Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Encrypted cell 2 gentoo

2016-03-28 Thread covici
Not if you use smtp with port 587 and not use plain login options. Max R.D. Parmer wrote: > The recipients mail server could still see the message in plaintext. > > If you are concerned your correspondent's mail server might be used to > try to read their messages then

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Encrypted cell 2 gentoo

2016-03-28 Thread Max R.D. Parmer
The recipients mail server could still see the message in plaintext. If you are concerned your correspondent's mail server might be used to try to read their messages then another layer of encryption is needed that only the recipient themselves can decrypt and that would be GPG/PGP. It depends

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Encrypted cell 2 gentoo

2016-03-28 Thread covici
If you have your own mta and use imap-s won't that do it? Max R.D. Parmer wrote: > Ahh, OK. So secure communications between all these clients. > > The two big players for client-side encryption for email or messaging > data would be GPG and OTR; for VoIP you would want to

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Encrypted cell 2 gentoo

2016-03-28 Thread Mick
On Monday 28 Mar 2016 10:54:49 Max R.D. Parmer wrote: > I think the paper on Intel issues Mick is referring to is the one I > linked not too long ago: > http://blog.invisiblethings.org/papers/2015/x86_harmful.pdf Yes, here's the M/L thread: http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.user/288720

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Encrypted cell 2 gentoo

2016-03-28 Thread Max R.D. Parmer
I think the paper on Intel issues Mick is referring to is the one I linked not too long ago: http://blog.invisiblethings.org/papers/2015/x86_harmful.pdf It seems like you're looking for something like the EFF's "surveillance self-defense"[1] site but with some stuff specific to Gentoo. [1]:

[gentoo-user] Re: Encrypted cell 2 gentoo

2016-03-28 Thread James
Mick gmail.com> writes: > > Ahh, OK. So secure communications between all these clients. > > The two big players for client-side encryption for email or messaging > > data would be GPG and OTR; Good 2 know. I'll keep searching for docs. > Also S/MIME encryption of the email message body

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Encrypted cell 2 gentoo

2016-03-28 Thread Mick
On Monday 28 Mar 2016 09:26:54 Max R.D. Parmer wrote: > Ahh, OK. So secure communications between all these clients. > > The two big players for client-side encryption for email or messaging > data would be GPG and OTR; Also S/MIME encryption of the email message body using SSL certificates

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Encrypted cell 2 gentoo

2016-03-28 Thread Max R.D. Parmer
Ahh, OK. So secure communications between all these clients. The two big players for client-side encryption for email or messaging data would be GPG and OTR; for VoIP you would want to look into ZRTP. There are several clients that support these three protocols on all the platforms you've listed

[gentoo-user] Re: Encrypted cell 2 gentoo

2016-03-28 Thread James
Max R.D. Parmer trystero.is> writes: > Do I understand correctly that you're looking to set up a Gentoo server > as a "hub" from which you can retrieve your mail using any of your > client systems? Not really. Yes that has to work but... What I want to read up on and test is encrypted