Re: [gentoo-user] Xine-ui masked? [Solved]

2006-02-05 Thread Daniel Pielmeier
Thank you, in one portage overlay i use there are three ebuilds media-video/xine-ui-0.99.4-r3 media-video/xine-ui-0.99.4-r2 media-video/xine-ui-0.99.3-r1 and they are all marked ~x86. In the nomal portage tree i have only one ebuild media-video/xine-ui-0.99.4-r3 and it is marked x86. I have

Re: [gentoo-user] Xine-ui masked? [Solved]

2006-02-05 Thread Holly Bostick
Daniel Pielmeier schreef: Thank you, in one portage overlay i use there are three ebuilds snip and they are all marked ~x86. Ebuilds from overlay are always ~arch, afaik. Overlays are not considered stable for what seem to me to be obvious reasons; namely that only the Portage tree itself

Re: [gentoo-user] Xine-ui masked? [Solved]

2006-02-05 Thread Mariusz Pękala
On 2006-02-06 00:47:03 +0100 (Mon, Feb), Holly Bostick wrote: Daniel Pielmeier schreef: Thank you, in one portage overlay i use there are three ebuilds snip and they are all marked ~x86. Ebuilds from overlay are always ~arch, afaik. Overlays are not considered stable for what

Re: [gentoo-user] Xine-ui masked? [Solved]

2006-02-05 Thread Holly Bostick
Mariusz Pękala schreef: Portage overlays are our 'private' portage trees, and they are in no thing 'worse' than 'official' ebuilds. You clearly haven't seen, or even imagined, some of my initial attempts at ebuild writing, which naturally resided in my overlay tree. :-) Holly --