On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 1:46 AM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
On Friday 06 Jun 2014 00:15:02 Peter Humphrey wrote:
I bet you have quite a lot of systemd components lurking in the background
though, ready to take over the world the next time you aren't looking :-)
Ha! I can already
On Friday 06 Jun 2014 12:18:09 Rich Freeman wrote:
That would be udev. It has been around long before systemd, and you
must have missed the huge flamewar when they renamed it to
systemd-udevd. Maybe we'll see java renamed to
java-by-oracle-with-ask-toolbar next. :)
TBH I wouldn't be
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
I am mostly happy with openrc and therefore have no reason to move to the
systemd monoculture, unless gentoo falls in line with Debian et al. and leaves
me no choice.
I don't really see that happening anytime soon - it
On 05/06/14 08:23, Mick wrote:
On Wednesday 04 Jun 2014 23:27:05 Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 05/06/14 01:14, »Q« wrote:
On Tue, 03 Jun 2014 22:06:07 +0200
Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
The good news is that the version of upower prior to this decision
still works fine and
On Thursday 05 Jun 2014 08:25:30 Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 05/06/14 08:23, Mick wrote:
Are you saying that as things stand it is a matter of time before a
gentoo user will have to switch from openrc to systemd, if they
want/need to continue using sleep and hibernate?
For those tasks you
On 05/06/14 12:03, Mick wrote:
On Thursday 05 Jun 2014 08:25:30 Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 05/06/14 08:23, Mick wrote:
Are you saying that as things stand it is a matter of time before a
gentoo user will have to switch from openrc to systemd, if they
want/need to continue using sleep and
On Thursday 05 Jun 2014 10:08:53 Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 05/06/14 12:03, Mick wrote:
On Thursday 05 Jun 2014 08:25:30 Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 05/06/14 08:23, Mick wrote:
Are you saying that as things stand it is a matter of time before a
gentoo user will have to switch from openrc to
On Thu, 5 Jun 2014 06:23:38 +0100
Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
Are you saying that as things stand it is a matter of time before a
gentoo user will have to switch from openrc to systemd, if they
want/need to continue using sleep and hibernate?
For them to have support for sleep and
On 05/06/14 13:47, Tom Wijsman wrote:
On Thu, 5 Jun 2014 06:23:38 +0100
Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
Are you saying that as things stand it is a matter of time before a
gentoo user will have to switch from openrc to systemd, if they
want/need to continue using sleep and hibernate?
On Thursday 05 Jun 2014 12:26:09 Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 05/06/14 13:47, Tom Wijsman wrote:
On Thu, 5 Jun 2014 06:23:38 +0100
Mick michaelkintz...@gmail.com wrote:
Are you saying that as things stand it is a matter of time before a
gentoo user will have to switch from openrc to
On Thursday 05 June 2014 13:58:45 Mick wrote:
.., I've keyworded sys-power/upower-0.99.0 for now on one machine
and it seems to work fine, without imposing systemd at the moment. :-)
I bet you have quite a lot of systemd components lurking in the background
though, ready to take over the
On Friday 06 Jun 2014 00:15:02 Peter Humphrey wrote:
On Thursday 05 June 2014 13:58:45 Mick wrote:
.., I've keyworded sys-power/upower-0.99.0 for now on one machine
and it seems to work fine, without imposing systemd at the moment. :-)
I bet you have quite a lot of systemd components
On Tuesday 03 June 2014 10:39:10 »Q« wrote:
I figured out what I wanted to do (uninstall upower, install
upower-pm-utils) by reading the changelogs, but I don't know what my
other options were. Could I have stuck with upower, letting it pull in
systemd, without messing up openrc?
Apparently
On Tue, 03 Jun 2014 22:06:07 +0200
Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
The good news is that the version of upower prior to this decision
still works fine and likely will for ages to come. That code has been
bundled into a new package upower-pm-utils.
Anyone that feels like doing
On 05/06/14 01:14, »Q« wrote:
On Tue, 03 Jun 2014 22:06:07 +0200
Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
The good news is that the version of upower prior to this decision
still works fine and likely will for ages to come. That code has been
bundled into a new package upower-pm-utils.
On Wednesday 04 Jun 2014 23:27:05 Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 05/06/14 01:14, »Q« wrote:
On Tue, 03 Jun 2014 22:06:07 +0200
Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote:
The good news is that the version of upower prior to this decision
still works fine and likely will for ages to come.
On Tue, 03 Jun 2014 18:14:56 +0300
Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
(I think I'll be forced to write up some minimal news item just to
shut up the loud minority who can't be bothered to do anything
themselfs, like even read package ChangeLogs if they stumble upon
something manual.)
17 matches
Mail list logo
