Re: [gentoo-user] KDE 3.5.10 in portage...

2008-09-16 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Sunday 14 September 2008 22:37:21 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: Making the 'official' overlay paludis-only was a BIG mistake. It's not paludis-only, it will work with any package manager whose developers care enough to support the useful features of the kdebuild-1 EAPI. and that was

Re: [gentoo-user] Speed up with pbzip2 or not!?

2008-01-27 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Sunday 27 January 2008 18:29:56 Enrico Weigelt wrote: Why not an universal wrapper script ? maybe something like:     magic-uncompress [-t format] [-c] [-o output] input     This script could try to find out the input format automatically (the optional -t parameter allows to explicitly

Re: [gentoo-user] Solid with Networkmanager Support

2008-01-27 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Sunday 27 January 2008 20:03:32 Thomas Kahle wrote: i'm trying to get Networkmanager support in KDE, but i cannot compile kde-base/solid with networkmanager use flag. It seems like portage just filters the flag, as it is in braces... emerge output shows USE=bluetooth (-networkmanager)

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE4.0?

2008-01-26 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Saturday 26 January 2008 10:59:15 Neil Bothwick wrote: On Fri, 25 Jan 2008 21:19:48 -0800 (PST), maxim wexler wrote: [blocks B ] kde-base/kdebase-3.5.7-r6 (is blocking kde-base/kdelibs-4.0.0) From the gentoo-kde4-faq: Q: You said I could install KDE 3.5 and KDE 4.0, but they

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE4.0?

2008-01-26 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Saturday 26 January 2008 02:21:23 maxim wexler wrote: #emerge -avD kde-base/kde-meta:kde-4 eight times and everytime I needed to add something to package.keywords, like so: =x11-libs/qt-4.3.3 ~x86 =app-crypt/gpgme-1.1.6 ~x86 =dev-util/cmake-2.4.7-r1 ~x86 =dev-libs/rasqal-0.9.15 ~x86

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE4.0?

2008-01-25 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Friday 25 January 2008 19:45:39 maxim wexler wrote: Which is rather pointless given that the KDE docs provides example package.{keywords,unmask} files... http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/desktop/kde/kde4.xml Thanks for this. The link from kde.org goes to a page dated Dec 11 2007 which

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE4.0?

2008-01-24 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Thursday 24 January 2008 21:33:12 Dale wrote: I emerged autounamsk and used the command autounmask kde-base/kde-meta-4.0.0 without the quotes of course.  There may be a block or two.  I had one that involved qt.  I also had to mask qt 4.4 since it does not have dbus support. Which is

Re: [gentoo-user] Polymake Ebuild and general questions

2008-01-24 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Sunday 20 January 2008 17:57:51 Thomas Kahle wrote: I've written an ebuild for a math-software called polymake (www.math.tu-berlin.de/polymake). You find it attached. You have to digest it yourself to use. (ebuild polymake-2.3.ebuild digest) Maybe some people could test it (on amd64 for

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE4 first impressions

2008-01-22 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Monday 21 January 2008 09:42:17 Alan McKinnon wrote: Kontact works properly and so does the kmail component. kmail on it's own does not work. wtf is up with that anyway? erm... kdepim (including kontact and kmail) wasn't released with kde 4.0.0 at all... -- Bo Andresen signature.asc

Re: [gentoo-user] Once again baffled by portage

2008-01-19 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Friday 18 January 2008 15:36:29 Alan McKinnon wrote: Roll on KDE4 when this monolithic nonsense will go away and there will only be -meta ebuilds. Actually it was decided to keep monolithics in KDE 4.0.0. Splits are now the default which means they are listed first in any-of

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS

2008-01-17 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Thursday 17 January 2008 17:10:11 Alan McKinnon wrote: Itanium2. You don't want to go there. Trust me. It's a bastard evolution of one of Intel's worst ideas ever I thought that would be Pentium 4 EE. :P -- Bo Andresen signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message

Re: [gentoo-user] Once again baffled by portage

2008-01-17 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Thursday 17 January 2008 16:28:24 Grant Edwards wrote: How does one figure out where these blocks are coming from? There are no other versions of kompare installed. kde-base/kdesdk-3.5.7 _is_ installed. http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/kde-split-ebuilds.xml -- Bo Andresen signature.asc

Re: [gentoo-user] Once again baffled by portage

2008-01-17 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Thursday 17 January 2008 17:06:28 Alan McKinnon wrote: Roll on KDE4 when this monolithic nonsense will go away and there will only be -meta ebuilds. Actually it was decided to keep monolithics in KDE 4.0.0. Splits are now the default which means they are listed first in any-of dependency

Re: [gentoo-user] Once again baffled by portage

2008-01-17 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Friday 18 January 2008 01:08:51 Neil Bothwick wrote: Actually it was decided to keep monolithics in KDE 4.0.0. Splits are now the default which means they are listed first in any-of dependency blocks such as e.g. || ( kde-base/kompare:kde-4 kde-base/kdesdk:kde-4 ) in KDE 4. But monos

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Is GWN dead?

2008-01-14 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Monday 14 January 2008 10:48:08 Etaoin Shrdlu wrote: You can use Daniel Robbins' stage3s: Why should I? They're likely also built with different use flags than the ones I use. Thus I will end up recompiling anyway. Ah ok, I wrongly thought yours was more a problem of outdated stage3

Re: [gentoo-user] SSH tunnel With Portage

2008-01-14 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Monday 14 January 2008 14:03:52 Alan McKinnon wrote: Now I am confused. Why do you run Putty on a Linux machine? I used it once just to confuse and confound co-workers and have it runable in Wine just to impress some other people. You do not need wine to run putty on Linux. There's a UNIX

Re: [gentoo-user] KDE4 overlay

2008-01-11 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Friday 11 January 2008 22:26:34 Alan McKinnon wrote: Anyone know where this overlay disappeared to? It moved to git. Assuming dev-util/git is installed: # layman -f layman -d kde layman -a kde Having said that KDE 4.0.0 should show up as package.mask'ed in gentoo-x86 within a few days.

Re: [gentoo-user] Suddenly emerging unstable packages = why?

2008-01-08 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Tuesday 08 January 2008 23:30:51 Kevin O'Gorman wrote: However, it is true that emerge sync and eix-update were in two separate jobs scheduled an hour apart. It is vaguely conceivable that they got out of step somehow. I've unified them, and hope things go better now. [...] Any

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: besides package.use where to store info needed at emerge

2008-01-03 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Thursday 03 January 2008 19:12:50 Neil Bothwick wrote: On Thu, 03 Jan 2008 12:01:07 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sorry to keep nagging with this but I must still not have it right. I do not see that compile flag being set during emerge: It looks like the cvs ebuild doesn't use

Re: [gentoo-user] removing X

2007-12-31 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Monday 24 December 2007 18:31:16 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm attempting to remove X from a former desktop machine now going to see action as a semi-DMZ. What is the best way to go about removing X and all its files. Removing the basic x11-base/xorg-x11 is easy enough but there appears

Re: [gentoo-user] No help on annoying `sandbox' error

2007-12-31 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Friday 28 December 2007 22:58:27 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm having a continuing annoying problem from sandbox trying to write out of its crib. I've posted here twice before but caught no ones attention. Possibly this is something screamingly obvious and people just ignored the posts.

Re: [gentoo-user] Paludis newbie questions [was: Excellent Paludis interview]

2007-12-29 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Sunday 23 December 2007 18:56:40 David Relson wrote: I suspect a better worded message would have let me find the mistake Such as? -- Bo Andresen signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [gentoo-user] Paludis newbie questions [was: Excellent Paludis interview]

2007-12-23 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Saturday 22 December 2007 20:09:40 David Relson wrote: As I'm a paludis newbie and as it allows a multitude of settings, I used portage2paludis.bash to create /etc/paludis/use.conf. Whatever is missing from use.conf is a combination of my ignorance and the script. A copy of use.conf is

Re: [gentoo-user] Paludis newbie questions [was: Excellent Paludis interview]

2007-12-22 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Saturday 22 December 2007 02:50:54 David Relson wrote: I'm experimenting with paludis. Seems fine, though a bit verbose and cryptic. Running paludis -i world produces: Unhandled exception: * In program paludis -i world: * When making environment from specification '': *

Re: [gentoo-user] Rebuilding world system after -march change

2007-12-21 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Friday 21 December 2007 17:39:50 Marzan, Richard non Unisys wrote: Recently, I've changed the -march from k8 to athlon64 and it failed to build packages. Am I doing something wrong here? I suspect that I am supposed to rebuild some packages first before rebuilding with emerge -eDNtv system

Re: [gentoo-user] re-emerge glibc after linux-headers update?

2007-12-21 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Thursday 20 December 2007 16:56:37 Grant wrote: The ELOG for my linux-headers update says: Kernel headers are usually only used when recompiling your system libc, as such, following the installation of newer headers, it is advised that you re-merge your system libc. Failure to do so will

Re: [gentoo-user] Excellent Paludis interview

2007-12-20 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Thursday 20 December 2007 10:08:13 Rumen Yotov wrote: Watch out for some scripts (perl-cleaner, claw-mail, etc.) in which the use of portage/emerge is embedded. Put 'paludis' as USE-flag. Unless you use a crappy, unsupported overlay no such use flag exists. [...] Regarding claws-mail

Re: [gentoo-user] Excellent Paludis interview

2007-12-20 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Thursday 20 December 2007 09:43:20 Neil Bothwick wrote: flagedit will warn you if you have any unsupported USE flags set. That and eix-test-obsolete are useful for keeping make.conf and /etc/portage clear of cruft. And the config-decruft ruby script that can be used with Paludis can do the

Re: [gentoo-user] Excellent Paludis interview

2007-12-19 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Wednesday 19 December 2007 21:37:38 Rumen Yotov wrote: Watch out for some scripts (perl-cleaner, claw-mail, etc.) in which the use of portage/emerge is embedded. Put 'paludis' as USE-flag. Unless you use a crappy, unsupported overlay no such use flag exists. Kind of curious how that relates

Re: [gentoo-user] Persistent revdep-rebuild issues: sun-jdk-1.4.2.16

2007-12-19 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Thursday 20 December 2007 02:43:04 Dale wrote: I have had mine showing it needed to recompile gcc for a very long time now.  There is also a bug for it too.  It has been there for a really long time.  There are hacks to work around the bug but some don't like the hack and neither did I.  I

Re: [gentoo-user] Excellent Paludis interview

2007-12-19 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Thursday 20 December 2007 02:46:20 Iain Buchanan wrote: And the recent addition of the option '--continue-on-failure' won me over all over again. :) I've been wondering for a long time why portage doesn't continue with building other packages when one fails - so long as deps are met why

Re: [gentoo-user] Python vs C++ [was: Gentoo Rules]

2007-12-17 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Monday 17 December 2007 14:38:30 Raphael wrote: So, even if Portage was recoded in C++, performance improvements would be marginal and the cost in man-hours would be too high. It would take months before reaching the maturity level Portage has now and all this time could be better spent

Re: [gentoo-user] Python vs C++ [was: Gentoo Rules]

2007-12-17 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Monday 17 December 2007 16:14:24 Raphael wrote: Hey, I made someone laugh today. Good deed of the day: check! :P :) I was unaware of Paludis. Re-reading the thread now, I saw that someone mentioned it. After googling for it, seems a lot of people are fond of it. Why is it not the default

Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo Rules

2007-12-16 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Saturday 15 December 2007 20:00:54 Grant wrote: The real blocker for features that I'd like Gentoo to support is Portage. There is only 1½ people working on it and changing anything in it is hard because Portage is a horrible mess. There's plenty of activity in the tree but new

Re: [gentoo-user] Python vs C++ [was: Gentoo Rules]

2007-12-16 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Sunday 16 December 2007 20:32:58 Randy Barlow wrote: C++ is most certainly going to yield faster programs since it is a machine compiled language and python is interpreted. In this case it's not really significant. The biggest performance hit for a package manager for Gentoo remains I/O no

Re: [gentoo-user] Python vs C++ [was: Gentoo Rules]

2007-12-16 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Sunday 16 December 2007 22:04:52 Randy Barlow wrote: Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote: In this case it's not really significant. The biggest performance hit for a package manager for Gentoo remains I/O no matter which language you use... Yeah, you are right - although there is one step

Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo Rules

2007-12-15 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Saturday 15 December 2007 03:35:51 Grant wrote: My ideas aren't really important unless they're everyone else's ideas too. What is it exactly you want to achieve by starting these pointless threads? -- Bo Andresen signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo Rules

2007-12-15 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Saturday 15 December 2007 15:05:28 Grant wrote: Neil correctly translated my pseudo-English to what I actually meant. I don't want to make Portage binary based. I just want to make Portage's binary package support more conveniently usable on big networks. Even eclasses in the tree don't

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Emerging virtual/editor installs nano - why?

2007-12-07 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Friday 07 December 2007 16:21:31 Alexander Skwar wrote: So the expectation should be, that it's not going to be possible to preselect an mta the way I've shown, as soon as virtual/mta is converted to a new style virtual. Is that right? Is there work going on to change all the old style

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Emerging virtual/editor installs nano - why?

2007-12-07 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Friday 07 December 2007 18:58:57 Alexander Skwar wrote: You are right except for the fact that virtual/mta will not be converted any time soon (if ever). Old style virtuals allow their providers to block all other providers by blocking the virtual. This isn't possible with the current

Re: [gentoo-user] Orphan libraries in my system

2007-12-03 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Sunday 02 December 2007 10:24:50 Mick wrote: Should I remove the lot?  (gcc-3.3.4 was unmerged from my system years ago). Yes. -- Bo Andresen signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [gentoo-user] Building all packages except gcc

2007-11-19 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Monday 19 November 2007 16:35:17 Dan Farrell wrote: How would I go about rebuilding all installed packages, except gcc? I suppose I could do emerge --emptytree world, but that would also merge gcc, which I don't want, because I want to be sure that the whole system is rebuilt with the

Re: [gentoo-user] The generated cache was invalid...

2007-11-19 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Tuesday 20 November 2007 00:40:16 Iain Buchanan wrote: I've been seeing this error during every emerge for a while now, and I don't know where it comes from, or what it means: * Updating desktop mime database ... * Updating shared mime info database ... * Updating icons cache ... The

Re: [gentoo-user] dev-libs/apr-0.9.12 pulled back by revdep-rebuild

2007-11-17 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Saturday 17 November 2007 06:17:26 de Almeida, Valmor F. wrote: How do I find out why apr-0.9.12 and apr-util-0.9.12 are pulled back when using revdep-rebuild? What I have currently is: This could be bug #189720 which would mean you need to manually remerge slot 1 of apr and apr-util. [1]

Re: [gentoo-user] How do I pass options to emerge

2007-11-13 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Tuesday 13 November 2007 16:15:31 Neil Bothwick wrote: On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 16:37:02 +0200, Rumen Yotov wrote: The package netqmail allows me to specify the value QMAIL_CONF_SPLIT before it compiles. How do I actually set this value? How do I set optional flags when I build a

Re: [gentoo-user] glibc unmerged by accident

2007-11-13 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Tuesday 13 November 2007 15:35:37 Dirk Heinrichs wrote: Am Dienstag, 13. November 2007 schrieb ext Florian Philipp: busybox ash And then? I guess Python will still not work - no emerge. Then unpack the binpkg (which is needed either way as mentioned in other replies) on /. After that put

Re: [gentoo-user] python-2.4 is it safe to unmerge it ?

2007-11-11 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Sunday 11 November 2007 18:28:15 Helmut Jarausch wrote: I'm using a Python-2.5 based system since a year now. (currently python-2.5.1-r3) I've run python-updater and revdep-rebuild. Is it safe to unmerge python-2.4.3-r1 (in my case)? Yes. -- Bo Andresen signature.asc Description:

Re: [gentoo-user] CFLAGS for Pentium Dual Core E2160 ?

2007-11-10 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Sat, Nov 10, 2007 at 02:18:46PM +, David W Noon wrote: If you change the CHOST, CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS variables, then do: emerge -e system emerge -e world you will have converted everything except your kernel to 64-bit. Clearly you are completely clueless. Do *NOT* do this. It will

Re: [gentoo-user] Deluge of emerge failures (ACCESS DENIED open_wr: /etc/passwd)

2007-11-09 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Friday 09 November 2007 21:55:20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [ ok ] ACCESS DENIED open_wr: /etc/passwd ... ACCESS DENIED open_wr: /etc/passwd --- ACCESS VIOLATION SUMMARY --- LOG FILE =

Re: [gentoo-user] Deluge of emerge failures (ACCESS DENIED open_wr: /etc/passwd)

2007-11-09 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Friday 09 November 2007 23:11:26 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 10:36:48PM +0100, Bo ?rsted Andresen wrote: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=196720 ? Upgrade sandbox to -r2 ? Any idea how to actually do that, since the bug prevents me from upgrading? Is there

Re: [gentoo-user] Deluge of emerge failures (ACCESS DENIED open_wr: /etc/passwd)

2007-11-09 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Saturday 10 November 2007 00:13:56 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just tried and got this:     checking for C compiler default output file name... configure: error: C compiler cannot create executables See `config.log' for more details. and the log file says     gcc-config error:

Re: [gentoo-user] Elibc GNU userland...

2007-11-06 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Tuesday 06 November 2007 21:18:30 pk wrote: Can someone in the know explain what this means? I googled and saw that GNU userland is related to Gentoo/BSD. Not really. Gentoo/GNU/Linux uses a GNU userland. Gentoo/*BSD uses a BSD userland.. My guess would be that the Elibc is also BSD

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge openssl fails.

2007-10-29 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Monday 29 October 2007 12:28:01 David Harel wrote: After re-emerge glibc, same problem. Attached the log file in case I missed a change with the problem. Just too bad you attached a log for the wrong package... Anyway, maybe downgrading linux-headers just wasn't such a good idea... Also..

Re: [gentoo-user] Writing an ebuild, #gentoo-dev-help best place?

2007-10-28 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Sunday 28 October 2007 19:55:13 Peter Alfredsen wrote: On Sunday 28 October 2007, Grant wrote: I'm writing an ebuild and need some help. Is #gentoo-dev-help the best place to get it? [...] I've been checking it all morning here: http://cgiirc.blitzed.org/ and it always seems to

Re: [gentoo-user] Question re desktop-file-utils

2007-10-27 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Friday 26 October 2007 22:19:23 Anthony E. Caudel wrote: On several emerges I see the message Install dev-util/desktop-file-utils, if you want to help to improve Gentoo. Can't really tell what this package does but how does it help Gentoo? It validates .desktop files. If installed

Re: [gentoo-user] libxml++config.h missing - what package should provide the file?

2007-10-25 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Thursday 25 October 2007 09:14:15 Alexander Skwar wrote: I'm trying to compile gnome-extra/assogiate-0.2.0, and it fails, because it cannot find libxml++config.h: In file included from /usr/include/libxml++-2.6/libxml++/exceptions/parse_error.h:25, from ../libassogiate/mime-type.hh:30,

Re: [gentoo-user] Huge problem

2007-10-21 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Sunday 21 October 2007 18:23:16 Kenneth Prugh wrote: At the end running etc-update I found 26 config files to upgrade . Surely I did something wrong (to upgrade udev I had to unmerge coldplug) and the result has been a failure in booting gentoo. Here is the message: /sbin/rc: line

Re: [gentoo-user] memoir blocking tetex?

2007-10-19 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Friday 19 October 2007 11:22:00 Jules Colding wrote: I'm trying to emerge memoir but it is blocking its own dependency - tetex: ## omc-2 ~ # emerge -va dev-tex/memoir These are the packages that would be merged, in order: Calculating

Re: [gentoo-user] etc-udpate error after emerge --sync and portage update

2007-10-18 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Wednesday 17 October 2007 16:57:59 Rafael Barrera Oro wrote: Since last emerge --sync and portage update i get the following when trying to attempt an etc-update. diff: %file1: No such file or directory diff: %/var/tmp/etc-update-19194/.diff-test-2: No such file or directory ERROR: 'diff

Re: [gentoo-user] portage sync error

2007-10-15 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Monday 15 October 2007 11:00:03 Stefán István wrote: We have a pc that hasn't been updated for a long time ago, and now I tried to update it's portage with the emerge --sync command, but I got the following error: Updating Portage cache: 89%!!! Cannot resolve a virtual package name

Re: [gentoo-user] portage sync error

2007-10-15 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Monday 15 October 2007 12:29:42 Stefán István wrote: Thanks for the tip, the manual update was successful. Now I have another problem, when I try to update portage with the emerge command: # emerge -pv portage !!! Problem with sandbox binary. Disabling... !!! Problem with sandbox

Re: [gentoo-user] whoa, this new(ish) portage is nice

2007-10-10 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Wednesday 10 October 2007 20:53:51 Christopher Copeland wrote: On 10 Oct 2007, at 13:57, Mark Shields wrote: I was thinking the same. I remember when I first started using Gentoo (2004?) when doing updates, I always wished it would spit out the notices at the end instead of every

Re: [gentoo-user] which binutils?

2007-10-08 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Tuesday 09 October 2007 02:56:06 W.Kenworthy wrote: Something that has bothered me ever since I had some version inconsistencies way back in the dark days ... now a new binutils update is in (not listed below) bunyip ~ # binutils-config -l [1] i686-pc-linux-gnu-2.16 [2]

Re: [gentoo-user] which binutils?

2007-10-08 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Tuesday 09 October 2007 04:12:10 W.Kenworthy wrote: On a mixed stable/unstable x86, which binutils should one generally use? So why do you use multislot at all? On a previous job (long ago now) I was switching gcc's and needed multislot. Now I dont. I presume if I remove the

Re: [gentoo-user] libusb upgraded failed with USE doc

2007-10-06 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Saturday 06 October 2007 11:32:31 Dale wrote: Do you need the doc USE flag? Unless you are coding with the package, you normally do not need it. The flag enables extra documentation, not the standard man/info pages. Is this normally true for other packages? I have doc set in my USE

Re: [gentoo-user] libusb upgraded failed with USE doc

2007-10-06 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Saturday 06 October 2007 21:01:06 Neil Bothwick wrote: Do you need the doc USE flag? Unless you are coding with the package, you normally do not need it. The flag enables extra documentation, not the standard man/info pages. It was a mistake when I started use gentoo at the very

Re: [gentoo-user] How does module-rebuild know what's installed?

2007-10-05 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Saturday 06 October 2007 00:13:20 Randy Barlow wrote: Howdy, every time I try to run module-rebuild on one of my systems it tries to emerge nvidia-legacy-drivers, which is no longer in portage. It's no big deal because I can obviously emerge the packages that need to be rebuilt manually,

Re: [gentoo-user] insatiable revdev-rebuild

2007-10-04 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Thursday 04 October 2007 05:37:19 Allan Gottlieb wrote: An emerge (of openssl, I believe, but am not sure) a few days ago triggered a request for me to run # revdep-rebuild --library libcrypto.so.0.9.7 # revdep-rebuild --library libssl.so.0.9.7 I have done so. The revdep-rebuild for

Re: [gentoo-user] undefined reference to `LINUX_TARGET_OS_CPP_BUILTINS'

2007-10-04 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Wednesday 03 October 2007 23:55:49 Robert Szentmihalyi wrote: Building gcc for ARM with # crossdev --target arm-softfloat-uclinux-gnu Which means the you are more likely to get help on the gentoo-embedded mailing list. -- Bo Andresen signature.asc Description: This is a digitally

Re: [gentoo-user] insatiable revdev-rebuild SOLVED

2007-10-04 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Thursday 04 October 2007 16:07:16 Norman Rieß wrote: It also told you to remove lib{crypto,ssl}.so.0.9.7 after running those revdep-rebuild commands. [SNIP] There was no remove command It used to tell you. ;) https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159245 -- Bo Andresen

Re: [gentoo-user] per-ebuild compil options

2007-10-03 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Wednesday 03 October 2007 02:38:42 Iain Buchanan wrote: On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 09:56 +0100, Neil Bothwick wrote: mkdir -p /etc/portage/env.d/sys-devel [SNIP] hey that looks cool... except that it didn't work! I should be doing this to dev-libs/glib and sys-libs/glibc right? $ cat

Re: [gentoo-user] Upgrading the kernel

2007-10-03 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Wednesday 03 October 2007 17:44:52 Jed R. Mallen wrote: Thank you to all who responded. `make oldconfig` works as usual without the worries. I was a bit apprehensive because of the gentoo kernel upgrade guide warning about using oldconfigs but turns out it's safe afterall. I was kind of

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Re: star

2007-09-26 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Wednesday 26 September 2007 10:59:00 Neil Bothwick wrote: Pardon? tar xf somefile doesn't do any compression at all. I don't get what you mean. No, but it does do whatever decompression is required. Of course, you do have to specify a compression method when creating a compressed

Re: [gentoo-user] shared portage tree

2007-09-24 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Monday 24 September 2007 13:36:34 Daniel Iliev wrote: Yes. This setup works here also and I have no breakages, but since I've let the x86 machies use shared portage tree I have the feeling the performance of portage dropped down notably. I don't know what happens at the end of emerge

Re: [gentoo-user] gcc 4.2.0 with java

2007-09-22 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Saturday 22 September 2007 00:35:22 Andrew Gaydenko wrote: After adding 'sys-devel/gcc gcj' string to 'package.use' file and reemergeing (twicely) the gcc package 'revdep-rebuild' still shows: * Checking dynamic linking consistency [ 49% ] * broken

Re: [gentoo-user] Changing CHOST

2007-09-22 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Sunday 23 September 2007 02:13:46 David Relson wrote: Now that my old AthlonXP mobo has been replaced by an AMD 64 X2 mobo, it's time for upgrading CHOST :- According to http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/change-chost.xml after a couple of changes to /etc/make.conf, i.e. from:

Re: [gentoo-user] glibc-2.3.6 fails to compile (in a vserver)

2007-09-20 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Thursday 20 September 2007 13:49:14 Alan McKinnon wrote: http://www.ecos.sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2006-04/msg00090.html https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131108 ? -- Bo Andresen signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [gentoo-user] Meaning of bold/regular font in output from emerge

2007-09-20 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Thursday 20 September 2007 15:07:20 Markus Schönhaber wrote: Since portage 2.1.3.9 I sometimes see package names printed with different colors and fonts in the output in emerge --ask ... Example: # emerge --ask --update --deep world [SNIP] In the above output ntp, git and openoffice are

Re: [gentoo-user] continue emerge on failure

2007-09-20 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Thursday 20 September 2007 17:28:14 Pawel K wrote: How to force emerge to continue build with the next package in case previous build failed. Paludis = 0.25 now has support for the ideal solution to this.. :) # paludis --help | grep continue -A 4 --continue-on-failure Whether to continue

Re: [gentoo-user] Playsound . . . won't!

2007-09-17 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Monday 17 September 2007 12:29:20 Mick wrote: Checking dynamic linking consistency...   broken /usr/bin/playsound (requires  libFLAC.so.7)   broken /usr/lib/gstreamer-0.10/libgstflac.so (requires  libFLAC.so.7)   broken /usr/lib/gstreamer-0.8/libgstossaudio.so (requires  

Re: [gentoo-user] Playsound . . . won't!

2007-09-17 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Monday 17 September 2007 14:41:37 Alan McKinnon wrote: broken /usr/lib/libakode_xiph_decoder.la (requires /usr/lib/libOggFLAC.la) done. [SNIP] More like revdep-rebuild doesn't know how to build libOffFLAC anymore as the ebuild that put it there isn't in portage anymore or masked or

Re: [gentoo-user] Playsound . . . won't!

2007-09-17 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Monday 17 September 2007 23:05:29 Mick wrote: What version of gentoolkit is that? Clearly revdep-rebuild is doing something wrong. Fri Mar 30 18:51:11 2007 app-portage/gentoolkit-0.2.3-r1 I'd try 0.2.4_pre7 then.. -- Bo Andresen signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed

Re: [gentoo-user] Dual failures in emerge -aDNvu world

2007-09-17 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
Maybe attaching the snippet of the bochs log as a file would have been better. At least the wrapping of it is rather annoying... On Tuesday 18 September 2007 03:16:33 Kevin O'Gorman wrote: jade:/usr/share/sgml/docbook/dsssl-stylesheets-1.79/html/../common/../commo n/dbl1sr.dsl:3:5:E: reference

Re: [gentoo-user] Apache 2.2: missing KEEPENV (with solution)

2007-09-17 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Sunday 16 September 2007 15:51:28 Michael Mauch wrote: the recent Apache 2.2.6 ebuild brought an /etc/init.d/apache2 that doesn't honour the KEEPENV variable anymore. Formerly one could preserve some of the environment variables (while all others would be unset to keep Apache's environment

Re: [gentoo-user] Playsound . . . won't!

2007-09-15 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Sunday 16 September 2007 00:11:24 Mick wrote: I am using playsound in KDE to play system sounds, but it has stopped working: $ /usr/bin/playsound chimes.wav /usr/bin/playsound: error while loading shared libraries: libFLAC.so.7: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory

Re: [gentoo-user] ERROR : sys-libs/db-4.5.20_p2 failed - econf failed

2007-09-14 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Friday 14 September 2007 11:14:20 Jean-Philippe Caruana wrote: /opt/sun-jdk-1.6.0.02/bin/javac: error while loading shared libraries: libjli.so: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory If might be worth bringing this up on the gentoo-java mailing list.

Re: [gentoo-user] Immensely disappointed in emerge -DuN world these days

2007-09-13 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Thursday 13 September 2007 05:58:16 Dan Farrell wrote: berkdb = sys-libs/db. apr-util is slotted and 0.9.12 is in a different slot than 1.2.8. this might give you some idea of what packages might be effected by the nontrivial update of db: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ equery depends db [

Re: [gentoo-user] Immensely disappointed in emerge -DuN world these days

2007-09-13 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Thursday 13 September 2007 05:41:59 Mark Knecht wrote: This latest emerge pass seems to be working better. I did have to skip a couple of packages though. I'll go back and see if I can catch them with revdep-rebuild when it hopefully finishes up in the next hour. [...] db2omf: Could not

Re: [gentoo-user] I can't build pango

2007-09-12 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Wednesday 12 September 2007 18:20:19 Jean-Philippe Caruana wrote: I try to build gnome on my system, but I can't build the pango dependence : [SNIP] I put the build.log here : http://perso.enstimac.fr/~caruana/perso/build.log [SNIP] here is my make.conf :# cat /etc/make.conf

Re: [gentoo-user] How to manage the upgrade.

2007-09-12 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Wednesday 12 September 2007 20:59:50 econti wrote: Hi all, it's me again. Above all, thank you everybody for the help . . .but now I am a little confused. Well, here is what I understood: 0. Resolve blockages.. :p 1 - first of all: to upgrade gcc following what explained here -

Re: [gentoo-user] Immensely disappointed in emerge -DuN world these days

2007-09-12 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Thursday 13 September 2007 01:36:56 Mark Knecht wrote: libtool: link: cannot find the library `/usr/lib/libgnomevfs-2.la' or unhandled argument `/usr/lib/libgnomevfs-2.la' # ls -l /usr/lib/libgnomevfs-2.la # equery check gnome-vfs ? -- Bo Andresen signature.asc Description: This is a

Re: [gentoo-user] Immensely disappointed in emerge -DuN world these days

2007-09-12 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Thursday 13 September 2007 04:54:08 Mark Knecht wrote: OK, the emerge -DuN world finished up and said everything was good. I then ran revdep-rebuild and have a list of things that need to be rebuilt. One has failed - dev-libs/apr-util. checking gdbm.h presence... yes checking for

Re: [gentoo-user] Immensely disappointed in emerge -DuN world these days

2007-09-12 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Thursday 13 September 2007 05:23:45 Mark Knecht wrote: gda-firebird-recordset.c:517: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type make[2]: *** [gda-firebird-recordset.lo] Error 1 [...] !!! ERROR: gnome-extra/libgda-1.2.3 failed. You really ought to learn to search bugzie.. :p

Re: [gentoo-user] Immensely disappointed in emerge -DuN world these days

2007-09-12 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Thursday 13 September 2007 05:32:07 Mark Knecht wrote: That's very interesting. What about slotting issues? What if it's the old version in a slot that needs to be rebuilt? (FYI - I don't really understand slotting that much since I don't program. I've guessed it's because some code needs

Re: [gentoo-user] Upgrade

2007-09-11 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Tuesday 11 September 2007 16:53:58 Gary Rickert wrote: A quick question / addition to this. It's not exactly related. In the future start a new thread instead and please don't top-post.. When I am finished with an update I usually run etc-update. I was told last week that this has been

Re: [gentoo-user] why unmerge acpid ?

2007-09-11 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Wednesday 12 September 2007 00:34:51 Jesús Guerrero wrote: [ebuild R ] gnome-base/gnome-applets-2.18.0-r2 USE=acpi apm gnome hal ipv6 -debug -doc -gstreamer 0 kB [...]         if use acpi ! use hal ; then [...] That message appears when you emerge gnome-applets. And it is telling

Re: [gentoo-user] rpm-4.4.6-r3 install error

2007-09-06 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Wednesday 05 September 2007 14:25:09 emerge.gentoo wrote: rpmdav.c:526: error: `ne_propfind_handler' undeclared (first use in this function) rpmdav.c:526: error: `pfh' undeclared (first use in this function) # emerge -1 neon https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=187740 -- Bo Andresen

Re: [gentoo-user] rpm-4.4.6-r3 install error

2007-09-06 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Thursday 06 September 2007 10:14:17 Alan McKinnon wrote: I tried to emerge the r4 version of the same package and got same error as before. [SNIP] I suggest you file a bug As said in another reply a bug already exists (#187740). so the gentoo maintainer can help get to the bottom of

Re: [gentoo-user] rpm-4.4.6-r3 install error

2007-09-06 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Thursday 06 September 2007 12:25:10 Alan McKinnon wrote: so the gentoo maintainer can help get to the bottom of this. What gentoo maintainer? ;) Ah yes, I kinda just assumed that *someone* was maintaining the ebuild. Then I realised that we are talking about rpm. So, did I make a

Re: [gentoo-user] portage update problem

2007-09-06 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Thursday 06 September 2007 17:22:15 Rafael Barrera Oro wrote: Hello, just installed from gentoo LiveCd 2006.0 Why are you using such an ancient stage? after an emerge --sync, i upgraded portage, everything was running smooth until the unmerging of the previous portage version started, this

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >