On Wednesday, 6 December 2017 10:33:54 GMT Raffaele Belardi wrote:
> Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > On Tuesday, 5 December 2017 16:49:28 GMT Raffaele Belardi wrote:
> >> Looks like your -fpic modification did not make it through.
> >
> > Do I have my syntax wrong, then?
> >
> > # cat
Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Tuesday, 5 December 2017 16:49:28 GMT Raffaele Belardi wrote:
>
>> Looks like your -fpic modification did not make it through.
>
> Do I have my syntax wrong, then?
>
> # cat /etc/portage/package.env
> www-client/palemoon nopic
> peak ~ # cat /etc/portage/env/nopic
On Tuesday, 5 December 2017 16:49:28 GMT Raffaele Belardi wrote:
> Looks like your -fpic modification did not make it through.
Do I have my syntax wrong, then?
# cat /etc/portage/package.env
www-client/palemoon nopic
peak ~ # cat /etc/portage/env/nopic
CFLAGS="${CFLAGS} -fPIC"
I've tried
On 2017-12-05 14:02, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > [0] http://people.redhat.com/drepper/dsohowto.pdf
>
> Ah. Right. I see now.
The error message you're showing probably means that -fpic is in effect
when in fact -fPIC is needed. Quoting the gcc manual:
If the GOT size for the linked executable
Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Tuesday, 5 December 2017 10:23:30 GMT Peter Humphrey wrote:
>
>> I've been waiting for shouts of horror at that suggestion, but all's quiet
>> so I'll see if I can remember how to set -fpic in the environment of
>> palemoon. I'd have expected the ebuild do that though.
On Tuesday, 5 December 2017 10:23:30 GMT Peter Humphrey wrote:
> I've been waiting for shouts of horror at that suggestion, but all's quiet
> so I'll see if I can remember how to set -fpic in the environment of
> palemoon. I'd have expected the ebuild do that though.
OK, I've done that and now I
On Tuesday, 5 December 2017 13:18:59 GMT Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 12/05/2017 05:23 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > I've been waiting for shouts of horror at that suggestion, but all's
> > quiet so I'll see if I can remember how to set -fpic in the environment
> > of palemoon. I'd have expected
On 12/05/2017 05:23 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
>
> I've been waiting for shouts of horror at that suggestion, but all's quiet
> so I'll see if I can remember how to set -fpic in the environment of
> palemoon. I'd have expected the ebuild do that though.
The upstream build system should already
On Monday, 4 December 2017 19:19:33 GMT Walter Dnes wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 10:34:48AM +, Peter Humphrey wrote
>
> > It doesn't build here; I get a few errors, thus:
> > 9:41.58 ../../build/unix/gold/ld: error: /var/tmp/portage/www-client/
> >
> >
On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 02:19:33PM -0500, Walter Dnes wrote
> On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 10:34:48AM +, Peter Humphrey wrote
>
> > It doesn't build here; I get a few errors, thus:
> >
> > 9:41.58 ../../build/unix/gold/ld: error: /var/tmp/portage/www-client/
> >
On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 10:34:48AM +, Peter Humphrey wrote
> It doesn't build here; I get a few errors, thus:
>
> 9:41.58 ../../build/unix/gold/ld: error: /var/tmp/portage/www-client/
> palemoon-27.6.2/work/palemoon-27.6.2/o/toolkit/library/../../media/
>
On Sunday, 3 December 2017 17:58:53 GMT Simon Thelen wrote:
> On 17-12-03 at 09:52, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> > On 2017-12-03 06:46, Heiko Baums wrote:
> > > 1. It can't find >=sys-devel/gcc-6.4.0 but only older gcc versions.
> > >
> > > 2. You have installed a package that depend on
On 17-12-03 at 12:06, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> On 2017-12-03 18:58, Simon Thelen wrote:
>
> > Palemoon builds fine with gcc 6.4.0 (just not with gcc 7.2.0), if the
> > ebuild you're using requires an older gcc it's either wrong or doing
> > something weird.
> It builds, but the result binary
On 2017-12-03 18:58, Simon Thelen wrote:
> Palemoon builds fine with gcc 6.4.0 (just not with gcc 7.2.0), if the
> ebuild you're using requires an older gcc it's either wrong or doing
> something weird.
It builds, but the result binary crashes every 10 minutes. Have you
tried it?
The ebuild
On 17-12-03 at 09:52, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> On 2017-12-03 06:46, Heiko Baums wrote:
>
> > 1. It can't find >=sys-devel/gcc-6.4.0 but only older gcc versions.
> >
> > 2. You have installed a package that depend on sys-devel/gcc-5.4.0-r3
> > or sys-devel/gcc-4.9.4.
> >
> > I already explained
On 2017-12-03 06:46, Heiko Baums wrote:
> 1. It can't find >=sys-devel/gcc-6.4.0 but only older gcc versions.
>
> 2. You have installed a package that depend on sys-devel/gcc-5.4.0-r3
> or sys-devel/gcc-4.9.4.
>
> I already explained what you can do in the first case. In the second
> case I
16 matches
Mail list logo
