Anyway - I stand to what I wrote. I'd suggest any MTA, *BESIDES*
qmail and sendmail. qmail, as it's too buggy, too few features
and too complicated. sendmail, as the configuration is a nightmare
(compared to easier systems available nowadays).
I object to this statement. Sendmail is a solid
Dear All,Which is the best for organization mail server.Thanks rgds.Suranga
Suranga Kasthuriarachchi wrote:
Which is the best for organization mail server.
NOT qmail - too many holes and not good performancewise.
sendmail has had numerous holes way back then. And I
dislike the configuration language.
So, I'd suggest postfix or exim. I personally use Postfix
always.
On 7/31/06, Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Suranga Kasthuriarachchi wrote:
Which is the best for organization mail server.
NOT qmail - too many holes and not good performancewise.
sendmail has had numerous holes way back then. And I
dislike the configuration language.
So, I'd
Michael Crute wrote:
On 7/31/06, Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Suranga Kasthuriarachchi wrote:
Which is the best for organization mail server.
NOT qmail - too many holes and not good performancewise.
I would beg to differ with the statement about security. Qmail is
arguably
On 7/31/06, Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael Crute wrote:
On 7/31/06, Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Suranga Kasthuriarachchi wrote:
Which is the best for organization mail server.
NOT qmail - too many holes and not good performancewise.
I would beg to differ
Alexander Skwar wrote:
Suranga Kasthuriarachchi wrote:
Which is the best for organization mail server.
NOT qmail - too many holes and not good performancewise.
Some clarification on the security of qmail:
qmail has no known holes be default other than still playing the MTA
game by 1998
7 matches
Mail list logo
