I have app-office/glabels installed with (barcode -eds)
but the style menus is not showing "GNU Barcode
Is it a bug?
--
Thelma
On 2020-12-05 01:04- Grant Edwards
wrote:
> On 2020-12-04, tastytea wrote:
> > On 2020-12-04 17:39- Grant Edwards
> > wrote:
> >> [...]
> >>
> >> I used to use 'python-updater' to take care of that, but it's
> >> gone. What are we supposed to use in its place?
> >>
> >> Are we just
On 2020-12-04, tastytea wrote:
> On 2020-12-04 17:39- Grant Edwards
> wrote:
>> [...]
>>
>> I used to use 'python-updater' to take care of that, but it's
>> gone. What are we supposed to use in its place?
>>
>> Are we just supposed to manually re-emerge various python modules over
>> the
On Friday, 4 December 2020 20:33:35 GMT the...@sys-concept.com wrote:
> Is there a use flag or setting in make.conf to instruct all up to
> default to "US Letter" size paper.
>
> Changing the defaults is not easy on gentoo. I have some notes but the
> configuration files and setting keep
On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 23:19:00 +0100, n952162 wrote:
> > Okay, I've never done a depclean. Is that something I need to do? I
> > mean, I'm always worried it'd remove something that I need, but given
> > all the problems I have, I guess that'd be the lesser of evils...
Yes you should, t keep your
You seem to not really understand how gentoo works.
On 2020.12.04 17:19, n952162 wrote:
On 12/4/20 11:13 PM, n952162 wrote:
On 12/4/20 10:49 PM, Arve Barsnes wrote:
On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 at 21:24, n952162 wrote:
I guess you mean, remove them all and then let emerge tell me
which
ones
I need.
On 12/4/20 11:13 PM, n952162 wrote:
On 12/4/20 10:49 PM, Arve Barsnes wrote:
On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 at 21:24, n952162 wrote:
I guess you mean, remove them all and then let emerge tell me which
ones
I need. I'll try that. But isn't '=' more restrictive than '>=',
promising me troubles earlier?
On 12/4/20 10:49 PM, Arve Barsnes wrote:
On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 at 21:24, n952162 wrote:
I guess you mean, remove them all and then let emerge tell me which ones
I need. I'll try that. But isn't '=' more restrictive than '>=',
promising me troubles earlier?
The earlier you encounter any
On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 at 21:24, n952162 wrote:
> > I guess you mean, remove them all and then let emerge tell me which ones
> > I need. I'll try that. But isn't '=' more restrictive than '>=',
> > promising me troubles earlier?
The earlier you encounter any conflicts, they're generally easier to
Is there a use flag or setting in make.conf to instruct all up to
default to "US Letter" size paper.
Changing the defaults is not easy on gentoo. I have some notes but the
configuration files and setting keep changing so hunting all the config
files is time taking.
When the Print windows
On 12/4/20 9:00 PM, n952162 wrote:
On 12/4/20 8:52 PM, n952162 wrote:
On 12/4/20 11:07 AM, Arve Barsnes wrote:
On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 at 10:34, n952162 wrote:
Forgotten about? I'm flattered! That would imply I understood
something here ...
Here's my python situation:
$ sed -n -e '/^\s*#/d'
On 12/4/20 8:52 PM, n952162 wrote:
On 12/4/20 11:07 AM, Arve Barsnes wrote:
On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 at 10:34, n952162 wrote:
Forgotten about? I'm flattered! That would imply I understood
something here ...
Here's my python situation:
$ sed -n -e '/^\s*#/d' -e '/python/Ip' * | sort -u
*/*
On 12/4/20 11:07 AM, Arve Barsnes wrote:
On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 at 10:34, n952162 wrote:
Forgotten about? I'm flattered! That would imply I understood
something here ...
Here's my python situation:
$ sed -n -e '/^\s*#/d' -e '/python/Ip' * | sort -u
*/* PYTHON_TARGETS: python3_7
On 12/04/2020 11:28 AM, Diagon wrote:
> One more:
>
> Using genkernel, is there a way to make sure a module is included in the
> initramfs?
>
> /D
>
>
>
> > Could someone clarify for me what `genkernel --menuconfig` is doing?
> >
> > Is it equivalent to a manual kernel
On 2020-12-04 17:39- Grant Edwards
wrote:
> Yesterday when I did my usual update/clean, Python 3.7 was removed and
> a bunch of stuff was re-installed for Python 3.8. However, there are
> still things (e.g. markdown) that I've had to manually re-emerge to
> get them rebuilt for 3.8.
>
> I
One more:
Using genkernel, is there a way to make sure a module is included in the
initramfs?
/D
> Could someone clarify for me what `genkernel --menuconfig` is doing?
>
> Is it equivalent to a manual kernel config, only saving me the `make` &&
> `make install`?
>
>
Could someone clarify for me what `genkernel --menuconfig` is doing?
Is it equivalent to a manual kernel config, only saving me the `make` && `make
install`?
Or is it setting what `genkernel all` would set, and letting you modify that?
Do I run it as `genkernel --menuconfig all` ? As
Yesterday when I did my usual update/clean, Python 3.7 was removed and
a bunch of stuff was re-installed for Python 3.8. However, there are
still things (e.g. markdown) that I've had to manually re-emerge to
get them rebuilt for 3.8.
I used to use 'python-updater' to take care of that, but it's
Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 12/4/20 1:44 AM, Dale wrote:
>>
>> Will opentmpfiles be fixed at some point or is it true that it can't be
>> fixed? On -dev, I think I read where one person said it can't be
>> fixed. In that case, switching is likely a good idea since the insecure
>> package can't
> You mean [ init system sys-apps/s6 ] ? It is still been marked
> test yellow
>
> flag. I think most of users are using openrc and systemd,
> Be carefull
>
> to use it, seems maybe no enough support to solve problems.
It's supported pretty well at s6, from what I've
> -- 原始邮件 --
> 发 件 人："Steven Lembark"
> 发送时间：2020-12-04 23:04:31
> 收 件 人：gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
> 抄 送：lemb...@wrkhors.com
> 主 题：[gentoo-user] Anyone have experience, good or bad, with s6?
>
>
> Seems like a reasonable idea, wondering if anyone has seen
Seems like a reasonable idea, wondering if anyone has seen particularly
good or bad results from trying to use it (on gentoo or anything else).
Thanks
--
Steven Lembark
Workhorse Computing
lemb...@wrkhors.com
+1 888 359 3508
On 12/4/20 1:44 AM, Dale wrote:
Will opentmpfiles be fixed at some point or is it true that it can't be
fixed? On -dev, I think I read where one person said it can't be
fixed. In that case, switching is likely a good idea since the insecure
package can't be fixed.
The answer is a bit
On 12/4/20 5:47 AM, Michael wrote:
If sys-apps/opentmpfiles is installed on openrc profiles, will this be
depracated and replaced with sys-apps/systemd-tmpfiles, or is this something
we should do manually ourselves?
Only the default is being changed for now, so you should swap them yourself.
On 12/4/20 3:55 AM, tastytea wrote:
From what I could gather, opentmpfiles is only vulnerable when an
attacker is able to put a config file into /etc/tmpfiles.d/, so they
have to be already root.
The exploit does require an entry in /etc/tmpfiles.d, but many packages
install perfectly
On Friday, 4 December 2020 02:18:49 GMT Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 12/3/20 8:40 PM, Dale wrote:
> > Howdy,
> >
> > I've mentioned I follow -dev to see what is coming around the corner.
> > There is a thread on there about switching tmpfiles packages for
> > security reasons. I currently have
On Friday, 4 December 2020 09:09:36 GMT antlists wrote:
> On 04/12/2020 01:40, Dale wrote:
> > Also, our local power company is about to start rolling out internet
> > service. It's done with fiber and the slowest package, 200MBs/sec, is
> > over 100 times faster than my current DSL. It only
> There seems to be some python3_6 and even python2_7 in your error
> output, maybe you have set some older python targets somewhere that
> you've forgotten about?
>
Yeah I was thinking the same.
If 'grep -i python /etc/portage/*' is not empty, try making it that way. On
my system with 1323
On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 at 10:34, n952162 wrote:
> Forgotten about? I'm flattered! That would imply I understood
> something here ...
>
> Here's my python situation:
>
> $ sed -n -e '/^\s*#/d' -e '/python/Ip' * | sort -u
> */* PYTHON_TARGETS: python3_7
> >=dev-lang/python-2.7.16:2.7 sqlite
>
antlists wrote:
> On 04/12/2020 01:40, Dale wrote:
>> Also, our local power company is about to start rolling out internet
>> service. It's done with fiber and the slowest package, 200MBs/sec, is
>> over 100 times faster than my current DSL. It only costs $4.00 a month
>> more than what I'm
On 12/4/20 9:53 AM, Arve Barsnes wrote:
On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 at 09:40, n952162 wrote:
!!! Multiple package instances within a single package slot have been pulled
!!! into the dependency graph, resulting in a slot conflict:
dev-python/requests:0
(dev-python/requests-2.24.0-r1:0/0::gentoo,
On 04/12/2020 08:53, Arve Barsnes wrote:
There seems to be some python3_6 and even python2_7 in your error
output, maybe you have set some older python targets somewhere that
you've forgotten about?
Or maybe he hasn't set any and the defaults are wrong? I'm guessing
that's the case with me.
On 04/12/2020 01:40, Dale wrote:
Also, our local power company is about to start rolling out internet
service. It's done with fiber and the slowest package, 200MBs/sec, is
over 100 times faster than my current DSL. It only costs $4.00 a month
more than what I'm paying now. Their fastest
On 2020-12-03 19:40-0600 Dale wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> I've mentioned I follow -dev to see what is coming around the corner.
> There is a thread on there about switching tmpfiles packages for
> security reasons. I currently have sys-apps/opentmpfiles installed.
> I guess that is the default for
On Fri, 4 Dec 2020 at 09:40, n952162 wrote:
> !!! Multiple package instances within a single package slot have been pulled
> !!! into the dependency graph, resulting in a slot conflict:
>
> dev-python/requests:0
>
>(dev-python/requests-2.24.0-r1:0/0::gentoo, ebuild scheduled for
> merge)
On 12/3/20 10:06 PM, tastytea wrote:
On 2020-12-03 21:33+0100 n952162 wrote:
I'm trying to update the gentoo system that I last updated 6 weeks
ago, but it seems not to work. Can somebody explain to me why?
Python 3.8 is the new default target and not all packages support it
yet. You can
On 12/3/20 10:11 PM, Adam Carter wrote:
On Fri, Dec 4, 2020 at 8:06 AM tastytea mailto:gen...@tastytea.de>> wrote:
On 2020-12-03 21:33+0100 n952162 mailto:n952...@web.de>> wrote:
> I'm trying to update the gentoo system that I last updated 6 weeks
> ago, but it seems not to work.
37 matches
Mail list logo
