Peter Humphrey wrote:
> On Sunday, 13 March 2022 08:03:04 GMT Wols Lists wrote:
>
>> To the best of my knowledge, gcc can't currently handle Rust, so yes
>> LLVM is needed. (Not Clang, because it isn't C :-) (Although Firefox
>> probably also uses loads of C, so Clang would be needed for that.)
>
On Sunday, 13 March 2022 08:03:04 GMT Wols Lists wrote:
> To the best of my knowledge, gcc can't currently handle Rust, so yes
> LLVM is needed. (Not Clang, because it isn't C :-) (Although Firefox
> probably also uses loads of C, so Clang would be needed for that.)
And that's why we have
On 12/03/2022 17:36, Dale wrote:
I've
sort of read about llvm and clang and I seem to recall things like
Firefox needing them or something.
I've just watched firefox emerging (yes I know, paint drying and all
that :-), and there's loads of Rust code in there.
To the best of my knowledge,
On 2022-03-12, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 12/03/2022 18:03, Grant Edwards wrote:
>> On 2022-03-12, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
>>> On 12/03/2022 10:43, Dale wrote:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/767700
Is that the one? It mentions the target but I don't quite understand
the why.
On 12/03/2022 18:03, Grant Edwards wrote:
On 2022-03-12, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 12/03/2022 10:43, Dale wrote:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/767700
Is that the one? It mentions the target but I don't quite understand
the why. The biggest thing, will this break something if I let it do
it?
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 12/03/2022 10:43, Dale wrote:
>> https://bugs.gentoo.org/767700
>>
>> Is that the one? It mentions the target but I don't quite understand
>> the why. The biggest thing, will this break something if I let it do
>> it?
>
> No. Unlike GCC, LLVM/Clang is always a
On 2022-03-12, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> On 12/03/2022 10:43, Dale wrote:
>> https://bugs.gentoo.org/767700
>>
>> Is that the one? It mentions the target but I don't quite understand
>> the why. The biggest thing, will this break something if I let it do
>> it?
>
> No. Unlike GCC, LLVM/Clang
On 12/03/2022 14:22, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 12/03/2022 10:43, Dale wrote:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/767700
Is that the one? It mentions the target but I don't quite understand
the why. The biggest thing, will this break something if I let it do
it?
No. Unlike GCC, LLVM/Clang is always a
On 12/03/2022 10:43, Dale wrote:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/767700
Is that the one? It mentions the target but I don't quite understand
the why. The biggest thing, will this break something if I let it do
it?
No. Unlike GCC, LLVM/Clang is always a cross-compiler. This just enables
some extra
9 matches
Mail list logo
