hello everyone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 19.07.2010 16:38, schrieb Neal Hogan:
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 2:19 AM, alex a...@sourcegarden.de wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 16.07.2010 20:18, schrieb Neal Hogan:
I'd start a new thread ;-)
Thank you, and that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 16.07.2010 20:18, schrieb Neal Hogan:
I'd start a new thread ;-)
Thank you, and that me now what to me? xD
Greeting
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 2:19 AM, alex a...@sourcegarden.de wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 16.07.2010 20:18, schrieb Neal Hogan:
I'd start a new thread ;-)
Thank you, and that me now what to me? xD
Is that a joke?
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all
small testing mail
Greeting's alex
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJMQGJHAAoJEB8n+SuWCkjv96IIALzEF5v5CP5lUpY+i8XugXcN
On Fri, 2010-07-16 at 15:44 +0200, alex wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all
small testing mail
Greeting's alex
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Welcome :D
Yeahr, some question. How good is Gentoo for a Samba AD environment?
I want to install my Gentoo at the work, and for my Data i have to
connect to AD. How good will work this with a Gentoo : ?
Greetings Alex
-BEGIN PGP
I'd start a new thread ;-)
On Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 9:08 AM, alex a...@sourcegarden.de wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Welcome :D
Yeahr, some question. How good is Gentoo for a Samba AD environment?
I want to install my Gentoo at the work, and for my Data i
On Fri, 16 Jul 2010 13:18:38 -0500, Neal Hogan wrote:
I'd start a new thread ;-)
I'd avoid top-posting :P
--
Neil Bothwick
Genius is 99% inspiration and 2% arithmetic
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
i am new at this list... i hope i can help
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 13:32 -0600, Jesús Abidan Ramos Salas wrote:
i am new at this list... i hope i can help
Me too, at first I'm basically reading and learning ^^
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Wed, 19 Dec 2007 13:32:18 -0600
Jesús Abidan Ramos Salas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i am new at this list... i hope i can help
Welcome to the list. Long live Gentoo!
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On 20:55 Wed 19 Dec , Sven Albrecht wrote:
On Wed, 2007-12-19 at 13:32 -0600, Jesús Abidan Ramos Salas wrote:
i am new at this list... i hope i can help
Me too, at first I'm basically reading and learning ^^
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Same here. I've been subscribed
On 9/7/06, Boris Fersing [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
x11-themes/gtk-engines-qt works too. Adding a package without keyword
will imply unstable host arch (cf manpage) :
Ah, ok thanks. I hadn't noticed that...probably because I generally
dislike implied behavior. Apologies to A.R.
-Richard
--
I have what is probably a stupid question. I run an amd64 gentoo
system. I find that lots of packages have in their KEYWORDS amd64~.
Up until now, to remedy this when I want to attempt to use one of these
packages, I simply edit the ebuild, regenerate the digest, and do the
installation. I
Up until now, to remedy this when I want to attempt to use one of these
packages, I simply edit the ebuild, regenerate the digest, and do the
installation. I feel sure there is an easier way around this - I've
read somewhere of being able to tell the system that I am not worried
about packages
2006/9/7, John Newman [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I have what is probably a stupid question. I run an amd64 gentoo
system. I find that lots of packages have in their KEYWORDS amd64~.
Up until now, to remedy this when I want to attempt to use one of these
packages, I simply edit the ebuild, regenerate
On 07/09/06, A. R. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Up until now, to remedy this when I want to attempt to use one of these packages, I simply edit the ebuild, regenerate the digest, and do the installation.I feel sure there is an easier way around this - I've
read somewhere of being able to tell the
On Thu, 7 Sep 2006, A. R. wrote:
2. Whilst I appreciate the courtesy (!), posts are more likely to stand
out,
and therefore be read, if they have a more on-topic subject line than
hello, or some such. For example, a better one for this thread might be
how to unmask packages? or even
On Thu, 7 Sep 2006 10:10:01 -0500, John Newman wrote:
Up until now, to remedy this when I want to attempt to use one of these
packages, I simply edit the ebuild, regenerate the digest, and do the
installation. I feel sure there is an easier way around this - I've
read somewhere of being able
On 9/7/06, A. R. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
where each line is the full package name that you want to allow
~amd64 for your system. (in your case)
An example is:
x11-themes/gtk-engines-qt
Small correction... that should be
x11-themes/gtk-engines-qt ~amd64
-Richard
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org
On 07/09/06, Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 7 Sep 2006 10:10:01 -0500, John Newman wrote: Up until now, to remedy this when I want to attempt to use one of these packages, I simply edit the ebuild, regenerate the digest, and do the installation.I feel sure there is an easier way
2006/9/7, Richard Fish [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 9/7/06, A. R. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
where each line is the full package name that you want to allow
~amd64 for your system. (in your case)
An example is:
x11-themes/gtk-engines-qt
Small correction... that should be
x11-themes/gtk-engines-qt
On Thu, 7 Sep 2006 19:04:42 +0100, Jeff Rollin wrote:
On 07/09/06, Neil Bothwick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've read somewhere of being able to tell the system that I
am not worried about packages that haven't been tested on amd64
It's ~amd64, not amd64~. The way to set this system-wide
On 3/7/06, A.R.S. KA9QLQ Alvin Koffman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I remember asking about a graphical frountend [like synaptit in Mepis] and
was told we're working on it. How's it coming?
take a look at porthole it's in portage
$ eix porthole
* app-portage/porthole
Available versions:
I looked at gentoo about 2 years back when I wanted to switch from
Mandrake, I went with Mepis and realy liked 3.3 but 3.4-3 doesn't seem as
good. Don't like how they changed the reopositories. So I thought I'd look
to gentoo again, and am please to see they're really making progress.
Looks like
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The message contains Unicode characters and has been sent as a binary
attachment.
-
Virus report (proxy4)
Virus was found and quarantined in
On Tue, 2006-01-17 at 12:52 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are those people really too stupid to realise that it is useless
to send windows viruses to linux mailing list???
Are there still people so stupid that they reply to virus spam?!!11!
1eleventyone!
--
Owen Ford [EMAIL PROTECTED]
()
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The message contains Unicode characters and has been sent as a binary
attachment.
-
Virus report (proxy4)
Virus was found and quarantined in
Nice.
I think it would be an excellent idea to ban
29 matches
Mail list logo
