On Sunday 27 June 2010 10:50:55 Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Saturday 26 June 2010 18:31:05 James Wall wrote:
You could also check out Pappy's Kernel Seeds at
http://www.kernel-seeds.org.org/
I will - thanks.
Turned out it was much simpler than kernel config - it was BOINC. Now all
I have to
On Saturday 26 June 2010 18:31:05 James Wall wrote:
You could also check out Pappy's Kernel Seeds at
http://www.kernel-seeds.org.org/
I will - thanks.
--
Rgds
Peter. Linux Counter 5290, 1994-04-23.
On 6/23/2010 4:36 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Wednesday 23 June 2010 03:29:16 Dale wrote:
By all means, use genkernel.
I will, RSN. This nearly new, shiny, quad-core box is as sluggish as
hell, and I want to find out why. So I'll use genkernel to install
everything under the sun and see if
On Wednesday 23 June 2010 03:29:16 Dale wrote:
By all means, use genkernel.
I will, RSN. This nearly new, shiny, quad-core box is as sluggish as
hell, and I want to find out why. So I'll use genkernel to install
everything under the sun and see if I can work it out.
--
Rgds
Peter.
On 06/21/2010 03:37 PM, Dale wrote:
I'm not saying you can't use it just that it doesn't always work. Thing
is, when someone uses genkernel to make the kernel, when someone asks
'did you include some driver', the usual answer is 'I don't know, I used
genkernel' and then nobody knows whether
Bill Longman wrote:
On 06/21/2010 03:37 PM, Dale wrote:
I'm not saying you can't use it just that it doesn't always work. Thing
is, when someone uses genkernel to make the kernel, when someone asks
'did you include some driver', the usual answer is 'I don't know, I used
genkernel' and then
snip
This is funny. I have NEVER got a genkernel to work on my system.
Actually, on any system. I'm not sure the OP would know that kernel is
any better then the one he makes.
Dale,
If you've never gotten genkernel to work, you should try this little
script that I've used for the past few
Bill Longman wrote:
snip
This is funny. I have NEVER got a genkernel to work on my system.
Actually, on any system. I'm not sure the OP would know that kernel is
any better then the one he makes.
Dale,
If you've never gotten genkernel to work, you should try this little
script
Dale writes:
I don't use genkernel anymore. I just roll my own. That way, I know
what is in there and what is not. Then if something doesn't work, I
know if it is the kernel or something else. With genkernel, you won't
have a clue what it is since you don't know much if anything about the
Alex Schuster wrote:
Dale writes:
I don't use genkernel anymore. I just roll my own. That way, I know
what is in there and what is not. Then if something doesn't work, I
know if it is the kernel or something else. With genkernel, you won't
have a clue what it is since you don't know
On 06/21/2010 12:01 PM, Dale wrote:
Alex Schuster wrote:
Dale writes:
I don't use genkernel anymore. I just roll my own. That way, I know
what is in there and what is not. Then if something doesn't work, I
know if it is the kernel or something else. With genkernel, you won't
have a
Bill Longman wrote:
On 06/21/2010 12:01 PM, Dale wrote:
Alex Schuster wrote:
Dale writes:
I don't use genkernel anymore. I just roll my own. That way, I know
what is in there and what is not. Then if something doesn't work, I
know if it is the kernel or something else.
On 06/21/2010 01:23 PM, Dale wrote:
The only thing that genkernel would add is your initrd. The kernel is
exactly the same, whether you compile it with make or through
genkernel. Do a test and you'll see. (I'm assuming we're both talking
about gentoo-sources, not vanilla-sources. Either way,
Bill Longman wrote:
On 06/21/2010 01:23 PM, Dale wrote:
The only thing that genkernel would add is your initrd. The kernel is
exactly the same, whether you compile it with make or through
genkernel. Do a test and you'll see. (I'm assuming we're both talking
about gentoo-sources, not
On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 14:26 +1000, Jake Moe wrote:
No, I was tempted to try genkernel, but again, OCD got the best of me;
I
like Gentoo because I tell it what I want and need, and it does that
and
nothing else. Genkernel, in my understand, does everything (and
apparently does it pretty
Albert Hopkins wrote:
On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 14:26 +1000, Jake Moe wrote:
No, I was tempted to try genkernel, but again, OCD got the best of me;
I
like Gentoo because I tell it what I want and need, and it does that
and
nothing else. Genkernel, in my understand, does everything (and
Jake,
Jake Moe jakesaddr...@gmail.com writes:
I've just completed a fresh Gentoo installation on a new laptop, and
strangely, after I choose the entry from the Grub screen, all I get is:
Booting `Gentoo Linux 2.6.32-r7`
root (hd0,1)
Filesystem type is ext2fs, partition type 0x83
On 17/06/10 20:38, Roger Mason wrote:
Jake,
Jake Moe jakesaddr...@gmail.com writes:
I've just completed a fresh Gentoo installation on a new laptop, and
strangely, after I choose the entry from the Grub screen, all I get is:
Booting `Gentoo Linux 2.6.32-r7`
root (hd0,1)
On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 13:54 +1000, Jake Moe wrote:
I had tried to see if there was anything special about the hardware,
but
couldn't find anything. I'm still of the opinion that it's something
to
do with the kernel, but I've given up on amd64 (I'm not sure if I've
had
an amd64 Gentoo PC
On 18/06/10 14:05, Albert Hopkins wrote:
On Fri, 2010-06-18 at 13:54 +1000, Jake Moe wrote:
I had tried to see if there was anything special about the hardware,
but
couldn't find anything. I'm still of the opinion that it's something
to
do with the kernel, but I've given up on amd64
I've just completed a fresh Gentoo installation on a new laptop, and
strangely, after I choose the entry from the Grub screen, all I get is:
Booting `Gentoo Linux 2.6.32-r7`
root (hd0,1)
Filesystem type is ext2fs, partition type 0x83
kernel /kernel-2.6.32-gentoo-r7 root=/dev/sda4
21 matches
Mail list logo
