On Mon, 2005-05-30 at 21:17 -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
--- Ow Mun Heng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm sorry but I looked inside the content of a tbz2
file and didn't find
that it has any references to the /var/db directory.
The data not inside the tar archive. It's appended
onto the end
--- Ow Mun Heng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In This case, how would one determine what IUSE
values were used for the
package said package then? How can one use to view
this data?
#!/usr/bin/python
import sys
if len(sys.argv)!=2:
print usage: %s tbz2 file % sys.argv[0]
On Mon, 2005-05-30 at 23:57 -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
--- Ow Mun Heng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In This case, how would one determine what IUSE
values were used for the
package said package then? How can one use to view
this data?
#!/usr/bin/python
import sys
if len(sys.argv)!=2:
--- Ow Mun Heng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
answer the 2nd question I have regarding the + or
- and whether the
USE flag is in USE?
This should do the trick:
#!/usr/bin/python
import sys
if len(sys.argv)!=2:
print usage: %s tbz2 file % sys.argv[0]
sys.exit(1)
sys.path =
On Tue, 2005-05-31 at 00:56 -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
#!/usr/bin/python
import sys
if len(sys.argv)!=2:
print usage: %s tbz2 file % sys.argv[0]
sys.exit(1)
sys.path = [/usr/lib/portage/pym]+sys.path
import xpak
mytbz2=xpak.tbz2(sys.argv[1])
myuse=mytbz2.getelements(USE)
--- Ow Mun Heng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So if I understand it correctly, what is being done
is XPAK will take
the USE flags from the system which compiled the
binary and then sort of
make a comparison with the USE flags for that
particular package and
work from there? Am I right?
On Tue, 2005-05-31 at 02:33 -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
--- Ow Mun Heng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So if I understand it correctly, what is being done
is XPAK will take
the USE flags from the system which compiled the
binary and then sort of
make a comparison with the USE flags for that
--- Ow Mun Heng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Cool.. nice script by the way. I'm gonna include
that in Edition 3
(July) of the MyOSS Magazine
(http://mag.my-opensource.org) as Tips and
Tricks. (crediting you of course)
Oh it's really nothing. Glad I could help. ;-)
Zac
On Mon, 2005-05-30 at 21:35 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
On 5/30/05, Ow Mun Heng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2005-05-30 at 10:13 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
On 5/30/05, Ow Mun Heng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think those binary packages
Paul Varner [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
With the exception of openoffice-bin, when revdep-rebuild indicates
that it wants to rebuild a -bin package it means that the ebuild is
potentially missing dependencies.
Also, I believe, opera. This has dependencies on a number of different
version of a
This is a shame, for sure. Being able to build binary packages with
portage, that can include such meta-information, would be a huge asset
to using gentoo as a meta-distribution, as it is so often claimed to
be.
On 5/30/05, Ow Mun Heng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2005-05-29 at 18:01 -0500,
On 5/30/05, Ow Mun Heng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think those binary packages
propagate into /var/db as well. (IF they do, I think they might not
reflect the actual USE flags used to built the binary.
This probably accounts for revdep-rebuild never
On Mon, 2005-05-30 at 10:13 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
On 5/30/05, Ow Mun Heng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think those binary packages
propagate into /var/db as well. (IF they do, I think they might not
reflect the actual USE flags used to built
On Mon, 2005-05-30 at 13:34 -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
--- Mark Knecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/30/05, Ow Mun Heng [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think
those binary packages
propagate into /var/db as well. (IF they do, I
think they might
--- Ow Mun Heng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm sorry but I looked inside the content of a tbz2
file and didn't find
that it has any references to the /var/db directory.
The data not inside the tar archive. It's appended
onto the end of the tbz2 file. You know it's there
because if you unzip
On 5/30/05, Ow Mun Heng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2005-05-30 at 10:13 -0700, Mark Knecht wrote:
On 5/30/05, Ow Mun Heng [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Someone correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think those binary packages
propagate into /var/db as well. (IF they do, I think they
16 matches
Mail list logo
