On Saturday 23 July 2011 10:24:17 Sebastian Beßler wrote:
> Am 22.07.2011 21:20, schrieb Michael Schreckenbauer:
> > Maybe because you did not enable compositing in xfce4, but use it with
> > kde4?
>
> No, disabling composition is the first thing I do.
Ah, thanks.
Without a backtrace it's hard to
On Saturday 23 July 2011 09:28:43 Mick wrote:
> > Well, have a look at http://www.mail-archive.com/ubuntu-
> > b...@lists.ubuntu.com/msg1483058.html for an example how the open source
> > atidrivers can hang X with firefox. Note that compositing was enabled
> > here (compiz). And here's another one
* Mick [110723 10:20]:
> On Saturday 23 Jul 2011 14:31:23 Todd Goodman wrote:
> > * Stroller [110723 09:21]:
> > > On 21 July 2011, at 19:48, Dale wrote:
> > > > ...
> > > > I would try to kill it as root. The -9 option should work. That
> > > > hasn't failed me yet. I always run kill commands
On Saturday 23 Jul 2011 14:31:23 Todd Goodman wrote:
> * Stroller [110723 09:21]:
> > On 21 July 2011, at 19:48, Dale wrote:
> > > ...
> > > I would try to kill it as root. The -9 option should work. That
> > > hasn't failed me yet. I always run kill commands as root and DOUBLE
> > > check the
* Stroller [110723 09:21]:
>
> On 21 July 2011, at 19:48, Dale wrote:
> > ...
> > I would try to kill it as root. The -9 option should work. That hasn't
> > failed me yet. I always run kill commands as root and DOUBLE check the PID
> > after typing it in.
>
> I believe that `kill -9` is bad
On 21 July 2011, at 19:48, Dale wrote:
> ...
> I would try to kill it as root. The -9 option should work. That hasn't
> failed me yet. I always run kill commands as root and DOUBLE check the PID
> after typing it in.
I believe that `kill -9` is bad practice - doesn't it leave memory allocate
On Friday 22 Jul 2011 20:20:47 Michael Schreckenbauer wrote:
> On Friday 22 July 2011 18:41:26 Sebastian Beßler wrote:
> > Am 22.07.2011 16:57, schrieb Alan McKinnon:
> > > It may look like KDE is the likely culprit based on just the
> > > information you provide, but I would be more inclined to lo
Am 22.07.2011 21:20, schrieb Michael Schreckenbauer:
> Maybe because you did not enable compositing in xfce4, but use it with kde4?
No, disabling composition is the first thing I do.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Friday 22 July 2011 18:41:26 Sebastian Beßler wrote:
> Am 22.07.2011 16:57, schrieb Alan McKinnon:
> > It may look like KDE is the likely culprit based on just the
> > information you provide, but I would be more inclined to look at
> > browser plugins first, concentrating on those with both Fir
On Friday 22 Jul 2011 17:18:40 Sebastian Beßler wrote:
> Am 22.07.2011 17:05, schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann:
> > and you strace'd firefox, X or chromium to see where this stuff hangs,
> > did you?
>
> No I did not, a strace is only as good as the person who can read it,
> and in my case is that not
Am 22.07.2011 16:57, schrieb Alan McKinnon:
> It may look like KDE is the likely culprit based on just the
> information you provide, but I would be more inclined to look at
> browser plugins first, concentrating on those with both Firefox and
> Chromium versions from the same developer team.
Am 22.07.2011 17:05, schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann:
> and you strace'd firefox, X or chromium to see where this stuff hangs, did
> you?
No I did not, a strace is only as good as the person who can read it,
and in my case is that not much, not because I'm too stupid but because
I rather let my dri
On Friday 22 July 2011 16:39:41 Sebastian Beßler wrote:
> Am 22.07.2011 15:13, schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann:
> > maybe it is not KDE's fault when firefox is badly coded?
>
> Lets think.
> KDE4+Firefox = X hangs and firefox can't be killed
> XFCE4+Firefox = no problems
>
> Sure, it has to be firef
On Friday 22 July 2011 16:39:41 Sebastian Beßler did opine thusly:
> Am 22.07.2011 15:13, schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann:
> > maybe it is not KDE's fault when firefox is badly coded?
>
> Lets think.
> KDE4+Firefox = X hangs and firefox can't be killed
> XFCE4+Firefox = no problems
>
> Sure, it has
Am 22.07.2011 15:13, schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann:
> maybe it is not KDE's fault when firefox is badly coded?
Lets think.
KDE4+Firefox = X hangs and firefox can't be killed
XFCE4+Firefox = no problems
Sure, it has to be firefox
Oh and a test 20 minutes ago showed
KDE4+Chromium = X hangs and ch
On Thursday 21 July 2011 19:38:53 Mick wrote:
> Whatever Dale had on his machine must have infected mine! LOL!
>
> A 32bit x86 box with KDE4.6, running firefox-3.6.17 and xulrunner-1.9.2.17
> after a few hours and loads of tabs (sometimes up to 15 or so) eventually
> hangs X.
>
> I can switch to
On Friday 22 July 2011 13:54:09 Sebastian Beßler wrote:
> Am 21.07.2011 20:38, schrieb Mick:
> > Whatever Dale had on his machine must have infected mine! LOL!
> >
> > A 32bit x86 box with KDE4.6, running firefox-3.6.17 and
> > xulrunner-1.9.2.17 after a few hours and loads of tabs (sometimes up
Am 21.07.2011 20:38, schrieb Mick:
> Whatever Dale had on his machine must have infected mine! LOL!
>
> A 32bit x86 box with KDE4.6, running firefox-3.6.17 and xulrunner-1.9.2.17
> after a few hours and loads of tabs (sometimes up to 15 or so) eventually
> hangs X.
I had the same problem with
Mick wrote:
Whatever Dale had on his machine must have infected mine! LOL!
A 32bit x86 box with KDE4.6, running firefox-3.6.17 and xulrunner-1.9.2.17
after a few hours and loads of tabs (sometimes up to 15 or so) eventually
hangs X.
I can switch to a console and login as the user running the X
Whatever Dale had on his machine must have infected mine! LOL!
A 32bit x86 box with KDE4.6, running firefox-3.6.17 and xulrunner-1.9.2.17
after a few hours and loads of tabs (sometimes up to 15 or so) eventually
hangs X.
I can switch to a console and login as the user running the X session, th
20 matches
Mail list logo
