[gentoo-user] webkit-gtk-2.18.6 failed (compile phase)

and the output of `emerge -pqv '=net-libs/webkit-gtk-2.18.6::gentoo'`. * The complete build log is located at '/var/log/portage/net-libs:webkit-gtk-2.18.6:20180314-223248.log'. * For convenience, a symlink to the build log is located at '/var/tmp/portage/net-libs/webkit-gtk-2.18.6/temp/build.l

Re: [gentoo-user] pdftk - replacement

On 03/14/2018 08:52 PM, Danny YUE wrote: > > On 2018-03-14 20:08, Poncho wrote: >> On 14.03.2018 20:10, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: >>> Is there a suitable replacement package for "pdftk". >>> Currently pdftk is masked and might be dropped from portage tree :-/ >>> >>> The

[gentoo-user] Re: pdftk - replacement

On 2018-03-14, Peter Humphrey wrote: > On Wednesday, 14 March 2018 19:48:36 GMT Grant Edwards wrote: >> On 2018-03-14, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: >> > Is there a suitable replacement package for "pdftk". >> >> I'm assuming that was meant as a

Re: [gentoo-user] pdftk - replacement

On 2018-03-14 20:08, Poncho wrote: > On 14.03.2018 20:10, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: >> Is there a suitable replacement package for "pdftk". >> Currently pdftk is masked and might be dropped from portage tree :-/ >> >> The packages require GCC 5 or earlier and are

[gentoo-user] Re: A new AMD CPU weakness?

On 14/03/18 02:54, Ian Zimmerman wrote: https://v.gd/PZkiuR Does anyone know more details? This looks like it's either completely fake, or based on half-truths: http://www.guru3d.com/news-story/amd-security-vulnerability-%E2%80%93-the-day-after-seems-financially-motivated.html

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: pdftk - replacement

On Wednesday, 14 March 2018 19:48:36 GMT Grant Edwards wrote: > On 2018-03-14, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > > Is there a suitable replacement package for "pdftk". > > I'm assuming that was meant as a question? It was phrased as a question, so yes, it was a question.

Re: [gentoo-user] install problem: dev-texlive/texlive-basic-2017-r1

Thelma: > I just upgraded two system and did not run into any problem with > dev-texlive/texlive-basic-2017-r1 > > Try unmerging previous version if you have one installed and try again. No, didn't have any, thanks for answering anyhow. Regards, /Karl Hammar

Re: [gentoo-user] pdftk - replacement

On 03/14/2018 02:01 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Wed, 14 Mar 2018 13:10:21 -0600, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > >> Is there a suitable replacement package for "pdftk". >> Currently pdftk is masked and might be dropped from portage tree :-/ >> >> The packages require GCC 5 or earlier and are

Re: [gentoo-user] pdftk - replacement

On 14.03.2018 20:10, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > Is there a suitable replacement package for "pdftk". > Currently pdftk is masked and might be dropped from portage tree :-/ > > The packages require GCC 5 or earlier and are therefore masked in the > 17.0 profiles. > > I use pdftk only to

Re: [gentoo-user] pdftk - replacement

On Wed, 14 Mar 2018 13:10:21 -0600, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > Is there a suitable replacement package for "pdftk". > Currently pdftk is masked and might be dropped from portage tree :-/ > > The packages require GCC 5 or earlier and are therefore masked in the > 17.0 profiles. > > I use

[gentoo-user] Re: pdftk - replacement

On 2018-03-14, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > Is there a suitable replacement package for "pdftk". I'm assuming that was meant as a question? A few seconds with Google came up with these: https://packages.gentoo.org/packages/app-text/qpdf

Re: [gentoo-user] install problem: dev-texlive/texlive-basic-2017-r1

On 03/14/2018 01:35 PM, k...@aspodata.se wrote: > Is this a bug or is there something wrong on my side ? > > * Messages for package dev-texlive/texlive-basic-2017-r1: > > * ERROR: dev-texlive/texlive-basic-2017-r1::gentoo failed (compile phase): > * failed to build format

[gentoo-user] install problem: dev-texlive/texlive-basic-2017-r1

Is this a bug or is there something wrong on my side ? * Messages for package dev-texlive/texlive-basic-2017-r1: * ERROR: dev-texlive/texlive-basic-2017-r1::gentoo failed (compile phase): * failed to build format texmf-dist/fmtutil/format.texlive-basic.cnf * * Call stack: *

[gentoo-user] pdftk - replacement

Is there a suitable replacement package for "pdftk". Currently pdftk is masked and might be dropped from portage tree :-/ The packages require GCC 5 or earlier and are therefore masked in the 17.0 profiles. I use pdftk only to merge two pdf file (overlap tax form). eg. pdftk t4-flat-02b.pdf

[gentoo-user] system wants to install "cups" unstable

Running: emerge @preserved-rebuild my system wants to install "net-print/cups-2.2.6" unstable. I don't know why? emerge -avq @preserved-rebuild [ebuild R ] dev-perl/DBD-Pg-3.5.3 [ebuild U ] net-print/cups-2.2.6 [2.1.4] USE="X dbus java pam ssl threads -acl -debug -kerberos

Re: [gentoo-user][SOLVED] emerge --oneshot portage

On 03/13/2018 06:56 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote: [snip] > > Do you have PYTHON_TARGETS or PYTHON_SINGLE_TARGET set anywhere? If so, > unset it. Try "grep -r PYTHON /etc/portage/make.conf" > > Once you have unset those variables, try a world update rather than > trying to cherry pick when you think

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge --oneshot portage

On Wed, 14 Mar 2018 13:32:24 +, Peter Humphrey wrote: > > If portage needed to be emerged first, portage would do so. That used > > to be the approach years ago, when portage updates were more > > significant. > > There's still room for confusion, though. For a long time, an update to >

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge --oneshot portage

On Wednesday, 14 March 2018 09:26:17 GMT Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Tue, 13 Mar 2018 19:41:39 -0600, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > > > Once you have unset those variables, try a world update rather than > > > trying to cherry pick when you think needs to be updated. > > > > " emerge -uDNavq

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge --oneshot portage

On Tue, 13 Mar 2018 19:41:39 -0600, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > > Once you have unset those variables, try a world update rather than > > trying to cherry pick when you think needs to be updated. > > " emerge -uDNavq world" appears to be working (and new "portage" is > there). I have

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: How to I keep the build log?

Le 14/03/18 à 05:37, Nikos Chantziaras a tapoté : > You know how it is. As soon you ask, you find the answer anyway... :P > >FEATURES=keeptemp emerge foo-bar/baz Or : - enable PORT_LOGDIR in make.conf - add (optionally) some FEATURES like clean-logs or split-log See man 5 make.conf. > $