[gentoo-user] hello world
hello everyone
Re: [gentoo-user] Hello All
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am 19.07.2010 16:38, schrieb Neal Hogan: On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 2:19 AM, alex a...@sourcegarden.de wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am 16.07.2010 20:18, schrieb Neal Hogan: I'd start a new thread ;-) Thank you, and that me now what to me? xD Is that a joke? yeahr ;-) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJMRYBQAAoJEB8n+SuWCkjvMs8IAIz2eaopyjkwfhJqWIc+Ddds HxGm04WUjCvmTADaAS26EcO+t/FLGz8QxPXD0DsMlaD/eXAECVH+yV8OI9t7mDi/ mz+M6v/Ebrgioe4ocwW2B6PfspzIjHB6lNHk5sAk/pNT2LSEp4laECn0RUzvWqg0 CAo4dNZRhgUK6jEMVFzRNz7j66AqYYwAr9crxVqivc852VivogOH3slDFwYFxafX mMKmR9/C4HQOHdWf8NMQo1QN2ne3JF83eM1Ie16hExX8GIbS+p33/PA0Zsf7i/Zg DJTq5hAsNUwPxCLkENvE18HfrILRMZJ8I9P1Vewmx6j4trZ3CyrEg9/pJOF+Fio= =Nfxd -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Sourcegarden GmbH HR: B-104357 Steuernummer: 37/167/21214 USt-ID: DE814784953 Geschaeftsfuehrer: Mario Scheliga, Rene Otto Bank: Deutsche Bank, BLZ: 10070024, KTO: 0810929 Schoenhauser Allee 51, 10437 Berlin
Re: [gentoo-user] Hello All
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am 16.07.2010 20:18, schrieb Neal Hogan: I'd start a new thread ;-) Thank you, and that me now what to me? xD Greeting -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJMQ/xxAAoJEB8n+SuWCkjv6uEIAM0RciZGtp30y1s7DRaVctpk 5j0zu7ce53mdpKazTNlFDt8S8j3Bjr/mZdxPP4IfqmNxg9h1NKHio1453idQ5rfZ k4S5Yx/56UuZJjlgTJs/dJRCqyR8u1si7F4uLGpry779sCJSAwikVd8wEZHkFLkf qJ79h1C4MYvndlOVNFUEYUgSSvuYgxyGjuY33hW7iD9bNxXa8jixvZuFB3RvX+s4 sWUwK04gCu/ZlKQXiKtab5t7zq2Bu62ngB8xmIGEfcfwrpoSI4S7msNtzsFVTp9n zCDQzWLQmNkssP/prKCVeN5ZTN+GzmpKe05n3XQIQ+5yS8JKiMMZflq45JbvLqE= =FBA0 -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Sourcegarden GmbH HR: B-104357 Steuernummer: 37/167/21214 USt-ID: DE814784953 Geschaeftsfuehrer: Mario Scheliga, Rene Otto Bank: Deutsche Bank, BLZ: 10070024, KTO: 0810929 Schoenhauser Allee 51, 10437 Berlin
Re: [gentoo-user] Hello All
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 2:19 AM, alex a...@sourcegarden.de wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Am 16.07.2010 20:18, schrieb Neal Hogan: I'd start a new thread ;-) Thank you, and that me now what to me? xD Is that a joke?
[gentoo-user] Hello All
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all small testing mail Greeting's alex -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJMQGJHAAoJEB8n+SuWCkjv96IIALzEF5v5CP5lUpY+i8XugXcN OcchK0DZYSA6o8v9/RFAZq5K1RJHWWeE5WFFfCIC1OqCgP2UgnCrmGTopINoXtDO hieos+pI/x1wN6HDBmkoY5ZULomNUbqiHv0Ypo50cJyseWRCjXI+HgTnRNOoxsRc IwRqJCQbH0iABsdB8ptkk1xRP7QUXT77lNBEr70zRDxkKLq37Ki8QY9cz6AzY6SP 2rVdt6OnYqGoaJA4ja1zhD2P6a2NrR61SsGQ5fAXd1EKHR8sXH+8CxfDW22HJJhN 3GtMdn956D9TCkhpCxa5kgxGCIO4YZYkP63e4H+dZTrT8W+FAer7YZhqsmY0Pj4= =9yOQ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Sourcegarden GmbH HR: B-104357 Steuernummer: 37/167/21214 USt-ID: DE814784953 Geschaeftsfuehrer: Mario Scheliga, Rene Otto Bank: Deutsche Bank, BLZ: 10070024, KTO: 0810929 Schoenhauser Allee 51, 10437 Berlin
Re: [gentoo-user] Hello All
On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 15:44 +0200, alex wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi all small testing mail Greeting's alex -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJMQGJHAAoJEB8n+SuWCkjv96IIALzEF5v5CP5lUpY+i8XugXcN OcchK0DZYSA6o8v9/RFAZq5K1RJHWWeE5WFFfCIC1OqCgP2UgnCrmGTopINoXtDO hieos+pI/x1wN6HDBmkoY5ZULomNUbqiHv0Ypo50cJyseWRCjXI+HgTnRNOoxsRc IwRqJCQbH0iABsdB8ptkk1xRP7QUXT77lNBEr70zRDxkKLq37Ki8QY9cz6AzY6SP 2rVdt6OnYqGoaJA4ja1zhD2P6a2NrR61SsGQ5fAXd1EKHR8sXH+8CxfDW22HJJhN 3GtMdn956D9TCkhpCxa5kgxGCIO4YZYkP63e4H+dZTrT8W+FAer7YZhqsmY0Pj4= =9yOQ -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Sourcegarden GmbH HR: B-104357 Steuernummer: 37/167/21214 USt-ID: DE814784953 Geschaeftsfuehrer: Mario Scheliga, Rene Otto Bank: Deutsche Bank, BLZ: 10070024, KTO: 0810929 Schoenhauser Allee 51, 10437 Berlin Hello Welcome :D -- Keep It Simple Stupid http://www.ghosTunix.org @ghosTM55
Re: [gentoo-user] Hello All
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Welcome :D Yeahr, some question. How good is Gentoo for a Samba AD environment? I want to install my Gentoo at the work, and for my Data i have to connect to AD. How good will work this with a Gentoo : ? Greetings Alex -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJMQGfEAAoJEB8n+SuWCkjv6IgIANElZrsyFuvZYJDMfLT/XMKe reG82pNNj3SIS65NMpd+SuOFH1S9THyiux5kWVTyOUoVEZSswCu19e9ReocJqSBH ch3T5OwsCi+BHxXx/QXUvEcAtxfIanG+K1e5/xaR5iQCljEFrblvZC0LNjiWjrhz GyQ+ZLaMN1H70pcyw/aCux8sP6IbU90c/xLZx91RmFjFDRE0bY8SgyUcNo84HqAn euchBdMMhRHlrsPDVuKMPLDPcdciZpZqh9GfR+QO7AEY2DNB/sq+NExziTBIBvE3 4lt3Awe7wJLepRbqiJxLcJ2PK/CGDGRGzNbpGd7GExlxrcz/lARq087b8Zp1vUI= =MM6p -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Sourcegarden GmbH HR: B-104357 Steuernummer: 37/167/21214 USt-ID: DE814784953 Geschaeftsfuehrer: Mario Scheliga, Rene Otto Bank: Deutsche Bank, BLZ: 10070024, KTO: 0810929 Schoenhauser Allee 51, 10437 Berlin
Re: [gentoo-user] Hello All
I'd start a new thread ;-) On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 9:08 AM, alex a...@sourcegarden.de wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Welcome :D Yeahr, some question. How good is Gentoo for a Samba AD environment? I want to install my Gentoo at the work, and for my Data i have to connect to AD. How good will work this with a Gentoo : ? Greetings Alex -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJMQGfEAAoJEB8n+SuWCkjv6IgIANElZrsyFuvZYJDMfLT/XMKe reG82pNNj3SIS65NMpd+SuOFH1S9THyiux5kWVTyOUoVEZSswCu19e9ReocJqSBH ch3T5OwsCi+BHxXx/QXUvEcAtxfIanG+K1e5/xaR5iQCljEFrblvZC0LNjiWjrhz GyQ+ZLaMN1H70pcyw/aCux8sP6IbU90c/xLZx91RmFjFDRE0bY8SgyUcNo84HqAn euchBdMMhRHlrsPDVuKMPLDPcdciZpZqh9GfR+QO7AEY2DNB/sq+NExziTBIBvE3 4lt3Awe7wJLepRbqiJxLcJ2PK/CGDGRGzNbpGd7GExlxrcz/lARq087b8Zp1vUI= =MM6p -END PGP SIGNATURE- -- Sourcegarden GmbH HR: B-104357 Steuernummer: 37/167/21214 USt-ID: DE814784953 Geschaeftsfuehrer: Mario Scheliga, Rene Otto Bank: Deutsche Bank, BLZ: 10070024, KTO: 0810929 Schoenhauser Allee 51, 10437 Berlin
Re: [gentoo-user] Hello All
On Fri, 16 Jul 2010 13:18:38 -0500, Neal Hogan wrote: I'd start a new thread ;-) I'd avoid top-posting :P -- Neil Bothwick Genius is 99% inspiration and 2% arithmetic signature.asc Description: PGP signature
[gentoo-user] hello there!
i am new at this list... i hope i can help -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] hello there!
On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 13:32 -0600, Jesús Abidan Ramos Salas wrote: i am new at this list... i hope i can help Me too, at first I'm basically reading and learning ^^ -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] hello there!
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 13:32:18 -0600 Jesús Abidan Ramos Salas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: i am new at this list... i hope i can help Welcome to the list. Long live Gentoo! -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] hello there!
On 20:55 Wed 19 Dec , Sven Albrecht wrote: On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 13:32 -0600, Jesús Abidan Ramos Salas wrote: i am new at this list... i hope i can help Me too, at first I'm basically reading and learning ^^ -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list Same here. I've been subscribed for awhile (maybe afew months), and have only just started to help. Welcome. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] hello
On 9/7/06, Boris Fersing [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: x11-themes/gtk-engines-qt works too. Adding a package without keyword will imply unstable host arch (cf manpage) : Ah, ok thanks. I hadn't noticed that...probably because I generally dislike implied behavior. Apologies to A.R. -Richard -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-user] hello
I have what is probably a stupid question. I run an amd64 gentoo system. I find that lots of packages have in their KEYWORDS amd64~. Up until now, to remedy this when I want to attempt to use one of these packages, I simply edit the ebuild, regenerate the digest, and do the installation. I feel sure there is an easier way around this - I've read somewhere of being able to tell the system that I am not worried about packages that haven't been tested on amd64 (thus the amd64~) - does anyone know what file I need to edit and in what way to make this work so I don't have to go through the hassle described above of editing the ebuild, regenerating the digest and then installing the package? thank you so much -- John Newman Systems Administrator, WebXess Inc. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] hello
Up until now, to remedy this when I want to attempt to use one of these packages, I simply edit the ebuild, regenerate the digest, and do the installation. I feel sure there is an easier way around this - I've read somewhere of being able to tell the system that I am not worried about packages that haven't been tested on amd64 (thus the amd64~) - does anyone know what file I need to edit and in what way to make this work so I don't have to go through the hassle described above of editing the ebuild, regenerating the digest and then installing the package? Sure there is: /etc/portage/package.keywords where each line is the full package name that you want to allow ~amd64 for your system. (in your case) An example is: x11-themes/gtk-engines-qt Save it and then just run: emerge -vuD world -p and you'll se portage telling you that is going to bring in the latest keyworded version of such package. HTH - AR -- If you stare long enough into an abyss, the abyss will stare back into you... -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] hello
2006/9/7, John Newman [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I have what is probably a stupid question. I run an amd64 gentoo system. I find that lots of packages have in their KEYWORDS amd64~. Up until now, to remedy this when I want to attempt to use one of these packages, I simply edit the ebuild, regenerate the digest, and do the installation. I feel sure there is an easier way around this - I've read somewhere of being able to tell the system that I am not worried about packages that haven't been tested on amd64 (thus the amd64~) - does anyone know what file I need to edit and in what way to make this work so I don't have to go through the hassle described above of editing the ebuild, regenerating the digest and then installing the package? thank you so much Hi, That's really ugly, have a look here : http://gentoo-wiki.com/Masked HTH. Boris. -- John Newman Systems Administrator, WebXess Inc. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list -- Quiconque me parle de Dieu en veut à ma bourse ou à ma liberté. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] hello
On 07/09/06, A. R. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Up until now, to remedy this when I want to attempt to use one of these packages, I simply edit the ebuild, regenerate the digest, and do the installation.I feel sure there is an easier way around this - I've read somewhere of being able to tell the system that I am not worried about packages that haven't been tested on amd64 (thus the amd64~) - does anyone know what file I need to edit and in what way to make this work so I don't have to go through the hassle described above of editing the ebuild, regenerating the digest and then installing the package?Sure there is:/etc/portage/package.keywords where each line is the full package name that you want to allow~amd64 for your system. (in your case)An example is:x11-themes/gtk-engines-qtSave it and then just run: emerge -vuD world -pand you'll se portage telling you that is going to bring in the latestkeyworded version of such package.HTH- AR--If you stare long enough into an abyss, the abyss will stare back into you... --gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing listAs an aside:1. Some ebuilds are masked packages. Whilst the chances of them being functional are *considerably smaller* than if they are marked ~amd64, if you REALLY must use them you can do so by putting their names into /etc/portage/package.unmask in a similar format to the above. 2. Whilst I appreciate the courtesy (!), posts are more likely to stand out, and therefore be read, if they have a more on-topic subject line than hello, or some such. For example, a better one for this thread might be how to unmask packages? or even just amd64?. In addition, some anti-spam software *might* throw away messages like ones which have a subject line hello, when they otherwise might catch the attention of someone able and willing to help you. HTH.Jeff Rollin-- Proud Linux user since 1998
Re: [gentoo-user] hello
On Thu, 7 Sep 2006, A. R. wrote: 2. Whilst I appreciate the courtesy (!), posts are more likely to stand out, and therefore be read, if they have a more on-topic subject line than hello, or some such. For example, a better one for this thread might be how to unmask packages? or even just amd64?. Well, and elegantly said. Hear hear. I routinely ignore posts with vague topics like hello or can i ask a question or even i have a problem. I get a couple hundred messsages a day, and I filter on subjects. If the original poster can't be bothered to summarize the post in the subject line, well then, I probably won't read it. The only reason I'm reading this post is by accident :-) I do recognize that it's a learned skill, and I appreciate replies like A.R.'s to help educate newcomers. I might be accused of putting too much info in my subject, but I figure it's helpful to those who wish to skip it. Good luck everyone, in finding the posts you wish, and the answers to your questions. Michael -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] hello
On Thu, 7 Sep 2006 10:10:01 -0500, John Newman wrote: Up until now, to remedy this when I want to attempt to use one of these packages, I simply edit the ebuild, regenerate the digest, and do the installation. I feel sure there is an easier way around this - I've read somewhere of being able to tell the system that I am not worried about packages that haven't been tested on amd64 (thus the amd64~) It's ~amd64, not amd64~. The way to set this system-wide is to set ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=~amd64 in /etc/make.conf. -- Neil Bothwick I'll be Bach. -- Johann Sebastian Swartzenegger signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] hello
On 9/7/06, A. R. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: where each line is the full package name that you want to allow ~amd64 for your system. (in your case) An example is: x11-themes/gtk-engines-qt Small correction... that should be x11-themes/gtk-engines-qt ~amd64 -Richard -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] hello
On 07/09/06, Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thu, 7 Sep 2006 10:10:01 -0500, John Newman wrote: Up until now, to remedy this when I want to attempt to use one of these packages, I simply edit the ebuild, regenerate the digest, and do the installation.I feel sure there is an easier way around this - I've read somewhere of being able to tell the system that I am not worried about packages that haven't been tested on amd64 (thus the amd64~)It's ~amd64, not amd64~. The way to set this system-wide is to set ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=~amd64 in /etc/make.conf.--Neil BothwickI'll be Bach.-- Johann Sebastian SwartzeneggerJust to clarify the point: putting individual packages in package.keywords or package.unmask allows you to use those individual, named, masked packages on a system that wouldn't normally accept them; putting ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=~amd64 makes the system pull in masked packages (rather than unmasked ones) by default. Jeff Rollin-- Proud Linux user since 1998
Re: [gentoo-user] hello
2006/9/7, Richard Fish [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On 9/7/06, A. R. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: where each line is the full package name that you want to allow ~amd64 for your system. (in your case) An example is: x11-themes/gtk-engines-qt Small correction... that should be x11-themes/gtk-engines-qt ~amd64 x11-themes/gtk-engines-qt works too. Adding a package without keyword will imply unstable host arch (cf manpage) : package.keywords Per-package KEYWORDS. Useful for mixing unstable packages in with a normally stable machine or vice versa. This will allow you to augment ACCEPT_KEYWORDS for a single package. Note: There are two special KEYWORDS to help out here: * Match any stable KEYWORD ~* Match any unstable KEYWORD Format: - comments begin with # - one DEPEND atom per line followed by additional KEYWORDS - lines without any KEYWORDS imply unstable host arch Example: # always use unstable libgd media-libs/libgd ~x86 # only use stable mplayer media-video/mplayer -~x86 # always use unstable netcat net-analyzer/netcat Boris. -Richard -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list -- Quiconque me parle de Dieu en veut à ma bourse ou à ma liberté. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] hello
On Thu, 7 Sep 2006 19:04:42 +0100, Jeff Rollin wrote: On 07/09/06, Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've read somewhere of being able to tell the system that I am not worried about packages that haven't been tested on amd64 It's ~amd64, not amd64~. The way to set this system-wide is to set ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=~amd64 in /etc/make.conf. Just to clarify the point: putting individual packages in package.keywordsor package.unmask allows you to use those individual, named, masked packages on a system that wouldn't normally accept them; Yes, but it you look at the original question, as quoted above, it looks like John wants testing packages system-wide. putting ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=~amd64 makes the system pull in masked packages (rather than unmasked ones) by default. It makes the system pull in testing keyworded packages (not hard masked ones) but that's what was asked for. If you have more than a few packages in /etc/portage/package.keywords, you may be better off with a completely testing system. -- Neil Bothwick Why is there an expiration date on sour cream? signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-user] Hello
On 3/7/06, A.R.S. KA9QLQ Alvin Koffman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I remember asking about a graphical frountend [like synaptit in Mepis] and was told we're working on it. How's it coming? take a look at porthole it's in portage $ eix porthole * app-portage/porthole Available versions: 0.4.1 0.5.0 Installed: 0.5.0 Homepage:http://porthole.sourceforge.net Description: A GTK+-based frontend to Portage Found 1 matches -- Cheers, Ghaith -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
[gentoo-user] Hello
I looked at gentoo about 2 years back when I wanted to switch from Mandrake, I went with Mepis and realy liked 3.3 but 3.4-3 doesn't seem as good. Don't like how they changed the reopositories. So I thought I'd look to gentoo again, and am please to see they're really making progress. Looks like there's a live cd with a graphical install from what I've read. I remember asking about a graphical frountend [like synaptit in Mepis] and was told we're working on it. How's it coming? I see it still leans heavly on Gnome but a KDE version is on it's way, that will help with popularity. I have a Celleron 2.9 gig 80 gig hd X 2 and 160 gig sata Diamond Stealth P90 nvidia fx 5200 video, and winsurf tv card that likes to lock my systom up g and dsl. Will the dvd have a ton of stuff? I see the live cd is only 200 meg, that seems kinda small. Be nice to see xvkbd in it for people who can't use their hands well. Just wondering. Alvin For the best jerky you've ever had go to http://alk.jerkydirect.com/ My home page http://ka9qlq.tripod.com This PC is windows free with Mepis Linux 3.4-3 http://www.mepis.org/ 1(747)632-4973 SIP Get Gizmo 1 cent per minuet calling http://www.gizmoproject.com/ -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] hello
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The message contains Unicode characters and has been sent as a binary attachment. - Virus report (proxy4) Virus was found and quarantined in http://www.gmxattachments.net/de/cgi/msgpart/xjzmy%2Ezip?LANG=deMSGNO=19%2D9452101fd51ddb4c6703b8b9adb3bb40m=497078782%2E1137498660PARTNO=1PARTFILE=xjzmy%2EzipLANG=deFROM=hagi%40p1d%2Ecom: Found virus WORM_MYTOB.AD in file xjzmy.scr (in xjzmy%2Ezip) The uncleanable file xjzmy%2Ezip is moved to /var/spool/iscan/virus/virpzSvSW. - Oh, what a pitty! I do not have winblows, so I can not open that interesting binary attachement. Otherwise I would sure do it... Are those people really too stupid to realise that it is useless to send windows viruses to linux mailing list??? Jarry -- 10 GB Mailbox, 100 FreeSMS/Monat http://www.gmx.net/de/go/topmail +++ GMX - die erste Adresse für Mail, Message, More +++ -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] hello
On Tue, 2006-01-17 at 12:52 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Are those people really too stupid to realise that it is useless to send windows viruses to linux mailing list??? Are there still people so stupid that they reply to virus spam?!!11! 1eleventyone! -- Owen Ford [EMAIL PROTECTED] () The ASCII Ribbon Campaign - against HTML Email /\ and proprietary formats. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Re: [gentoo-user] hello
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED] The message contains Unicode characters and has been sent as a binary attachment. - Virus report (proxy4) Virus was found and quarantined in Nice. I think it would be an excellent idea to ban attachments all together from this list. This would also do away with all that HTML junk Are those people really too stupid to realise that it is useless to send windows viruses to linux mailing list??? Oh, pardon me, I must have skipped a step. When I registered, there was no step showing the allowed MUAs. Jarry, do you know since when this has been changed? I'd be interested to know. Thanks a lot, Alexander Skwar -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
