-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 03/14/14 23:29, Guido Budack wrote:
Good proposition but why? It works...
Never change a running system :-/
Sorry failed to parse that. btw i'm on the list.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using
On Fri, March 14, 2014 20:29, Guido Budack wrote:
Good proposition but why?
It works...
Never change a running system :-/
For the sake of communication, please do NOT strip out the part of the
conversation you are replying to.
Also, do NOT restart the thread every time.
Thank you
--
Joost
copy...
On Sat, March 15, 2014 11:50, Guido Budack wrote:
copy...
Last attempt:
- Do NOT strip previous conversations from the email you are replying to
- Do NOT CC people into the email, we are ALL subscribed to the list
On Saturday 15 Mar 2014 01:42:51 William Kenworthy wrote:
On 15/03/14 03:29, Guido Budack wrote:
Good proposition but why?
It works...
Never change a running system :-/
ahh ... its running, but its NOT running correctly! (if you are
referring to what I think you are)
check if you
Buisness as usual...
Look...
I don't like things or words like 'last attempt' or 'for the sake of' ''what
kind of shit so ever'...
I prefer words or expressions including the words 'please' or 'can you be so
kind' or for dumb freaks like me sometimes something more intrusive like 'hey
you,
By the way and like I mentioned, the file-sizes are correct!
On Fri, 14 Mar 2014 20:43:37 +0800, Guido Budack wrote:
By the way and like I mentioned, the file-sizes are correct!
Where did you get the file sizes? The mirror only shows approximate sizes
and the only reported size I recall seeing in this thread was from du,
which is not file size.
FYI
%
dev/null... grmpf... :-/
No, the filesize is and was the same...
I'm really astonished...
Listen, to keep it brief... I guess there are more urgend topics to discuss.
I'll repeat the whole procedure when I'm back in Europe at the end of the month
and report to the community
It doesn't make
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 03/14/14 18:01, Guido Budack wrote:
dev/null... grmpf... :-/
No, the filesize is and was the same... I'm really astonished...
Listen, to keep it brief... I guess there are more urgend topics to
discuss. I'll repeat the whole procedure
On Fri, 14 Mar 2014 22:01:09 +0800, Guido Budack wrote:
dev/null... grmpf... :-/
It was 2/dev/null, to get rid of all the irrelevant complaints about
missing files. Have you actually tried running md5sum -c on the DIGESTS
file instead of the ISO?
I just can say that the filesize is the same
Good proposition but why?
It works...
Never change a running system :-/
On 15/03/14 03:29, Guido Budack wrote:
Good proposition but why?
It works...
Never change a running system :-/
ahh ... its running, but its NOT running correctly! (if you are
referring to what I think you are)
check if you have caching/buffering between you and the file (i.e., is
it over
13 matches
Mail list logo
