Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 12:53 PM, Dale wrote:
>> Yea, keep in mind, I didn't want a init thingy at all.
> Could have fooled us...
>
That's either a touch of sarcasm or you missed my messages. ;-)
Dale
:-) :-)
On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 12:53 PM, Dale wrote:
>
> Yea, keep in mind, I didn't want a init thingy at all.
Could have fooled us...
--
Rich
Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Jan 2018 20:59:56 -0600, Dale wrote:
>
>> Yea, it used to be recommended and in a way it can still be a good
>> idea. I use LVM for example and I can increase /usr, /var, /home or
>> whatever without having to redo my drive setup. The only thing I can't
>>
On Sat, 13 Jan 2018 20:59:56 -0600, Dale wrote:
> Yea, it used to be recommended and in a way it can still be a good
> idea. I use LVM for example and I can increase /usr, /var, /home or
> whatever without having to redo my drive setup. The only thing I can't
> change is / which is a regular
Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> On 2018-01-13 15:49, Dale wrote:
>
>> I think without a init thingy, it mounts / ro at first, runs the checks
>> and then remounts rw.
> Right.
>
>> I think it does the same with /usr.
> No, other filesystems are not mounted at all until they're checked, in
> this situation
On 2018-01-13 15:49, Dale wrote:
> I think without a init thingy, it mounts / ro at first, runs the checks
> and then remounts rw.
Right.
> I think it does the same with /usr.
No, other filesystems are not mounted at all until they're checked, in
this situation (which is the traditional one,
6 matches
Mail list logo