2009/10/30 Volker Armin Hemmann volkerar...@googlemail.com:
Virtualbox on the other hand is pretty much hassle free in my experience.
Can't talk about vmware - haven't used that in years ;)
Thanks for the pointer to Virtualbox... I hadn't heard of it. Looks
like the wiki has some help, though.
2009/10/31 William Kenworthy bi...@iinet.net.au:
I was in a similar position some years ago - grab a copy of the needed
libs from somewhere and use ldpreload to load them into memory before
running the application. Google will help.
In some cases, you can symlink the needed lib names to
I was in a similar position some years ago - grab a copy of the needed
libs from somewhere and use ldpreload to load them into memory before
running the application. Google will help.
In some cases, you can symlink the needed lib names to existing later
libs and run ldconfig before trying to
On Fri, 2009-10-30 at 10:01 -0400, Duncan Smith wrote:
The company I work for is using gentoo on all its machines. We just
got a license to a commercial tool which does not support gentoo. The
closest thing it supports is RHEL v4.
Running any command provided by the tool results in an
On Freitag 30 Oktober 2009, Albert Hopkins wrote:
3. If it is glibc, is there some way to install glibc slotted? Could
I install an old version of glibc to some other lib folder (like
/opt/lib64), and then use LD_LIBRARY_PATH somehow to get the tool to
look there first? How?
You
Thank you both for your quick response.
I'll probably end up taking the virtual machine approach. I may also
try some sort of chroot solution... I'll see how much of a hassle
vmware is.
2009/10/30 Volker Armin Hemmann volkerar...@googlemail.com:
On Freitag 30 Oktober 2009, Albert Hopkins
On Freitag 30 Oktober 2009, Duncan Smith wrote:
Thank you both for your quick response.
I'll probably end up taking the virtual machine approach. I may also
try some sort of chroot solution... I'll see how much of a hassle
vmware is.
chroot can work nicely, but you have to create a gentoo
Avoiding 1, 2, and 3 but thought I'd propose a 4 other than a virtual
machine. Ask the vendor if they can provide a statically compiled
version, that way you don't have to worry about libc. I dunno how
flexible the vendor is but its worth asking :)
On 10/30/09, Duncan Smith
On Friday 30 October 2009 23:52:10 Kyle Bader wrote:
Avoiding 1, 2, and 3 but thought I'd propose a 4 other than a virtual
machine. Ask the vendor if they can provide a statically compiled
version, that way you don't have to worry about libc. I dunno how
flexible the vendor is but its worth
On Fri, 2009-10-30 at 14:52 -0700, Kyle Bader wrote:
I dunno how
flexible the vendor is but its worth asking :)
They only support RHEL4. RHEL4 was released nearly 5 years ago and uses
the 2.6.9 kernel. I think that shows how flexible they are. :)
10 matches
Mail list logo
