Geralt wrote:
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 10:30 PM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk
wrote:
You don't need to remove anything, just let portage handle the block
for you. Blocks marked with a b (instead of a B) can be handled by
recent portage releases.
are you sure that his works in this
On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 23:59:32 -0200, Alejandro wrote:
That's right, but now the new portage is stable so it is handled on
stable systems. The block was handled automatically when it first
appeared on ~arch systems.
Which version of portage do this? I am on amd64 stable and have the
Alejandro wrote:
2009/1/15 Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk mailto:n...@digimed.co.uk
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 00:00:07 +0100, Geralt wrote:
You don't need to remove anything, just let portage handle the
block
for you. Blocks marked with a b (instead of a B) can be handled
2009/1/16 Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com
Alejandro wrote:
2009/1/15 Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk mailto:n...@digimed.co.uk
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 00:00:07 +0100, Geralt wrote:
You don't need to remove anything, just let portage handle the
block
for you. Blocks
Hi,
I have a machine I haven't touched in about 6 months that I need to
update. I've got one block that tells me (correctly) that it's part of
system. It should be as I'm updating system.
Anyway, it is OK to remove this block and then proceed with the
system emerge, correct?
I have
On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 13:24:33 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
Anyway, it is OK to remove this block and then proceed with the
system emerge, correct?
Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild U ] sys-devel/gnuconfig-20080123 [20070724] 0 kB [?=0]
[ebuild U ] app-arch/lzma-utils-4.32.7
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 1:30 PM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 13:24:33 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
Anyway, it is OK to remove this block and then proceed with the
system emerge, correct?
Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild U ]
On Thu, Jan 15, 2009 at 10:30 PM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Thu, 15 Jan 2009 13:24:33 -0800, Mark Knecht wrote:
Anyway, it is OK to remove this block and then proceed with the
system emerge, correct?
Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild U ]
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 00:00:07 +0100, Geralt wrote:
You don't need to remove anything, just let portage handle the block
for you. Blocks marked with a b (instead of a B) can be handled by
recent portage releases.
are you sure that his works in this case? This blocking bug was some
time
2009/1/15 Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 00:00:07 +0100, Geralt wrote:
You don't need to remove anything, just let portage handle the block
for you. Blocks marked with a b (instead of a B) can be handled by
recent portage releases.
are you sure that his works
10 matches
Mail list logo
