Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Again: Critical bugs considered invalid

2007-06-09 Thread Zachary Grafton
On Friday 08 June 2007 19:29, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote: On Samstag, 9. Juni 2007, »Q« wrote: In news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Hemmann, Volker Armin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Freitag, 8. Juni 2007, Alexander Skwar wrote: b.n. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Really. If you think there's a

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Again: Critical bugs considered invalid

2007-06-09 Thread Kent Fredric
On 6/9/07, Zachary Grafton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Friday 08 June 2007 19:29, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote: On Samstag, 9. Juni 2007, »Q« wrote: In news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Hemmann, Volker Armin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Freitag, 8. Juni 2007, Alexander Skwar wrote: b.n. [EMAIL

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Again: Critical bugs considered invalid

2007-06-09 Thread Dale
Kent Fredric wrote: On 6/9/07, Zachary Grafton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Friday 08 June 2007 19:29, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote: On Samstag, 9. Juni 2007, »Q« wrote: In news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Hemmann, Volker Armin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Freitag, 8. Juni 2007, Alexander

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Again: Critical bugs considered invalid

2007-06-09 Thread Kent Fredric
On 6/9/07, Dale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Kent Fredric wrote: On 6/9/07, Zachary Grafton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Friday 08 June 2007 19:29, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote: Maybe someone should submit a bug report http://www.xkcd.com/c258.html I tried . Critical bug, but was

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Again: Critical bugs considered invalid

2007-06-09 Thread Dale
Kent Fredric wrote: On 6/9/07, Dale [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Let me guess, Jakub closed it? LOL Can I also assume he decided to stay? I read he was leaving a while back. Dale :-) :-) :-) Lemme be perfectly clear here. Jakub does a very good job of what he does, and gentoo IMO

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Again: Critical bugs considered invalid

2007-06-09 Thread Dale
Dale wrote: I didn't but I didn't want him to leave either. Dale :-) :-) :-) That should read as I didn't _say anything_ but I didn't want him to leave either. It was to late to be posting much of anything. o_O Dale :-) :-)

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Again: Critical bugs considered invalid

2007-06-09 Thread Bo Ørsted Andresen
On Saturday 09 June 2007 15:11:48 Dale wrote: I think replacing him with a bot thing was going to cause a lot of trouble.  I read that was their plan at least. The bot doesn't replace him. It shows suggestions for who the right assignee would be based on metadata.xml for the package in

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Again: Critical bugs considered invalid

2007-06-09 Thread Dale
Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote: On Saturday 09 June 2007 15:11:48 Dale wrote: I think replacing him with a bot thing was going to cause a lot of trouble. I read that was their plan at least. The bot doesn't replace him. It shows suggestions for who the right assignee would be based on

[gentoo-user] Re: Again: Critical bugs considered invalid

2007-06-08 Thread Alexander Skwar
b.n. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Really. If you think there's a problem, explain it. You get attacked? Insist. Prove them they are wrong. Just curious: Did you ever try this with Jakub? Alexander Skwar -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Again: Critical bugs considered invalid

2007-06-08 Thread b.n.
Alexander Skwar ha scritto: b.n. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Really. If you think there's a problem, explain it. You get attacked? Insist. Prove them they are wrong. Just curious: Did you ever try this with Jakub? Don't think so. I understand from this thread he's a tough guy, but if logic

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Again: Critical bugs considered invalid

2007-06-08 Thread Hemmann, Volker Armin
On Freitag, 8. Juni 2007, Alexander Skwar wrote: b.n. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Really. If you think there's a problem, explain it. You get attacked? Insist. Prove them they are wrong. Just curious: Did you ever try this with Jakub? I did. And after some arguments a different dev came in

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Again: Critical bugs considered invalid

2007-06-08 Thread Hemmann, Volker Armin
On Samstag, 9. Juni 2007, »Q« wrote: In news:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Hemmann, Volker Armin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Freitag, 8. Juni 2007, Alexander Skwar wrote: b.n. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Really. If you think there's a problem, explain it. You get attacked? Insist. Prove them

[gentoo-user] Re: Again: Critical bugs considered invalid

2007-06-07 Thread Alexander Skwar
Enrico Weigelt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sometimes it seems, certain wranglers are for killing bugs of specific persons ;-O I don't know. I think it's just Jakub. He's REALLY quick to kill a bug, especially if he doesn't completely understand what the bug is about. This also pisses me off from

[gentoo-user] Re: Again: Critical bugs considered invalid

2007-06-07 Thread Alexander Skwar
Enrico Weigelt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Hemmann, Volker Armin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: well, Jakub is very fast closing bugs - and sometimes he closes them too fast... this is nothing new - and arguing with him in a civil manner usually solves that. I'm some bit confused that the

[gentoo-user] Re: Again: Critical bugs considered invalid

2007-06-06 Thread Alexander Skwar
Enrico Weigelt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=180935 Again the old philosophy what I don't understand is invalid. Obviously my contributions are unwelcomed, so I closed the bug. Yep, Jakub often has a quite jerky tone. So do a lot of the Gentoo devs.