Re: [gentoo-user] Palemoon again - again

On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 07:04:57AM +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote > As I'm now on sys-devel/gcc-5.4.0-r3 I'll have to assess what to > do next. That will be after I've finished sorting out another > problem I have. Step #1) Rebuild your system with gcc-5.4.0 Step #2) Tweak the Octopus overlay

Re: [gentoo-user] Palemoon again - again

On 170421-07:04+0100, Peter Humphrey wrote: > On Thursday 20 Apr 2017 17:59:13 Walter Dnes wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 10:06:12AM +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote > > > > > On Monday 17 Apr 2017 13:05:59 Walter Dnes wrote: > > > > 2) USE="-system-libs" is recommended. Yes, this does make the

Re: [gentoo-user] Palemoon again - again

On Thursday 20 Apr 2017 17:59:13 Walter Dnes wrote: > On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 10:06:12AM +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote > > > On Monday 17 Apr 2017 13:05:59 Walter Dnes wrote: > > > 2) USE="-system-libs" is recommended. Yes, this does make the binary > > > slightly larger. But it avoids problems

Re: [gentoo-user] Palemoon again - again

On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 10:06:12AM +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote > On Monday 17 Apr 2017 13:05:59 Walter Dnes wrote: > > > > 2) USE="-system-libs" is recommended. Yes, this does make the binary > > slightly larger. But it avoids problems where changing API/ABI in the > > system lib causes subtle

Re: [gentoo-user] Palemoon again - again

On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 09:17:24AM +, J. Roeleveld wrote > > If you are certain you don't have gcc in slot 5.x installed. You > can add palemoon to /etc/portage/package.unmask > > That will override the package.mask from the overlay. For the official contributed SSE version, I build with

Re: [gentoo-user] Palemoon again - again

On Tuesday 18 Apr 2017 09:17:24 J. Roeleveld wrote: > If you are certain you don't have gcc in slot 5.x installed. You can add > palemoon to /etc/portage/package.unmask > > That will override the package.mask from the overlay. This looks pretty conclusive to me: $ eix -eI gcc [I] sys-devel/gcc

Re: [gentoo-user] Palemoon again - again

On April 18, 2017 11:06:12 AM GMT+02:00, Peter Humphrey wrote: >On Monday 17 Apr 2017 13:05:59 Walter Dnes wrote: >> A couple of things to note, which also apply to building Firefox >> >> 1) When using the Palemoon overlay, I found that USE="optimize" turns >> off

Re: [gentoo-user] Palemoon again - again

On Monday 17 Apr 2017 13:05:59 Walter Dnes wrote: > A couple of things to note, which also apply to building Firefox > > 1) When using the Palemoon overlay, I found that USE="optimize" turns > off Gentoo's optimization, and replaces it with limited "optimization" > by the mozconfig. If you're

Re: [gentoo-user] Palemoon again - again

On Tuesday 18 Apr 2017 06:28:57 J. Roeleveld wrote: > I had some issues in the past (can't remember when this was) where "-j" > was misinterpreted. I ended up using the longer version: "--jobs" > > This might work for you as well. Good idea. Thanks Joost. -- Regards Peter

Re: [gentoo-user] Palemoon again - again

On April 17, 2017 2:41:45 PM GMT+02:00, Peter Humphrey wrote: >Hello list, > >After following the "Palemoon again" thread I wanted to try Pale Moon, >so I >installed layman and added the octopus overlay. Here's a snippet from >the >build log: > >Configure complete! >Be

Re: [gentoo-user] Palemoon again - again

On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 02:18:16PM +0100, Peter Humphrey wrote > On Monday 17 Apr 2017 13:41:45 I wrote: > > > You see it couldn't even find a rule to make the object files. I tried > > setting MAKEOPTS="-j 1" to override the --jobs=24 that I usually have set, > > but that just changed the logged

Re: [gentoo-user] Palemoon again - again

Peter Humphrey wrote: > On Monday 17 Apr 2017 13:41:45 I wrote: > >> After following the "Palemoon again" thread I wanted to try Pale Moon, so >> I installed layman and added the octopus overlay. Here's a snippet from >> the build log: > --->8 > >> You see it couldn't even find a rule to make the

Re: [gentoo-user] Palemoon again - again

On Monday 17 Apr 2017 13:41:45 I wrote: > After following the "Palemoon again" thread I wanted to try Pale Moon, so > I installed layman and added the octopus overlay. Here's a snippet from > the build log: --->8 > You see it couldn't even find a rule to make the object files. I tried > setting

[gentoo-user] Palemoon again - again

Hello list, After following the "Palemoon again" thread I wanted to try Pale Moon, so I installed layman and added the octopus overlay. Here's a snippet from the build log: Configure complete! Be sure to run |mach build| to pick up any changes >>> Source configured. >>> Compiling source in >>>