >> On Friday, December 8, 2017 12:48:45 AM CET Wols Lists wrote: >>> On 07/12/17 22:35, Frank Steinmetzger wrote: > (Oh - and md raid-5/6 also mix data and parity, so the same

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Again, emerge -e @world related questions...

On 12/08/2017 09:53 AM, Melleus wrote: > I had moved to v 17.0 profile mostly painless, though it was a time > consuming event. But I got one point anyway. Python in my system was > updated from 3.4 to 3.5 and after 3.4 was removed with depclean, the > option for v 3.4 in eselect python remains.

Re: [gentoo-user] preparing for profile switch -- major problem

On Saturday, 9 December 2017 23:20:40 GMT Daniel Frey wrote: > I was trying to get the dependencies resolved so I could run > `emerge - auDNe world ... Really? Specifying -e overrules -uDN and makes them superfluous. Why would you want to do that? -- Regards, Peter.

Re: [gentoo-user] preparing for profile switch -- major problem

On 12/09/17 08:18, John Covici wrote: On Sat, 09 Dec 2017 10:28:25 -0500, Daniel Frey wrote: I had a lot of problems with the perl updates as well, and could not get it to resolve. I wasted over an hour trying to resolve it (my poor Celeron would take 5-10 minutes trying to calculate

Re: [gentoo-user] OT: btrfs raid 5/6

On 09/12/17 16:58, J. Roeleveld wrote: > On Friday, December 8, 2017 12:48:45 AM CET Wols Lists wrote: >> On 07/12/17 22:35, Frank Steinmetzger wrote: (Oh - and md raid-5/6 also mix data and parity, so the same holds true > there.) >>> >>> Ok, wasn’t aware of that. I thought I read

Re: [gentoo-user] autofs wants rpcgen despite libtirpc is USEd

On 12/09 12:04, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Sat, Dec 9, 2017 at 11:54 AM, wrote: > > On 12/09 06:27, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: > >> On Sat, Dec 9, 2017 at 6:03 PM, wrote: > >> > Hi, > >> > > >> > autofs-5.1.3 fails to compile: > >> > solfire:/root>emerge -v autofs

Re: [gentoo-user] autofs wants rpcgen despite libtirpc is USEd

On Sat, Dec 9, 2017 at 11:54 AM, wrote: > On 12/09 06:27, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: >> On Sat, Dec 9, 2017 at 6:03 PM, wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > autofs-5.1.3 fails to compile: >> > solfire:/root>emerge -v autofs >> > >> > These are the packages that would be

Re: [gentoo-user] OT: btrfs raid 5/6

On Friday, December 8, 2017 12:48:45 AM CET Wols Lists wrote: > On 07/12/17 22:35, Frank Steinmetzger wrote: > >> (Oh - and md raid-5/6 also mix data and parity, so the same holds true > >> > >> > there.) > > > > Ok, wasn’t aware of that. I thought I read in a ZFS article that this were > > a

Re: [gentoo-user] autofs wants rpcgen despite libtirpc is USEd

On 12/09 06:27, Alexander Kapshuk wrote: > On Sat, Dec 9, 2017 at 6:03 PM, wrote: > > Hi, > > > > autofs-5.1.3 fails to compile: > > solfire:/root>emerge -v autofs > > > > These are the packages that would be merged, in order: > > > > Calculating dependencies... done! > >

Re: [gentoo-user] setuptools (python) - how to disable the sandbox ?

On 12/09/2017 11:43 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: >> >> I wouldn't mind the package to write to its own working directory > > That's not usually a problem... what phase is this in, and which command > in the ebuild raised the error? > And now that I've actually read the error message, these

Re: [gentoo-user] setuptools (python) - how to disable the sandbox ?

On 12/09/2017 11:17 AM, Helmut Jarausch wrote: > Hi, > I want to create an ebuild for a package that's not in the tree > (http://pypi.python.org/pypi/grako) > > Unfortunately, this always fails due to > >File "/usr/lib64/python3.6/site-packages/setuptools/sandbox.py", > line 411, in

Re: [gentoo-user] preparing for profile switch -- major problem

On 09/12/2017 17:28, Daniel Frey wrote: >> hmmm, nothing masked as far as perl modules,  I will look at >> verbose-conflicts and maybe write down all those modules and start >> unmerging and see if eventually portage can figure out something -- I >> don't really want to  do that,  however I will

Re: [gentoo-user] autofs wants rpcgen despite libtirpc is USEd

On Sat, Dec 9, 2017 at 6:03 PM, wrote: > Hi, > > autofs-5.1.3 fails to compile: > solfire:/root>emerge -v autofs > > These are the packages that would be merged, in order: > > Calculating dependencies... done! > [ebuild R] net-fs/autofs-5.1.3::gentoo USE="libtirpc

Re: [gentoo-user] preparing for profile switch -- major problem

On Sat, 09 Dec 2017 10:28:25 -0500, Daniel Frey wrote: > > On 12/09/17 03:23, John Covici wrote: > > On Sat, 09 Dec 2017 03:51:03 -0500, > > Alan McKinnon wrote: > >> > >> On 08/12/2017 21:12, John Covici wrote: > >>> On Fri, 08 Dec 2017 11:42:16 -0500, > >>> Alan McKinnon wrote: > >

[gentoo-user] setuptools (python) - how to disable the sandbox ?

Hi, I want to create an ebuild for a package that's not in the tree (http://pypi.python.org/pypi/grako) Unfortunately, this always fails due to File "/usr/lib64/python3.6/site-packages/setuptools/sandbox.py", line 411, in _violation raise SandboxViolation(operation, args, kw)

[gentoo-user] autofs wants rpcgen despite libtirpc is USEd

Hi, autofs-5.1.3 fails to compile: solfire:/root>emerge -v autofs These are the packages that would be merged, in order: Calculating dependencies... done! [ebuild R] net-fs/autofs-5.1.3::gentoo USE="libtirpc -dmalloc -hesiod -ldap -mount-locking -sasl" 0 KiB Total: 1 package (1

Re: [gentoo-user] preparing for profile switch -- major problem

On 12/09/17 03:23, John Covici wrote: On Sat, 09 Dec 2017 03:51:03 -0500, Alan McKinnon wrote: On 08/12/2017 21:12, John Covici wrote: On Fri, 08 Dec 2017 11:42:16 -0500, Alan McKinnon wrote: On 07/12/2017 17:46, John Covici wrote: On Thu, 07 Dec 2017 09:37:56 -0500, Alan McKinnon wrote:

Re: [gentoo-user] net-wireless/blueman-2.1_alpha2 blocked by net-wireless/gnome-bluetooth - is it necessary?

On R, 2017-12-08 at 19:39 +0700, Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov wrote: > > > > Is it really necessary to block one package when another installed? > > Most of the time, the reason to make packages to block each other is  > collisions (if they they contain files (like binaries or libraries) > with

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Is gnome becoming obligatory?

On 09/12/2017 14:04, taii...@gmx.com wrote: > On 12/09/2017 05:45 AM, Mick wrote: >> On Saturday, 9 December 2017 10:34:32 GMT Nikos Chantziaras wrote: >>> On 09/12/17 11:51, Mick wrote: I've seen gnome-base/gnome-common pulled in on more than one systems, all of> which have

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Is gnome becoming obligatory?

On 12/09/2017 05:45 AM, Mick wrote: On Saturday, 9 December 2017 10:34:32 GMT Nikos Chantziaras wrote: On 09/12/17 11:51, Mick wrote: I've seen gnome-base/gnome-common pulled in on more than one systems, all of> which have USE="-gnome" set: # emerge -uaNDvt world These are the packages

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Is gnome becoming obligatory?

On Sat, Dec 9, 2017 at 10:45 AM, Mick wrote: > > Thank you all for detailed and clear replies. You'd forgive me for being (a > little) paranoid about Poettering's fingers getting anywhere near my systems. > :-p > Are you sure you need udisks? And policykit? I'm

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGs change but no filter/strip/replace in ebuild

> > I would strongly advise against that, just on principle. > > yasm is an assembler, and as such it's right at the bottom of the stack. > It's not unreasonable for such a package to use different FLAGS etc as > it's not a userland app. It's an app that builds things you use to build > a

Re: [gentoo-user] preparing for profile switch -- major problem

On Sat, 09 Dec 2017 03:51:03 -0500, Alan McKinnon wrote: > > On 08/12/2017 21:12, John Covici wrote: > > On Fri, 08 Dec 2017 11:42:16 -0500, > > Alan McKinnon wrote: > >> > >> On 07/12/2017 17:46, John Covici wrote: > >>> On Thu, 07 Dec 2017 09:37:56 -0500, > >>> Alan McKinnon wrote: > >

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Is gnome becoming obligatory?

On Saturday, 9 December 2017 10:34:32 GMT Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > On 09/12/17 11:51, Mick wrote: > > I've seen gnome-base/gnome-common pulled in on more than one systems, all > > of> > > which have USE="-gnome" set: > > # emerge -uaNDvt world > > > > These are the packages that would be

[gentoo-user] Re: Is gnome becoming obligatory?

On 09/12/17 11:51, Mick wrote: I've seen gnome-base/gnome-common pulled in on more than one systems, all of which have USE="-gnome" set: # emerge -uaNDvt world These are the packages that would be merged, in reverse order: [...] Calculating dependencies... done! [ebuild N ]

Re: [gentoo-user] Is gnome becoming obligatory?

On 09/12/2017 11:51, Mick wrote: > I've seen gnome-base/gnome-common pulled in on more than one systems, all of > which have USE="-gnome" set: > > # emerge -uaNDvt world > > These are the packages that would be merged, in reverse order: > > Calculating dependencies... done! > [nomerge ]

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGs change but no filter/strip/replace in ebuild

On 09/12/2017 11:37, Adam Carter wrote: > On Sat, Dec 9, 2017 at 8:10 PM, Alan McKinnon > wrote: > > On 09/12/2017 11:10, Adam Carter wrote: > > # grep -ic flags yasm-1.3.0.ebuild > > 0 > > > > However, emerge --info

Re: [gentoo-user] Is gnome becoming obligatory?

On Sat, Dec 9, 2017 at 11:51 AM, Mick wrote: > I've seen gnome-base/gnome-common pulled in on more than one systems, all of > which have USE="-gnome" set: > > # emerge -uaNDvt world > > These are the packages that would be merged, in reverse order: > > Calculating

[gentoo-user] Is gnome becoming obligatory?

I've seen gnome-base/gnome-common pulled in on more than one systems, all of which have USE="-gnome" set: # emerge -uaNDvt world These are the packages that would be merged, in reverse order: Calculating dependencies... done! [nomerge ] kde-apps/kdebase-meta-17.08.3:5::gentoo [nomerge

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGs change but no filter/strip/replace in ebuild

On Sat, Dec 9, 2017 at 8:10 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote: > On 09/12/2017 11:10, Adam Carter wrote: > > # grep -ic flags yasm-1.3.0.ebuild > > 0 > > > > However, emerge --info yasm shows me that only -march -O2 -pipe make it > > through. Where is the code that strips the

Re: [gentoo-user] install ebuilds from funtoo, zentoo distro overlay

On 09/12/2017 11:15, Kruglov Sergey wrote: > Hi! > > > How can I install ebuilds from funtoo, zentoo distro overlays? I can't > find any information about it. > Find the URL for those overlays on the internet, then follow "man layman" instructions to have them added to

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGs change but no filter/strip/replace in ebuild

On 09/12/2017 11:10, Adam Carter wrote: > # grep -ic flags yasm-1.3.0.ebuild > 0 > > However, emerge --info yasm shows me that only -march -O2 -pipe make it > through. Where is the code that strips the others? > Have you checked yasm's Makefile? -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com

[gentoo-user] install ebuilds from funtoo, zentoo distro overlay

Hi! How can I install ebuilds from funtoo, zentoo distro overlays? I can't find any information about it.

[gentoo-user] CFLAGs change but no filter/strip/replace in ebuild

# grep -ic flags yasm-1.3.0.ebuild 0 However, emerge --info yasm shows me that only -march -O2 -pipe make it through. Where is the code that strips the others?

Re: [gentoo-user] preparing for profile switch -- major problem

On 08/12/2017 21:12, John Covici wrote: > On Fri, 08 Dec 2017 11:42:16 -0500, > Alan McKinnon wrote: >> >> On 07/12/2017 17:46, John Covici wrote: >>> On Thu, 07 Dec 2017 09:37:56 -0500, >>> Alan McKinnon wrote: On 07/12/2017 07:44, John Covici wrote: > Hi. In preparing for the

Re: [gentoo-user] net-wireless/blueman-2.1_alpha2 blocked by net-wireless/gnome-bluetooth - is it necessary?

On 09/12/2017 02:47, Alexey Eschenko wrote: > Except that fact that I didn't unmasked it. You must have had a tree checkout slightly newer than mine. I just synced here and see that the mask has now been removed. It's quite unusual to unmask an alpha version, maybe raise it on b.g.o ? For the

Re: [gentoo-user] gambas-3.10.0 installed from jorgicio overlay can't run

On 12/08/2017 11:04 PM, Kruglov Sergey wrote: > I installed the 'gambas-3.10.0' from the overlay 'jorgicio' > (http://data.gpo.zugaina.org/jorgicio/dev-lang/gambas/) > And I can't run it. In /usr/bin/gambas3 there is a link to > 'gambas3.gambas' and 'gambas3.gambas' not found. > Maybe somebody