On Wed, 27 Jan 2021 19:13:37 +0100, Bertram Scharpf wrote:
> after a long period with a lot of problems installing Ruby Gems and
> Gentoo packages containing Ruby Gems, I found the following solution: I
> added a line
>
> s.executables = ["rake".freeze]
> What do you think? Maybe someone
On Mon, 22 Jul 2019 05:12:55 -0500, Dale wrote:
> emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy
> ">=dev-ruby/xmlrpc-0.3.0[ruby_targets_ruby25]".
> (dependency required by "dev-lang/ruby-2.5.5::gentoo" [ebuild])
> Anyone have a clue on this?
An error on my part in preparing for a stable ruby:2.5. It
On Sun, 01 Oct 2017 06:25:27 +0200, tuxic wrote:
Compiling source in /var/tmp/portage/app-text/ronn-0.7.3-r3/work ...
> * Running compile phase for all ...
> fatal: the 'hpricot' library is required (gem install hpricot)
The compile phase for all uses the currently eselected ruby. Perhaps
On Sat, 02 Sep 2017 22:57:12 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> OK, so disclaimer up front. I detest Ruby. I hate it with a passion.
Personally I find that passion is better reserved for positive things.
> You have to understand what Ruby is. It is not a language. It is 5
> languages. Like python27
On Sat, 02 Sep 2017 21:33:31 +0800, Andrew Lowe wrote:
> Hi all,
> I'm in the process of doing a world update and due to a failed
compile,
> I have cause to look up through the list of stuff to compile/update.
> Imagine my surprise when I saw there were three versions of Ruby wanting
> to
On Sun, 20 Aug 2017 08:26:49 -0600, Alec Ten Harmsel wrote:
> I don't believe that will be enough. You should update RUBY_TARGETS in
> /etc/portage/make.conf if you have it set. If you don't have it set and
> are still getting this error, that's a bug and should be filed on b.g.o.
> I have a
On Sat, 03 Sep 2016 21:41:51 -0700, Jigme Datse Yli-RAsku wrote:
> I like that. Haven't got to even reaching the "dev in training" stage,
> but I'd like to have some place where I can ask general gentoo-dev
> questions. I have a couple of projects which I'd like to get working
> with a simple
On Sat, 05 Mar 2016 01:23:08 +0100, lee wrote:
> I haven't found any documentation about how to deal with all the
> snapshots which would be created over time. Can they be destroyed once
> the backup is finished? A full backup took about 48 hours, so something
> faster is needed, and I don't
On Fri, 03 Jul 2015 13:53:39 +0800, Andrew Lowe wrote:
Does anyone know how I can prevent this infestation from
happening?
It may not be possible since some packages require ruby to be present
unconditionally, e.g. webkit-gtk has a built-time dependency on ruby, and
the
On Tue, 20 Jan 2015 18:20:18 -0700, Joseph wrote:
I've tried to setup some stocks in GnuCash but it does not list TSX What
alternatives are to keep track of stocks under Linux.
GnuCash uses Finance-Quote to get its stock quotes, and it looks like
Finance-Quotes also includes a source for TSX
On Sun, 02 Nov 2014 10:10:34 -0500, gottlieb wrote:
I am running firefox-24.8.0, which is highest stable (highest testing is
33.0).
Several sites, in particular mail.google.com, report that This version
of Firefox is no longer supported. Please upgrade to a supported
browser.
Does that
On Tue, 16 Sep 2014 22:43:18 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Puppet seems to me a good product for a large site with 1000 hosts.
Not so much for ~20 or so. Plus puppet's language and configs get large
and hard to keep track of - lots and lots of directory trees with many
things mentioning other
On Thu, 26 Jun 2014 23:36:00 -0400, Ajai Khattri wrote:
!!! All ebuilds that could satisfy
virtual/rubygems[ruby_targets_ruby18]
have been masked.
You still have packages on your system that have been installed with the
ruby18 RUBY_TARGET. It's not immediately clear which package that is
On Sat, 07 Jun 2014 17:20:22 -0700, walt wrote:
On 06/07/2014 12:56 AM, Hans de Graaff wrote:
For example, I (want to) use only ruby19:
#grep RUBY /etc/portage/make.conf RUBY_TARGETS=ruby19
Yes, in hindsight I think that should have been the current default since
ruby19 has the best
On Fri, 06 Jun 2014 15:47:38 -0700, walt wrote:
Is all of the above familiar to you? If not, you may need more help
with managing multiple ruby versions. I find it a large PITA and I
could use more help myself :)
Could you explain what bothers you or where you would need help?
Hans
On Mon, 24 Mar 2014 20:23:55 +, Mick wrote:
I have been chasing my tail with ruby tonight.
The masking of ruby18 meant that I had to unmerge a lot of ruby packages
and then portage chose what to merge afresh.
unmerge or depclean? unmerge is less safe and may leave your system in a
bad
On Fri, 21 Feb 2014 09:32:03 +, Svoop wrote:
Hans de Graaff graaff at gentoo.org writes:
Because we haven't gotten around to that yet. Also note that only a few
packages currently have ruby21 support, so eselecting it right now is
not very useful yet.
We should be updating the ruby
On Mon, 30 Dec 2013 18:25:38 +0400, Pavel Volkov wrote:
I currently set my RUBY_TARGETS in make.conf to:
RUBY_TARGETS=ruby20 ruby21
World is updated.
But ruby21 profile can't be selected with eselect:
$ eselect ruby list Available Ruby profiles:
[1] ruby20 (with Rubygems) *
If I
On Tue, 10 Dec 2013 11:06:19 -0500, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
On 12/10/2013 10:19 AM, Grant Edwards wrote:
I understand that portage defaults to installing multiple versions (of
Ruby, Python, and probably other stuff). What I don't understand it
_why_. If none of the ebuilds specify q
On Tue, 10 Dec 2013 15:19:56 +, Grant Edwards wrote:
AFAICT, if you have a global tk USE flag, you can not have 1.8
installed at the same time as 1.9 or 2.0.
It looks like ruby 1.8 wants tk built with the same threads setting, and
ruby 1.9 and 2.0 (because their threads setting is now
On Mon, 09 Dec 2013 18:29:46 +, Grant Edwards wrote:
My routine more-or-less weekly update suddenly decided that it needed to
install 3 versions of Ruby along with ~50 other ruby-related packages.
This caused a bit of a problem, since those versions of Ruby can't
coexist: (something to
On Thu, 14 Nov 2013 15:57:40 -0800, Chris Stankevitz wrote:
True or false: The correct way to appease portage's error message below
is to add a bunch of ruby_targets_ruby20 use flags in
/etc/portage/package.use
False. These packages should already have this use flag set by default in
a
On Tue, 30 Jul 2013 19:48:19 -0400, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
I want to become a dev, what's my next step? There is none. Help out,
and maybe someone will notice you? Ok, I'm on it. Been doing it for
years, and I know several other people in the same situation. It doesn't
work, and recruitment
On Wed, 31 Jul 2013 14:34:41 -0400, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
It seems a little rude to pop in, address them personally, and ask them
each if they'd devote months of their time towards mentoring me. (Doing
so can pressure someone into agreeing to something he doesn't want to
do, or makes him
On Sun, 19 Aug 2012 16:02:15 -0400, covici wrote:
Hi. In my update world of today, the system wanted to emerge rubinius
-- for reasons known only to itself -- however it fails to emerge during
its config phase with the following output:
Any suggestions would be appreciated.
Check our bug
On Tue, 22 May 2012 18:10:18 -0700, Chris Stankevitz wrote:
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 11:32 AM, kwk...@hkbn.net wrote:
No! Don't do that! Instead, you should add a line
RUBY_TARGETS=ruby19
For now this should be
RUBY_TARGETS=ruby18 ruby19
We currently don't support running with ruby19
On Tue, 22 May 2012 23:35:21 -0700, Chris Stankevitz wrote:
1. What on my system is insisting on make.conf RUBY 1.9 USE_EXPAND
changes? An emerge --tree is not giving me a clear answer (as it
usually does). The original post in this thread provides a pastebin
link to back up this claim.
It
On Mon, 21 May 2012 20:52:01 -0700, Chris Stankevitz wrote:
Question: Is is true that the RUBY dependencies listed in the above
paste link are entirely due to adding documentation support
(specifically rdoc)? If so, can I tell portage to not install the rdoc
stuff? I have USE=-doc already.
On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 14:24:30 -0800, Hilco Wijbenga wrote:
If there is a requirement for this to be in the global environment, what
is the consequence of unsetting RUBYOPT in my own .bashrc (or similar)?
Is that safe? Or does that break something that I simply haven't
noticed yet?
We don't
On Sun, 15 Jan 2012 22:21:30 -0800, Hilco Wijbenga wrote:
On 15 January 2012 18:21, Michael Orlitzky mich...@orlitzky.com wrote:
On 01/15/2012 05:24 PM, Hilco Wijbenga wrote:
Hi all,
The dev-ruby/rubygems ebuild adds -rauto_gem to the global RUBYOPT.
This breaks my own scripts so I have
On Sat, 29 Oct 2011 16:36:31 +0530, Vishnupradeep wrote:
Gem files will remain installed in
/usr/lib64/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/ffi-1.0.9 for inspection.
Results logged to
/usr/lib64/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/ffi-1.0.9/ext/ffi_c/gem_make.out
The gem is broken. Install dev-ruby/ffi instead.
Hans
On Fri, 21 Oct 2011 09:23:38 -0400, Mike Edenfield wrote:
I'm trying to build XEmacs on my laptop (Hardened ~amd64), and it
appears to be stuck near the end trying to load and/or execute
update-elc.el (it's been on this step for approaching 6 hours now).
This happens every time I attempt to
On Tue, 07 Jun 2011 20:27:45 -0500, Dale wrote:
From there, there is a link to test whether the new IPv6 works on my
system and between me and the reat of the world. It appears I am not
ready. It complained about the DNS server for the most part. Funny
thing is, I use googles DNS
On Thu, 21 Apr 2011 23:12:51 -0700, kashani wrote:
On 4/21/2011 9:54 PM, Hans de Graaff wrote:
Please note that Gentoo also supports multiple ruby implementations out
of the box (ruby 1.8, ruby enterprise edition, jruby currently stable,
ruby 1.9 unfortunately still masked, rubinius
On Thu, 21 Apr 2011 17:33:05 -0700, kashani wrote:
Install RVM, make it part of your shell, then install the ruby and gems
of your choice. That way you leave the system Ruby alone and can develop
with the versions you want. You can even do multiple versions of ruby
and various gems for
On Fri, 22 Apr 2011 00:57:13 +0100, Matt Harrison wrote:
I've just tried setting up a new development machine and I'm stuck
installing the ffi gem for ruby.
According to a bug I found (can't find it now I'm afraid) the gentoo
devs do not support installing gems via the gem command and
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 15:32:53 -0400, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
Thanks for the tip. The cron environment was missing
RUBYOPT=-rauto_gem -- adding it fixed the problem.
Dark magic, whatever it does.
It ensures that installed gems are found automatically without
specifying this explicitly in your
On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 17:52:05 -0500, Harry Putnam wrote:
Googling lead to a tool called Sphinx that apparently is coupled with a
data base tool like mysql. It is advertised as the kind of search tool
I'm after and has a perl front-end also available in portage
(dev-perl/Sphinx-Search).
The
On Mon, 25 Feb 2008 13:15:22 -0800, Michael Higgins wrote:
I use Gnome ['gnome-light'] as my WM.
For the past few months (many months) I've had the 'gnome-panel' lock up
on me. Nothing is clearly causing this. Rebuilding has not seemed to
help. Of course, what to rebuild? Everything?
I've
On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 21:07:53 -0500, Randy Barlow wrote:
7v5w7go9ub0o wrote:
My concerns with this, other than my abilities, are:
1. Showing proper respect to the guy who pioneered the effort to date,
and who may simply be out of town. (This disrespect would be alleviated
if there was an
On Fri, 14 Dec 2007 11:56:41 -0800, Grant wrote:
Lately I've been shopping around for other distros as well as looking
at *BSD. Gentoo development seems to have slowed way down and I like
things being improved as quickly as possible. FreeBSD is supposed to
be the closest relation, but
On Sat, 15 Dec 2007 01:05:08 +0100, b.n. wrote:
Florian Philipp ha scritto:
Other things to improve? A better documentation on USE-flags. In my
opinion every maintainer should provide as much information as possible
on what exactly a USE-flag changes. At the moment it's the
administrator's
On Sat, 01 Dec 2007 15:24:00 -0800, Justin Patrin wrote:
# emerge -auv esound
These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild N] media-sound/esound-0.2.38-r1 USE=alsa ipv6 tcpd -debug
-doc 0 kB
...
Making all in docs
make[2]:
On Sat, 24 Nov 2007 05:30:14 +, Thufir wrote:
I'm running into some error messages from rails when running script/
generate controller foo and am wondering if it's related to package
management, a mismatch between gems and emerge. Do not use gems, use
emerge? The wiki is incorrect?
I'd
44 matches
Mail list logo
