Re: [gentoo-user] USE flag "unsupported" for "sci-libs/hdf5"

Netfab, On Thursday, 2020-12-31 18:28:07 +0100, you wrote: > ... > > Anybody having an educated guess what the risk would be? Is it save > > to set a USE flag even if its name is "unsupported"? > > Full story here : > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/710986 Hmmm, not very enlighting either.

Re: [gentoo-user] USE flag "unsupported" for "sci-libs/hdf5"

Hi, Le 31/12/20 à 17:54, Dr Rainer Woitok a tapoté : > Anybody having an educated guess what the risk would be? Is it save > to set a USE flag even if its name is "unsupported"? Full story here : https://bugs.gentoo.org/710986

[gentoo-user] USE flag "unsupported" for "sci-libs/hdf5"

Greetings, after having decided to globally set the "threads" USE flag I get the following: These are the packages that would be merged, in order: Calculating dependencies... done! !!! The ebuild selected to satisfy "sci-libs/hdf5[mpi]" has unmet requirements. - sci-libs/hdf5-1.10.5-r1::gent

Re: [gentoo-user] use flag nocd

b-r2:0 [-P-] [ -] games-action/fakk2-1.02-r1:0 > On Sat, 7 Nov 2020, phredus wrote: > > > Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2020 08:36:10 > > From: phredus > > Reply-To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] use flag nocd

Re: [gentoo-user] use flag nocd

Thanks, that would make sense and it is a scenario I had not encountered before. On Sat, 7 Nov 2020, phredus wrote: > Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2020 08:36:10 > From: phredus > Reply-To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] use

Re: [gentoo-user] use flag nocd

wrote: > Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2020 10:17:08 > From: Neil Bothwick > Reply-To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] use flag nocd > > On Sat, 7 Nov 2020 08:28:44 -0500, Jude DaShiell wrote: > > > Hi, I read the d

Re: [gentoo-user] use flag nocd

gt; > Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2020 07:35:52 > > From: phredus > > Reply-To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] use flag nocd > > > > nocdInstall all files required to run the application wi

Re: [gentoo-user] use flag nocd

, phredus wrote: > >> Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2020 07:35:52 >> From: phredus >> Reply-To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org >> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org >> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] use flag nocd >> >> nocd Install all files required to run the app

Re: [gentoo-user] use flag nocd

Hi, I read the description already and the description has me puzzled. On Sat, 7 Nov 2020, phredus wrote: > Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2020 07:35:52 > From: phredus > Reply-To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org > Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] use flag nocd > &

Re: [gentoo-user] use flag nocd

nocdInstall all files required to run the application without a CD mounted. Here is the whole list: https://gentoo.org/support/use-flags/ Cheers > On Nov 7, 2020, at 4:31 AM, Jude DaShiell wrote: > > What does it enable and what does it disable? >

[gentoo-user] use flag nocd

What does it enable and what does it disable? -- United States has 633 Billionaires with only 10 doing any annual significant giving.

Re: [gentoo-user] USE flag 'split-usr' is now global

On Sunday, 4 August 2019 11:23:20 BST Kai Peter wrote: > Hi, > > now, upstream made the USE flag 'split-usr' global. This puts me a bit > in a state of uncertainty :(. > > What is the reason or goal behind this change? I did read something > about the flag itself but it wasn't really clear to me.

[gentoo-user] USE flag 'split-usr' is now global

Hi, now, upstream made the USE flag 'split-usr' global. This puts me a bit in a state of uncertainty :(. What is the reason or goal behind this change? I did read something about the flag itself but it wasn't really clear to me. What does this mean: "Enable behavior to support maintaining

[gentoo-user] USE flag enca

Today I received the following from my daily emerge --update !!! One of the following packages is required to complete your request: - media-libs/libass-0.9.11 (Change USE: +enca) - media-video/mplayer-1.0_rc4_p20101107 (Change USE: -enca) The instructions are clear enough, but how do I chose whi

[gentoo-user] USE flag semantic-desktop

Hi, I have been doing a bit of cleaning on my system - namely, removing kde 3.5 packages according to directions given via Gentoo documentation. After doing this, I ran revdep-rebuild (with --pretend) and found that there were a lot of broken packages. One of the problem packages was krecipes.

Re: [gentoo-user] use flag not used - why

On 12 May, Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Tue, 12 May 2009 12:54:31 -0500, Dale wrote: > >> >> How can I revert that mask (in /etc/portage/package.mask ?) >> >> without editing /usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/package.use.mask > >> > So there you have it. The devs disabled qt4 support because parav

Re: [gentoo-user] use flag not used - why

Alan McKinnon wrote: > On Tuesday 12 May 2009 19:54:31 Dale wrote: > >> Now you know he is going to want this even more since it is reported not >> to work. lol Curiosity you know will get him. If nothing else, he >> will want to know what it breaks. ;-) >> >> Dale >> > > Even better is

Re: [gentoo-user] use flag not used - why

Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Tue, 12 May 2009 12:54:31 -0500, Dale wrote: > > How can I revert that mask (in /etc/portage/package.mask ?) without editing /usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/package.use.mask > > >>> So there you have it. The devs disabled qt4 support becau

Re: [gentoo-user] use flag not used - why

On Tuesday 12 May 2009 19:54:31 Dale wrote: > Now you know he is going to want this even more since it is reported not > to work. lol Curiosity you know will get him. If nothing else, he > will want to know what it breaks. ;-) > > Dale Even better is if he fixes it, reports the fix, supplies a

Re: [gentoo-user] use flag not used - why

On Tue, 12 May 2009 12:54:31 -0500, Dale wrote: > >> How can I revert that mask (in /etc/portage/package.mask ?) > >> without editing /usr/portage/profiles/default-linux/package.use.mask > > So there you have it. The devs disabled qt4 support because paraview > > does not work with the unmasked v

Re: [gentoo-user] use flag not used - why

Alan McKinnon wrote: > On Tuesday 12 May 2009 19:06:23 Helmut Jarausch wrote: > >> On 12 May, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: >> > > >>> sometimes certain useflags are masked - you can grep PORTDIR/profiles to >>> see if that is your problem. >>> >> Many thanks (to Albert, as well). >

Re: [gentoo-user] use flag not used - why

On Tuesday 12 May 2009 19:06:23 Helmut Jarausch wrote: > On 12 May, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > > sometimes certain useflags are masked - you can grep PORTDIR/profiles to > > see if that is your problem. > > Many thanks (to Albert, as well). > I didn't know about that. > How can I revert that ma

Re: [gentoo-user] use flag not used - why

On 12 May, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: > On Dienstag 12 Mai 2009, Helmut Jarausch wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm trying to emerge sci-visualization/paraview >> with a qt4 GUI. >> >> My /etc/portage/package.use contains >> sci-visualization/paraview examples qt4 threads python mpi >> >> >> but when I try

Re: [gentoo-user] use flag not used - why

On Dienstag 12 Mai 2009, Helmut Jarausch wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to emerge sci-visualization/paraview > with a qt4 GUI. > > My /etc/portage/package.use contains > sci-visualization/paraview examples qt4 threads python mpi > > > but when I try to emerge it > emerge -vp sci-visualization/paravi

Re: [gentoo-user] use flag not used - why

On Tue, 2009-05-12 at 17:42 +0200, Helmut Jarausch wrote: > Hi, > > I'm trying to emerge sci-visualization/paraview > with a qt4 GUI. > > My /etc/portage/package.use contains > sci-visualization/paraview examples qt4 threads python mpi > > > but when I try to emerge it > emerge -vp sci-visual

[gentoo-user] use flag not used - why

Hi, I'm trying to emerge sci-visualization/paraview with a qt4 GUI. My /etc/portage/package.use contains sci-visualization/paraview examples qt4 threads python mpi but when I try to emerge it emerge -vp sci-visualization/paraview I get USE="examples mpi* python threads -doc -hdf5 (-qt4)" Wh

Re: [gentoo-user] USE flag question

* »Q« ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) [14.07.08 01:16]: > A few days ago, I used eselect to switch profiles, from > default-linux/x86/2007.0/desktop to default/linux/x86/2008.0/desktop. > As I did... > A lot of USE flags were removed from my make.conf, including > the cpu-optimizations such as sse and mmx

[gentoo-user] USE flag question

A few days ago, I used eselect to switch profiles, from default-linux/x86/2007.0/desktop to default/linux/x86/2008.0/desktop. A lot of USE flags were removed from my make.conf, including the cpu-optimizations such as sse and mmx. After re-compiling a few things and getting warnings from the ebu

[gentoo-user] USE flag mpm-prefork in apache

Apparently apache2 is built with mpm-prefork if no other mpm USE flag is enabled, even if USE="-mpm-prefork" is specified. Wouldn't it be better to either have the emerge fail and instruct the user to enable an mpm or remove the mpm-prefork USE flag entirely? - Grant -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org ma

Re: [gentoo-user] USE flag

On Wed, 28 Jun 2006 23:04:45 -0500 Jeremy Olexa wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Nick Rout wrote: > > On Wed, 28 Jun 2006 11:30:26 +0530 > > Aniruddha Shankar wrote: > > > >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > >> Hash: SHA1 > >> > >> Willie Wong wrote: > >>> Person

Re: [gentoo-user] USE flag

Jeremy Olexa wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ryan Tandy wrote: Jeremy Olexa wrote: without gtk support (aka ncurses) then I would re-emerge profuse WITHOUT Er... maybe I misunderstood something, but gtk and ncurses are two COMPLETELY different things. right. that is wha

Re: [gentoo-user] USE flag

On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 12:21:06PM -0500, Penguin Lover Jeremy Olexa squawked: > Ryan Tandy wrote: > > Jeremy Olexa wrote: > >> without gtk support (aka ncurses) then I would re-emerge profuse WITHOUT > > > > Er... maybe I misunderstood something, but gtk and ncurses are two > > COMPLETELY differe

Re: [gentoo-user] USE flag

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ryan Tandy wrote: > Jeremy Olexa wrote: >> without gtk support (aka ncurses) then I would re-emerge profuse WITHOUT > > Er... maybe I misunderstood something, but gtk and ncurses are two > COMPLETELY different things. right. that is what I meant. if

Re: [gentoo-user] USE flag

On Thu, 29 Jun 2006 04:46:07 -0400, David Corbin wrote: > and what is the correct way to disable the -gtk flag for all future > emerges of a particular ebuild? echo "cate-gory/package -gtk" >>/etc/portage/package.use man portage for more info. -- Neil Bothwick Life's what you make it, you ca

Re: [gentoo-user] USE flag

On Thursday 29 June 2006 12:04 am, Jeremy Olexa wrote: > Nick Rout wrote: > > On Wed, 28 Jun 2006 11:30:26 +0530 > > > > Aniruddha Shankar wrote: > >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > >> Hash: SHA1 > >> > >> Willie Wong wrote: > >>> Personally speaking, I suggest you emerge 'ufed'. > >> > >> I

Re: [gentoo-user] USE flag

On Thursday 29 June 2006 09:03, Jure Varlec wrote: > On Thursday 29 June 2006 06:49, Ryan Tandy wrote: > > Er... maybe I misunderstood something, but gtk and ncurses are two > > COMPLETELY different things. > > Well, they are both libraries for creating user interfaces. GTK uses X, > ncurses uses a

Re: [gentoo-user] USE flag

On Thursday 29 June 2006 06:49, Ryan Tandy wrote: > Er... maybe I misunderstood something, but gtk and ncurses are two > COMPLETELY different things. Well, they are both libraries for creating user interfaces. GTK uses X, ncurses uses a terminal. And if Nick prefers to run profuse in the console,

Re: [gentoo-user] USE flag

Jeremy Olexa wrote: without gtk support (aka ncurses) then I would re-emerge profuse WITHOUT Er... maybe I misunderstood something, but gtk and ncurses are two COMPLETELY different things. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-user] USE flag

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Nick Rout wrote: > On Wed, 28 Jun 2006 11:30:26 +0530 > Aniruddha Shankar wrote: > >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Willie Wong wrote: >>> Personally speaking, I suggest you emerge 'ufed'. >> I moved from ufed to profuse, it'

Re: [gentoo-user] USE flag

On Wed, 28 Jun 2006 11:30:26 +0530 Aniruddha Shankar wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Willie Wong wrote: > > > > Personally speaking, I suggest you emerge 'ufed'. > > I moved from ufed to profuse, it's slightly better with multiple display > interfaces (dialog/ncur

Re: [gentoo-user] USE flag

On Wednesday 28 June 2006 22:29, sean wrote: > They both like interesting, I did see some screen shots of profuse, does > ufed operate the same? Emerge them and see for yourself. They are really minor... # genlop -t profuse * app-portage/profuse Wed Jun 28 22:39:56 2006 >>> app-portage/pro

Re: [gentoo-user] USE flag

Willie Wong wrote: On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 11:30:26AM +0530, Penguin Lover Aniruddha Shankar squawked: Willie Wong wrote: Personally speaking, I suggest you emerge 'ufed'. I moved from ufed to profuse, it's slightly better with multiple display interfaces (dialog/ncurses/gtk) I've tried bo

Re: [gentoo-user] USE flag

On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 11:30:26AM +0530, Penguin Lover Aniruddha Shankar squawked: > Willie Wong wrote: > > > > Personally speaking, I suggest you emerge 'ufed'. > > I moved from ufed to profuse, it's slightly better with multiple display > interfaces (dialog/ncurses/gtk) > I've tried both,

Re: [gentoo-user] USE flag

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Willie Wong wrote: > > Personally speaking, I suggest you emerge 'ufed'. I moved from ufed to profuse, it's slightly better with multiple display interfaces (dialog/ncurses/gtk) cheers, K -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/

Re: [gentoo-user] USE flag

On Tue, Jun 27, 2006 at 10:44:35PM -0400, Penguin Lover sean squawked: > I would like to fine tune my USE flags a bit more and have a question. > > Currently I am emerging gaim, and as it proceeds I see gnome and > evolution related items across the screen. > > I am not running gnome desktop or e

[gentoo-user] USE flag

I would like to fine tune my USE flags a bit more and have a question. Currently I am emerging gaim, and as it proceeds I see gnome and evolution related items across the screen. I am not running gnome desktop or evolution and could a -gnome and -evolution be placed in USE and would it cause any

Re: [gentoo-user] USE flag oddity

Kevin O'Gorman wrote: I noticed that as constituted, I would see firefox and thunderbird differing on the flag "mozcalendar". It seemed like something I would like, however, so I tried putting the flag into /etc/portage/package.keywords: Why did you use that file? What made you use this file

Re: [gentoo-user] USE flag oddity

Kevin O'Gorman wrote: > I noticed that as constituted, I would see firefox and > thunderbird differing on the flag "mozcalendar". It seemed like > something I would like, however, so I tried putting the flag into > /etc/portage/package.keywords: > > mail-client/mozilla-thunderbird mozcalendar > ww

[gentoo-user] USE flag oddity

I don't know what I'm doing.  It seems wise to admit that at the start. Nobody needs to rub my nose in it that way. I noticed that as constituted, I would see firefox and thunderbird differing on the flag "mozcalendar".  It seemed like something I would like, however, so I tried putting the flag i

Re: [gentoo-user] USE flag order confusion

On Thu, 08 Dec 2005 19:54:59 -0600, Harry Putnam wrote: > Using it on the emerge command line has the desired effect. That is, > USE="-sasl" emerge -v -p sendmail shows `-sasl' as expected. > > Why doesn't it work with the entry in /etc/make.conf? What do you get from grep sasl /etc/portage/p

[gentoo-user] USE flag order confusion

I want to use a global USE flag of -sasl in make.conf. However when I use it there it has no effect on emerges of things that it should effect: I don't have actual output from the commands below because I'm in the throws of an install from scratch and have only ftp for remote access so far. cat

[gentoo-user] USE flag vhosts

Hi, Can someone give me a short explanation (or link) what difference the vhosts flag do to my web-apps? Regards, -- Dan Johansson, *** This message is printed on 100% recycled electrons! ***