[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So I'm interested in what I might run into. So far it looks like it
would be ALMOST as easy as symlinking ksh to bash in /bin.
Uh, this sounds scary :)
The two big things I see that will cause that not to work are lots of
calls to `print' and that bash does not
Alex Schuster [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So I'm interested in what I might run into. So far it looks like it
would be ALMOST as easy as symlinking ksh to bash in /bin.
Uh, this sounds scary :)
Yeah, it would be on a system with actual users but here its just me,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Alex Schuster [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But I was really just saying that syntax at my low level of usage is
largely interchangeable but for the cases I mentioned. So it makes
switching scripting shells from ksh93 to bash pretty smooth.
Matthias B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Tue, 08 Jan 2008 20:32:46 -0600 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm beginning to think I may just drop ksh93. Unfortunately, I've
grown quite accustomed to using `print' instead of `echo -e' so I will
have to replace that in a couple dozen scripts...
Matthias B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, 11 Jan 2008 11:18:44 -0600 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you say why you think zsh is better?
The bugs. I've hit lots of bash bugs in the past and every version seems
to fix some bugs and introduce new ones. I'm tired of adding new
workarounds
On Fri, 11 Jan 2008 11:18:44 -0600 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you say why you think zsh is better?
The bugs. I've hit lots of bash bugs in the past and every version seems
to fix some bugs and introduce new ones. I'm tired of adding new
workarounds to my scripts whenever I update bash.
MSB
On Fri, 11 Jan 2008 12:56:11 -0600 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you cite some actual examples of what you are talking about, with
enough detail so I can see what you mean? Maybe include one or two of
the workarounds you are tired of dealing with?
One thing I encountered is this bug
echo
On Tue, 08 Jan 2008 20:32:46 -0600 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm beginning to think I may just drop ksh93. Unfortunately, I've
grown quite accustomed to using `print' instead of `echo -e' so I will
have to replace that in a couple dozen scripts... otherwise the
scripts seem to run fine under
Alan McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
Can anyone interpret this emerge failure and have some educated
guesses what I should do to get it to compile. That message follows
the eix output below.
http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-p-4210019.html?sid=a282fd302189d24b214267ec5b90
9 matches
Mail list logo
