Re: [gentoo-user] freezing a package

2009-12-20 Thread Neil Bothwick
On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 09:03:19 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: Create an local overlay. Put the ebuild in there. I'd also rename the ebuild to something like my-nvidia-drivers That way it becomes a completely new app from portage's point of view and therefore not subject to updated

[gentoo-user] freezing a package

2009-12-19 Thread Michael P. Soulier
If I want to freeze my nvidia-drivers because any upgrade will abandon my hardware, masking out newer versions doesn't seem to be enough as it will also offer to downgrade once that version is no longer in the portage tree. Is it simpler to just remove nvidia-drivers from the world file? Thanks,

Re: [gentoo-user] freezing a package

2009-12-19 Thread Albert Hopkins
On Sat, 2009-12-19 at 10:12 -0500, Michael P. Soulier wrote: If I want to freeze my nvidia-drivers because any upgrade will abandon my hardware, masking out newer versions doesn't seem to be enough as it will also offer to downgrade once that version is no longer in the portage tree. Is it

Re: [gentoo-user] freezing a package

2009-12-19 Thread Dale
Michael P. Soulier wrote: If I want to freeze my nvidia-drivers because any upgrade will abandon my hardware, masking out newer versions doesn't seem to be enough as it will also offer to downgrade once that version is no longer in the portage tree. Is it simpler to just remove nvidia-drivers

Re: [gentoo-user] freezing a package

2009-12-19 Thread Marcus Wanner
On 12/19/2009 10:27 AM, Dale wrote: Michael P. Soulier wrote: If I want to freeze my nvidia-drivers because any upgrade will abandon my hardware, masking out newer versions doesn't seem to be enough as it will also offer to downgrade once that version is no longer in the portage tree. Is it

Re: [gentoo-user] freezing a package

2009-12-19 Thread Dale
Marcus Wanner wrote: On 12/19/2009 10:27 AM, Dale wrote: Michael P. Soulier wrote: If I want to freeze my nvidia-drivers because any upgrade will abandon my hardware, masking out newer versions doesn't seem to be enough as it will also offer to downgrade once that version is no longer in the

Re: [gentoo-user] freezing a package

2009-12-19 Thread Marcus Wanner
On 12/19/2009 12:37 PM, Dale wrote: Marcus Wanner wrote: My package mask file reads =x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-97.00 Because I have a GEForce 3 from goodness knows when and need 96.x. When something had ABI updates and the video driver was part of them, the driver was updated to the new

Re: [gentoo-user] freezing a package

2009-12-19 Thread Dale
Marcus Wanner wrote: On 12/19/2009 12:37 PM, Dale wrote: Marcus Wanner wrote: My package mask file reads =x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-97.00 Because I have a GEForce 3 from goodness knows when and need 96.x. When something had ABI updates and the video driver was part of them, the driver was

Re: [gentoo-user] freezing a package

2009-12-19 Thread Michael P. Soulier
On 19/12/09 Albert Hopkins said: Create an local overlay. Put the ebuild in there. I'll need to read up on how. The section on overlays left me with the impression that overlays were for experimental code, not for keeping private copies of packages. Anyway, I think I'll remove it from the

Re: [gentoo-user] freezing a package

2009-12-19 Thread Dale
Michael P. Soulier wrote: On 19/12/09 Albert Hopkins said: Create an local overlay. Put the ebuild in there. I'll need to read up on how. The section on overlays left me with the impression that overlays were for experimental code, not for keeping private copies of packages. Anyway,

Re: [gentoo-user] freezing a package

2009-12-19 Thread Michael Higgins
On Sat, 19 Dec 2009 19:01:03 -0500 Michael P. Soulier msoul...@digitaltorque.ca wrote: On 19/12/09 Albert Hopkins said: Create an local overlay. Put the ebuild in there. I'll need to read up on how. The section on overlays left me with the impression that overlays were for experimental