On 2006-01-16 03:00 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can anyone help explain the status=bounced (mail for
mail.validdomain.co.uk loops back to myself error message, please?
It actually is pretty self explanationary. It means that a mail was
received (from a host that is allowed to relay, in
On 16 Jan 2006, at 08:53, Michael Kjorling wrote:
On 2006-01-16 03:00 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can anyone help explain the status=bounced (mail for
mail.validdomain.co.uk loops back to myself error message, please?
It actually is pretty self explanationary. It means that a mail was
I had a similar problem with a school's mail system. I setup spam
assasin but found it identified the same nicely but didnt do any thing
about it. Now there are a few things that you particularly dont want
such as penixensizer and viagra and such...
What I landed up doing is defining a set of my
Hi,
On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 03:08:38 +
Stroller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I emerged SpamAssasin on a mailserver the other day, added the
appropriate line to /etc/postfix/master.cf and it all seems to be
working ok. But it doesn't seem to be very accurate in the default
configuration -
On 15 Jan 2006, at 10:15, Ryan Viljoen wrote:
What I landed up doing is defining a set of my own rules that detected
if penis, viagra, slut and such words occured it added a +10.0 to the
spam assassin rating so if is clearly identified as spam.
I'm somewhat cautious about this. I know you
On 15 Jan 2006, at 12:56, Hans-Werner Hilse wrote:
I'd strongly suggest using the Bayesian filters, per-user, that is...
That way all users can put mails they'd like to be learned as being
spam in the respective IMAP folder and have them automatically learned
overnight. Simple setup, highly
On Jan 15, 2006, at 7:59 AM, Stroller wrote:
On 15 Jan 2006, at 10:15, Ryan Viljoen wrote:
What I landed up doing is defining a set of my own rules that
detected
if penis, viagra, slut and such words occured it added a +10.0 to the
spam assassin rating so if is clearly identified as
On Sunday 15 January 2006 04:08, Stroller wrote:
I'd be very happy with a 95% success rate on spam detection, but
obviously false positives are a Bad Thing.
Never tried it myself, but I've read many articles that say that dspam is
a better filter than spamassassin, and can be trained by users
On 15 Jan 2006, at 14:36, Etaoin Shrdlu wrote:
On Sunday 15 January 2006 04:08, Stroller wrote:
I'd be very happy with a 95% success rate on spam detection, but
obviously false positives are a Bad Thing.
Never tried it myself, but I've read many articles that say that
dspam is
a better
On Monday 16 January 2006 04:28, Stroller wrote:
It does indeed seem very good, but again it requires training, which
is something I'm trying to avoid in this instance.
Stroller.
No solution you have is going to be perfect I suspect. Really it does come
down to individual requirements,
On 15 Jan 2006, at 16:44, Glenn Enright wrote:
On Monday 16 January 2006 04:28, Stroller wrote:
It does indeed seem very good, but again it requires training, which
is something I'm trying to avoid in this instance.
Stroller.
No solution you have is going to be perfect I suspect. Really it
Hi,
On Sun, 15 Jan 2006 14:07:51 +
Stroller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 15 Jan 2006, at 12:56, Hans-Werner Hilse wrote:
I'd strongly suggest using the Bayesian filters, per-user, that is...
[...]
What improvement rate are you seeing for this, please?
About 99% of _Spam_ mails are
What I landed up doing is defining a set of my own rules that detected
if penis, viagra, slut and such words occured it added a +10.0 to the
spam assassin rating so if is clearly identified as spam.
I'm somewhat cautious about this. I know you get very high hit rates
with this, but it
On 15 January 2006 21:33, Ryan Viljoen wrote:
What I landed up doing is defining a set of my own rules that detected
if penis, viagra, slut and such words occured it added a +10.0 to the
spam assassin rating so if is clearly identified as spam.
I'm somewhat cautious about this. I know
On 15 Jan 2006, at 19:15, Hans-Werner Hilse wrote:
...And if I teach them to train the filters by
dragging dropping into the learn folder then I anticipate perhaps
just one of them complaining but why can't I just right-click it and
`mark as junk' in Outlook?.
True. My answer is: because
On 15 Jan 2006, at 06:48, William Kenworthy wrote:
On Sun, 2006-01-15 at 03:08 +, Stroller wrote:
Hi there,
I emerged SpamAssasin on a mailserver the other day, added the
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/mailfilter-guide.xml
The reason I avoided using this for some time was that I feel it
I've followed and used this setup a few times. I actually just got it
up and running a few minutes ago.
I did ignore most of the info about DCC and razor etc... and I agree
with you, it isn't the best documentation. But I always thought postfix
was the better free mailserv out there..
On 16 Jan 2006, at 03:00, Stroller wrote:
Jan 16 02:51:39 baby postfix/cleanup[7255]: 63F853636A: message-
id=[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jan 16 02:51:39 baby postfix/qmgr[7222]: 63F853636A: from=,
size=4128, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
Jan 16 02:51:39 baby postfix/qmgr[7222]: 2875136369:
On Monday 16 January 2006 06:01, Stroller wrote:
I'm looking at dcc now - it looks useful, but I'm not yet clear on
how to configure it (with SpamAssassin?).
perldoc Mail::SpamAssassin::Plugin::DCC
in the file /etc/spamassassin/init.pre
add this line
loadplugin
On 16 Jan 2006, at 04:32, Stroller wrote:
On 16 Jan 2006, at 03:00, Stroller wrote:
Jan 16 02:51:39 baby postfix/cleanup[7255]: 63F853636A: message-
id=[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jan 16 02:51:39 baby postfix/qmgr[7222]: 63F853636A: from=,
size=4128, nrcpt=1 (queue active)
Jan 16
Hi there,
I emerged SpamAssasin on a mailserver the other day, added the
appropriate line to /etc/postfix/master.cf and it all seems to be
working ok. But it doesn't seem to be very accurate in the default
configuration - I have a mailbox with about 4,000 messages,
approximately 98% of
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/mailfilter-guide.xml
On Sun, 2006-01-15 at 03:08 +, Stroller wrote:
Hi there,
I emerged SpamAssasin on a mailserver the other day, added the
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
22 matches
Mail list logo
