Hi,
for some applications I want to activate some USE flags, which are
disabled by default.
Some of those USE flags are set in () brackets. From searching the
internet I learned, that this may be due to unresolveable dependencies
or settings in the make.profile or
Is there a way to exactly
On 21/06/2014 11:19, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
for some applications I want to activate some USE flags, which are
disabled by default.
Some of those USE flags are set in () brackets. From searching the
internet I learned, that this may be due to unresolveable dependencies
or
Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com [14-06-21 12:36]:
On 21/06/2014 11:19, meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
for some applications I want to activate some USE flags, which are
disabled by default.
Some of those USE flags are set in () brackets. From searching the
internet I
Hi,
I'm trying to update my old rig, the x86 one. It is about 2 months or
so behind. I wanted to get it ready for the latest KDE for my brother
to play on. I keep running into this type of error:
checking whether make sets $(MAKE)... yes
checking whether to disable maintainer-specific
This is usually CFLAGS and other bits of env stuff. There's probably a more
meaningful error earlier in the build log.
Can you post the full log for a failing file?
Apparently, though unproven, at 09:45 on Friday 06 May 2011, Dale did opine
thusly:
Hi,
I'm trying to update my old rig,
Alan McKinnon wrote:
This is usually CFLAGS and other bits of env stuff. There's probably a more
meaningful error earlier in the build log.
Can you post the full log for a failing file?
Here is one:
Emerging (1 of 5) x11-libs/gdk-pixbuf-2.22.1
* gdk-pixbuf-2.22.1.tar.bz2 RMD160 SHA1
I just switched to a new WD Caviar Black hard drive (really fast and
quiet!) and I noticed some errors when I was cp -ax'ing everything
from my old drive to the new drive which were accompanied by loud
clicks. Is there a way to do a comprehensive test/check of the old
drive to see if it has any
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 9:46 AM, Grant emailgr...@gmail.com wrote:
I just switched to a new WD Caviar Black hard drive (really fast and
quiet!) and I noticed some errors when I was cp -ax'ing everything
from my old drive to the new drive which were accompanied by loud
clicks. Is there a way
On 22 Sep 2010, at 17:46, Grant wrote:
... I noticed some errors when I was cp -ax'ing everything
from my old drive to the new drive which were accompanied by loud
clicks. Is there a way to do a comprehensive test/check of the old
drive to see if it has any problems?
You don't need to do a
meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
this is no security issue in sense of attacks...it is related
to the consistency of the system.
Simple question (and may be complicate to answer... ;) )
How can I check, that my Gentoo system is uptodate, consistent
and sane?
Best regards,
mcc
I think
Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com [10-04-04 08:20]:
meino.cra...@gmx.de wrote:
Hi,
this is no security issue in sense of attacks...it is related
to the consistency of the system.
Simple question (and may be complicate to answer... ;) )
How can I check, that my Gentoo system is uptodate,
Am 04.04.2010 07:18, schrieb meino.cra...@gmx.de:
Hi,
this is no security issue in sense of attacks...it is related
to the consistency of the system.
Simple question (and may be complicate to answer... ;) )
How can I check, that my Gentoo system is uptodate, consistent
and sane?
Best
Von: nor...@smash-net.org
Datum: 04.04.2010 11:37
An: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Betreff: Re: [gentoo-user]
Checking sanity of system...
Am 04.04.2010 07:18, schrieb meino.cra...@gmx.de:
Hi,
this is no security
issue in sense of attacks...it is related
to the consistency of the system
Hi,
this is no security issue in sense of attacks...it is related
to the consistency of the system.
Simple question (and may be complicate to answer... ;) )
How can I check, that my Gentoo system is uptodate, consistent
and sane?
Best regards,
mcc
--
Please don't send me any Word- or
Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
I've encountered the same and didn't know how to solve it. I found out that
mkstemp was some standard C function so I remerged glibc, but that didn't do
the trick. Eventuella I restarted my installation. It as i686 with 32 bit
though. Did you change CHOST maybe?
On Wednesday 02 September 2009 01:16:10 Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 2. September 2009 schrieb Nick Khamis:
Hello Everyone.
I am trying to update-python and I am stuck at checking for working
mkstemp. for ever, what should I do.. This is a fresh install
AMD64.
Thanks
On Wed, 2 Sep 2009 13:12:22 +0200
Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday 02 September 2009 01:16:10 Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 2. September 2009 schrieb Nick Khamis:
Hello Everyone.
I am trying to update-python and I am stuck at checking for working
On Wednesday 02 September 2009 16:13:12 Mike Kazantsev wrote:
On Wed, 2 Sep 2009 13:12:22 +0200
Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday 02 September 2009 01:16:10 Frank Steinmetzger wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 2. September 2009 schrieb Nick Khamis:
Hello Everyone.
I
Hello Everyone.
I am trying to update-python and I am stuck at checking for working
mkstemp. for ever, what should I do.. This is a fresh install AMD64.
Thanks in Advanced,
Ninus.
Am Mittwoch, 2. September 2009 schrieb Nick Khamis:
Hello Everyone.
I am trying to update-python and I am stuck at checking for working
mkstemp. for ever, what should I do.. This is a fresh install AMD64.
Thanks in Advanced,
Ninus.
I've encountered the same and didn't know how to
I did not change CHOST just CFLAGS and CXXFLAGS as per the manual.
h
Regards,
Ninus
* Alan McKinnon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You are expecting autoconf to actually do something sane when it runs???
*rofl*
The point is: the way autoconf does its 'checks' is completely
insane - beginning with the expectation that an dumb script
is more clever than an operator ;-o
I've did
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the middle of doing a major upgrade from very old pkgs to current
2008 and compiling lots and lots of stuff.
Seeing that line `checking for WHATEVER' go by 486,211 times so far
makes me wonder if there wouldn't be someway to cache all those
answers somewhere so
ccache caches the compile step. I believe the OP was specifically
looking for something that would cache the answers to the checking
for lines (the configuration step).
On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 4:49 AM, Wolf Canis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[snip]
Hello,
ccache does caching, I use it and
Brandon Mintern wrote:
ccache caches the compile step. I believe the OP was specifically
looking for something that would cache the answers to the checking
for lines (the configuration step).
Yes, you are right, but I thought that ccache cached parts of the
configuration too.
That's what
On Fri, 02 May 2008 11:25:41 +0200
Wolf Canis wrote:
Brandon Mintern wrote:
ccache caches the compile step. I believe the OP was specifically
looking for something that would cache the answers to the checking
for lines (the configuration step).
Yes, you are right, but I thought that
Brandon Mintern ha scritto:
I had thought the same thing myself some time ago, and I discovered
that there had been work on a FEATURE called confcache. I believe it
was abandoned, though, due to major difficulties. This is merely a
guess, but I think some of the problems arise in that some of
In the middle of doing a major upgrade from very old pkgs to current
2008 and compiling lots and lots of stuff.
Seeing that line `checking for WHATEVER' go by 486,211 times so far
makes me wonder if there wouldn't be someway to cache all those
answers somewhere so whatever test is done for each
On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 3:11 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the middle of doing a major upgrade from very old pkgs to current
2008 and compiling lots and lots of stuff.
Seeing that line `checking for WHATEVER' go by 486,211 times so far
makes me wonder if there wouldn't be someway to
On Thursday 01 May 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the middle of doing a major upgrade from very old pkgs to current
2008 and compiling lots and lots of stuff.
Seeing that line `checking for WHATEVER' go by 486,211 times so far
makes me wonder if there wouldn't be someway to cache all those
On Thursday 01 May 2008, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Thursday 01 May 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the middle of doing a major upgrade from very old pkgs to
current 2008 and compiling lots and lots of stuff.
Seeing that line `checking for WHATEVER' go by 486,211 times so
far makes me
Hi,
emerge gnome fails. Does anyone recognize what portage is
complaining about here?
Thanks,
Mark
dragonfly ~ # emerge -pvDuN gnome
These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild U ] gnome-base/gnome-vfs-2.18.1 [2.16.3-r1] USE=hal ipv6
On 8/11/07, Mark Knecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
emerge gnome fails. Does anyone recognize what portage is
complaining about here?
I'm not really sure, but I solved it by reemerging dev-perl/XML-Parser.
--
Canek Peláez Valdés
Facultad de Ciencias, UNAM
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Saturday 11 August 2007 20:53:59 Canek Peláez wrote:
On 8/11/07, Mark Knecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
emerge gnome fails. Does anyone recognize what portage is
complaining about here?
I'm not really sure, but I solved it by reemerging dev-perl/XML-Parser.
--
Canek Peláez
On Tue, 06 Jun 2006 18:17:46 -0600, Joseph wrote:
How to check packages that are installed on my system but are no longer
available in portage (so I can remove them)?
emerge -uavDN world should show them up. I get this on one machine
These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
Recently I found out that I had an old package avifile installed on my
system but it was no longer in portage.
How to check packages that are installed on my system but are no longer
available in portage (so I can remove them)?
--
#Joseph
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Joseph wrote:
Recently I found out that I had an old package avifile installed on my
system but it was no longer in portage.
How to check packages that are installed on my system but are no longer
available in portage (so I can remove them)?
/usr/sbin/emaint --check
--
Ryan Tandy wrote:
Joseph wrote:
Recently I found out that I had an old package avifile installed on my
system but it was no longer in portage.
How to check packages that are installed on my system but are no longer
available in portage (so I can remove them)?
/usr/sbin/emaint --check
On Tue, 2006-06-06 at 20:57 -0500, Teresa and Dale wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / # emerge -pv portage
These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
Calculating dependencies ...done!
[ebuild R ] sys-apps/portage-2.0.54-r2 -build +doc (-selinux) 0
kB
Total size of
Teresa and Dale wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / # emaint --check
usage: emaint [options] all | world
Currently emaint can only check and fix problems with one's world
file. Future versions will integrate other portage check-and-fix
tools and provide a single interface to system health checks.
Ryan Tandy wrote:
Teresa and Dale wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / # emaint --check
usage: emaint [options] all | world
Currently emaint can only check and fix problems with one's world
file. Future versions will integrate other portage check-and-fix
tools and provide a single interface to
Am Mittwoch, 7. Juni 2006 02:17 schrieb ext Joseph:
Recently I found out that I had an old package avifile installed on my
system but it was no longer in portage.
How to check packages that are installed on my system but are no longer
available in portage (so I can remove them)?
It seems
42 matches
Mail list logo
