On Tue, 8 Jan 2013 01:32:29 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > I was experimenting with Enlightenment... clearly it isn't :)
> Raster is screwing with your head. He does that :-)
>
> E17 is all about choice. Like these:
[snippage]
> See? E17 is all about choice. All the choices all the time. Even
On Mon, 7 Jan 2013 22:23:29 +
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Mon, 7 Jan 2013 11:33:18 +, Jorge Almeida wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Neil Bothwick
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> > WHAT?! No tagline?
> >
>
> I was experimenting with Enlightenment... clearly it isn't :)
>
>
Ras
On Mon, 7 Jan 2013 11:33:18 +, Jorge Almeida wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Neil Bothwick
> wrote:
>
>
> WHAT?! No tagline?
>
I was experimenting with Enlightenment... clearly it isn't :)
--
Neil Bothwick
Unsupported service (adj): Broken (see Demon)
signature.asc
Desc
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Neil Bothwick wrote:
WHAT?! No tagline?
J.A.
On Thu, 3 Jan 2013 18:24:13 +, Kevin Chadwick wrote:
> I love claws but perhaps you should ask on the claws mailing list I
> thought it was too mouse heavy too but when I actually look it's very
> few tabs, arrows, enter and ctrl-R to reply etc. and the
> configurability of claws may help too,
On Sun, 06 Jan 2013 21:43:51 -0500
Randy Barlow wrote:
> That seems like it will likely be tricky. I don't know a lot about
> kmail, but I've got two ideas that might work:
>
> 1) Depending on what kmail can do, you might be able to set up a
> maildir or mbox folder with kmail, and have kmail tr
On Sunday 06 January 2013 19:22:16 Mick wrote:
> WOW! The fact that any KDEPIM devs consider this migration torture even
> remotely acceptable must be a clear sign of advanced insanity! O_O
>
> Thank you very much for your detailed instructions. It seems that kmail2
> requires the full KDE de
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/06/2013 09:10 PM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> I've got Thunderbird to connect to my ISP and fetch new messages,
> but I now have another, large problem. It won't import my 25,000 or
> so messages from kmail, nor even its filters. I do not wish to los
On 04/01/13 17:09, Mick wrote:
> On Friday 04 Jan 2013 04:13:21 Randy Barlow wrote:
>> On 01/03/2013 12:09 PM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
>>> Does anyone recommend a mail client that doesn't rely too heavily on the
>>> mouse? I much prefer to navigate, reply etc with the keyboard. I've
>>> seen Evolutio
On Sunday 06 Jan 2013 15:11:35 Francesco Talamona wrote:
> > On 4.9.3 you are still experiencing something similar. Hmmm. Indicates
> > to me a high probability of a systemic problem with the projects
> > approach, something that is unlikely to ever get really fixed. In my
> > opinion kdepim2 is va
> On 4.9.3 you are still experiencing something similar. Hmmm. Indicates
> to me a high probability of a systemic problem with the projects
> approach, something that is unlikely to ever get really fixed. In my
> opinion kdepim2 is vastly over-engineered and an attempt to solve a
> problem that doe
On Thursday 03 January 2013 18:22:08 Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> I do not know who shat into the brains of the kdepim devs that they fucked
> up kmail in this unbelievable broken way. Most people do not need akonadi
> - or nepomuk. Everything worked GREAT. Now most shit only works half way, a
>
On 4/1/2013, "Randy Barlow" wrote:
>On 01/03/2013 12:09 PM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
>> Does anyone recommend a mail client that doesn't rely too heavily on the
>> mouse? I much prefer to navigate, reply etc with the keyboard. I've
>> seen Evolution recommended; is that OK?
>
>Thunderbird is my fav
On Friday 04 Jan 2013 04:13:21 Randy Barlow wrote:
> On 01/03/2013 12:09 PM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > Does anyone recommend a mail client that doesn't rely too heavily on the
> > mouse? I much prefer to navigate, reply etc with the keyboard. I've
> > seen Evolution recommended; is that OK?
>
> Th
On 04/01/13 01:09, Peter Humphrey wrote:
>
> On 3/1/2013, "Alan McKinnon" wrote:
>> On Thu, 03 Jan 2013 09:43 +
>> Peter Humphrey wrote:
>>> When kmail was upgraded to 4.9.3 last month it made a complete hash
>>> of my e- mail system. In the end I moved my user out of the way and
>>> created
On Thu, 03 Jan 2013 18:09:27 +0100
"Peter Humphrey" wrote:
>
> On 3/1/2013, "Alan McKinnon" wrote:
> >On Thu, 03 Jan 2013 09:43 +
> >Peter Humphrey wrote:
> >> When kmail was upgraded to 4.9.3 last month it made a complete hash
> >> of my e- mail system. In the end I moved my user out of t
On 01/03/2013 12:09 PM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> Does anyone recommend a mail client that doesn't rely too heavily on the
> mouse? I much prefer to navigate, reply etc with the keyboard. I've
> seen Evolution recommended; is that OK?
Thunderbird is my favorite mail client. You can do a lot with the
On Thu, 3 Jan 2013 18:24:13 +
I wrote:
> it's very
> few tabs
If tabs are the irritation to scroll open mail, try three column view to
reduce the likelihood or small screen view which only needs arrows enter
and escape.
On Thu, 03 Jan 2013 18:09:27 +0100
"Peter Humphrey" wrote:
> Thanks for your thoughts Alan. I didn't like Claws much last time I
> tried it, but then that was some time ago.
>
> Does anyone recommend a mail client that doesn't rely too heavily on
> the mouse? I much prefer to navigate, reply etc
Am Donnerstag, 3. Januar 2013, 18:09:27 schrieb Peter Humphrey:
> Does anyone recommend a mail client that doesn't rely too heavily on the
> mouse? I much prefer to navigate, reply etc with the keyboard. I've
> seen Evolution recommended; is that OK?
it is like replacing cholera with ebola.
--
first of all:
filtering is completely and utterly broken. You have to delete all filters
whenever you add a new 'ressource' and even then they don't work most of the
time. They might work if you select all mails and click 'apply filters' - or
not. Bugs on b.k.o are open.
Second, to import your
On 3/1/2013, "Alan McKinnon" wrote:
>On Thu, 03 Jan 2013 09:43 +
>Peter Humphrey wrote:
>> When kmail was upgraded to 4.9.3 last month it made a complete hash
>> of my e- mail system. In the end I moved my user out of the way and
>> created a new user. Importing the e-mails from a backup of
On 3/1/2013, "Alan McKinnon" wrote:
>On Thu, 03 Jan 2013 09:43 +
>Peter Humphrey wrote:
>> When kmail was upgraded to 4.9.3 last month it made a complete hash
>> of my e- mail system. In the end I moved my user out of the way and
>> created a new user. Importing the e-mails from a backup of
On Thursday 03 Jan 2013 10:33:52 Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Thu, 03 Jan 2013 09:43 +
>
> Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > Hello list,
> >
> > When kmail was upgraded to 4.9.3 last month it made a complete hash
> > of my e- mail system. In the end I moved my user out of the way and
> > created a new
On Thu, 03 Jan 2013 09:43 +
Peter Humphrey wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> When kmail was upgraded to 4.9.3 last month it made a complete hash
> of my e- mail system. In the end I moved my user out of the way and
> created a new user. Importing the e-mails from a backup of the old
> version omitted
Hello list,
When kmail was upgraded to 4.9.3 last month it made a complete hash of my e-
mail system. In the end I moved my user out of the way and created a new user.
Importing the e-mails from a backup of the old version omitted large numbers
of e-mails, including a lot of complete folders. I
26 matches
Mail list logo
