On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 11:25 PM, J. wrote:
> They say it's not a GNOME thing only, but born in the GNOME project,
> Quote from their FAQ:
>
> "Is Flatpak tied to GNOME?
>
> No. While Flatpak has been developed by people with a long involvement
> in the GNOME community it
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 7:40 PM, José Maldonado wrote:
> El 16/06/16 a las 13:32, Tom H escribió:
>>
>> When I first saw this, I thought "strange, maybe if Gentoo develops an
>> 'esnap' in order to build the container-package locally" but then I
>> remembered that we have
Andreas K. Huettel gentoo.org> writes:
> > Gentoo is supporting officially Snap packages? Why not Flatpak?
> Gentoo support for Snap is roughly as "official" as RedHat/Fedora support.
Still, if gentoo images can be customized at one's favorite cloud service
provider, it may serve as a way to
On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 4:01 AM, Mick wrote:
> On Thursday 16 Jun 2016 21:25:01 J. García wrote:
>
> How does Nix compare to flatpack, docker, snap, et al. from a gentoo
> perspective?
>
Nix is a similar sort of approach. I don't think they run apps in
containers
On Thursday 16 Jun 2016 21:25:01 J. García wrote:
> El jue, 16-06-2016 a las 19:40 -0400, José Maldonado escribió:
> > That is possible, but the goal is to serve Snap container for
> > applications that can be downloaded and used by the user, down a
> > single
> > binary that will have all the
On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 3:16 AM, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 22:35:24 -0400 waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:
>> I don't follow this stuff, so this may be a stupid question... how
>> does a "container" or "docker" differ from a chroot or a QEMU VM with a
>>
oh yeah, forgot the catchy name. Mea culpa.
2016-06-17 10:52 GMT+02:00 Neil Bothwick :
> On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 10:28:10 +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
>
> > soo... why not compile everything statically in the first place? and
> > put it in HOME?
>
> Because that's not new
On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 10:28:10 +0200, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
> soo... why not compile everything statically in the first place? and
> put it in HOME?
Because that's not new and shiny with a catchy name!
--
Neil Bothwick
Windows Error #02: Multitasking attempted. System confused.
soo... why not compile everything statically in the first place? and put it
in HOME?
2016-06-17 9:18 GMT+02:00 Andrew Savchenko :
> On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 19:30:49 -0400 José Maldonado wrote:
> >
> >
> > El 16/06/16 a las 11:27, James escribió:
> > > One word SECURITY? Trust
On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 19:30:49 -0400 José Maldonado wrote:
>
>
> El 16/06/16 a las 11:27, James escribió:
> > One word SECURITY? Trust but verify does come to mind.
> >
>
> The snaps come to "replace" a lack of security that is in Linux, in
> addition to facilitating the installation of all
On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 22:35:24 -0400 waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 04:33:12PM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote
> > On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 4:11 PM, Alan McKinnon
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > I don't see the part where all these latest fancy container
El jue, 16-06-2016 a las 19:40 -0400, José Maldonado escribió:
> That is possible, but the goal is to serve Snap container for
> applications that can be downloaded and used by the user, down a
> single
> binary that will have all the dependencies in that binary. Docker and
> LXC obviously can do
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 04:33:12PM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote
> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 4:11 PM, Alan McKinnon
> wrote:
> >
> > I don't see the part where all these latest fancy container thingymagicies
> > are not really just "embed everything in everything"
> >
> >
On 17/06/2016 02:02, José Maldonado wrote:
El 16/06/16 a las 16:33, Rich Freeman escribió:
FWIW - the subject of this thread suggests that this is some kind of
"official" Gentoo thing. As far as I can tell somebody took it upon
themselves to make this available for Gentoo, but it is not in any
El 16/06/16 a las 16:33, Rich Freeman escribió:
> FWIW - the subject of this thread suggests that this is some kind of
> "official" Gentoo thing. As far as I can tell somebody took it upon
> themselves to make this available for Gentoo, but it is not in any way
> endorsed by the distro. Of
El 16/06/16 a las 13:32, Tom H escribió:
>
> When I first saw this, I thought "strange, maybe if Gentoo develops an
> 'esnap' in order to build the container-package locally" but then I
> remembered that we have docker and lxc/lxd, so why not another method?
>
That is possible, but the goal
El 16/06/16 a las 11:27, James escribió:
> One word SECURITY? Trust but verify does come to mind.
>
The snaps come to "replace" a lack of security that is in Linux, in
addition to facilitating the installation of all applications from the
user-space without root privileges.
>
> Is their a
El 16/06/16 a las 12:36, Mick escribió:
>
> Keylogger in a snap anyone?
>
It is possible, who knows. Especially when the server-side is proprietary .
--
Dios en su cielo, todo bien en la Tierra
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 4:11 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
>
> I don't see the part where all these latest fancy container thingymagicies
> are not really just "embed everything in everything"
>
> We've known for years the dangers of embedding stuff in packages (it hardly
>
On 16/06/2016 21:11, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 15:27:29 + (UTC) James wrote:
José Maldonado gmail.com> writes:
The last days, ArsTechnica publish this new:
On Thu, 16 Jun 2016 15:27:29 + (UTC) James wrote:
> José Maldonado gmail.com> writes:
>
>
> > The last days, ArsTechnica publish this new:
>
> >
> http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2016/06/goodbye-apt-and-yum-ubuntus-snap-apps-are-coming-to-distros-everywhere/
> >
> > "Snaps
James wrote:
> José Maldonado gmail.com> writes:
>
>
>> The last days, ArsTechnica publish this new:
> http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2016/06/goodbye-apt-and-yum-ubuntus-snap-apps-are-coming-to-distros-everywhere/
>> "Snaps now work natively on Arch, Debian, Fedora, Kubuntu,
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 11:53 PM, José Maldonado wrote:
>
> The last days, ArsTechnica publish this new:
>
> http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2016/06/goodbye-apt-and-yum-ubuntus-snap-apps-are-coming-to-distros-everywhere/
>
> "Snaps now work natively on Arch,
On Thursday 16 Jun 2016 15:27:29 James wrote:
> José Maldonado gmail.com> writes:
> > The last days, ArsTechnica publish this new:
> http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2016/06/goodbye-apt-and-yum-ub
> untus-snap-apps-are-coming-to-distros-everywhere/
> > "Snaps now work natively on
José Maldonado gmail.com> writes:
> The last days, ArsTechnica publish this new:
>
http://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2016/06/goodbye-apt-and-yum-ubuntus-snap-apps-are-coming-to-distros-everywhere/
>
> "Snaps now work natively on Arch, Debian, Fedora, Kubuntu, Lubuntu,
> Ubuntu
25 matches
Mail list logo