Re: [gentoo-user] [solved] portage bug?

2009-05-17 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Mon, 18 May 2009 01:49:54 +0300, Daniel Iliev wrote: > Yes, that's it. Strange, I was under the impression that bdeps was "yes" > by default. Only when using --depclean. -- Neil Bothwick To boldly go where I surely don't belong. signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-user] [SOLVED] portage bug?

2009-05-17 Thread Daniel Iliev
My mistake, not a bug. I'm glad I asked here before wasting devs' time with invalid reports. Thanks, guys! :) -- Best regards, Daniel

Re: [gentoo-user] [solved] portage bug?

2009-05-17 Thread Dale
Daniel Iliev wrote: > On Mon, 18 May 2009 00:36:56 +0200 > Peter Alfredsen wrote: > > >> On Mon, 18 May 2009 01:16:24 +0300 >> Daniel Iliev wrote: >> >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> >>> Would anybody, please, confirm the following behavior before I file >>> a report with B.G.O? >>> >>> >>> % emerge -

Re: [gentoo-user] [solved] portage bug?

2009-05-17 Thread Daniel Iliev
On Mon, 18 May 2009 00:36:56 +0200 Peter Alfredsen wrote: > On Mon, 18 May 2009 01:16:24 +0300 > Daniel Iliev wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Would anybody, please, confirm the following behavior before I file > > a report with B.G.O? > > > > > > % emerge -C dev-perl/yaml > [...] > > %