Re: [gentoo-user] scrapping hal

2010-10-28 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Thursday 28 October 2010 04:50:18 Dale wrote:

 I think KDE is moving away from hal to tho.  I read somewhere the
 switch is coming.  I think it is switching to policykit at some
 point.  I notice it is already in the USE flags for kdelibs here,
 disabled here at the moment tho.  That would be if it doesn't change
 again.

On this ~amd64 box:

$ emerge -pv xorg-server
[...]
[ebuild   R   ] x11-base/xorg-server-1.9.1  USE=ipv6 nptl udev xorg -
dmx -doc -kdrive -minimal 

No mention of hal there.

-- 
Rgds
Peter.  Linux Counter 5290, 1994-04-23.



Re: [gentoo-user] scrapping hal

2010-10-28 Thread Dale

Peter Humphrey wrote:

On Thursday 28 October 2010 04:50:18 Dale wrote:

   

I think KDE is moving away from hal to tho.  I read somewhere the
switch is coming.  I think it is switching to policykit at some
point.  I notice it is already in the USE flags for kdelibs here,
disabled here at the moment tho.  That would be if it doesn't change
again.
 

On this ~amd64 box:

$ emerge -pv xorg-server
[...]
[ebuild   R   ] x11-base/xorg-server-1.9.1  USE=ipv6 nptl udev xorg -
dmx -doc -kdrive -minimal

No mention of hal there.

   


They are probably already moved away from hal.  Everybody knows it is 
going and that is a bleeding edge version of xorg too.  I'm still on 1.7.*.


Which brings me to my next question.  How is xorg 1.9 working for ya?  
Any gotchas?  May try it here.


Dale

:-)  :-)



Re: [gentoo-user] scrapping hal

2010-10-28 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Thursday 28 October 2010 11:46:30 Dale wrote:

 Which brings me to my next question.  How is xorg 1.9 working for ya?
 Any gotchas?  May try it here.

No problems so far. I had to unmask a more recent version of xorg 
because version 1.7.7 was incompatible with kernel 2.6.36. Well, I could 
have gone back to an earlier kernel, but what the hell?

-- 
Rgds
Peter.  Linux Counter 5290, 1994-04-23.



Re: [gentoo-user] scrapping hal

2010-10-28 Thread Alan McKinnon
Apparently, though unproven, at 12:46 on Thursday 28 October 2010, Dale did 
opine thusly:

 Peter Humphrey wrote:
  On Thursday 28 October 2010 04:50:18 Dale wrote:
  I think KDE is moving away from hal to tho.  I read somewhere the
  switch is coming.  I think it is switching to policykit at some
  point.  I notice it is already in the USE flags for kdelibs here,
  disabled here at the moment tho.  That would be if it doesn't change
  again.
  
  On this ~amd64 box:
  
  $ emerge -pv xorg-server
  [...]
  [ebuild   R   ] x11-base/xorg-server-1.9.1  USE=ipv6 nptl udev xorg -
  dmx -doc -kdrive -minimal
  
  No mention of hal there.
 
 They are probably already moved away from hal.  Everybody knows it is
 going and that is a bleeding edge version of xorg too.  I'm still on 1.7.*.
 
 Which brings me to my next question.  How is xorg 1.9 working for ya?
 Any gotchas?  May try it here.

xorg-server 1.8 and 1.9 use mesa-7.8.2, and there's reports around that that 
version of mesa causes desktop slowdowns. mesa-7.7.1 as used by xorg-
server-1.7 is reported to be fine

Me, I'm undecided. I have a slow sluggish desktop, but it might be the nvidia 
drivers, mesa, X-server, kernel config, wrong elevator or even just the shitty 
IO scheduler design on desktops that the kernel devs are recently waking up to 
admitting to. Lots of stuff to change one at a time and see what results...


-- 
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com



Re: [gentoo-user] scrapping hal

2010-10-28 Thread Dale

Alan McKinnon wrote:

Apparently, though unproven, at 12:46 on Thursday 28 October 2010, Dale did
opine thusly:

   

Peter Humphrey wrote:
 

On Thursday 28 October 2010 04:50:18 Dale wrote:
   

I think KDE is moving away from hal to tho.  I read somewhere the
switch is coming.  I think it is switching to policykit at some
point.  I notice it is already in the USE flags for kdelibs here,
disabled here at the moment tho.  That would be if it doesn't change
again.
 

On this ~amd64 box:

$ emerge -pv xorg-server
[...]
[ebuild   R   ] x11-base/xorg-server-1.9.1  USE=ipv6 nptl udev xorg -
dmx -doc -kdrive -minimal

No mention of hal there.
   

They are probably already moved away from hal.  Everybody knows it is
going and that is a bleeding edge version of xorg too.  I'm still on 1.7.*.

Which brings me to my next question.  How is xorg 1.9 working for ya?
Any gotchas?  May try it here.
 

xorg-server 1.8 and 1.9 use mesa-7.8.2, and there's reports around that that
version of mesa causes desktop slowdowns. mesa-7.7.1 as used by xorg-
server-1.7 is reported to be fine

Me, I'm undecided. I have a slow sluggish desktop, but it might be the nvidia
drivers, mesa, X-server, kernel config, wrong elevator or even just the shitty
IO scheduler design on desktops that the kernel devs are recently waking up to
admitting to. Lots of stuff to change one at a time and see what results...

   


Since you are undecided, I'm decided.  I'm sticking with what I have 
now.  I just got mine to speed up again and I don't want to be trying to 
narrow down problems again.


What's the old saying, if it's working, don't fix it.  lol

Dale

:-)  :-)



Re: [gentoo-user] scrapping hal

2010-10-28 Thread Alan McKinnon
Apparently, though unproven, at 16:36 on Thursday 28 October 2010, Dale did 
opine thusly:

 What's the old saying, if it's working, don't fix it.

What's the old saying, if it's working, don't fix it, until it's ancient, not 
supported and your box won't update world anymore so you are up the creek 
without a paddle and shit outta luck

There ya go, fixed that for ya Dale :-)


-- 
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com



Re: [gentoo-user] scrapping hal

2010-10-28 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Thursday 28 October 2010 13:35:49 Alan McKinnon wrote:

 xorg-server 1.8 and 1.9 use mesa-7.8.2, and there's reports around
 that that version of mesa causes desktop slowdowns. mesa-7.7.1 as
 used by xorg- server-1.7 is reported to be fine

This box has been the most sluggish box I've ever seen for several 
months now. Mesa-7.7.1 was not fine here - or something else wasn't.
 
 Me, I'm undecided. I have a slow sluggish desktop, but it might be
 the nvidia drivers, mesa, X-server, kernel config, wrong elevator or
 even just the shitty IO scheduler design on desktops that the kernel
 devs are recently waking up to admitting to. Lots of stuff to change
 one at a time and see what results...

Puzzling, innit?

-- 
Rgds
Peter.  Linux Counter 5290, 1994-04-23.



Re: [gentoo-user] scrapping hal

2010-10-28 Thread Dale

Alan McKinnon wrote:

Apparently, though unproven, at 16:36 on Thursday 28 October 2010, Dale did
opine thusly:

   

What's the old saying, if it's working, don't fix it.
 

What's the old saying, if it's working, don't fix it, until it's ancient, not
supported and your box won't update world anymore so you are up the creek
without a paddle and shit outta luck

There ya go, fixed that for ya Dale :-)

   


Well, if I wanted to stay fairly ancient, I could have stayed with 
Mandrake.  They were pretty slow to release packages and even then they 
were way behind.  lol


That's one thing about Gentoo, you get new stuff pretty quick even if 
you run stable.  If you run unstable, you get things really quick, bugs 
and all.  ;-)


Speaking of ancient:

Apr 16  2009 /boot/bzImage-2.6.23-r8-8

I still got that old kernel in there.  I would be surprised if it would 
boot and work.  I bet udev would really have issues with that old 
thing.  I'm not running that tho.  I am actually up to 2.6.35-gentoo-r4 
so far.   See, I'm not completely ancient.  lol


Dale

:-)  :-)



Re: [gentoo-user] scrapping hal

2010-10-28 Thread Paul Hartman
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 10:25 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
 That's one thing about Gentoo, you get new stuff pretty quick even if you
 run stable.  If you run unstable, you get things really quick, bugs and all.
  ;-)

Unstable is still pretty stable. If you really want to have fun start
to use some live ebuilds and rebuild new versions each day from
svn/git, and then deal with problems that occur because they expect
some specific git version of a library, so you use live ebuild of
that, which breaks other ebuilds which are made to work with the
stable release, and...   :)



Re: [gentoo-user] scrapping hal

2010-10-28 Thread Alex Schuster
Dale asks:

 They are probably already moved away from hal.  Everybody knows it is
 going and that is a bleeding edge version of xorg too.  I'm still on
 1.7.*.

Me too.

 Which brings me to my next question.  How is xorg 1.9 working for ya?
 Any gotchas?  May try it here.

X starts, but crashes about a minute after logging into KDE4. I had 
similar experiences with 1.8.

I'm using the radeon drivers for my ATI Radeon HD 3200 card.

Wonko



[gentoo-user] scrapping hal

2010-10-27 Thread Harry Putnam
I've been off the list a good while and wondered if there is some kind
of guide to scrap hal.

I understand it is being done away with upstream and will probably
require some changes on users part.

I'm also guessing there is some kind of replacement that I need to
learn about if it effects my longtime reliance on xorg.conf to keep
using my huge desktops I like to use.  For yrs I've
used.

Subsection Display
Depth   24
Modes   1280x1024 #1024x768 800x600 640x480
Virtual 2048 1536 
ViewPort0 0
EndSubsection
EndSection

in /etc/X11/xorg.conf
To get a 2048x1536 desktop to flop around on.

I've never seen or heard of a way to get that without using xorg.conf.

Other things, I noticed was the onetime I did try to dump hal I ended
up with no mouse or keyboard and fiddled with that a couple days,
finally going back to hal.

That has been probably a yr or more ago now.

Back to the point:  Can anyone provide some URLS that will help me
form a battle plan or even better a brief outline of (generally) how
to proceed with more or less painlessly dumping hal?




Re: [gentoo-user] scrapping hal

2010-10-27 Thread Alan McKinnon
Apparently, though unproven, at 23:06 on Wednesday 27 October 2010, Harry 
Putnam did opine thusly:

 I've been off the list a good while and wondered if there is some kind
 of guide to scrap hal.
 
 I understand it is being done away with upstream and will probably
 require some changes on users part.
 
 I'm also guessing there is some kind of replacement that I need to
 learn about if it effects my longtime reliance on xorg.conf to keep
 using my huge desktops I like to use.  For yrs I've
 used.
 
 Subsection Display
 Depth   24
 Modes   1280x1024 #1024x768 800x600 640x480
 Virtual 2048 1536
 ViewPort0 0
 EndSubsection
 EndSection
 
 in /etc/X11/xorg.conf
 To get a 2048x1536 desktop to flop around on.
 
 I've never seen or heard of a way to get that without using xorg.conf.
 
 Other things, I noticed was the onetime I did try to dump hal I ended
 up with no mouse or keyboard and fiddled with that a couple days,
 finally going back to hal.
 
 That has been probably a yr or more ago now.
 
 Back to the point:  Can anyone provide some URLS that will help me
 form a battle plan or even better a brief outline of (generally) how
 to proceed with more or less painlessly dumping hal?

It should all just work automagically with no real effort from you.

However, you cannot just unmerge hal and expect stuff to work, you might still 
need it, as in:

$ emerge -pv --depclean hal

Calculating dependencies... done!
  sys-apps/hal-0.5.14-r3 pulled in by:
app-cdr/k3b-2.0.1
app-emulation/virtualbox-ose-3.2.10
app-misc/hal-info-20091130
dev-libs/e_dbus-
kde-base/solid-4.5.2
media-gfx/gimp-2.6.10
media-libs/libgphoto2-2.4.9

Recent xorg-server (i.e. 1.9.1 do not have hal in USE anymore. For earlier 
versions, you may still need to set USE=-hal udev for xorg-server in 
package.use. Then rebuild xorg-server. If you are *updating* xorg-server while 
doing this, then you might need to rebuild mesa and all the drivers as usual 
for an xorg update.

As for xorg.conf. It's not quite true that you don't need an xorg.conf - this 
is still needed to define Screens and Devices if you have more than just one 
video adapter at native resolution. The part you don't need without hal is the 
Input section.

Once you have rebuilt xorg-server and made sure you run a recent udev plus 
evdev in the kernel, comment out ALL Input sections in xorg.conf and all 
references to them. Restart X.

It should all JustWork(tm). In the rare event it doesn't, post back with logs 
etc and we'll take it from there.

-- 
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com




Re: [gentoo-user] scrapping hal

2010-10-27 Thread Paul Hartman
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Harry Putnam rea...@newsguy.com wrote:
 I'm also guessing there is some kind of replacement that I need to
 learn about if it effects my longtime reliance on xorg.conf to keep
 using my huge desktops I like to use.  For yrs I've
 used.

    Subsection Display
        Depth       24
        Modes       1280x1024 #1024x768 800x600 640x480
        Virtual     2048 1536
        ViewPort    0 0
    EndSubsection
 EndSection

 in /etc/X11/xorg.conf
 To get a 2048x1536 desktop to flop around on.

 I've never seen or heard of a way to get that without using xorg.conf.

I think you would use xrandr to set it, or your desktop environment's
GUI settings panel (or equivalent).



Re: [gentoo-user] scrapping hal

2010-10-27 Thread Paul Hartman
On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Paul Hartman
paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com wrote:
 On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 4:06 PM, Harry Putnam rea...@newsguy.com wrote:
 I'm also guessing there is some kind of replacement that I need to
 learn about if it effects my longtime reliance on xorg.conf to keep
 using my huge desktops I like to use.  For yrs I've
 used.

    Subsection Display
        Depth       24
        Modes       1280x1024 #1024x768 800x600 640x480
        Virtual     2048 1536
        ViewPort    0 0
    EndSubsection
 EndSection

 in /etc/X11/xorg.conf
 To get a 2048x1536 desktop to flop around on.

 I've never seen or heard of a way to get that without using xorg.conf.

 I think you would use xrandr to set it, or your desktop environment's
 GUI settings panel (or equivalent).

Also, I think if you still need to use an xorg.conf file if you want
to use the proprietary NVIDIA or ATI drivers. If you're using the
standard xorg drivers then it should all probe and configure
automagically. In theory. :)



Re: [gentoo-user] scrapping hal

2010-10-27 Thread Philip Webb
101027 Harry Putnam wrote:
 I wondered if there is some kind of guide to scrap hal.

From my notes, having done it on  2  desktops machines +  1  netbook :

  To remove Hal : drop '-hal' flag, add 'udev' flag ;
  update to  Xorg-server = 1.8.0  -drivers = 1.8
 Xinit = 1.2.1  + drivers ;
  re-merge Exo Thunar ;
  delete refs to 'mouse' 'keyboard' in  xorg.conf ;
  remove 'hald' fr  /etc/runlevels/default/ . 

IIRC Hal is needed to the KDE desktop, but not for most KDE apps;
I use Fluxbox + quite a few KDE apps; Exo Thunar belong to Xfce.

-- 
,,
SUPPORT ___//___,   Philip Webb
ELECTRIC   /] [] [] [] [] []|   Cities Centre, University of Toronto
TRANSIT`-O--O---'   purslowatchassdotutorontodotca




Re: [gentoo-user] scrapping hal

2010-10-27 Thread Dale

Philip Webb wrote:

101027 Harry Putnam wrote:
   

I wondered if there is some kind of guide to scrap hal.
 

 From my notes, having done it on  2  desktops machines +  1  netbook :

   To remove Hal : drop '-hal' flag, add 'udev' flag ;
   update to  Xorg-server= 1.8.0  -drivers= 1.8
  Xinit= 1.2.1  + drivers ;
   re-merge Exo Thunar ;
   delete refs to 'mouse' 'keyboard' in  xorg.conf ;
   remove 'hald' fr  /etc/runlevels/default/ .

IIRC Hal is needed to the KDE desktop, but not for most KDE apps;
I use Fluxbox + quite a few KDE apps; Exo Thunar belong to Xfce.

   


I think KDE is moving away from hal to tho.  I read somewhere the switch 
is coming.  I think it is switching to policykit at some point.  I 
notice it is already in the USE flags for kdelibs here, disabled here at 
the moment tho.  That would be if it doesn't change again.


Dale

:-)  :-)