Re: [gentoo-user] google SMTP with postfix - Password not accepted

On Tuesday, 20 June 2023 09:55:10 BST William Kenworthy wrote: > getmail can facilitate getting googlemail into postfix. In my case, it > fetches an mail then invokes sendemail to forward into postfix. The > docs for the google side of the equation are quite good. Coming to this after a while,

Re: [gentoo-user] Getting output of a program running in background after a crash

Frank Steinmetzger wrote: > Am Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 08:35:21PM -0500 schrieb Dale: > >> Frank Steinmetzger wrote: >>> Am Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 10:44:39PM +0100 schrieb Michael: >>> Why don't you test throughput without encryption to confirm your assumption? >>> What does `cryptsetup

Re: [gentoo-user] Getting output of a program running in background after a crash

Am Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 08:35:21PM -0500 schrieb Dale: > Frank Steinmetzger wrote: > > Am Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 10:44:39PM +0100 schrieb Michael: > > > >> Why don't you test throughput without encryption to confirm your > >> assumption? > > What does `cryptsetup benchmark` say? I used to use a

Re: [gentoo-user] Getting output of a program running in background after a crash

> I'm planning on my new rig having the Ryzen 5900X. Is the 5950 better? While I've kinda picked that one, I'm open to ideas if it is faster and I can afford it. As it is, I'm looking at between $300 and $350 for the 5900. My last CPU cost a little over $100. > I'm not going to say one is

Re: [gentoo-user] Getting output of a program running in background after a crash

Mark Knecht wrote: > > > On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 10:02 AM Dale > wrote: > > > > Michael wrote: > > > > On Friday, 13 October 2023 02:35:21 BST Dale wrote: > > > > root@fireball / # cryptsetup benchmark > > # Tests are approximate using memory only (no storage IO). > >

Re: [gentoo-user] Getting output of a program running in background after a crash

On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 10:02 AM Dale wrote: > > Michael wrote: > > On Friday, 13 October 2023 02:35:21 BST Dale wrote: > > root@fireball / # cryptsetup benchmark > # Tests are approximate using memory only (no storage IO). > PBKDF2-sha1 878204 iterations per second for 256-bit key >

Re: [gentoo-user] Getting output of a program running in background after a crash

Michael wrote: > On Friday, 13 October 2023 02:35:21 BST Dale wrote: > >> root@fireball / # cryptsetup benchmark >> # Tests are approximate using memory only (no storage IO). >> PBKDF2-sha1 878204 iterations per second for 256-bit key >> PBKDF2-sha256 911805 iterations per second for

[gentoo-user] Re: Video card. Will this work for me?

On 2023-10-13, Dale wrote: > As most likely know, I'm in the process of building a new rig and > putting a couple older systems to use.  Most of my mobos support > PCIe-x16 2.0 for video cards.  I found a Nvidia NVS 510 that has four > mini HDMI outputs.  Research claims those are for multiple

[gentoo-user] Video card. Will this work for me?

Howdy, As most likely know, I'm in the process of building a new rig and putting a couple older systems to use.  Most of my mobos support PCIe-x16 2.0 for video cards.  I found a Nvidia NVS 510 that has four mini HDMI outputs.  Research claims those are for multiple monitors, in other words not

Re: [gentoo-user] Getting output of a program running in background after a crash

On Friday, 13 October 2023 02:35:21 BST Dale wrote: > root@fireball / # cryptsetup benchmark > # Tests are approximate using memory only (no storage IO). > PBKDF2-sha1 878204 iterations per second for 256-bit key > PBKDF2-sha256 911805 iterations per second for 256-bit key >