On Monday 12 April 2010 18:33:21 KH wrote:
Am 12.04.2010 14:57, schrieb Alan McKinnon:
[...]
2. when devs commit to ~arch, they tend to run ~arch on their test boxes.
Issues are easy to spot and get fixed quickly. If you have a mixture of
the two, then you have a combination that no-one
On Tue, 2010-04-13 at 09:09 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Monday 12 April 2010 18:33:21 KH wrote:
Am 12.04.2010 14:57, schrieb Alan McKinnon:
So, in the rare case of a user who can discipline himself to say within the
limits you describe, your advice is fine. But that's a theoretical
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 12:30 AM, William Kenworthy bi...@iinet.net.au wrote:
On Tue, 2010-04-13 at 09:09 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Monday 12 April 2010 18:33:21 KH wrote:
Am 12.04.2010 14:57, schrieb Alan McKinnon:
So, in the rare case of a user who can discipline himself to say
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 7:40 AM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
Notes about what I think happened here:
1) I missed the message about running perl-cleaner so I had to do that.
2) I had a gcc build that didn't allow the profile to get set so
emerge -1 gcc fixed that.
3) After that I
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 7:40 AM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
OK, so I've been pushing forward and finally I'm emerge -e @world
clean. xfce still doesn't work right. It's in fact pretty unusable at
the moment as it has no menus at all, but it's only a backup
environment so I'm going
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 8:12 AM, Paul Hartman
paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 7:40 AM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
Notes about what I think happened here:
1) I missed the message about running perl-cleaner so I had to do that.
2) I had a gcc build that
Mark Knecht writes:
One minor annoyance is that the task bar at the bottom is about 1/3
black on the left. Resolution is 1920x1080 so I'd guess about the
first 800 pixels are painted the wrong color. The task bar still
works, it just doesn't look right.
I think I have the same problem,
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 10:34 AM, Alex Schuster wo...@wonkology.org wrote:
Mark Knecht writes:
One minor annoyance is that the task bar at the bottom is about 1/3
black on the left. Resolution is 1920x1080 so I'd guess about the
first 800 pixels are painted the wrong color. The task bar
...is not so good actually. Certainly not the way I'd want others to
experience Gentoo.
OK, the ~amd64 upgrade to @system was easy and relatively painless.
The documents were fairly clear. There are things to learn, and old
friends like rc-update and df look different, but it worked and didn't
Are you merely ranting or asking for help?
If the former, well, OK i Hear you. But I don't care.
If the latter, then you need to provide info like logs, output etc.
~amd64 works like a charm for me here.
On Monday 12 April 2010 13:57:39 Mark Knecht wrote:
...is not so good actually.
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 04:57:39AM -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
...is not so good actually. Certainly not the way I'd want others to
experience Gentoo.
OK, the ~amd64 upgrade to @system was easy and relatively painless.
The documents were fairly clear. There are things to learn, and old
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 5:00 AM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
Are you merely ranting or asking for help?
If the former, well, OK i Hear you. But I don't care.
If the latter, then you need to provide info like logs, output etc.
~amd64 works like a charm for me here.
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 5:14 AM, Zeerak Mustafa Waseem
zeera...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 04:57:39AM -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
...is not so good actually. Certainly not the way I'd want others to
experience Gentoo.
OK, the ~amd64 upgrade to @system was easy and relatively
I am however documenting my experiences for others than come after me
to this question of to ~amd64 or not ~amd64. Nothing more. It worked
for Alan who is a __very__ experienced and capable person. It didn't
work for Mark (at this point) who is a 10 year Gentoo user but
__nothing__ more than
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 5:42 AM, William Kenworthy bi...@iinet.net.au wrote:
I am however documenting my experiences for others than come after me
to this question of to ~amd64 or not ~amd64. Nothing more. It worked
for Alan who is a __very__ experienced and capable person. It didn't
work for
On Monday 12 April 2010 14:29:00 Mark Knecht wrote:
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 5:00 AM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com
wrote:
Are you merely ranting or asking for help?
If the former, well, OK i Hear you. But I don't care.
If the latter, then you need to provide info like logs,
On Mon, 12 Apr 2010 05:29:00 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
It's certainly not working for me at this point but I'm not upset,
mad, or anything like that. I'm asking a simple question. That's it.
Except you didn't really ask a question, at least not in manner that
could be answered. Posting the
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 6:57 AM, Mark Knecht markkne...@gmail.com wrote:
...is not so good actually. Certainly not the way I'd want others to
experience Gentoo.
OK, the ~amd64 upgrade to @system was easy and relatively painless.
The documents were fairly clear. There are things to learn, and
Am 12.04.2010 14:57, schrieb Alan McKinnon:
[...]
2. when devs commit to ~arch, they tend to run ~arch on their test boxes.
Issues are easy to spot and get fixed quickly. If you have a mixture of the
two, then you have a combination that no-one but you is using, and it will not
have been
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 10:45 AM, Paul Hartman
paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm not a gnome user but I can try this if you want (135 packages to
emerge in my case), or if you have more specific info about which part
doesn't build I can try only the specifics.
I went ahead and emerged
20 matches
Mail list logo
