- with over 800 ebuilds this is
an important question. I'm noting the problem ebuilds in a log
file manually, so I can see to them when it's all over.
This is resilient to the single merge between resumes case in 2.1_pre.
For 2.0, you can manually back up and restore /var/cache/edp/mtimedb.
--
Jason
On Monday 03 April 2006 22:12, Peter Ruskin wrote:
On Monday 03 April 2006 13:12, Jason Stubbs wrote:
I'm just experiencing the same thing - with over 800 ebuilds
this is an important question. I'm noting the problem ebuilds
in a log file manually, so I can see to them when it's all
dependencies.
--onlydeps
Is there a way to install just the package and forghet all
dependencies ?
See above. ;)
--
Jason Stubbs
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
).
--
Jason Stubbs
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On Thursday 02 March 2006 22:49, Bo Andresen wrote:
My problem is that I am unable to locate a reference that defines
the escape sequences.
Google for xterm escape sequences yields many results. s/xterm/ansi/
for even more.
--
Jason Stubbs
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
)
--
Is there someone way I can work around this? I don't seem to be able to
emerge anything.
Update portage.
--
Jason Stubbs
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
)
--
Is there someone way I can work around this? I don't seem to be able to
emerge anything.
Hrmm.. Sorry.
# export PORTDIR=$(portageq envvar PORTDIR)
# mv $PORTDIR/virtual ./virtual.backup
# emerge --oneshot portage
# mv ./virtual.backup $PORTDIR/virtual
--
Jason Stubbs
--
gentoo
On Friday 24 February 2006 23:56, John Fawcett wrote:
Calculating dependencies /!!! Cannot resolve a virtual package name to
an ebuild.
!!! This is a bug, please report it. (virtual/perl-Storable-2.13)
Update portage.
--
Jason Stubbs
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
algorithms. If you have a look at portage's
Manifest, you'll see MD5, RMD160 and SHA256 hashes for all files. These are
generatable and verifiable from 2.1_pre4.
--
Jason Stubbs
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
`fpu'
These are the important lines. By the look of it you have -mfpu in your
CFLAGS which, as the following output says, is not a valid option (unless you
are running SPARC).
--
Jason Stubbs
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On Wednesday 25 January 2006 03:43, Philip Webb wrote:
060124 Jason Stubbs wrote:
I've started a poll on the specific question of USE flag ordering in
portage-2.1_pre3 at http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-426033.html
1) Create a login if you don't have one
2) Log in
3) View
it may have started before I did that
upgrade.
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104705
--
Jason Stubbs
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
to a prompt?
If so, what were the last 20-30 lines of output before make stated there was
an error?
--
Jason Stubbs
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
is that sun-jdk-1.5 is
installed but emerge is wanting to install sun-jdk-1.4. This indicates that
sun-jdk-1.5 is likely masked.
--
Jason Stubbs
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On Saturday 31 December 2005 23:53, Holly Bostick wrote:
Jason Stubbs schreef:
On Saturday 31 December 2005 21:57, Holly Bostick wrote:
Anyway, my latest emerge world failed because of sun-jdk-1.4.2.10
(!!!). The current one is 1.5 something.
Meaning (to me) that Kevin is referring
should fix that issue.
It also has a KEYWORDS of ~x86 ~amd64 so adding the same
to /etc/portage/package.keywords should fix that issue. Beyond that there
shouldn't be a problem.
--
Jason Stubbs
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On Sunday 01 January 2006 02:57, Kevin O'Gorman wrote:
Oh, and yes, java is ~x86 both in unmask and in keywords.
Can you list exactly what sun-jdk lines you have in
/etc/portage/package.{unmask,keywords} please?
--
Jason Stubbs
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
) the world file contains just sun-jdk
2) equery depends =sun-jdk-1.4.2.10 shows nothing at all
3) sun-jdk does not appear at all in /etc/portage/package.* files
How should I explore this further?
Whatever command you used to update, add --tree --pretend to it.
--
Jason Stubbs
--
gentoo-user
-jdk in /etc/portage/package.unmask?
--
Jason Stubbs
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
, including
portage. In other words portage is completely broken.
What should I do?
One of your /etc/portage/package.* files contains an invalid atom. By the look
of the traceback, you have a line with just a * perhaps?
--
Jason Stubbs
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
/pym/* /usr/lib/portage/pym
# ln -sf ../lib/portage/bin/emerge /usr/bin/emerge
# emerge portage
--
Jason Stubbs
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
portage is
installed noting this. The default cache format has changed so you'll need to
run `emerge metadata` to get the local cache back up to date.
--
Jason Stubbs
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
ChangeLog is no longer being
maintained. Instead, a ChangeLog will be generated from the subversion commit
logs instead. A script will be ready and the/a ChangeLog added back to the
tarballs again in time for the next _rc / final release.
--
Jason Stubbs
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
.
--
Jason Stubbs
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
?
--
Jason Stubbs
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
in /usr/bin
why should anyone have it in his path? It just pollutes directory
Works for me.
--
Jason Stubbs
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
there is 2760 permissions. What you need
is 2750. `chmod 2750 /root/.ccache` will fix it.
--
Jason Stubbs
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
, but nowadays...
/mnt/archive/gentoo $ du -sh *
750Mdistfiles
516Mrsync
--
Jason Stubbs
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
SYNOPSIS states [general options] dev=device [track options] and
has no hyphen on either speed or dev and only a single hypen on eject. As I
said, it doesn't seem like it's misinterpreting from the output but it can't
hurt to try...
--
Jason Stubbs
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
you'd expect. --deep without
--update would only install any missing dependencies.
--
Jason Stubbs
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
do emerge search mozilla-firefox) is 1.0.6-r5.
If that is the case then 1.0.6-r5 is the latest version available for you
with respect to your current snapshot of the tree.
--
Jason Stubbs
pgpgOHJHMeSrI.pgp
Description: PGP signature
My question is: Could I unmerge 2.3.5 version which is not in my world
tree and use only 2.4.1 or is it some dependency which have to be on
system and i should only update that port to unvulnerable version?
If you've run python-updater, it should be safe to unmerge python-2.3.x.
--
Jason Stubbs
package. Hence, updating world will
still grab the package. Using --oneshot just keeps the world file clean.
--
Jason Stubbs
pgpJ1kBcYynH2.pgp
Description: PGP signature
. In that big message
displayed at the end of merging any of the 2.0.51 series that nobody reads,
it states that virtuals are now calculated on the fly.
--
Jason Stubbs
pgpugT19rSd3S.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Monday 05 September 2005 20:44, Holly Bostick wrote:
Jason Stubbs schreef:
/var/cache/edb/virtuals is a relic from 2.0.50. In that big message
displayed at the end of merging any of the 2.0.51 series that nobody
reads, it states that virtuals are now calculated on the fly.
So I could
really archive all of etc now.
You've hit a bug in dispatch-conf. /etc/init.d/net.eth0 was previously a
file. Now it's a symlink to net.lo. dispatch-conf fails to handle that
change correctly. Hence, delete /etc/init.d/net.eth0 and recreate it as a
symlink and all should be fine.
--
Jason
on it.
Also check dmesg. It should say exactly why the filesystem was made
read-only.
--
Jason Stubbs
pgpC7yDfnCQPE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
with
such files in it.
I had a look at the USE flags for PHP but didn't see anything
obvious. Is there an easy way to build PHP to have large file
support?
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=24373
--
Jason Stubbs
pgpjzyHmgxJYA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
this:
FEATURES=-sandbox emerge f4l
addpredict /usr/qt/3/etc/settings. It's a common problem with Qt apps. It's
even in both qt.eclass and kde.eclass (although they both use addwrite
rather than addpredict!?)
--
Jason Stubbs
pgpAC1ml0brap.pgp
Description: PGP signature
, it is cascading. And your make.conf is read last. Which means
whatever in the defaults will hold unless your make.conf gives a
different one...
Except for the environment, which is processed after make.conf.
--
Jason Stubbs
pgpLHBpnWzMdu.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Saturday 20 August 2005 19:31, Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Sat, 20 Aug 2005 16:24:29 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
yes, it is cascading. And your make.conf is read last. Which means
whatever in the defaults will hold unless your make.conf gives a
different one...
Except
that records that?
Bug 11359. There's also PORT_LOGDIR which will log everything.
--
Jason Stubbs
pgpjiSQIY951I.pgp
Description: PGP signature
to
switch? I would not like to mess things and have no mail delivered
at all...
Easy to do with procmail if that's already installed. You can just add a
rule to both forward and continue delivery to /etc/procmailrc.
--
Jason Stubbs
pgpLDwENXjNB0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Saturday 06 August 2005 01:31, Jarry wrote:
Jason Stubbs wrote:
Easy to do with procmail if that's already installed. You can just add
a rule to both forward and continue delivery to /etc/procmailrc.
I thought procmail takes care only for incomming mail. Am I wrong?
Because I need
# CONFIG_PD6729 is not set
# CONFIG_I82092 is not set
# CONFIG_TCIC is not set
CONFIG_PCCARD_NONSTATIC=y
CONFIG_CARDBUS enables support for 32-bit cards (which you probably want)
and you'll also need to enable at least one driver. Looking at your lspci
output, the Yenta driver should work fine.
--
Jason
bug
activity to gentoo-portage-dev@gentoo.org from now on. If you'd like to join
the portage team or just feel like giving a quick hand, have a browse through
the bugs and see what fixes you can come up with.
--
Jason Stubbs
pgp0LZa8QYoih.pgp
Description: PGP signature
| grep 200507' and nothing showed up.
Does the portage db need to be updated? I figured it would use the rss.
GLSAs are held in $PORTDIR/metadata/glsa
--
Jason Stubbs
pgpmKxKDEUGzX.pgp
Description: PGP signature
choice policy.
Gentoo isn't about imposing someone elses preferences on everyone.
You're not forced to upgrade. You're not even forced to sync with the rsync
servers. If you're happy with your machine the way it is, don't upgrade.
Simple.
Regards,
Jason Stubbs
pgp4nhBX1Gxq0.pgp
Description
=app-office/openoffice-bin-1.9.104
media-sound/timidity++ =media-video/xine-ui-0.99.3
=net-im/centericq-4.20.0-r1 =xfce-extra/xfce4-showdesktop-0.3.0
Regards,
Jason Stubbs
pgpG6gf1ouQur.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Friday 17 June 2005 06:11, Christoph Gysin wrote:
Richard Fish wrote:
It is a long-standing bug in portage, and apparently not easy to fix.
reference to bugzilla, anyone?
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13632
pgpFmqilciZ1D.pgp
Description: PGP signature
replies could be CCd to me as well, thx
PORTAGE_TMPDIR is the correct answer that you missed.
Regards,
Jason Stubbs
pgpBol06jBR1x.pgp
Description: PGP signature
very
small in size but has a much larger feature set that is generally very useful
in emergencies.
Regards,
Jason Stubbs
pgpH9BhbpSTCr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
/db/pkg -mindepth 3 -type d
Any results that returns shouldn't be there. I'd be interested in what it does
return though.
Regards,
Jason Stubbs
pgptaZInT63E9.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wednesday 01 June 2005 22:56, Kevin Bucknum wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Jason Stubbs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, June 01, 2005 8:25 AM
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] IOError: [Errno 21] Is a directory
Any idea what to look
?
Regards,
Jason Stubbs
I had it in overlay for a while, but I'm pretty sure I blew that away
along time ago. It's showing at
http://packages.gentoo.org/ebuilds/?showeq-5.0.0.18 as the current.
I haven't run it since end of 2004 so don't really remember the history
of when I did what.
I had
dependency of whatever other targets are being chosen to upgrade or install.
Regards,
Jason Stubbs
pgpa7BWiOFdQu.pgp
Description: PGP signature
, the tarballs aren't
available yet (so I didn't bother unmasking). I thought maybe the
ebuilds were nonetheless in Portage because the devs have some secret
source for preliminary testing or something.
The kde ebuild maintainers do, yes. This unfortunately does not include me. ;)
Regards,
Jason
.
Regards,
Jason Stubbs
pgpsMthg7bUAK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
to an emerge installed system when possible.
/etc/portage/profile/package.provided
Regards,
Jason Stubbs
pgp5WVvTZH0EC.pgp
Description: PGP signature
@gentoo.org and [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Regards,
Jason Stubbs
pgpHMmWd2g1nK.pgp
Description: PGP signature
/
This is always good advice.
Regards,
Jason Stubbs
pgpq1G4BpiwLq.pgp
Description: PGP signature
and then warns if it matches. Slots aren't taken into
account at all but probably should be.
That would likely reduce the mixed-message factor I seem to be sensing
here.
Okay. So no countdown during --pretend as well as using slot checks. Care to
open a bug so I don't forget please? :)
Regards,
Jason
,
Mrugesh Karnik
emerge world -uDpv
and fix all the packages that want to be downgraded.
emerge world --newuse
and fix all the packages that want to change their useflags.
Mostly right. You'll need to add --deep and --update to the --newuse run as
well.
Regards,
Jason Stubbs
a try.
Regards,
Jason Stubbs
pgpNb3YNuDceA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
:
CONFIG_PROTECT=$CONFIG_PROTECT /lib/modules
Adding $CONFIG_PROTECT is not needed unless it already has some definition in
make.conf. Also, ${NAME} syntax should always be used in portage config
files.
Thanks, that did the trick.
What portage version are using?
Regards,
Jason Stubbs
pgpZABctvueO9.pgp
On Saturday 21 May 2005 22:08, Dan Johansson wrote:
On Saturday 21 May 2005 14.55, Jason Stubbs wrote:
What portage version are using?
My portage version is sys-apps/portage-2.0.51.19 on x86.
There's been a hack in portage all the way through 2.0.51 and I'm pretty sure
2.0.50 as well
On Sunday 22 May 2005 00:43, Julien Cayzac wrote:
On 5/21/05, Jason Stubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You miss the point. Adding that flag to CFLAGS (or CXXFLAGS) is faulty in
and of itself. It is not a general optimization flag. It is something
that each package's codebase needs
On Sunday 22 May 2005 00:54, askar ... wrote:
On 5/21/05, Jason Stubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Saturday 21 May 2005 17:36, askar ... wrote:
In the kernel I enables option for 'CardBus yenta-compatible' - this
seems the one I was looking for. After recompilation the kernel I
looked in the wrong
place, but I didn't see that change mentioned at all in the changelog
for portage (actually, I didn't even see a changelog when I issued
`emerge -vlPu portage').
etcat and qpkg are not part of portage. They are part of gentoolkit.
Regards,
Jason Stubbs
pgpCsVwosjVOA.pgp
that one. I know that ddskk is easy to
install and comes with a tutorial if you like SKK, although the tutorial is
in Japanese. The other emacs package for Japanese is tamago, which has the
description Emacs Backend for Sj3 Ver.2, FreeWnn, Wnn6 and Canna.
Regards,
Jason Stubbs
pgpE8fch2hfKg.pgp
for it to have been handled). That
is, if you reemerge linux-headers the problem should be fixed and howl should
emerge properly.
Regards,
Jason Stubbs
pgp6GyBGLn3Eq.pgp
Description: PGP signature
only be one
with issues.
Regards,
Jason Stubbs
pgpPRWbo3VzOB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
.
Regards,
Jason Stubbs
pgpll6ipA3lm4.pgp
Description: PGP signature
have both 2.2 and 2.3 installed?
Regards,
Jason Stubbs
pgpwfpCa3MNBB.pgp
Description: PGP signature
it is
merged without having to use --resume every time. Or you could remove the
|| break and have it continue on regardless of failures and you'll have a
list of problems at the end.
Regards,
Jason Stubbs
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
the
compile of. There are also other side-effects of using ebuild (such as
packages not being added to world) that will invariably lead to INVALID bugs.
Regards,
Jason Stubbs
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On Monday 25 April 2005 18:42, Andrew Gaydenko wrote:
After yesterday updating I can not emerge anything or do sync-ing.
The error is shown below.
How to repair the error?
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90347
Patch available.
Regards,
Jason Stubbs
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing
test of my gentoo skills. so far so good. you can bet your ass I'm
backing up /etc before running dispatch-conf...
Wait a couple of weeks and there'll be a couple of dispatch-conf releases that
should make a little bit safer.
Regards,
Jason Stubbs
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
a lot of control codes.
Well, that's three people saying it should be implemented but no offerings off
any code yet... Here's my solution: Add NOCOLOR=true to your crontab.
Regards,
Jason Stubbs
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On Tuesday 12 April 2005 23:24, Jason Cooper wrote:
Jason Stubbs ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) scribbled:
On Tuesday 12 April 2005 20:49, A. Khattri wrote:
There really ought to be a --nocolor option for emerge, alongside the
--nospinner option. (I know I could add it to FEATURES in make.conf
80 matches
Mail list logo
