Hi again!
I've now compiled 3 new binary packages for you:
http://members.chello.at/martin-ullrich/coreutils-5.2.1-r7.tbz2
http://members.chello.at/martin-ullrich/coreutils-5.93.tbz2
Whichever you want to use.
If they don't work, I've also compiled a statically linked package:
Bogo Mipps wrote:
/bin/install -c 'cp'
'/usr/tmp/portage/coreutils-5.2.1-r7/image//bin/cp' install:
unable to open
`/usr/tmp/portage/coreutils-5.2.1-r7/image//bin/cp/cp': No such
file or directory
Ahrrr! We were _so_ close...
All it would have taken to get around this was 'rm
On Mon, 06 Feb 2006 18:27, Rumen Yotov wrote:
Yeah it's due to acl USE flag, which i have/use.
$ emerge coreutils -pv
These are the packages that I would merge, in order:
Calculating dependencies ...done!
[ebuild R ] sys-apps/coreutils-5.93 USE=acl nls -build -static 59
kB
Will
On Tue, 07 Feb 2006 00:21, Benno Schulenberg wrote:
Ahrrr! We were _so_ close...
All it would have taken to get around this was 'rm /bin/install' and
'cp /var/tmp/portage/coreutils-5.93/work/coreutils-5.93/src/ginstall
/bin/install' and then coreutils would have emerged fine.
Have done it
On Mon, 06 Feb 2006 23:42, Martin Ullrich wrote:
I've now compiled 3 new binary packages for you:
http://members.chello.at/martin-ullrich/coreutils-5.2.1-r7.tbz2
http://members.chello.at/martin-ullrich/coreutils-5.93.tbz2
Whichever you want to use.
If they don't work, I've also compiled a
Hi
Have stuffed up and accidentally un-merged my coreutils: now can't emerge
either what was current (5.2.1-r7) or newer version (5.3.0-r1) and needless
to say have lost all coreutils tools which doesn't help. Google makes it look
like no-one else has been so stupid.
This is what I get:
Bogo Mipps wrote:
Have stuffed up and accidentally un-merged my coreutils: now
can't emerge either what was current (5.2.1-r7) or newer version
(5.3.0-r1) and needless to say have lost all coreutils tools
which doesn't help.
Yours is a up-to-date system and you have busybox installed? Then
Benno Schulenberg wrote:
here's the output of 'equery files coreutils':
Hmm... equery behaves different when its output is redirected.
Here's a list without any of the duplicates (symlinks) in /usr/bin.
/bin/basename
/bin/cat
/bin/chgrp
/bin/chmod
/bin/chown
/bin/chroot
/bin/cksum
/bin/comm
On Sunday 05 February 2006 12:13, Bogo Mipps wrote:
Hi
Have stuffed up and accidentally un-merged my coreutils: now can't emerge
either what was current (5.2.1-r7) or newer version (5.3.0-r1) and needless
to say have lost all coreutils tools which doesn't help. Google makes it
look like
Benno Schulenberg wrote:
Benno Schulenberg wrote:
here's the output of 'equery files coreutils':
Hmm... equery behaves different when its output is redirected.
Here's a list without any of the duplicates (symlinks) in /usr/bin.
/bin/link
/bin/ln
^^^
Ehm. Which possibly
On Sun, 05 Feb 2006 17:07:37 +0100 Maarten [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Benno Schulenberg wrote:
/bin/link
/bin/ln
^^^
Ehm. Which possibly creates a chicken-egg problem. How do you make
the symlink from ln - busybox without having /bin/ln in the first
place ?
Boot from a Live-CD.
On Mon, 06 Feb 2006 01:30, Mike Williams wrote:
I think the only real option is to post your CFLAGS, and perhaps someone
will be nice enough to send you a statically compiled binary package of
coreutils.
Thanks guys - will start with this one, in the hope that someone out there
will take
Bogo Mipps wrote:
Thanks guys - will start with this one, in the hope that someone
out there will take pity.
No no, don't take pity. This is too good a chance to see busybox in
action. :) Please report back how you are getting along.
Start with these:
busybox ln -s busybox /bin/ln
ln -s
Maarten wrote:
Benno Schulenberg wrote:
Benno Schulenberg wrote:
/bin/ln
^^^
Ehm. Which possibly creates a chicken-egg problem. How do you make the
symlink from ln - busybox without having /bin/ln in the first place ?
There's no requirement for ln being a symlink. Instead, you
On Mon, 2006-02-06 at 07:10 +1300, Bogo Mipps wrote:
On Mon, 06 Feb 2006 01:30, Mike Williams wrote:
I think the only real option is to post your CFLAGS, and perhaps someone
will be nice enough to send you a statically compiled binary package of
coreutils.
Thanks guys - will start with
Hi!
I compiled coreutils 5.2.1-r7 with your CFLAGS and only the NLS
USE-flag. Assuming you have gcc-3.4 installed it should work.
http://members.chello.at/martin-ullrich/coreutils-5.2.1-r7.tbz2
Just boot from a live-cd (e.g. the gentoo install-cd), and extract the
file with tar -xjpf
On Sunday 05 February 2006 18:27, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Ehm. Which possibly creates a chicken-egg problem. How do you make the
symlink from ln - busybox without having /bin/ln in the first place ?
There's no requirement for ln being a symlink. Instead, you could
also copy busybox to ln -
On Sunday 05 February 2006 11:35 am, Mike Williams wrote:
On Sunday 05 February 2006 18:27, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Ehm. Which possibly creates a chicken-egg problem. How do you make the
symlink from ln - busybox without having /bin/ln in the first place ?
There's no requirement for ln
Bogo Mipps wrote:
Yes, it's up-to-date and busybox is installed. Never had the
occasion to use it, but this could be the time.
Yes! :) What's the fun in taking binaries from others when you
have busybox aboard, and it is there exactly for this purpose.
If you don't like trial and error,
Bogo Mipps wrote:
/bin/install -c 'cp'
'/usr/tmp/portage/coreutils-5.2.1-r7/image//bin/cp' install:
unable to open
/bin/install -c 'vdir'
'/usr/tmp/portage/coreutils-5.2.1-r7/image//bin/vdir'
install: unable to open
Hrrm... No idea why it's doing that... On a secondary gentoo
Benno Schulenberg wrote:
here too it keeps failing at different places all the time.
This is a bug in busybox 1.00, it's fixed in busybox-1.1.0.
On my primary partition I've emerged the newer version, copied it to
the other partition, and did the 'ebuild install' again: it worked
flawlessly.
On Mon, 2006-02-06 at 01:02 +0100, Benno Schulenberg wrote:
Benno Schulenberg wrote:
here too it keeps failing at different places all the time.
This is a bug in busybox 1.00, it's fixed in busybox-1.1.0.
On my primary partition I've emerged the newer version, copied it to
the other
On Mon, 06 Feb 2006 07:47, Rumen Yotov wrote:
I have one (CFLAGS=-O2 -march=athlon-xp -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer)
Normal except ~x86 (all testing) system - coreutils-5.93: 2.1M.
Putting the binary here: ftp://ftp.qrypto.org (my router).
As emerge doesn't work (assume) put it in / (root dir)
On Mon, 06 Feb 2006 13:02, Benno Schulenberg wrote:
This is a bug in busybox 1.00, it's fixed in busybox-1.1.0.
On my primary partition I've emerged the newer version, copied it to
the other partition, and did the 'ebuild install' again: it worked
flawlessly. ... This won't help you now,
On Mon, 06 Feb 2006 07:54, Martin Ullrich wrote:
I compiled coreutils 5.2.1-r7 with your CFLAGS and only the NLS
USE-flag. Assuming you have gcc-3.4 installed it should work.
http://members.chello.at/martin-ullrich/coreutils-5.2.1-r7.tbz2
Just boot from a live-cd (e.g. the gentoo
On Mon, 2006-02-06 at 15:53 +1300, Bogo Mipps wrote:
On Mon, 06 Feb 2006 07:47, Rumen Yotov wrote:
I have one (CFLAGS=-O2 -march=athlon-xp -pipe -fomit-frame-pointer)
Normal except ~x86 (all testing) system - coreutils-5.93: 2.1M.
Putting the binary here: ftp://ftp.qrypto.org (my router).
26 matches
Mail list logo
