Re: [gentoo-user] Remote desktop to WinXP from Gentoo

2006-10-02 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mick wrote: > On Monday 02 October 2006 00:23, gentuxx wrote: >> gentuxx wrote: > >> I forgot to state the obvious, in that, the ability to RDP needs to be >> enabled on the target WinXP box. So, in System Properties, go to

Re: [gentoo-user] Remote desktop to WinXP from Gentoo

2006-10-01 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 gentuxx wrote: > Mick wrote: >>> Hi All, >>> >>> I want to access remotely my father in law's laptop which is running WinXP >>> to >>> help him out with his IT problems. >>> >>>

Re: [gentoo-user] Remote desktop to WinXP from Gentoo

2006-10-01 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mick wrote: > Hi All, > > I want to access remotely my father in law's laptop which is running WinXP to > help him out with his IT problems. > > I assumed that krdc will do just that, but all it does is to ask me for the > password for my kdewallet

Re: [gentoo-user] emerge problems

2006-08-27 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bryan Whitehead wrote: > It is most likely a problem with your own build enviroment or bad use > flags. Post the errors you are having to this group so we can see the > build problems. > > Before you do that, try running "repdev-rebuild". I don't kno

Re: [gentoo-user] Gmail + Email Client = No way

2006-08-27 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mick wrote: > On Sunday 27 August 2006 00:37, Samuel Baldwin wrote: >> For last year or so, I've been using Gmail with Firefox, all in browser, >> and have wanted to move to a local email client (using Thunderbird or >> Sylpheed-Claws). >> Unfortunatel

[gentoo-user] .bashrc not getting sourced at login

2006-08-24 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, I'm having an issue with root's .bashrc not getting sourced at login. I was under the impression that .bashrc setting overrode those of /etc/bashrc. Is this not the case? Any idea why this isn't happening? TIA - -- gentux echo "hfouvyyAhn

Re: [gentoo-user] Practical log reviewing

2006-08-21 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Grant wrote: > Does anyone know of a practical way to review all the various logs on > the system each day? Does it just come down to a brisk scroll through > the previous day's rotated logs? > > - Grant Depending on what you're requirements are, tr

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: .keep

2006-08-21 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Alexander Skwar wrote: > · Shawn Haggett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> Philip Webb wrote: >>> 060821 Shaochun Wang wrote: Does anyone know the function of .keep file in a directory? >>> It prevents the dir from being deleted by a script, >>> eg esp du

Re: [gentoo-user] Confusing boot up messages

2006-08-14 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 20:39:07 -0700, gentuxx wrote: > >> Yeah, baselayout was one of the packages updated. > > From what to what? genlop will tell you. If it was a path level update, > it is unlikely

Re: [gentoo-user] Confusing boot up messages

2006-08-13 Thread gentuxx
ing to start at boot. I get fewer errors, but I still get some. One of my OCD tendencies is to have a "clean" boot, so I would really like to get this resolved. TIA > > On Sun, 13 Aug 2006 19:42:21 -0700 > gentuxx wrote: > > I just ran an update today, and after reb

[gentoo-user] Confusing boot up messages

2006-08-13 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I just ran an update today, and after rebooting, I get a bunch of odd errors when all of the services are starting. I wasn't able to capture the exact warnings, and I couldn't find a log that contained them. But it was something to the effect of "WAR

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: What is available besides samba

2006-08-11 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > "Michael Crute" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> On 8/11/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> For easy fast comunication between winxp and linux machines, is there >>> anything other than samba the works relia

Re: [gentoo-user] udev hickup

2006-08-11 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Meino Christian Cramer wrote: > From: Meino Christian Cramer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Is the best solution still NIS+NFS? > Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2006 16:03:58 +0200 (CEST) > > (ooops...sorry...wrong subject...) And wrong thread

[gentoo-user] kdebase won't "re"-build

2006-08-10 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I've recently found that bugs.gentoo.org is my new friend. However, this is sort of a one-off issue, and I haven't been able to find it there. I run `glsa-check -f all' maybe once a month, or less (I usually get packages/versions recommended in the g

Re: [gentoo-user] How to see network activity?

2006-08-09 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > this has been a fascinating conversation. thanks boris for starting it. > i've tested almost everything that has been mentioned. > > i often have to monitor my computers over slow text-only ssh > sessions, so my > focus may b

Re: [gentoo-user] OT? Samba/LDAP Hell

2006-07-30 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Michael W. Holdeman wrote: > On Sunday 30 July 2006 02:14, gentuxx wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> This is slightly off topic for this list, but I thought I might get >> some response from the "braintrust". ;-) >> &

[gentoo-user] OT? Samba/LDAP Hell

2006-07-29 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, This is slightly off topic for this list, but I thought I might get some response from the "braintrust". ;-) A while back I started to configure samba to work with LDAP. I got as far as configuring slapd.conf and entering a "tickler" user.

Re: [gentoo-user] how to get ssh host based authentication working?

2006-07-29 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 John Blinka wrote: > Hi, folks, > > I'd like to get host based ssh authentication working within > all the gentoo boxes on my home network. I've had no > success yet - I hope someone can enlighten me! > > What I've done so far on the server side is: >

Re: [gentoo-user] unable to activate dma mode

2006-07-28 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Raymond Lewis Rebbeck wrote: > On Friday, 28 July 2006 22:36, Stefán István wrote: >> Hello! >> I'm not able to activate dma mode for cdrom drive in my laptop. >> # hdparm -d1 /dev/hdd >> >> /dev/hdd: >> setting using_dma to 1 (on) >> HDIO_SET_DMA fa

Re: [gentoo-user] Weird dependencies

2006-07-26 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Zac Medico wrote: > gentuxx wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> I'm trying to run a routine `emerge -DuatvN world' and am getting > some > >> funky dependency errors. Here's the error I get: >

Re: [gentoo-user] Weird dependencies

2006-07-25 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Zac Medico wrote: > gentuxx wrote: > >> Hi all, > >> > >> I'm trying to run a routine `emerge -DuatvN world' and am getting > some > >> funky dependency errors. Here's the error I get: >

[gentoo-user] Weird dependencies

2006-07-25 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, I'm trying to run a routine `emerge -DuatvN world' and am getting some funky dependency errors. Here's the error I get: emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy ">=dev-java/kaffe-1.4". (dependency required by "net-dns/libidn-0.5.15" [ebuild])

[gentoo-user] LiveCD genkernel fails

2006-07-13 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I'm trying to build a liveCD for a single-purpose test, and am having some issues getting the kernel to install. I actually think that this error is in the initrd generation, but I'm not totally positive. I've been using the instructions on the wiki

[gentoo-user] libquicktime-0.9.4 failes to compile

2006-07-09 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ok, given recent experience with imagemagick and libpng, I'm thinking this is likely a bug as well. This, and OOo-bin are the last two packages that revdep-rebuild is wanting to rebuild. I tried unmasking the testing version, but that has one or more

Re: [gentoo-user] Imagemagick fails

2006-07-08 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mike wrote: >> Bottom line: you need ~x86 libpng and imagemagick until libpng-1.2.12-r1 >> and imagemagick-6.2.8.0 are stabled. > > If you dont want to install the packages from testing you can compile > imagemagick with the -png use flag set and it sh

Re: [gentoo-user] Imagemagick fails

2006-07-08 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ryan Tandy wrote: > gentuxx wrote: > revdep-rebuild tells me that I need to remerge ImageMagick, but then > fails during the remerge. This is the error I get: > > libxml2 -O2 -march=pentium4 -fomit-frame-pointer -Wall -pthre

[gentoo-user] Imagemagick fails

2006-07-08 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 revdep-rebuild tells me that I need to remerge ImageMagick, but then fails during the remerge. This is the error I get: libxml2 -O2 -march=pentium4 -fomit-frame-pointer -Wall -pthread -MT coders/coders_png_la-png.lo -MD -MP -MF "coders/.deps/coders_

Re: [gentoo-user] Things that can be improved

2006-07-07 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Rafael Fernández López wrote: > Hi, > > This is not flame war. I love Gentoo, and it is the distribution > that > fits me perfectly, but I've been wondering this last year what things > can be improved in this wonderful distro. > > The first th

Re: [gentoo-user] 2006.0 - no universal anymore? (use LiveCD?)

2006-07-04 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mark Knecht wrote: > On 7/4/06, gentuxx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Mark Knecht wrote: >> > Hi, >> > I am moving my son from FC2 to Gentoo t

Re: [gentoo-user] 2006.0 - no universal anymore? (use LiveCD?)

2006-07-04 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mark Knecht wrote: > Hi, > I am moving my son from FC2 to Gentoo today. I went to get an up to > date universal CD and it seems that there isn't one. Is the preferred > stage 3 method of install these days to use the LiveCD and then just > go to the

[gentoo-user] revdep-rebuild find broken links, but doesn't fix them.

2006-06-27 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, I have a script that runs `emerge world', and the circuit of utilities, including revdep-rebuild. The last time I ran it, revdep-rebuild finds a bunch of broken links but it doesn't fix them. So, how do I go about re-emerging the packages tha

Re: [gentoo-user] gkrellm-1.2.13 emerge fails

2006-06-18 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Vladimir G. Ivanovic wrote: > On Sat, 2006-06-17 at 22:04 -0700, gentuxx wrote: > >> I was going through and cleaning out some older slotted packages. One >> of which was gkrellm-1.2.13. I use (and LOVE) gkrellm2, but really >

[gentoo-user] gkrellm-1.2.13 emerge fails

2006-06-17 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, I was going through and cleaning out some older slotted packages. One of which was gkrellm-1.2.13. I use (and LOVE) gkrellm2, but really have no interesting in keeping 1.2.13 around. But whenever I run an `emerge -Duatv world', 1.2.13 pops

Re: [gentoo-user] Which process is using port 5060 ?

2006-06-15 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dave S wrote: > Hi all, > > Apparently my SIP port 5060 is in use. Is there a Linux command to tell me > what process is using this port. I have a vague memory of seeing such a > command but just cannot remember or find it. > > Many thanks in advance >

Re: [gentoo-user] Module philosophy: Compile-in or Load

2006-06-11 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Anthony E. Caudel wrote: > I was wondering what gentoo-users think and practice about kernel > modules. Do most compile them in the kernel or load them at boot-up. > > Note that I'm _NOT_ talking about those modules that have to be compiled > in such

Re: [gentoo-user] Can't run `X -configure' successfully.

2006-06-11 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Richard Fish wrote: > On 6/11/06, gentuxx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> While looking closely at /var/log/Xorg.0.log, I noticed that Xorg had >> been built under a different kernel. So, I re-emerged Xorg under the >>

Re: [gentoo-user] Can't run `X -configure' successfully.

2006-06-11 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 david wrote: > Try changing /dev/mouse > to > /dev/input/mice > or > /dev/psaux OK, that worked as far as getting a running config. Now I just have to figure out what the scan rates are for my monitor. Is there anyway to dump the config being used wh

Re: [gentoo-user] Can't run `X -configure' successfully.

2006-06-11 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 maxim wexler wrote: > > --- gentuxx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Jason's recent inquiry about the alternate terminals >> caused me to >>

[gentoo-user] Can't run `X -configure' successfully.

2006-06-11 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jason's recent inquiry about the alternate terminals caused me to revisit an issue that I've had for some time. AFAIK, I don't have an xorg.conf. I've tried running `X -configure -verbose' and it fails with a "Signal 11". There are a bunch of module

Re: [gentoo-user] OT sorry for hijacking thread

2006-06-11 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mick wrote: > On 11/06/06, Jason A. Booth <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Sorry about that. >> ~J > > Don't worry about it. It is considered bad form especially when I was > relying on that thread to improve my limited knowledge on cryptography > in Lin

Re: [gentoo-user] Getting to grips with S/MIME in Kmail

2006-06-11 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mick wrote: > On 11/06/06, Bo Ørsted Andresen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Which versions of gnupg and kmail do you use? Did you look under >> Settings -> >> Configure KMail -> Security -> Crypto Backends ? On my computer it >> says it >> uses gpgsm

Re: [gentoo-user] ctrl-alt-f(123456) dono worky so good

2006-06-10 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jason A. Booth wrote: > Apologies if this is silly, but google didn't do it for me. > > I've recently updated a lot of things, and am doing emerge -u world > right now.. but from my user account, I lost the ability to get > back to a tty. seems really

Re: [gentoo-user] Getting to grips with S/MIME in Kmail

2006-06-10 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mick wrote: > Hi All, > > I am trying to set up S/MIME in Kmail. When I select the 'S/MIME > Singing Certificate' field in Kmail/Identities/Cryptography/ it fails > to find my key. > > The error pop up says: > = > Key Listi

Re: [gentoo-user] glibmm-2.8.4 failing to compile

2006-06-02 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Rumen Yotov wrote: >gentuxx wrote: > >>Hi all, >> >>I'm running an `emerge -Duatv world' and emerge is wanting to upgrade >>glibmm-2.8.1 to 2.8.4. But 2.8.4 doesn't seem to want to compile. >>H

[gentoo-user] glibmm-2.8.4 failing to compile

2006-06-02 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, I'm running an `emerge -Duatv world' and emerge is wanting to upgrade glibmm-2.8.1 to 2.8.4. But 2.8.4 doesn't seem to want to compile. Here's the error I get: ../../glib/glibmm/.libs/libglibmm-2.4.so: undefined reference to `sigc::internal:

Re: [gentoo-user] Updated gentoo systems and fresh installs

2006-03-13 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Trenton Adams wrote: >Hi guys, > >Is there a difference between the two? I have 2005.1 installed. As >I've always understood it, my system will now always be up-to-date, as >long as I keep updating it. Is 2006.0 any different than 2005.1 after >the sy

Re: [gentoo-user] need to be in wheel for sound?

2006-02-27 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Antoine wrote: > Benno Schulenberg wrote: > >> Antoine wrote: >> >>> I just had to add the missus to wheel for her to get sound in kde >> >> >> >> Check the permissions and owners in /dev/s{,ou}nd? >> >> Benno > > > tux ~ # ls -l /dev/sound/ > total 0

Re: [gentoo-user] After upgrading to the latest Baselayout...

2006-02-27 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Seo Boon, NG wrote: >I have the following error upon booting up after the latest baselayout upgrade. >My lo interface can comes alive after I manually do a "ifconfig lo up". Any I'm >operating a number of services on lo, I need lo to be up and running

Re: [gentoo-user] BS dependencies?

2006-02-26 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Iain Buchanan wrote: >IMHO, I'd try and find and fix the reason that it's not keeping time, >rather than patch it with ntpdate. Unless you know the reason already, >and it can't be fixed, then I'll just shut up :) Well, that *would* be the ideal way

Re: [gentoo-user] BS dependencies?

2006-02-26 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Richard Fish wrote: >On 2/26/06, gentuxx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >>Hash: SHA1 >> >>Why in the world to I need Apache, php(4), and a whole host of other >>pac

Re: [gentoo-user] BS dependencies?

2006-02-26 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Boyd Stephen Smith Jr. wrote: >On Sunday 26 February 2006 04:21, gentuxx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about >'[gentoo-user] BS dependencies?': > >>Why in the world to I need Apache, php(4), and a whole host of other >

[gentoo-user] BS dependencies?

2006-02-26 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Why in the world to I need Apache, php(4), and a whole host of other packages (22 to be exact) just to install NTP? Now, I'm assuming that the net-misc/ntp package is actually the daemon, and not just the client. Can anyone suggest a client *only* pa

Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo kixtstart/jumpstart equivalent

2006-02-24 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 John Jolet wrote: > Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo kixtstart/jumpstart equivalent > > > On 2/17/06 11:30 PM, "Ghislain Bourgeois" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > At my job, I designed a system we call Pullstart that we use to > install Gentoo servers. I'm

Re: [gentoo-user] Gentoo kixtstart/jumpstart equivalent

2006-02-17 Thread gentuxx
d I doubt I could fit all the drivers/commands/etc. on a floppy, and one doesn't even have a floppy. Thus the necessity for a network boot situation. I appreciate the response though. > -- > Ghislain Bourgeois > --- > Linux System administrator > > On 2/17/06, *gentuxx* <[

[gentoo-user] Gentoo kixtstart/jumpstart equivalent

2006-02-17 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I've got a little amateur project that I'm working on, and I'm running into some difficulty. The most immediate problem I'm having, is that I want to put gentoo on one of my systems, but they don't have a CDROM. (These are old boxes.) So, my questio

Re: [gentoo-user] Kernel not updating...

2006-02-16 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bo Andresen wrote: >On Thursday 16 February 2006 20:53, gentuxx wrote: > >>>Do you have eix installed? If not I suggest you install it. >> >>No, I just installed it. So this is the first time running these >>comman

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Kernel not updating...

2006-02-16 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mick wrote: >Daniel da Veiga wrote: > >>On 2/16/06, Bo Andresen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>>On Thursday 16 February 2006 19:35, gentuxx wrote: >>> >>>>>>Hmmm, shouldn't

Re: [gentoo-user] Kernel not updating...

2006-02-16 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Neil Bothwick wrote: >On Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:29:50 -0300, Daniel da Veiga wrote: > >> I was poking around in packages.gentoo.org, and noticed >> >>>that 2.6.15-r1 is unmasked for x86. So I run an `emerge --sync`, and >>>`emerge -av gentoo-sources`. An

Re: [gentoo-user] Kernel not updating...

2006-02-16 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bo Andresen wrote: >On Thursday 16 February 2006 19:35, gentuxx wrote: > >>>>Hmmm, shouldn't it be emerge -uav gentoo-sources ? >>>>I mean, "u" for "update"? >> >>emerge -uav gent

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Kernel not updating...

2006-02-16 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 james wrote: >gentuxx gmail.com> writes: > >>emerge -uav gentoo-sources >> >>These are the packages that I would merge, in order: >> >>Calculating dependencies ...done! >> >>Total size of downloads:

Re: [gentoo-user] Kernel not updating...

2006-02-16 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Holly Bostick wrote: >gentuxx schreef: > >>Daniel da Veiga wrote: >> >>>>On 2/16/06, gentuxx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> >>>>Forgive me if this ends up being the "stupid question

Re: [gentoo-user] package dependencies

2006-02-16 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Nick Smith wrote: >is there a way to tell what packages are required by what? for >instance i have a package that is blocking another package when i do >an emerge, is there a way to tell if the package that is blocking the >other is actually needed by

Re: [gentoo-user] Kernel not updating...

2006-02-16 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Daniel da Veiga wrote: >On 2/16/06, gentuxx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Forgive me if this ends up being the "stupid question of the day". > > But, I haven't been able to upgrade my kernel for some reason. &

[gentoo-user] Kernel not updating...

2006-02-16 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Forgive me if this ends up being the "stupid question of the day". But, I haven't been able to upgrade my kernel for some reason. (Obviously I could download it from kernel.org and go that route, but I would like to keep as much as possible in portage

Re: [gentoo-user] Last line of boot `this is reader.(none)'

2006-02-11 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Harry Putnam wrote: >My last line of boot output always says something like: > > This is reader.(none) > >I guess that means it doesn't know its domain name? > >Any know why this would happen?: > > root # domainname >local.net0 > There are a number of

Re: [gentoo-user] 4/8 CPU Gentoo server

2006-02-08 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 kashani wrote: > gentuxx wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Just wondering if anyone here has any experience with gentoo on a 4/8 >> CPU server. I say "4/8" because we're looking at Xeons that'll, at a >

Re: [gentoo-user] 4/8 CPU Gentoo server

2006-02-08 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Iain Buchanan wrote: >On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 15:52 -0800, gentuxx wrote: > >>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >>Hash: SHA1 >> >>Hi all, >> >>Just wondering if anyone here has any experience with gentoo

Re: [gentoo-user] 4/8 CPU Gentoo server

2006-02-08 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bob Sanders wrote: >On Wed, 08 Feb 2006 15:52:01 -0800 >gentuxx <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >>Hash: SHA1 >> >>Hi all, >> >>Just wondering if anyone here h

[gentoo-user] 4/8 CPU Gentoo server

2006-02-08 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, Just wondering if anyone here has any experience with gentoo on a 4/8 CPU server. I say "4/8" because we're looking at Xeons that'll, at a minimum, have HT but could possibly be dual-core. I run gentoo on a P4 w/ HT and it runs great! But I

Re: [gentoo-user] Mysterious dev-lang/php 'n' junk 'n' stuff....

2006-01-27 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Daevid Vincent wrote: >>Well, this is what I would like to do. ( I thought this would be >>obvious.) But I can't continue with the `emerge world` >>unless I'm able to resolve the blocks. The command/process >>dies almost immediately complaining about

Re: [gentoo-user] Mysterious dev-lang/php 'n' junk 'n' stuff....

2006-01-25 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Holly Bostick wrote: >gentuxx schreef: > >>Hi all, >> > > >>I went to do an `emerge -Duatv world` tonight, and I get dev-php/php >>and dev-php/mod_php blocking. So I uninstalled them, and thought >>that I wou

[gentoo-user] Mysterious dev-lang/php 'n' junk 'n' stuff....

2006-01-24 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, I had posted about this relatively recently, and didn't get any response, so I thought I would try again. I thought I had solved the problem (I had a bunch of stuff in package.keywords that probably didn't need to be there), so I left it alon

[gentoo-user] dev-lang/php blocking

2006-01-17 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all. Had a rather weird thing happen. I hadn't run an 'emerge world' in a few days, so when I did, there was a long grocery list of things to update. Most of them seem to be related to, or dependent upon, the recent perl and php updates. I had s

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: What USE flags would make for the ideal home KDE box?

2005-12-06 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Harry Putnam wrote: >Cláudio Henrique <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >>try these to start: >>kdeenablefinal >>kdexdeltas > > >Explanation? > http://www.gentoo.org/dyn/use-index.xml - -- gentux echo "hfouvyAdpy/ofu" | perl -pe 's/(.)/chr(ord($1)-1)/ge'

Re: [gentoo-user] unkillable processes

2005-11-28 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mark Knecht wrote: >Hi, > My wife ran into a problem this evening that required I do a >reboot. She runs Gnome. Sometimes something about her setup goes >haywire and she loses all her desktop icons and her wallpaper. In the >past I've found that if we

[gentoo-user] Bash Config files

2005-11-18 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, This is sort of a n00bie question, but something I haven't really had to mess around with. I recently did an `emerge world` and after the update and a reboot, my root prompt has changed back to the gentoo default. It now seems that the /etc/

Re: [gentoo-user] Developmnet Environment for PHP and PERL

2005-11-08 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Michael Shaw wrote: > What editor do people use for PHP and Perl development. I'm looking > for something with syntax highlighting and such, so that rules ut vi > or gedit. > > Thanks, > Mike I seems like you've got a lot of good suggestions here, so

Re: [gentoo-user] About sed

2005-11-06 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Willie Wong wrote: >On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 09:03:01PM -0800, gentuxx wrote: > >>sed -n '/^CLOCK=/s/^\(CLOCK=".*"\).*$/\1/p /etc/conf.d/clock >> > >Ah, yes, I misunderstood the OP. I thought he didn't w

Re: [gentoo-user] About sed

2005-11-06 Thread gentuxx
CK= in /etc/conf.f/clock without any comments. Is this right? Well, what I really want is replace just CLOCK="fool1" by CLOCK="fool2" keeping the comments in line. > > By the way, \1 do really what? If i put \0 the result is the entire line. So, could you explain me this a

Re: [gentoo-user] About sed

2005-11-06 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Willie Wong wrote: >On Mon, Nov 07, 2005 at 01:44:42AM -0200, Rafael Barreto wrote: > >>Hi, >> >>I'm learning about the use of the sed command and I have some questions. I'm >>trying to read in /etc/conf.d/clock the CLOCK variable with: >> >>sed '/^CL

Re: [gentoo-user] Visited web sites

2005-11-05 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Mark Knecht wrote: >Hi, > My wife is asking if there is an easy way to keep a list of all web >sites visited on a specific computer in the house. I don't know about >such stuff. Is there any way to do that for either Mozilla or Firefox? > >Thanks, >Ma

[gentoo-user] Optimal time to 'emerge world'?

2005-10-31 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Just wondering if there was an "optimal" time to update one's system. Meaning, is there a global/bulk "cvs commit" done once a day, that we should wait for? Especially concerned about security patches - can we *safely* assume that if the GLSA is out, t

Re: [gentoo-user] having a real mta + virtual one (ie postfix & nbsmtp)

2005-10-26 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Covington, Chris wrote: >Hi all, > >I'd like to have both nbsmtp and postfix, so that I can run an MTA and >use an MUA independently of each other. Although the two can co-exist >peacefully, the combo seems to upset portage: > >videodrome ccovington #

Re: [gentoo-user] Um...Who can fix this? -- SOLVED

2005-10-24 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Nick Rout wrote: >On Mon, 24 Oct 2005 22:32:46 +0100 >Jonathan Wright wrote: > >>- Second, run the digest command. You'll need to do this if it's not in >>the standard portage tree and it's something you have added. Portage >>needs to be told all the

Re: [gentoo-user] Um...Who can fix this?

2005-10-24 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jonathan Wright wrote: > gentuxx wrote: > >> !!! Security Violation: A file exists that is not in the manifest. >> !!! File: files/digest-sylpheed-claws-1.9.1 > > > There's a file within the portage structure for sylp

[gentoo-user] Um...Who can fix this?

2005-10-24 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I was emerging some packages to set up a postfix virtual mailer and got this: >>> emerge (8 of 10) mail-client/sylpheed-claws-1.0.5 to / !!! Security Violation: A file exists that is not in the manifest. !!! File: files/digest-sylpheed-claws-1.9.1 -

[gentoo-user] DBI/DBD ebuild?

2005-10-20 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I'm upgrading from mysql-4.0.25 to mysql-4.1.14 per the gentoo doc (http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/mysql-upgrading.xml). MySQL seemed to compile/install fine, but it fails on dev-perl/DBD-mysql with the following error: * Using ExtUtils::MakeMaker Can

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: stealth ethernet

2005-10-19 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 James wrote: >gentuxx gmail.com> writes: > >>I've set up Solaris systems with multiple NICs, 1 as a >>command-and-control interface, and 1 as a "sniffing" interface. The >>sniffing interface was config

Re: [gentoo-user] stealth ethernet

2005-10-18 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 James wrote: >Hello, > >For a variety of reasons, I need to be able to make an ethernet >interface on a gentoo system, change into listen only (stealth mode). >Kind of like half duplex, so to speak. Any simple tricks? >Just disabling all responses fro

Re: [gentoo-user] CVS problem

2005-10-17 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Peter Gordon wrote: >gentuxx said: > >>[EMAIL PROTECTED]'s password: >>cvs server: cannot open /root/CVSROOT/config: Permission denied >>Cannot access /root/CVSROOT >>Permission denied >> >>Here's

Re: [gentoo-user] CVS problem

2005-10-17 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Michael Crute wrote: > On 10/17/05, *gentuxx* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi all, > > I just set up cvsd using the Wik

[gentoo-user] CVS problem

2005-10-17 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, I just set up cvsd using the Wiki How-To here: http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_CVS_Server. Nice little How-To, and I seemed to get every thing set up fine. I was able to import the first module with the :pserver: protocol, but then decided that

Re: [gentoo-user] Syslog-ng has shell port open... SOLVED

2005-10-17 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Dave Nebinger wrote: >On Monday 17 October 2005 02:00 pm, Dave Nebinger wrote: > >>So I'm busy tracking down a tcp connection issue on my server and I see >>that *.shell is open (not a good thing). >> >>So I do the 'netstat -pl' command to see who has

Re: [gentoo-user] Setting up ALSA on a new computer

2005-10-13 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Michael Sullivan wrote: >I'm trying to set up ALSA on my new computer. I ran lspci to find out >what sound card I had: > >camille ~ # lspci -v | grep -i 'audio' >:00:1b.0 Class 0403: Intel Corporation 82801FB/FBM/FR/FW/FRW (ICH6 >Family) High Defi

[gentoo-user] RECALL: Snort/BASE/PostgreSQL Config

2005-10-07 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 gentuxx wrote: > Hi All. > > After a fair amount of effort, I was able to finally get snort/BASE > working with postgresql. I followed the instructions at the wiki, > here: > http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Setup_BASE_wi

[gentoo-user] Snort/BASE/PostgreSQL Config

2005-10-07 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi All. After a fair amount of effort, I was able to finally get snort/BASE working with postgresql. I followed the instructions at the wiki, here: http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Setup_BASE_with_Apache%2C_Snort%2C_and_PostgreSQL I ran into a number of

Re: [gentoo-user] New kernel and udev

2005-10-06 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Richard Fish wrote: > > > gentuxx wrote: > >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Hi all, >> >> I went to do my routine "emerge -Duptv world" and it came back with >>

[gentoo-user] New kernel and udev

2005-10-06 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all, I went to do my routine "emerge -Duptv world" and it came back with devfsd blocking gentoo-sources-2.6.13-r3. I'm not sure whether I'm using udev now or not. I remember compiling into the kernel last time I did a kernel compile. Naturally,

Re: [gentoo-user] vanilla-source-2.6.12.5 Xeon EM64T + SMP

2005-10-06 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Chris Ong wrote: > Hi Friends, > I am having a machine with 2 x Xeon 2.8Ghz w/HT/EM64T. > > I am using the minimal-amd64 iso to boot up and install the > machine and it's a sucess. > > But there's a doubt here.. > > During the installation stage, the

[gentoo-user] os-headers differ from kernel version

2005-10-05 Thread gentuxx
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 This is just a difference that I noticed while running the 'emerge - --info' command. My kernel is 2.6.12-gentoo-r9, but emerge --info reports the os-headers as 2.6.11-r2. I was able to trace the os-headers info back to the sys-kernel/linux-headers p

  1   2   >