Re: [gentoo-user] Re: fsck check of /usr on a separate partition fails during boot

2018-01-14 Thread Dale
Rich Freeman wrote: > On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 12:53 PM, Dale wrote: >> Yea, keep in mind, I didn't want a init thingy at all. > Could have fooled us... > That's either a touch of sarcasm or you missed my messages.  ;-) Dale :-)  :-) 

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: fsck check of /usr on a separate partition fails during boot

2018-01-14 Thread Rich Freeman
On Sun, Jan 14, 2018 at 12:53 PM, Dale wrote: > > Yea, keep in mind, I didn't want a init thingy at all. Could have fooled us... -- Rich

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: fsck check of /usr on a separate partition fails during boot

2018-01-14 Thread Dale
Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Sat, 13 Jan 2018 20:59:56 -0600, Dale wrote: > >> Yea, it used to be recommended and in a way it can still be a good >> idea.  I use LVM for example and I can increase /usr, /var, /home or >> whatever without having to redo my drive setup.  The only thing I can't >>

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: fsck check of /usr on a separate partition fails during boot

2018-01-14 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Sat, 13 Jan 2018 20:59:56 -0600, Dale wrote: > Yea, it used to be recommended and in a way it can still be a good > idea.  I use LVM for example and I can increase /usr, /var, /home or > whatever without having to redo my drive setup.  The only thing I can't > change is / which is a regular

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: fsck check of /usr on a separate partition fails during boot

2018-01-13 Thread Dale
Ian Zimmerman wrote: > On 2018-01-13 15:49, Dale wrote: > >> I think without a init thingy, it mounts / ro at first, runs the checks >> and then remounts rw. > Right. > >> I think it does the same with /usr. > No, other filesystems are not mounted at all until they're checked, in > this situation

[gentoo-user] Re: fsck check of /usr on a separate partition fails during boot

2018-01-13 Thread Ian Zimmerman
On 2018-01-13 15:49, Dale wrote: > I think without a init thingy, it mounts / ro at first, runs the checks > and then remounts rw. Right. > I think it does the same with /usr. No, other filesystems are not mounted at all until they're checked, in this situation (which is the traditional one,