Re: [gentoo-user] Re: CoreOS vulnerability inherited from Gentoo?

On Thu, Jun 2, 2016, at 06:44, James wrote: > Neil Bothwick digimed.co.uk> writes: > > > > > Does this mean we need to do anything to improve the security of our > > > systems? > > > The report seems to be saying that the problem is caused by using the > > Gentoo default config, which assumes

Re: [gentoo-user] CoreOS vulnerability inherited from Gentoo?

On Tue, May 31, 2016, at 11:07, Max R.D. Parmer wrote: > On Tue, May 31, 2016, at 10:44, Mick wrote: > > On Tuesday 31 May 2016 16:30:27 James wrote: > > > Here is an interesting read:: > > > > > > Security brief: CoreOS Linux Alpha remote SSH issue >

Re: [gentoo-user] CoreOS vulnerability inherited from Gentoo?

On Tue, May 31, 2016, at 10:44, Mick wrote: > On Tuesday 31 May 2016 16:30:27 James wrote: > > Here is an interesting read:: > > > > Security brief: CoreOS Linux Alpha remote SSH issue > > May 19, 2016 · By Matthew Garrett > > > > > > > > Gentoo defaults to ending the PAM configuration with

Re: [gentoo-user] Surviving perl-5.24.0

On Mon, May 23, 2016, at 10:50, Thanasis wrote: > On 05/23/2016 08:27 PM, Max R.D. Parmer wrote: > > > > > Then everything rolls along 'til dying with this: > >> installman: Can't open cpan/podlators/blib/script/pod2man: No such file or > >> directory >

Re: [gentoo-user] Surviving perl-5.24.0

On Fri, May 20, 2016, at 16:33, walt wrote: > I spent most of today updating from perl-5.22 to perl-5.24 because so > many packages failed to install. I ran perl-cleaner about a hundred > times and tried emerge -ac in between, which always failed because it > falsely accused me of not doing

Re: [gentoo-user] freeSwitch

On Wed, Apr 27, 2016, at 15:17, Stroller wrote: > > > On Wed, 27 April 2016, at 3:21 pm, Michael Mol wrote: > > ... > > I have a Freeswitch install on a (non-Gentoo) box at a client. That client > > has > > recently moved to a different PBX product. I will not willingly

Re: [gentoo-user] In search of an XMPP client with OTR

Hello Meino, perhaps this will help: https://github.com/maxrp/profanity-overlay Profanity is a great client IMO. There's another called Jackline (written in OCaml) that is pretty cool and supports OTR too. -- 0x7D964D3361142ACF On Sun, Apr 17, 2016, at 02:20, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote: > Hi, >

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Encrypted cell 2 gentoo

on your particular needs whether that extra step is needed. -- 0x7D964D3361142ACF On Mon, Mar 28, 2016, at 13:45, cov...@ccs.covici.com wrote: > If you have your own mta and use imap-s won't that do it? > > Max R.D. Parmer <m...@trystero.is> wrote: > > > Ahh, OK. So secur

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Encrypted cell 2 gentoo

I think the paper on Intel issues Mick is referring to is the one I linked not too long ago: http://blog.invisiblethings.org/papers/2015/x86_harmful.pdf It seems like you're looking for something like the EFF's "surveillance self-defense"[1] site but with some stuff specific to Gentoo. [1]:

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Encrypted cell 2 gentoo

(though support for ZRTP is across the board pretty rare). Unfortunately, I'm not aware of any single cohesive guide to tie it altogether. -- 0x7D964D3361142ACF On Mon, Mar 28, 2016, at 09:13, James wrote: > Max R.D. Parmer trystero.is> writes: > > > > > > D

Re: [gentoo-user] Encrypted cell 2 gentoo

Do I understand correctly that you're looking to set up a Gentoo server as a "hub" from which you can retrieve your mail using any of your client systems? If I understood correctly, interoperability should be easy because mostly it comes down to IMAP/SMTP/POP3 and support for those protocols is

Re: [gentoo-user] The war continues.

Wow, sounds like you've been having a rough time. I think if you chunk things up into tiny pieces of logs, and take the issues on one at a time, you will be able to solve your problems. That said, if you would like to send us the last month or so of your emerge.log, we might be able to help focus

Re: [gentoo-user] pvcreate on LUKS container -> 'Device not found'

On Tue, Mar 8, 2016, at 15:06, Frank Steinmetzger wrote: > On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 12:02:23AM +0100, Frank Steinmetzger wrote: > > > > If you would like to get rid of the /run/lvm/lvmetad.socket error just > > > start lvm with "service lvm start". I still get the error when starting > > > up but

Re: [gentoo-user] [OT] Any thoughts on Intel Skylake SGX?

It seems like SGX is intertwined with the Intel Management Engine, Chapter 4 in Joanna Rutkowska's "Intel x86 considered harmful"[1] (pp. 35) goes in-depth on the potential issues with Intel ME. That same book has some light discussion on SGX (pp. 20) but it seems like, if you are concerned about

Re: [gentoo-user] glibc security issue

Yes, looks like it is: https://security.gentoo.org/glsa/201602-02 -- 0x7D964D3361142ACF On Wed, Feb 17, 2016, at 08:48, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote: > Hi, > > I found this > http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/glibc-Dramatische-Sicherheitsluecke-in-Linux-Netzwerkfunktionen-3107621.html > >