Re: [gentoo-user] Mailing list policy on reply

2010-07-10 Thread luis jure
on 2010-07-06 at 13:14 Alan McKinnon wrote: The football competition where england, france and italy all got their asses handed to them recently :-) not to mention argentina and brazil... did you notice the tiny uy in my e-mail address? :-) :-) (it's a real pity i don't give a sh*t about

Re: [gentoo-user] Mailing list policy on reply

2010-07-06 Thread Peter Humphrey
On Sunday 04 July 2010 10:02:37 Neil Bothwick wrote: I thought the World Cup finished last weekend :( What world cup? -- Rgds Peter. Linux Counter 5290, 1994-04-23.

Re: [gentoo-user] Mailing list policy on reply

2010-07-06 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Tuesday 06 July 2010 12:38:48 Peter Humphrey wrote: On Sunday 04 July 2010 10:02:37 Neil Bothwick wrote: I thought the World Cup finished last weekend :( What world cup? The football competition where england, france and italy all got their asses handed to them recently :-) I hear

Re: [gentoo-user] Mailing list policy on reply

2010-07-06 Thread Christopher Swift
On 6 July 2010 12:14, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote: On Tuesday 06 July 2010 12:38:48 Peter Humphrey wrote: On Sunday 04 July 2010 10:02:37 Neil Bothwick wrote: I thought the World Cup finished last weekend :( What world cup? The football competition where england, france and

Re: [gentoo-user] Mailing list policy on reply

2010-07-04 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Sat, 3 Jul 2010 21:34:42 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: When I replied, I hit A without thinking and only saw it after I pressed Ctrl-Enter to send. So my bad, my screw-up. That's the likely explanation. I occasionally get direct replies from you, and they always appear in the list too.

Re: [gentoo-user] Mailing list policy on reply

2010-07-04 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Sat, 3 Jul 2010 21:42:36 +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: never had any problems like that with kmail. Problems with stupid fingers - yeah, a lot. But it's easier to blame the software! -- Neil Bothwick Unsolicited advice is the junk mail of life signature.asc Description: PGP

Re: [gentoo-user] Mailing list policy on reply

2010-07-04 Thread Tanstaafl
On 2010-07-03 6:55 AM, Mick wrote: Before TB implemented Reply-To-List, I preferred lists that munged the Reply-To, but no longer. Sometimes I receive a personal email response to a message that I have posted to the list. This seems to happen because the person that kindly responded has for

Re: [gentoo-user] Mailing list policy on reply

2010-07-03 Thread Mick
On Friday 02 July 2010 15:00:10 Tanstaafl wrote: On 2010-07-01 8:54 PM, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote: I'm often stucked by the current policy in this mailing list changing the 'Reply-To' header to the mailing list address. Most mailing lists I use don't do that. It is usually better and

Re: [gentoo-user] Mailing list policy on reply

2010-07-03 Thread Mick
On Saturday 03 July 2010 11:55:02 Mick wrote: On Friday 02 July 2010 15:00:10 Tanstaafl wrote: On 2010-07-01 8:54 PM, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote: I'm often stucked by the current policy in this mailing list changing the 'Reply-To' header to the mailing list address. Most mailing lists I

Re: [gentoo-user] Mailing list policy on reply

2010-07-03 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Saturday 03 July 2010 18:37:36 Mick wrote: Sometimes I receive a personal email response to a message that I have posted to the list. This seems to happen because the person that kindly responded has for some reason cc'd me in the reply. If I try to reply to it the post will not go to

Re: [gentoo-user] Mailing list policy on reply

2010-07-03 Thread Mick
On Saturday 03 July 2010 18:09:37 Alan McKinnon wrote: On Saturday 03 July 2010 18:37:36 Mick wrote: Sometimes I receive a personal email response to a message that I have posted to the list. This seems to happen because the person that kindly responded has for some reason cc'd me in

Re: [gentoo-user] Mailing list policy on reply

2010-07-03 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Saturday 03 July 2010 19:44:27 Mick wrote: Two things happened here on my end: My kmail filters didn't kick in (kmail does that to me sometimes) so the mail I replied to was in my inbox, not the gentoo-user folder where it should have been. The list folder is the one that knows it

Re: [gentoo-user] Mailing list policy on reply

2010-07-03 Thread Volker Armin Hemmann
On Samstag 03 Juli 2010, Mick wrote: On Saturday 03 July 2010 18:09:37 Alan McKinnon wrote: On Saturday 03 July 2010 18:37:36 Mick wrote: Sometimes I receive a personal email response to a message that I have posted to the list. This seems to happen because the person that kindly

Re: [gentoo-user] Mailing list policy on reply

2010-07-02 Thread Mihamina Rakotomandimby
Nicolas Sebrecht nicolas.s-...@laposte.net : It is usually better and prefer the answer to all If the replier-to-all thinks of removing unwanted recipients, yes. But most of the time, people reply-to-really-all and that annoys. Among that, when replying-to-all, messages To: the mailing list are

Re: [gentoo-user] Mailing list policy on reply

2010-07-02 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Friday 02 July 2010 02:54:33 Nicolas Sebrecht wrote: Hi all, I'm often stucked by the current policy in this mailing list changing the 'Reply-To' header to the mailing list address. Most mailing lists I use don't do that. It is usually better and prefer the answer to all policy as it

Re: [gentoo-user] Mailing list policy on reply

2010-07-02 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Fri, 2 Jul 2010 02:54:33 +0200, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote: It is usually better and prefer the answer to all policy as it permit to be notified of an answer without having to track the whole mailing list. If I post to the list, I expect a reply via the list. Getting two replies is annoying,

Re: [gentoo-user] Mailing list policy on reply

2010-07-02 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Friday 02 July 2010 10:14:38 Neil Bothwick wrote: On Fri, 2 Jul 2010 02:54:33 +0200, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote: It is usually better and prefer the answer to all policy as it permit to be notified of an answer without having to track the whole mailing list. If I post to the list, I

Re: [gentoo-user] Mailing list policy on reply

2010-07-02 Thread Willie Wong
On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 02:54:33AM +0200, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote: Hi all, I'm often stucked by the current policy in this mailing list changing the 'Reply-To' header to the mailing list address. Most mailing lists I use don't do that. It is usually better and prefer the answer to all

Re: [gentoo-user] Mailing list policy on reply

2010-07-02 Thread Tanstaafl
On 2010-07-01 8:54 PM, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote: I'm often stucked by the current policy in this mailing list changing the 'Reply-To' header to the mailing list address. Most mailing lists I use don't do that. It is usually better and prefer the answer to all policy -10 this is plain

Re: [gentoo-user] Mailing list policy on reply

2010-07-02 Thread Kevin O'Gorman
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 1:14 AM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote: On Fri, 2 Jul 2010 02:54:33 +0200, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote: It is usually better and prefer the answer to all policy as it permit to be notified of an answer without having to track the whole mailing list. If I post

Re: [gentoo-user] Mailing list policy on reply

2010-07-02 Thread Paul Hartman
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 9:35 AM, Kevin O'Gorman kogor...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 1:14 AM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote: If I post to the list, I expect a reply via the list. Getting two replies is annoying, especially if I don't realise the private one is a duplicate

[gentoo-user] Mailing list policy on reply

2010-07-01 Thread Nicolas Sebrecht
Hi all, I'm often stucked by the current policy in this mailing list changing the 'Reply-To' header to the mailing list address. Most mailing lists I use don't do that. It is usually better and prefer the answer to all policy as it permit to be notified of an answer without having to track the