Volker Armin Hemmann schrieb:
On Mittwoch 18 November 2009, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Wednesday 18 November 2009 01:16:04 Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
Volker Armin Hemmann schrieb:
Namespaces - you don't need it? Kick 'em out.
hmm, interesting ... ;-)
for sure I also want to decrapify my
Alan McKinnon schrieb:
To disable namespace, enable embedded, leave everything on, and you will find
you can now disable namespaces.
did that, as well as the other suggestions by Volker, recompiled kernel
sits there and waits until I re-emerged stuff related to that
patch-2.6-issue ;-)
On Mittwoch 18 November 2009, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Wednesday 18 November 2009 01:16:04 Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
Volker Armin Hemmann schrieb:
Namespaces - you don't need it? Kick 'em out.
hmm, interesting ... ;-)
for sure I also want to decrapify my kernel-config ...
To
To disable namespaces I would have to set CONFIG_EMBEDDED=y ... correct?
This is rather counterintuitive to me, as my main workstation is far
from an embedded or small system (ok, not compared to the
4096-cpu-clusters in http://xkcd.com/619/ , but compared to, for
example, my embedded
Volker Armin Hemmann schrieb:
Namespaces - you don't need it? Kick 'em out.
hmm, interesting ... ;-)
for sure I also want to decrapify my kernel-config ...
To disable namespaces I would have to set CONFIG_EMBEDDED=y ... correct?
This is rather counterintuitive to me, as my main workstation
On Mittwoch 18 November 2009, Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
Volker Armin Hemmann schrieb:
Namespaces - you don't need it? Kick 'em out.
hmm, interesting ... ;-)
for sure I also want to decrapify my kernel-config ...
To disable namespaces I would have to set CONFIG_EMBEDDED=y ... correct?
On Wednesday 18 November 2009 01:16:04 Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
Volker Armin Hemmann schrieb:
Namespaces - you don't need it? Kick 'em out.
hmm, interesting ... ;-)
for sure I also want to decrapify my kernel-config ...
To disable namespaces I would have to set CONFIG_EMBEDDED=y ...
Volker Armin Hemmann volkerar...@googlemail.com writes:
configuring is easy.
enable the hardware you have.
disable the hardware you don't have.
read the help to all options that are default on - do you really need it?
Really?
read the help to all options that are off but might be usefull
Volker Armin Hemmann schrieb:
On Sonntag 08 November 2009, Stroller wrote:
On 7 Nov 2009, at 11:32, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
...
I'd love to know what the name of the kernel module is so I can
unload
it:
$ zcat /proc/config.gz | grep -i pegasus
CONFIG_USB_PEGASUS=y
it is not a module,
Florian Philipp wrote:
Volker Armin Hemmann schrieb:
On Sonntag 08 November 2009, Stroller wrote:
On 7 Nov 2009, at 11:32, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
...
I'd love to know what the name of the kernel module is so I can
unload
it:
$ zcat /proc/config.gz | grep -i pegasus
On 8 Nov 2009, at 06:55, Dale wrote:
...
I am not you, but I need maybe 5min for a config ;)
and there are more benefits. Smaller binary, more cpu cache free
for real data.
Better performance lies that way. Also, you don't have to wonder
about
processes you did not start. Security is also
On Sunday 08 November 2009 23:20:31 Stroller wrote:
You really need to learn to make your own kernel. ...
Whilst I agree in principle that a good (slim?) kernel is better and
your comments on that, I am sceptical whether the majority of people
have the knowledge to make any significant
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Sunday 08 November 2009 23:20:31 Stroller wrote:
You really need to learn to make your own kernel. ...
Whilst I agree in principle that a good (slim?) kernel is better and
your comments on that, I am sceptical whether the majority of people
have the
On Monday 09 November 2009 00:20:45 Dale wrote:
What he said plus this little tidbit of info. When I built my first
kernel, I had no howto except for the basic instructions in the Gentoo
install guide. This was about 6 years or so ago and there was not a lot
on configuring a kernel except
On 8 Nov 2009, at 22:20, Dale wrote:
...
You seem to think it takes a rocket scientist to build a kernel, it
doesn't. You just have to know what hardware you have and then enable
the features you need. ... You can config a kernel in less than five
minutes most likely then compile and you are
On Monday 09 November 2009 00:41:08 Stroller wrote:
Any time I spend messing with obscure kernel config options is time I
could be spending reading a good book, instead [1].
Sorry, spending time configuring my kernel loses, as does this thread.
And yet you use gentoo
Considering what
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Monday 09 November 2009 00:20:45 Dale wrote:
What he said plus this little tidbit of info. When I built my first
kernel, I had no howto except for the basic instructions in the Gentoo
install guide. This was about 6 years or so ago and there was not a lot
on
Stroller strol...@stellar.eclipse.co.uk writes:
Any time I spend messing with obscure kernel config options is time I
could be spending reading a good book, instead [1].
Sorry, spending time configuring my kernel loses, as does this thread.
I'm with you Stroller.
Although I do have to admit
On Mon, 09 Nov 2009 00:02:34 +0100, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Monday 09 November 2009 00:20:45 Dale wrote:
What he said plus this little tidbit of info. When I built my first
kernel, I had no howto except for the basic instructions in the Gentoo
install guide.
On Monday 09 November 2009 01:02:34 Dale wrote:
I do find this funny tho. Someone spends the better part of a day
installing Gentoo but doesn't think building their own kernel is worth
it. Most compiles take longer to finish than configing a kernel.
Here's a funnier one:
I've actually
On 8 Nov 2009, at 23:02, Dale wrote:
...
I do find this funny tho. Someone spends the better part of a day
installing Gentoo ...
You're doing it wrong.
... Most compiles take longer to finish than configing a kernel.
I personally don't spend time sitting there watching the progress of
first kernel I configured and 'maked' myself was 2.2.14 and I was scared. When
it finaly booted and everything worked I was overjoyed.
I wad even more overjoyed when it performed a lot better than Suse's 2.2.10...
which was a bit swap-happy.
On Montag 09 November 2009, Harry Putnam wrote:
Stroller strol...@stellar.eclipse.co.uk writes:
Any time I spend messing with obscure kernel config options is time I
could be spending reading a good book, instead [1].
Sorry, spending time configuring my kernel loses, as does this thread.
Harry Putnam wrote:
Stroller strol...@stellar.eclipse.co.uk writes:
Any time I spend messing with obscure kernel config options is time I
could be spending reading a good book, instead [1].
Sorry, spending time configuring my kernel loses, as does this thread.
I'm with you
On Monday 09 November 2009 01:21:24 Stroller wrote:
And yet you use gentoo
Considering what gentoo is and how one interfaces with it, should
you not
rather be using a binary distro where someone else does the heavy
lifting?
Something like Fedora, OpenSuse, Ubuntu?
Not at
On 8 Nov 2009, at 22:51, Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Monday 09 November 2009 00:41:08 Stroller wrote:
Any time I spend messing with obscure kernel config options is time I
could be spending reading a good book, instead [1].
Sorry, spending time configuring my kernel loses, as does this
thread.
Stroller wrote:
On 8 Nov 2009, at 23:02, Dale wrote:
...
I do find this funny tho. Someone spends the better part of a day
installing Gentoo ...
You're doing it wrong.
Nope, older puter. I've installed Gentoo quite a few times. I have
done it without a install guide before. I've even
On 7 Nov 2009, at 11:32, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
...
I'd love to know what the name of the kernel module is so I can
unload
it:
$ zcat /proc/config.gz | grep -i pegasus
CONFIG_USB_PEGASUS=y
it is not a module, but compiled in. You have to rebuild your
kernel. And
probably decrapify
On Sonntag 08 November 2009, Stroller wrote:
On 7 Nov 2009, at 11:32, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
...
I'd love to know what the name of the kernel module is so I can
unload
it:
$ zcat /proc/config.gz | grep -i pegasus
CONFIG_USB_PEGASUS=y
it is not a module, but compiled in. You
On 8 Nov 2009, at 00:10, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
...
using a livecds kernel is probably the worst decision out there.
http://www.kroah.com/lkn/
as you can see, you don't have to download it.
Or just do it step for step, reading help files.
seccomp? Except Andrea Arcangeli nobody uses
On Sonntag 08 November 2009, Stroller wrote:
On 8 Nov 2009, at 00:10, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
...
using a livecds kernel is probably the worst decision out there.
http://www.kroah.com/lkn/
as you can see, you don't have to download it.
Or just do it step for step, reading help
Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
On Sonntag 08 November 2009, Stroller wrote:
On 8 Nov 2009, at 00:10, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote:
...
using a livecds kernel is probably the worst decision out there.
http://www.kroah.com/lkn/
as you can see, you don't have to download it.
Or just do
32 matches
Mail list logo
