>> Now that's a new (and important!) piece of information. Your server
>> runs slow for 10 *minutes* after your script has made its request?
>>
>> To me, that indicates that important data wound up getting swapped to
>> disk on the server, and the slow behavior reported by other users is
>> the res
On 12 February 2013, at 01:19, Michael Mol wrote:
> ...
> I sincerely apologize. I will try to read your messages more clearly
> in the tone they're obviously intended. Perhaps I do have you confused
> with someone else. I hope so...either way, I apologize.
No problem, thank you and I'm glad we'r
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/11/2013 08:05 PM, Stroller wrote:
>
> On 12 February 2013, at 00:04, Michael Mol wrote:
>>> I am sorry if I have caused you offence on any other occasion -
>>> if so, please feel free to explain why.
>>
>> Primarily, what bothers me is your typ
On 12 February 2013, at 00:04, Michael Mol wrote:
>> I am sorry if I have caused you offence on any other occasion - if
>> so, please feel free to explain why.
>
> Primarily, what bothers me is your typically acerbic tone, and that
> your posts often (at least to my perception) carry more pejora
On Tuesday 12 February 2013 00:04:52 Michael Mol wrote:
> Primarily, what bothers me is your typically acerbic tone, and that
> your posts often (at least to my perception) carry more pejorative
> than useful information.
I've not noticed that, for what it's worth.
--
Peter
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/11/2013 06:07 PM, Stroller wrote:
>
> On 11 February 2013, at 17:43, Michael Mol wrote:
>> ...
>>> If so, I don't understand why apache2 seems to bog down a bit
>>> for about 10 minutes afterward.
>>
>> Now that's a new (and important!) piece o
On 11 February 2013, at 17:43, Michael Mol wrote:
> ...
>> If so, I don't understand why apache2 seems to bog down a bit for
>> about 10 minutes afterward.
>
> Now that's a new (and important!) piece of information. Your server
> runs slow for 10 *minutes* after your script has made its request?
On 11/02/2013 19:43, Michael Mol wrote:
> Now that's a new (and important!) piece of information. Your server
> runs slow for 10 *minutes* after your script has made its request?
>
> To me, that indicates that important data wound up getting swapped to
> disk on the server, and the slow behavior r
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/10/2013 08:53 PM, Stroller wrote:
>
> On 10 February 2013, at 05:05, Grant wrote:
>>> ... Your server is just a single computer, running multiple
>>> processes. Each request from a user (be it you or someone else)
>>> requires a certain amount o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/10/2013 12:05 AM, Grant wrote:
>>> The responses all come back successfully within a few seconds.
>>> Can you give me a really general description of the sort of
>>> problem that could behave like this?
>>
>> Your server is just a single compu
On 10 February 2013, at 05:05, Grant wrote:
>> ...
>> Your server is just a single computer, running multiple processes.
>> Each request from a user (be it you or someone else) requires a
>> certain amount of resources while it's executing. If there aren't
>> enough resources, some of the requests
>> The responses all come back successfully within a few seconds.
>> Can you give me a really general description of the sort of problem
>> that could behave like this?
>
> Your server is just a single computer, running multiple processes.
> Each request from a user (be it you or someone else) requ
>
> Can't; mod_php isn't compatible with mpm_worker. You have to use a
> single-threaded mpm like prefork or itk.
>
> Anyway, you're starting to get the idea why you want a caching proxy in
> front of apache.
>
Indeed. Thanks for your comments.
On Feb 9, 2013 9:26 PM, "Adam Carter" wrote:
>
> Sure, so long as Apache doesn't have any additional modules loaded. If
>>
>> it's got something like mod_php loaded (extraordinarily common),
>> mod_perl or mod_python (less common, now) then the init time of
>> mod_php gets added to the init time f
Sure, so long as Apache doesn't have any additional modules loaded. If
> it's got something like mod_php loaded (extraordinarily common),
> mod_perl or mod_python (less common, now) then the init time of
> mod_php gets added to the init time for every request handler.
>
Interesting, so if you hav
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/09/2013 05:36 AM, Adam Carter wrote:
>
> There are several things you can do to improve the state of
> things. The first and foremost is to add caching in front of the
> server, using an accelerator proxy. (i.e. squid running in
> accelerator mo
> There are several things you can do to improve the state of things.
> The first and foremost is to add caching in front of the server, using
> an accelerator proxy. (i.e. squid running in accelerator mode.) In
> this way, you have a program which receives the user's request, checks
> to see if it
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/08/2013 09:39 PM, Grant wrote:
A little more infromation would help. like what webserver,
what kind of requests, etc
-Kevin
>>>
>>> It's apache and the requests/responses are XML. I know this is
>>> pathetically little inf
>>> A little more infromation would help. like what webserver, what kind of
>>> requests, etc
>>>
>>> -Kevin
>>
>> It's apache and the requests/responses are XML. I know this is
>> pathetically little information with which to diagnose the problem.
>> I'm just wondering if there is a tool or metho
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Grant wrote:
>> A little more infromation would help. like what webserver, what kind of
>> requests, etc
>>
>> -Kevin
>
> It's apache and the requests/responses are XML. I know this is
> pathetically little information with which to diagnose the problem.
> I'm just
> A little more infromation would help. like what webserver, what kind of
> requests, etc
>
> -Kevin
It's apache and the requests/responses are XML. I know this is
pathetically little information with which to diagnose the problem.
I'm just wondering if there is a tool or method that's good to
di
A little more infromation would help. like what webserver, what kind of
requests, etc
-Kevin
On 02/06/2013 07:13 PM, Grant wrote:
> I have a script that makes 6 successive HTTP requests via
> LWP::UserAgent. It runs fine and takes only about 3 seconds, but
> whenever it is run I start receiving
I have a script that makes 6 successive HTTP requests via
LWP::UserAgent. It runs fine and takes only about 3 seconds, but
whenever it is run I start receiving alerts that my website is
responding slowly to requests. This lasts for up to around 10
minutes. I've tried turning the timeout down to
23 matches
Mail list logo
